AC 2012-3711: TEACHING NON-MAJOR STUDENTS ELECTRICAL SCI-ENCE AND TECHNOLOGYDr. Harold R. Underwood, Messiah College Harold Underwood received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering at UIUC in 1989 and has been a faculty member of the Engineering Department at Messiah College since 1992. Besides teaching circuit analysis and electromagnetics, he supervises the Communications Group of the Messiah College Collaboratory, including a project involving flight tracking and messaging for small planes in remote locations, and an assistive communication technology involving wireless enabled remote co-presence for cognitively and behaviorally challenged individuals. He has been teaching Exploring Electrical Technology as a
complex skills like design and advanced research methods like agent-based modeling. He is the incoming Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division within ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring how Empathy Manifests with/for Teammates in a Junior-Level Biomedical Engineering CourseAbstractTeamwork projects are a common feature of undergraduate and graduate engineering programsand improved collaboration skills is an expectation of ABET accredited programs. Thus, it isimportant to understand factors that contribute to the development of more effectivecollaboration skills among engineering students. We posit
. What themes emerge from studies’ findings about the impact of outreach on undergraduates?Method The first steps were to develop inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review. Criteria forincluding the papers were fourfold: (1) describe programmatic outreach efforts from one or morecolleges of engineering to K-12 audiences, (2) include undergraduate engineering students asambassadors or mentors, (3) take place within the continental United States, and (4) includeevidence of impacts on the undergraduate students. In other words, papers were excluded if they(1) described undergraduate involvement in service learning, affinity group, or communityengagement projects, (2) included undergraduates simply as chaperones or creators of
, happiness andsafety. The students were mentored by a faculty member whose background is inCommunication. The quality of student presentations was high, utilizing the assertion-evidencemethod of slide design.Data was collected to determine whether the following project objectives were met: 1) Studentsin the First Year Seminars will have a greater understanding of the possible careers inengineering as well as the engineering majors; and 2) Students will be more likely to defineengineering in terms associated with health, happiness, and safety. The data showed that thestudents had a very positive reaction to the Engineering Ambassador visits, although a largersample size would be necessary to more clearly understand the impact.Introduction and
meaningful component of students’professional formation as engineers.This paper will discuss a new, two course sequence that students can use to meet the historyrequirements at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The courses were developed and arebeing co-taught by the authors, a history professor and an engineering professor. The coursesequence, entitled “World History and Technology” departs significantly from traditional worldhistory courses by using a Big History textbook as a basis for the course content, along with avariety of activities, group projects and guest speakers. The paper discusses the motivation forcreating the course sequence, some challenges in getting it approved as a distributionrequirement by the university, the
and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by a fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Her current research project, ”The Ethics of Extraction: Integrating Corporate So- cial Responsibility into Engineering Education,” investigates the sociotechnical dimensions of CSR for engineers in the mining, oil and gas industries and is funded by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines Carrie J McClelland is an Associate Teaching Professor at Colorado School of Mines. Carrie is a regis- tered professional engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider
research yet again―this time concentrating on education.”His sense of ethics began to truly drive his care statements, while any mention of technology orengineering approaches was generally left out of his reflections. His driving mentality was toensure that information should be conveyed in a safe environment, where interventions weredesigned to “appeal to people’s reason, not reaction―focus on facts (and understanding), notfear.” During this time, he also articulated his first idea for his project, which was essentially aversion of the course we were involved in before the summer internship administered to highschool and college students in rural India. It would focus specifically on designing and building alatrine with the community and from
contribution to integration social justice inengineering curricula. 1. How well does a course help engineers listen contextually to diverse users and actors so the ways in which the social context shapes (and is shaped by) the technical becomes visible? How effectively does the course help engineers and other stakeholders listening to discover more about criteria 2-6 below? 2. How thoroughly does the course help engineers and other stakeholders identify structural conditions so legal, historical, political, economic, and other social structures that serve as real or potential project-related barriers and/or opportunities to users, key actors, or engineers become visible and are openly acknowledged in the
for Social Scienceswithin the university core. This required the course to conduct some surveys and analyze the datain a meaningful way, and this activity had to be a reasonable percentage of the course content.Fortunately the four-credit course structure permits this to happen and still retain sufficient classtime and activities to explore project management, the functions of an engineering team within thecontext of a business operation, and aspects of entrepreneurship. The course allows the engineeringstudents to have a basic understanding of business principles and terminology.3.2 ABET AssessmentWhile much of the liberal arts core does not directly contribute to ABET assessment, the courseon Engineering and Technology Ethics will be used
tendency forthe students to associate a good presentation with a “naturally” gifted presenter, even though it isa strong sign of a well rehearsed talk. On the other hand, without the correct technique evenrehearsing is not sufficient to deliver powerful presentation. Therefore, a senior elective coursewas tailored to reinforce our future professionals with the necessary steps to yield a compellingtechnical talk via judicious practice. Beyond exposing students to the topic, the ‘Introduction toNanotechnology’ course was designed with an additional skill-building objective: to teachstudents to present well. This paper discusses how this objective was attained via several classactivities, resources and assignments that culminated into a final project
