, rather than teaching. Both Baxter-Magolda23 and Schön22 discuss the need for working with and developing astudent’s existing meaning making, instead of imposing meaning making onto them. In ourconception of innovation, students become innovators when they are freed from thinking withstereotypes and freed from unilaterally seeking approval from their relationships with others, andinstead can develop the capacity to construct their own knowledge, identities and relationships.Methods For our research in understanding and reporting on the educational environment in whichthe IPM classes were situated, we relied on ethnographic observation. Ethnography providesresearchers with the opportunity to understand and develop their own
Paper ID #25678Making Connections Across a Four-Year Project-Based Curriculum: ePort-folios as a Space for Reflection and Integrative LearningDr. Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Chrysanthe Demetry is associate professor of Mechanical Engineering and director of the Morgan Teaching & Learning Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her teaching and scholarship interests focus on materials science education, K-12 engineering outreach, gender equity in STEM, and intercul- tural learning in experiential education abroad. As director of the Morgan Center at WPI since 2006, Dr. Demetry coordinates
. Most of thesepapers describe a specific course, project, program, or teaching tool, without making ageneralized claim about STS or engineering education.Authorship trends may reflect the common understanding of STS that is present in the appliedSTS papers and absent in many of the other papers (Table 2). Half of both groups’ papers werewritten by teams of authors from different disciplines, such as engineering, STS, social sciences,and education. A third of the applied STS papers were written by STS scholars, while a third ofthe other papers were written by engineers. This discrepancy may explain why the applied STSpapers share a worldview that the other papers do not. However, it does not mean that engineerslack an understanding or
chamber, vocal, and stage settings, his music traverses wide-ranging topics such as Sumerian legends, nuclear war, and the American Dream. He has been named a national finalist in composing competitions sponsored by SCI/ASCAP (twice) and the National Opera Association (one of three works selected). Dr. Gullings is committed to improving the quality and efficiency of undergraduate music theory and com- position education through classroom innovation, collaboration, and scholarship. In addition to teaching in the core music theory sequence, he maintains a growing interest in developing, practicing, and sharing efficient assessment methods. Dr. Gullings has taught at The University of Texas at Tyler since 2011. He lives
others? How does the team undertake thecollective gate keeping surrounding inclusion artifacts? These are a few of the questions thatexplorations of inclusion artifacts may begin to provide answers to.Furthermore, in teaching teamwork practices, faculty could use the concept of BNAs to teachcommunication skills by demonstrating how inclusion artifacts can help them explain their ideasto other team members and other relevant stakeholders. Prototypes, sketches, and CADdrawings—all of which could be boundary negotiating artifacts—are significant parts ofengineering work, and their importance should not be downplayed. When such objects areassignments for interdisciplinary teams, they can be conceptualized as BNAs and used to callstudents’ attention
AC 2011-2746: THE 2010 HAITI EARTHQUAKE: REAL-TIME DISAS-TER INQUIRY IN THE CLASSROOMKeith E. Hedges, Drury University Keith Hedges is an Assistant Professor at Drury University. His research interests involve the disciplinary knowledge gap between architecture and engineering students in higher education. Keith’s teaching reper- toire includes seventeen total courses of engineering topics at NAAB (architecture) and architecture top- ics at ABET (engineering) accredited institutions. He has presented educational themed papers in seven countries. Page 22.1425.1 c American Society
Paper ID #30435Real-World Examples and Sociotechnical Integration: What’s the Connec-tion?Jacquelene Erickson, Colorado School of Mines Jacquelene Erickson is a fourth year undergraduate student at Colorado School of Mines pursuing a major in Electrical Engineering. After graduation in May 2020, she plans to work in electrical distribution design at an engineering firm.Dr. Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines Stephanie Claussen is a Teaching Professor with a joint appointment in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division and the Electrical Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines. She ob
to science and engineering communication studies 17,18, 19 and a plethora of advice from scientists and communication scholars about how to write forthe public20. Despite this interest, few university science or engineering programs dedicateformal coursework in public communication to undergraduate or graduate students 21. Whenprograms do offer such training, they are usually limited to teaching students to write intraditional genres such as press releases, newspaper-style articles, and essays13, 14, and fail toconsider more personal, informal, and affective forms of communication such as face-to-faceconversations that can occur through science cafes or street science 22, 23 or to make use ofmultimedia genres such as podcasts, blogs, or
Teaching, the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and its precursor, the Society for the Promotion of EngineeringEducation, internalized an investigation tradition built on familiar practices such as survey research, sitevisits, and the enlistment of objective experts hired to carry out an investigation. During mid-century,however, internal fissures within the engineering profession and among the engineering schools causedthe primary decision-making authority to shift from ASEE to ECPD. With it, the voluntary traditions ofinvestigation and society-wide deliberation that characterized ASEE’s grand investigations gave way tothe more mediated conversations carried out within the particular governance structure set up for theECPD, which
, we teach the students to fashion sentences onthe spot after planning and practice. Although the recommendation to students in all sections ofthis course is to speak extemporaneously, the textbook used in the regular sections advises thecreation and use of speaking notes.24 These speaking notes, which are described as condensedversions of a preparation outline, contain the following: key words or phrases for points, sub-points, transitions, statistics, and delivery cues (such as stage directions). Perhaps because of this recommendation of speaking notes, observations from a speakingcontest associated with the course reveal that the overwhelming majority of students read from ascript, rely on a stack of note cards, or read bulleted
others is what engineers do all of the time. This is irresponsible.”.He adds that “In engineering we take pride in teaching “the fundamentals”. It’s time to explicitlyrecognize that what is fundamental to engineering practice goes beyond the scientific,instrumental rationality; to fail to acknowledge this is “just about unethical”.”.21Wendy Faulkner22 observes that “Their educational grounding in mathematics and science allowsengineers to claim an identity in the material and (mostly) predictable phenomena governed bythe 'laws of nature', backed up by a faith in cause-and-effect reasoning. And this same materialityand scientificity enables them to claim, as the central contribution of engineering design, that itcreates technologies that 'do the
