personal path led me from a [university] BS/MS in 1969/70 to industry experience in [state]. After balancing family obligations and career motivation in the late 70’s and early 80’s, I returned to school and received my PhD from [different university] in 1985. My continued commitment to education led me to the newly created chemical engineering department at [another university] in 1986, where I started as an assistant professor just before turning 40.” – Diane Dorland, dean, Rowan UniversitySally Ann Keller gained leadership experience at the National Science Foundation and LosAlamos National Laboratory before becoming dean: “When I look back on my career, I can honestly say I did not spend much time planning
;5000 <10,000 >30,000 <10,000 <5000 <5000 >30,000 <5000Instruction A&S Prof+ Prof+ Prof+ Balanced Prof Balanced Balanced Assoc-Program A&S A&S A&S iatesGraduate Single Single Doc/ Comp Single Postbac Prof./ Comp N/APrograms Doc Doc Prof Doc Doc Prof Doc DocUndergrad Full time Full Full time Full time Full time Full time Full time Full time
3 Jung Typology Extrovert (E) 2 9 5 Introvert (I) 7 8 4 Sensing (S) 1 7 4 Intuition (N) 8 10 5 Thinking (T) 4 12 8 Feeling (F) 5 5 1 Judging (J) 7 15 5 Perceiving (P) 2
world we live in.Joseph Carl PriceCol. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from West Point, a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Missouri S&T, a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 23 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed
Politics of Progress. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.7. MacInnis, B. and Krosnick, J.A. (2020). Climate Insights 2020: Partisan Divide. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. (https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/climateinsights2020-partisan-divide/); also see, Funk, C. (2021). Key Findings: How Americans’ Attitudes about Climate Change Differ by Generation, Party, and Other Factors. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans- attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors/); Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg, M., & Gustafson, A. (2019
. 13References[1] M. Poe, N. Learner, and J. Craig. Learning to Communicate in Science and Engineering:Case Studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2010.[2] K.B. Yancey, L. Robertson, and K. Taczak. Writing across Contexts: Transfer, Composition,and Sites of Writing. Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[3] C. Kalman, M.W. Aulls, S. Rohar, and J. Godley, “Students’ Perceptions of ReflectiveWriting as a Tool for Exploring an Introductory Textbook.” Journal of College ScienceTeaching, pp. 74-81, March/April 2008[4] C.S. Kalman, and S. Rohar, “Toolbox of Activities to Support Students in a Physics GatewayCourse.” Physics Education Research, vol. 6, no. 020111, pp. 1-15, 2010.[5] V.A. Burrows, B. McNeill, N.F. Hubele, and L. Bellamy
that fell into the applied STS category were not included in the search results.It is possible that a search for the word “sociotechnical” would produce more comprehensiveresults. We could also draw more on the experience of ASEE members who were instrumental insome of the changes we described here in constructing an account of how STS as been applied inengineering education. 13 References[1] D. Edge, “Reinventing the wheel,” in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, Eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.[2] X. (Shane) Wang, N. T. Bendle
, Pages Textbook Title Author(s) Edition Chapter Analyzed Analyzed rd Fluid Mechanics: Cengel, Y.A., & 2014, 3 Ed. 5. Bernoulli and 230-242 Fundamentals and Cimbala, J. M. Energy Equations Applications Fundamentals of Munson, B.R., 2013, 7th Ed. 3. Elementary 141-156 Fluid Mechanics Okiishi, T. H., Fluid Dynamics – Huebsch, W.W. & The Bernoulli Rothmayer, A.P. Equation
traditionallyconsidered more transitive in nature, such as nursing students. Performing this activity withnursing students could help to bolster our findings as we would expect to see a higher proportionof nursing students use transitive action-statements.References[1] E. A. Cech, "The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices," in Engineering Education for Social Justice, J. Lucena Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 67-84.[2] E. A. Cech, "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?," Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.[3] G. S. Aikenhead and O. J. Jegede, "Cross‐cultural science education: A
. Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one's own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising Interdisciplinarity (pp. 115-133). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.17. Brown, J. (1992). The Definition of a Profession: The Authority of Metaphor in the History of Intelligence Testing, 1890-1930. Princeton: Princeton University Press.18. Brown, T. L. (2008). Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.19. Lawson, S. (2011). Surfing on the Edge of Chaos: Nonlinear Science and the Emergence of a Doctrine of Preventive War in the US. Social Studies of Science, 41(4), 563-584.20. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books
immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky - Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants - Part1.pdf2. Wesch, M. (2009). Participatory media literacy : Why it matters. Mediated Cultures. Retrieved from http://mediatedcultures.net/smatterings/192/3. Craig, D. V. (2009). Action research essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.4. McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357–382. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/030576405003190655 Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. S. (2007). Studying your own school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.6. Hobbs, R. (2011). Digital and media
outcomes, and interpersonal outcomes. Empathic processesresemble the skills dimension of Walther et al.’s [6] model of empathy in engineering andmanifest through perspective-taking, self/other awareness, and related skills. As this modelemphasizes, however, one’s orientation to others and one’s behavioral dispositions also play akey role in determining whether one will empathize. Thus, as one example, numerous factorsinfluence ‘team member understanding.’ Moreover, as Davis’s model emphasizes, this type ofintrapersonal understanding can promote interpersonal action or behavior.Second, empathy can promote positive teaming environments. Such positive teamingenvironments may be evident through a lack of negative valences, such as limited frustration
and what response they receivedfrom their audience(s).The student writing projects were analyzed using discourse analysis 12 and multimodal analysis30,31 in order to examine how the students enacted positions through roles and relationships visa vithe reader, and the extent to which they were successful in their positioning (RQ1).We considered criteria for successful positioning in multiple ways. First, we asked ourselveswhether the authors actually positioned themselves as engineering researchers or engineers -what were the strategies they use, and did they appropriately signal membership in thatcommunity. For instance, scientists are expected to use the language of uncertainty and to avoidoverstating their claims when discussing the
allow as little as half a year. WhenEC 2000 abandoned credit-hour bean counting, the language shifted to require “adequateattention and time” for general education subjects (while retaining numerical requirements of ayear for fundamental science and math courses and a year and a half of engineering content).Nevertheless, regardless of whether one casts EC 2000’s advancements for liberal education ofengineers as meager, incremental, or transformative, there is no doubt that the current proposedchanges, by omitting the requirement of “adequate attention and time” for educational breadth,drops the floor on well-rounded education of engineers. This change threatens to send thecountry back not just 20 years to the 1990s before EC 2000, but more than
Paper ID #12829Writing-to-Learn-to-Program: Examining the Need for a New Genre in Pro-gramming PedagogyDr. Bryan A. Jones, Mississippi State University Bryan A. Jones (S’00–M’00) received the B.S.E.E. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Rice University, Houston, TX, in 1995 and 2002, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineer- ing from Clemson University, Clemson, SC, in 2005. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. From 1996 to 2000, he was a Hardware Design Engineer with Compaq, where he specialized in board layout for high
., Bielefeldt, A. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Littlejohn, R. L. (2017). Divergent requirements for technicaland non-technical coursework in undergraduate engineering programs. International Journal of EngineeringEducation, in press.9. Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., and Layton, R. A. (2008). Persistence,engagement, and migration in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), pp. 259-278.10. The College Board. Trends in Higher Education. Retreived December 15, 2016.https://trends.collegeboard.org/college-pricing/figures-tables/tuition-fees-room-board-over-time-unweighted11. DeAngelo, L., Franke, R., Hurtado, S., Pryor, J. H., & Tran, S. (2011). Completing college: Assessinggraduation rates at four
3.00 L E A D E R S Average Normalized Ind Avg Wk 1 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.14 0.90 Tm Avg Wk 1 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.62 4.62 4.56 4.56 4.60 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 5 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 1.10 Tm Avg Wk 5 4.53 4.67 4.60 4.53 4.47 4.53 4.53 4.55 1.00 Ind Avg Wk 1 Tm Avg Wk 1 Ind Avg Wk 5 Tm Avg Wk 5 Figure 2: Student ‘D’ Leadership AssessmentThis positive improvement in
) μ σTechnology plays an important role in solving society's problems 3.29 0.77Engineers make more money than most other professionals 3.23 0.76My parent(s) would disapprove if I chose a major other than 1.5 0.81engineeringEngineers have contributed greatly to fixing problems in the 3.51 0.73worldEngineers are well paid 3.3 0.74My parent(s) want me to be an engineer 1.86 0.98An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I graduate 3.32 0.81A faculty member, academic advisor, teaching assistant, or other 1.89 1.04university affiliated person has