retention and graduation rates as well as supporting faculty with development with effective learning and teaching pedagogies.Warren R Hull, Louisiana State University Warren Hull is the Engineering Communication Studio Manager at Louisiana State University. He earned a baccalaureate in Mechanical Engineering from Louisiana State University and master’s degree in En- vironmental Health from Harvard University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer with over 40 years engineering experience. Prior to joining LSU he was an engineering consultant who managed numerous domestic and international projects. He is also a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel.David Bowles, Louisiana State University David (Boz) Bowles is a Technical
. Literature Review We conducted a literature review to better understand the role of CSR in the larger context of ethicseducation, what limitations may exist to the effectiveness of CSR in engineering education, and whattechniques are commonly used already in teaching similar forms of ethics education. We also looked forresearch similar to our own to help determine limitations of our project, and possibly compare findings.The importance of teaching engineering ethics, communication, teamwork, and CSR at an undergraduateeducation level has been identified as important for engineer’s success in the workplace after graduation[6], [9]-[11]. ABET has stipulated that students graduating from accredited engineering programs areexpected to have “an
diminishment of students’ desire to do good in the world.Students’ interest in public welfare considerations of engineering work decreased over the courseof their education. Bielefeldt [40] performed a detailed study of a related phenomenon: “sociallymotivated students leaving engineering at disproportionately higher rates,” a particular concernsince societal and caring motivations have gendered and ethnoracial variations. Bydecontextualizing engineering knowledge in the curriculum, engineering education pushes outstudents motivated to use engineering for social good.When students are encouraged to work on local or global community-based projects, their sense(reinforced by their educators) that social and cultural contexts are irrelevant to – or, at
project management and implementation. She holds a BASc in Industrial Engineering from the University of Toronto and an MSc in Management, specializing in Operations Management, from the University of Bath. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Penalized for Excellence: The Invisible Hand of Career Track StratificationAbstractInequities persist in the engineering profession despite nearly four decades of diversity and inclusionefforts. In this paper, we propose an institutional mechanism to explain this persistence—career trackstratification. When engineering educators and researchers frame engineers’ careers as personal journeys,we implicitly characterize
a foreign culture and language—to wit, American culture and English language.) a suitable technical elective. This echoes the original GEC, but the GEM’s electives must explicitly combine technical and non-technical aspects of engineering. a global experience typically involving an international study or work project. This was an option associated with the original IEC, and proposed as the post-graduate goal of the GEC, but now it is an integrated and essential requirement for the new Minor. a new gateway course to give GEM students a common focus. This course orients students towards the program’s definition of global engineering. It encourages students to gain cultural awareness, not
Page 26.616.2more as a metaphor for conveying students’ experience of disappointment than to insinuatemalicious intent.(i)In K-12 engineering programs, the overwhelming curricular emphasis is on engaging, design-based classroom activities: open-ended, hands-on projects requiring creative synthesis acrossmultiple domains of knowledge on the part of the student.1 In university engineering programs,students confront an educational philosophy that can be characterized as exclusionary and builtupon a “fundamentals first” approach to learning:2 analytically rigorous, rote learning of basicprinciples in math and science (e.g., calculus, chemistry, physics) followed by engineeringsciences (e.g. statics, fluid dynamics) followed by engineering analysis
,Chemical Engineering, and Chemistry students will be analyzed in order to answer the followingresearch questions: 1. What types of socializing agents do students engage with prior to arriving at their university and what impact, if one at all, do these agents have on students’ choice of discipline? 2. What types of disciplinary socialization do first-year students engage in at their university and why choose these specific types? 3. What differences, if any, exist in the engagement with disciplinary socialization between first-year biochemistry, chemical engineering, and chemistry students?Broader Project BackgroundThis qualitative analysis makes use of an existing dataset that is part of a larger project involvingsix
, international relations in the sphere of transport communications, iternational logistics and supply chain management, sustainable development and ecology.Mrs. Karalyn Clouser, Western Transportation Institute at Montana State University Karalyn Clouser is a GIS and planning specialist with the Western Transportation Institute. She has expe- rience editing and managing spatial data to support transportation planning and implementation projects, and offers skills with numerous GIS tools and platforms. At WTI, she has provided GIS and planning support to the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Technical Assistance Center, which assists with the de- velopment of alternative transportation on federal lands. Her experience includes
in engineering capstonecourses as they form teams, seek professional positions in the workplace, and/or make decisionsto continue on to graduate school during their last year of undergraduate studies. Further, understanding persistence of Latinx is particularly imperative given that they arethe nation’s largest minority group and among its fastest growing populations [3]. As such, thisresearch project will contribute to the national conversation on broadening participation ofLatinx. The site of this research investigation is “Border University” (BU), which serves alargely Mexican-origin population in a region of Texas with one of the lowest median incomes[4]. In particular, we focus on the senior capstone course where students work in
students and collecting survey data from multiple institutions.IntroductionWriting is an important skill for engineers, but it is not necessarily thought about or taught as an“engineering skill.” Because of this, and despite ABET accreditation criteria directly related towriting,1 the inclusion of writing in engineering programs varies widely from program toprogram and course to course. While writing in engineering practice varies in scope frominformal emails and memos to large scope reports and proposals, writing in engineering coursesis often limited to formal laboratory or project reports, if it is included at all. This often causes adisconnect, leaving engineering graduates lacking in writing knowledge and skills, including asrelated to