“program evaluator competency model” to specify the competencies thatsuccessful program evaluators exhibit. This model includes six major categories: technicallycurrent, effective at communicating, interpersonally skilled, team-oriented, professional, andorganized.17In comparison, CEEAA accepted most of the same qualifications/competencies provided byABET, including six basic qualifications. For instance, similar to ABET, CEEAA requires“accreditation experts” to “know scientific, technological, and engineering advances in their ownfields”, “have abundant teaching, administrative, and working experience”, “have disciplinarybackground necessary for accreditation”, and “have strong working, organizational, andcommunicative competencies.”17 However
Paper ID #34647Leveling the Playing Field: A Virtual Summer Camp for Women of ColorDr. Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati Dr. Gaskins is the Assistant Dean of Inclusive Excellence and Community Engagement in the University of Cincinnati College of Engineering and Applied Science, the only African-American female currently teaching in the faculty of the College of Engineering. Whitney earned her Bachelor of Science in Biomed- ical Engineering, her Masters of Business Administration in Quantitative Analysis and her Doctorate of Philosophy in Biomedical Engineering/Engineering Education. In her role as Assistant Dean
traditionalrequired engineering calculus sequence as it offers a one-semester laboratory-based immersioninto the ways mathematical concepts—including trigonometry, vectors, derivatives, integrals,and differential equations—are actually used by engineers. Research from Wright State, as wellas other implementation sites, has robustly demonstrated that completing the WSM courseduring the first semester of college leads to boosts in retention rates and engineering persistence,desirable outcomes motivating nationwide replication [1]–[3].As administrators and instructors of the WSM course pilot at the University of Colorado Boulder(CU), we are interested in understanding the change processes wherein the WSM becomesinstitutionalized and integrated into the
State University. He serves on the advisory board of the Engineering Ambassador Network. With Melissa Marshall and Christine Haas, he teaches advanced presentation skills to Engineering Ambassadors in workshops across the country. Page 23.496.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engineering Ambassador Network: Establishment of Successful Engineering Ambassador Programs at Four UTC Partner UniversitiesThis paper presents an overview of the establishment of the Engineering AmbassadorProgram at four schools to begin the
- cation with specific emphasis on innovative pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. With the goal of improving learning opportunities for all students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities, Dr. Zastavker’s re- cent work involves questions pertaining to students’ motivational attitudes and their learning journeys in a variety of educational environments. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from science to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and
of the compounding errors that yield catastrophic results. Morerecently, a second approach has emerged in the teaching and scholarship and stands in starkcontrast to aspirations for greater control. This approach seeks to foster reflexivity and learningabout one’s own context and broader societal implications of engineering practice. Robbins [8]offers the notion of the “reflexive practitioner” as an emergent theme in engineering ethics.However, there are few examples for how such reflexivity can be demonstrated in the educationand maturation of engineers. This project aims to address that knowledge gap in a small, but important way, byassessing reflective writing by engineers in an undergraduate program. This paper offers datafrom 65
Paper ID #20397Fourth-Year Engineering Students’ Descriptions of the Importance of Im-proving Society Through their Engineering CareersDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches sustainable community development in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD research at CU Boulder
University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Dr. Angela Harris, North Carolina State University Dr. Angela Harris joined the faculty at NCSU in August 2018 as an Assistant Professor. Harris is a member of the Global Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (Global WaSH) cluster in the Chancellor’s Fac- ulty Excellence Program. Her research seeks to better characterize human exposure pathways of fecal contamination and develop methods to interrupt pathogen transmission to protect human health. Harris is engaged in computational and laboratory investigations in addition to conducting field work in inter- national locations (prior work includes projects in Tanzania, Kenya, and
educators and trainers of engineers need not assign themselves responsibility to teach students how to sort out and assess the diverse effects for different populations of engineering work in particular. Such analysis falls outside the boundaries of engineering practice. On the side of engineers, the image of service to human progress as a whole inhibits engineers from paying attention to and examining a myriad of differences that distinguish themselves from one another. In particular, they typically have no analysis of how or why what it has meant to be an engineer and what budding engineers have come to value as their knowledge have varied
showcasing how to use SPSS software to analyze data, and required completion ofIRB training modules in order to learn how to conduct studies involving human participants.Additional choice activities included laboratory safety training, a session on Big Data, andattending research presentations hosted by several departments on campus.Course OutlineThis 3-credit hour course met once per week for 14 weeks. The following outline showcases theactivities conducted and assignments submitted each week.Week 1During the first class meeting all of the students enrolled in the course met together at thebeginning of the period. The dean of the Honors College provided an overview of research andthe diversity of research being conducted at the university. The
2006)12; and ParliamentaryLaw No. 562 (“PL 562” hereafter) which set out to merge the nation’s 150 specialized semi-professional colleges into a new system of eight regional “University Colleges.” This was donefor the purpose of simultaneously expanding educational access, controlling cost, and upholdingthe status of “medium cycle” bachelor’s degrees—generally semi-professional degrees in fieldssuch as teaching or nursing, but also more traditional, craft-oriented programs in engineering.While PL 562 affects primarily the Diplom (baccalaureate) institutions, it has had compleximplications for all engineering degree programs and institutions in Denmark.The tension between neoliberal policies and social welfare principles is also evident