activity conducted over two consecutive course periods, students, in teams, choosefrom a list of articles about different types of technologies, such as a bridge, a GPS app, airconditioning in office buildings, and airbags. Many of the articles were non-academic includingsome blogs. Our intent here was to push students to not only be able to discern the key points theauthor(s) raise(s) and what information and evidence (or lack thereof) is used to support theirclaims, but also critically consider what the stance of the author is and how this might havecolored his/her assumptions and viewpoint.After evaluating the article as a whole, students are asked to analyze the technology itself andcreate a single presentation slide to summarize their
stakeholder needs.In spring 2017, Polak served as Executive in Residence in the Division of Engineering, Designand Society at Colorado School of Mines to guide faculty and staff on how to incorporate enduser information into routine design problem definition and solution processes. Today, thiscourse, which exposes students to both user empathy and stakeholder engagement [19], has thefollowing learning objectives: 1. Identify, breakdown, and define open-ended problem(s). 2. Research the context and background of problems and solutions, through a variety of scholarly and authoritative sources. 3. Design solutions through cycle of testing, refining, iterating, and feedback. 4. Equitably contribute to team efforts from start to end on a
—a specific critique offered by the ABET Engineering AccreditationCommission’s (EAC’s) Criterion 3 Task Force (TF-3). The obdurate habit of over-specification cansimply manifest itself in different ways—although we ought to consider in the same light TF-3’s ownrecommendation to include within Criterion 3 only those outcomes that can be reliably achieved.11As already alluded to above, what stymies effective solutions in engineering education is hardly limited tothe disciplinary habits and boundaries of engineering; the reasons go back to the structure of U.S.educational institutions and the engineering profession itself. With regards to the latter, engineers shouldstop worrying that theirs is somehow an incomplete profession. Sociologists
/ christiansandengineering/christian-engineering-conferences-ceec7 Adams, R. et al. Storytelling in engineering education. in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. (2007)8 For other examples of this format, see Adams, R. S. et al. Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 48–88 (2011).9 Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W. & Hernandez, K. A. C. Collaborative autoethnography. (Left Coast Press, 2013).10 Vatican Council II. Lumen gentium: Dogmatic constitution of the church. Conciliar Post Conciliar Doc. Austin Flannery, OP, ed., rev. Ed.(bost. St. Paul Ed. 1988), Par 32, (1964).11 Horkheimer, Max. Traditional and critical theory. Critical theory: Selected essays 188-243 (1972)12 Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow : The Psychology of
for writing: Contributes to team meetings: Helps the team move forward Demonstrates a thorough understanding of by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals. context, audience, and purpose that is Facilitates the contributions of team members: Engages responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work. team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing Content development: Uses appropriate, the contributions of others as well as noticing when someone is relevant, and
Summary (if known) Author Becca First-year engineering Fall 2018 Female, probable first-year, K. Johnson projects course, other data not collected University B Dorothy First-year engineering Fall 2019 Female, first-year, other data J. Blacklock projects course, not collected University B Cleopatra Second-year Spring Female, self-described S. Claussen introduction to 2019 sophomore, probable ME mechanical major, other data not
look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
Paper ID #25435What Do Engineering Students Really Need for the Workplace and Life?Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion
author and reviewer(s) were selected for analysis. 3.3 Analytical Framework Student comments were coded using a typology based on Smith Taylor [20], [21] and Smithand Patton’s [22] work characterizing engineering instructor comments and Straub andLunsford’s [19] characterization of expert writing teacher comments. Each comment was coded Page 26.1482.10along three axes: focus, mode, and tone. The focus of a comment identifies what the commentrefers to in the original text; mode and tone refer to the qualities of the comment itself.Focus Categorizations of comment focus include form, content, and extra-textual. Form commentsrefer to the text
directlyexplained in the sign. In that sense, analyzing the meaning(s) of images (e.g., cartoon drawings)is comparable to analyzing texts (e.g., a peer-reviewed academic article). Both require the viewerto understand the exact words or depictions (signifiers) while also “reading between the lines” tointerpret indirect meanings embedded in the sign. Signifieds, for example, can include sarcasm,irony, absurdity, double entendre, or other implied meanings. These meanings can only beunderstood through the reader’s awareness both of the social context and of the fact that thesignifiers are not intended to stand alone.Signs are only interpretable with knowledge of social context; cartoons therefore require viewersto understand the norms and debates in the