background established, let’s quickly outline how engineering might be described interms of Kagan’s nine dimensions. We have already dealt with the first dimension, that ofprimary interest.The second dimension has to do with sources of evidence. Here we realize that engineers oftenperform projects that run for months or years, and that different questions are asked at differentstages of a project. Generally, the first step of a project requires engineers to understand theintentions of the humans who will be affected by the project. Evidence of the sort normallysought by social scientists and humanists plays important roles in this early stage. The evidencehere may be heavily contextualized as well. Then, as engineers move into the middle phases
, collaborative research projects among scholars, and with underserved communities. She is also a lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department where she is currently teaching a course built on her doctoral thesis called Global Engineers’ Education. Page 24.398.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Developing curriculum to preparestudent engineers to engage with problems faced by underserved communities globally Page 24.398.2Abstract:This paper addresses the need to develop pedagogy that will enable engineering
AC 2011-1553: NOTE TO SELF: SAVE HUMANITY (A SOCIAL AND CUL-TURAL HISTORY OF THE ”GRAND CHALLENGES”Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng.) Amy E. Slaton is an associate professor of history at Drexel University and a visiting associate professor at Haverford College. She received her PhD in the History and Sociology of Science from the Univer- sity of Pennsylvania and has written on the history of standards and instrumentation in materials science, engineering and the building trades. Her most recent book , Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineer- ing: The History of an Occupational Color Line (Harvard University Press, 2010), traces American ideas about race and technical aptitude since 1940. Current projects
(eitherimplicitly or explicitly) that the public does not understand or appreciate engineering becausethey are uninformed or misinformed and that, consequently, the provision of more information(in the form of scientific literacy or the benefits of engineering) will lead to increasedunderstanding and support for engineering. In that way, such initiatives are enactments of thedeficit model. The deficit model (DM) is a term from the field of Science and TechnologyStudies (STS) used to describe initiatives/projects that are based upon a belief in the public’slack of knowledge and scientific literacy and seek to remedy it by providing more, and correct,information. However, a large body of literature has now identified significant problems with thedeficit
for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33282Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2018). His current research grant project explores how to foster and assesssociotechnical thinking in engineering science and design courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring the Nexus Between Students’ Perceptions of Sociotechnical Thinking and Construction of Their Engineering Identities Introduction In the United States, engineering education traditionally prioritizes learning the technical detailsof math and applied science over understanding the complex social, political
energy systems and power electronics. He has been working on thin film solar cell research since 1979 including a Sabbatical Leave at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in 1993. He has also worked on several photovoltaic system projects Dr. Singh has also worked on electric vehicle research, working on battery monitoring and management systems funded primarily by federal agencies (over $3.5 million of funding). Dr. Singh has consulted for several companies including Ford Motor Company and Epuron, LLC. He has also served as a reviewer for the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation. Dr Singh has over 150 conference and journal publications and holds seven issued US patents. Dr. Singh’s recent
perspectives that differ fromyour own and integrate your individual expertise and views with those of other people of bothtechnical and non-technical backgrounds(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems: identify, formulate,articulate, and solve engineering problems; think critically about and reflect on the processes ofproblem definition, engineering design, and project management(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility: understand professional andethical responsibilities as they apply to both particular engineering projects and to the engineeringprofession as a whole(g) an ability to communicate effectively with both expert and non-expert audiences(h) the broad education necessary to understand the
developing a technical communication guide for students and faculty members withsufficient flexibility to accommodate the different preferences of our colleagues. This guide willbe a technical communication compendium that includes threshold concepts, learning outcomes,and practical guidelines for various forms of TC.Mapping technical communication in the ME curriculumIn order to begin this project, we first identified what forms of TC are currently required in theME undergraduate curriculum and in what courses these TC experiences occur. A committeecomprised of four faculty—three from ME and one from the Humanities and Social Sciences(HSS) Department—investigated the current state of TC practice and learning by conductinginterviews with the faculty
, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy to engineering students. He is currently the Education Di- rector for Engineers for a Sustainable World, an assistant editor for Engineering Studies, and a member of the ASEE Committee on Sustainability, Subcommittee on Formal Education.Ms. Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology Sarah Brownell is a Lecturer in Design Development and Manufacturing for the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She works extensively with students in the mul- tidisciplinary engineering capstone design course and other project based elective courses, incorporating
Talmadge Fennell, Ohio Northern UniversityElizabeth Marie Spingola Elizabeth is a junior at Ohio Northern University. She is the Project Manager of an organization at school that is designing and fabricating a model Mars Rover for a local museum. She is, also, has leadership roles in Phi Sigma Rho, the engineering sorority at ONU. Other organizations she belongs to include SWE, ASME, Flute Choir, JEC, and more. Page 23.238.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Bachelor of Science in Engineering Education: Differentiating from Traditional