education. A second set of challenges has interrogated the contents of the engineering sciences and engineering design. Social philosophers have long mapped engineers as technological intelligentsia whose success depends upon a wide range of social, ethical, and epistemological criteria (Goldman 1984; Lenk 1984; Davis 1996). Micro-‐ethicists have made visible contrasts between formal codes and actual practices (Baum and Flores 1982; Martin and Schinzinger 1983). More recently, macro-‐ethicists make visible a range of broader material projects that engineering formation and engineering work could serve or, in some cases, does serve (Herkert 2009
a sample scenarioabout modern challenges in managing electronic waste. Feedback from project advisory boardmembers are integrated in this discussion.BackgroundEngineering programs have an explicit need to define, teach and measure professional skillssince their introduction by ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs in 2000. Theseskills include ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (3d), understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility (3f), ability to communicate effectively (3g), understanding of theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societalcontexts (3h), recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning (3i), and knowledge ofcontemporary issues (3j). A well
others found increase access and lower stress. As part of a larger study, thispaper examines three students’ experiences taking mechanical engineering courses during thepandemic; the analysis serves as a pilot study for a larger research project that encompassesinterviews with 23 students across two universities in the U.S. and South Africa. As part of thepilot, this paper assesses the value of an a priori codebook based on six previously identifieddimensions of engineering culture [1], which serve as the framework for this study, as a means tounderstand what is entrenched and what is malleable.Literature ReviewResearch on engineering culture has explored its values, beliefs, and underlying ideologies of theculture (e.g., meritocracy, rigor
, militaryservice, work in the trades, and life events that too often prevent individuals from pursuingengineering.In the specific context of a project focused on preparing an engineering workforce that canrealize vehicle and roadway electrification and grid decarbonization for a sustainabletransportation infrastructure, we developed a strategic agenda for instilling cross-disciplinarycapacities and creating a smooth interconnected system of pathways through engineering.This paper discusses the structural changes needed in our educational infrastructure and thecurricular and pedagogical changes required for engineering formation to address sustainabilitychallenges in the future. We identify areas for growth and a set of strategic actions in pre-college
professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State Univer- sity, Mankato, where she is helping to build the Bell Engineering program, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Dr. Donna M Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engi- neering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Thomas A De Pree, Bucknell University Thomas De Pree is postdoctoral researcher at Bucknell University for the project, ”Developing Human Social Networks to Identify and Develop Data-Driven Metrics and Methods for Expanding
from practices and experiments, from praxis. Because of the need for further praxis inliberatory engineering education as a pedagogical imperative, and the limited, almost nonexistentengagement between the topics we place in conversation (pedagogy, critical thinking, liberationpraxis and theory), this paper aims to initiate and catalyze attention on the subject matter, but itwill not aim to resolve some of the questions it opens. Rather, we emphasize the importance ofliberatory theory and praxis for contemporary engineering education and, then, suggest somecriteria that might guide praxis and broader shifts in pedagogical strategies. To that end, weintend for the project to prompt further research and discussion on these topics.Engineering
equity and inclusive social justice.ResultsWe have three stories to share: Lorena writes about her experience as an undergraduate studentexperiencing microaggressions in a group explicitly designed to foster and model inclusivepractices; Devlin writes about his experience as a faculty member trying to facilitate that groupand address those microaggressions, and; Christina writes about her experience as a graduatestudent collecting and reporting her colleagues’ negative experiences in a positive and productiveway.LorenaThe purpose of the project I was taking part in was to create and implement inclusive groups forstudents These groups are intended to benefit students who feel excluded or uncertain in anunfamiliar environment. The group met for
manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Adam Lenz, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring students’ and instructors’ perceptions of engineering: case studies of professionally-focused and career exploration courses Work in ProgressAbstractPrevious work developed a working definition of engineering professional identity (EPI), definedas the degree of internalization of the norms, behaviors, language, values, and practices ofengineering. This EPI
. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2015 and is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students at UIUC. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion, teamwork skills, assessment, and identity construction.Mrs. Jeremy Alexis Magruder, University of Florida Doctoral student in the materials group of the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the Univer- sity of Florida.Ms. Chanel Renee Easley, Techbridge Young woman of color with a Master of Science in
approach to teaching professional communication, andintroduce our larger research project, which aims to assess the effectiveness of our program.Finally, we shall briefly reflect on whether the small communication class is really as inefficientas some have suggested. The purpose of this study is to develop the theoretical groundwork fora larger study we are just beginning to conduct on the efficacy of our professionalcommunication program. Using the investigative tools of narrative research and discourseanalysis, we hope ultimately to determine the degree to which our program, which maintainssmall classes and focuses on cultivating students’ rhetorical judgment, effectively graftsprofessional communication onto our students’ burgeoning
consulting and verification and validation. He has headed the corporate product and technology innovations and quality and delivery innovation departments. He has designed and delivered workshops in the areas of problem solving, project management and innovation management that were received very well by the participants. Pradeep was on the apex senior management group before proceeding on to pursue his academic, research and social interests. Before Patni, he has worked at IIT Delhi, IIT Bombay, SGGS College of Engineering and Crompton Greaves R & D Electronics in different research and academic positions. Pradeep Waychal has also published papers in peer reviewed journals, presented keynote invited talks in many
, and by an authorityderived from education and expertise. The historical development of engineering into aprofession highlighted the engineer’s role in social development and progress; the tradeoffsnecessary in engineering decision-making; and the need to anticipate “unintended consequences”and identify stakeholders who may be silent or lack social power.Student learning outcomes are listed in Table 1.Student work included several design projects, with documentation in the form of hand and CADdrawings, written descriptions, and oral presentations; design problem definition assignments;and writing assignments in which students reflected on their experiences and responded toreading assignments. This work was assessed to evaluate achievement of
knowledge and developing skills most familiarto students entering unfamiliar disciplinary territory, students are likely to feelencouraged, rather than inhibited, and engaged, rather than lost, confused, or intimidated.Faculty, as well, benefit from the significant possibilities for enhanced insight andcommunication that can result when we listen to and try “talking in” one another’sdisciplinary languages.We approach this paper’s title, “Can We Talk,” quite literally, asking about the ways inwhich “we”—science/engineering faculty and faculty in the liberal arts/composition –can maximize our ability to meaningfully communicate across disciplines to createcourses, curricula, projects, and assignments that best serve our students and thatfacilitate
at Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Mr. Corey M Schimpf, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education with affiliations with the Women’s Studies Program and Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering (with distinction) from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at
facets), communicating with diversestakeholders, and requiring a lifelong learning approach to every project. Grounded in a richliberal arts tradition, Wake Forest University (WFU) launched a new engineering program in2017 with a strong commitment to this practice of authentically integrating engineeringfundamental knowledge to rich liberal arts knowledge. Together, we believe this combination ofknowledge leads to better engineers. After all, four out of the seven ABET Student Outcomesthat every accredited program must meet is inherently connected to liberal arts knowledge. Inthis paper, we describe a semester-long module within one of our required, first-year engineeringcourses that was co-designed by an interdisciplinary team to embody this
a focus on electro- chemical energy storage systems.Israa Ali, University of Michigan Israa Ali is a senior undergraduate studying Aerospace Engineering.Dr. Corin L Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University - Los Angeles, where she is working on the NSF-funded Eco- STEM project. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering sys- tems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April
transformation of engineering education.Dr. Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University Having completed his Ph.D. through the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program (see bit.ly/uwiphd), Ryan is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Texas Tech University. He currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University
education curriculum. This line ofinquiry is relevant to issues of representation in engineering schools: the socio-technical divideimpacts undergraduate engineering retention, especially students from historicallyunderrepresented groups in engineering (e.g. women, students of color, LGBTQIA, indigenous1people, and low-income) [5]. A recurring justification for upholding the socio-technical divide(that we have heard voiced during discussions about engineering curricula and that we want tointerrogate) is that technical content would have to be sacrificed in order to accommodate socialjustice issues. Therefore, a project in which students add context to traditional engineeringscience problems has the transformative potential of reaching students
, materials science, and sustainable energy courses and works on gas hydrate and algal biofuel research projects with students. She is very passionate about engaging and teaching up-and-coming students about engineering, especially topics related to cleaner, low carbon energy.Prof. Judy Randi EdD, University of New Haven Judy Randi, Ed.D. is Professor of Education at the University of New Haven where she is currently teaching in the Tagliatela College of Engineering and coordinating a college-wide initiative, the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Partnership Model for Integrating Technical Communication
currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, art in engineering, social justice in engineering, care ethics in engineering, humanitarian engineering, engineering ethics, and computer modeling of electric power and renewable energy systems.Ms. Ngan T.T. Nguyen, Texas Tech University Ngan Nguyen is a research assistant and doctoral student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruc- tion at Texas Tech University. Her research is focused on fostering the learning experiences of Asian international graduate students in higher education.Dr. Roman Taraban, Texas Tech
,medicine, or a joint-engineering degree in language studies or the social sciences(including project-based studies). While these changes in content of education allowstudents to better grasp the connection between politics, large technological projectsand societal effects, the issue remains how to pedagogically introduce students toassessing information and thinking analytically and critically. Thereby, onemotivation of the study is to analyze and discuss the potential of tools that couldachieve this in a practical way by introducing course activities of analytical thinking,critical reflections, and web-based peer feedback of the student‟s work.Between SweSoc‟s initiation in 2004 and its present design in 2015, the course hasundergone major
Paper ID #23301Peer Review and Reflection in Engineering Labs: Writing to Learn and Learn-ing to WriteDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a
refers to. For this reason, Sapir [26] described metonymy as “the logical inverse of metaphor… [with] two terms that occupy a common domain but do not share common features.”• Synecdoche is a specific type of metonymy, in which one part of an entity represents the entire entity [23]. For example, in the sentence “We need some more hands on the project,” hands refer to people.• Analogy is a broad category encompassing any figure of speech involving a comparison of domains [32], and therefore, metaphor is “a species” of analogy [3]. Readers of this paper who completed the SATs (Scholastic Assessment Test) in the U.S. prior to 2005 are likely familiar with the extended analogy form of one comparison juxtaposed with another
for twenty-five years. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development pro- gram that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. He is also a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryDr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Robin is an Assistant Professor with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the Uni- versity of Toronto where she teaches leadership and positive psychology. She served as Director of the Engineering Leadership Project, which aims to understand how engineers lead in industry.Mr. Mike Klassen, University of Toronto Mike Klassen is the Assistant Director, Community of Practice on Engineering Leadership at the Institute
evolution of the engineering curriculum since she joined the faculty in 2003. Her current research interests are twofold: as well as her research in biological materials (cur- rently focused on bioderived plastics synthesized by bees), she also researches the engineering student experience, including persistence and migration, differences by gender, and the role of self-efficacy in project-based learning. In 2010, she received an NSF CAREER Award in support of her research on engineering education. Page 22.1081.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Motivation
Larson have come to view professional stature and jurisdictional claimsas part of a “professional project” entered into by all occupations that are in a position to claimsome socially beneficial form of expertise.16 Still, this basic “relational” approach that focuses onthe social relations among the occupations is of little value, in and of itself, for analyzingdifferences among the professions, or for understanding how specific professions operate.From this point of view, Edwin Layton‟s early analysis of engineering professional societiesremains quite useful for thinking in terms of different and distinct “professional configurations.”Extracting from what he and others have written, the two most frequently noted features of theU.S. engineering
. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering
(1) the speaker shows ownership ofthe information, (2) the speaker has the potential to make effective eye contact with the audience,and (3) the speaker could adjust the talk if circumstances called for that. One disadvantage is thatthis style of delivery requires much preparation. A second disadvantage is that novice speakersoften lack the confidence that they will remember the planned and practiced sequence of ideas.What Expert Engineering Speakers Do: Fashioning Sentences on the Spot Historical writings reveal that the best speakers of science and engineering do not readfrom manuscripts or speak from note cards or projections of bulleted lists.7 Rather, thesespeakers fashion sentences on the spot, but after practice with a planned
each year.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is a Research Associate Professor in The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Ambassadors Network (EAN): Goals, Successes and Challenges in Growing the EAN The engineering field is facing a crisis. In order to solve today’s engineering challenges,we need a diverse workforce with strong technical and leadership skills. Unfortunately,workforce studies have shown that the number of students being educated in STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) cannot meet projected demands.1 In addition
engage students in design thinking activities and discussion as a pre-cursorto discussing the science/math content that is relevant to their design project for that semester.In Fall 2011, when I first started teaching the Design Course, I reached out to my colleagues,Monica Cardella and Robin Adams, at Purdue University to share their instructional materials onengineering design, especially on how to introduce students to the notion of design. From thosematerials, I decided to use a prompt asking students to help solve a problem in the everydaycontext of long grocery store lines (credit for design of the original prompt: David Radcliffe,Robin Adams, and Monica Cardella at Purdue University). The prompt and how it was used inclass is shown in