Paper ID #23594Connecting with First-year Engineering Students’ Interest in Social JusticeIssues through Ethics Lessons to Sustain Student Retention in EngineeringMs. Kathryn Waugaman, University of Colorado Boulder Katie is an undergraduate student researcher at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She is interested in why students choose to study engineering and what retention methods are successful for universities, particularly in underrepresented communities. She is a Senior in Mechanical Engineering and plans to work in renewable energy when she graduates in December.Dr. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder
practiceIntroductionEngineering work relies on effective collaboration and communication among diverse groups ofengineers and scientists, and engagement in partnership with broader constituencies (managers,technicians, end users, among others). There is a long-standing expectation that graduates fromengineering programs be proficient communicators and team members, and outcomes relevantto communication and teaming survived the recent re-visioning of ABET criterion 3 (Graduateswill have … “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meetobjectives” and “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences”). As would beexpected, a
engage in more inclusionary interactions and team work. Inreferring to the ECE program, students characterized their experience in terms of “survival.” Onestudent called himself and his peers “veterans of ECE,” while others described the studentculture as “stressed.” Christopher, a sophomore in CompE, recalled his strategy for coping withthe rigor of ECE: Because it's hard, but trying to avoid burn out the only way to do is to follow the plan of study. What's better to do is learn when you are going to burn out and pick a time when you can afford it. If you can do it before the finals, do it right before the finals, because you don't want to do it the week of the exams, because you want to study at that time
typical engineering identities. For example, studentsdiscussed the breakdown of their assumptions about the popular “nerd” and “builder” stereotypesof engineers. One student discussed the differences between their previous beliefs of engineers as“typically non-social people who were only proficient at math and science” and those they holdas a result of participating in STEP, which included constructively using criticism and effectivelycommunicating ideas. Another student discussed their prior belief about engineers as “glorifiedfactory workers,” but, through the course and participation in STEP, came to see engineers as“dynamic problem solvers” who engage in “careful planning and out of the box problemsolving.” Additionally, students shared
education that is explicitly socio-technical in nature.We plan to develop a transformative, inclusive approach to teaching energy as a model for howto adopt culturally-sustaining pedagogies within engineering. We have selected energy, as it is afoundational topic across multiple engineering disciplines, relevant to students’ lived 2experiences, and has important social ramifications. We are targeting a class in the second yearto provide students with a grounding in CSP early in their engineering education so that theymight use these mindsets moving forward. Many students often first see energy concepts in“Introduction to Thermodynamics.” With its grounding in 18th century power cycles and
appear in search results and keyword analyses of the abstracts and complete texts of relevant articles. These could be applied not only within ASEE but in the wide range of scholarly publications that treat topics that are relevant to engineering communication and its teaching. • Organize a National Science Foundation workshop that would allow the participants to extend and deepen the analysis presented in this paper by (a) identifying issues of common concern and (b) planning research to advance knowledge and understanding. In addition to establishing direction for research that would meet the needs of teachers and practitioners of engineering communication, such a workshop would also assist the
things—on one side of the card jot down briefly why the students wanted to take a collegegrammar course, in general; and on the other side of the card, list three favorite nouns (persons,places, or things). I asked question one to get a better sense of my audience and to make sure thesyllabus of activities I had planned would be sufficient for the group. I asked question two as anicebreaker and fun factor.Out of the 58 students initially present, 23 indicated they were there to take a grammar course tolearn grammar theory; 22 indicated they were there principally to learn applied grammar, that is,common grammar mistakes and how to spot them and fix them in documents; and 3 studentsindicated they wanted to learn more about the history of English
. Page 26.609.5Team 1This team, composed of a number of highly motivated students, used strategies drawn frominside and outside of this classroom to produce a handful of different possible story scenarios.Most of the group began plotting the scene before the assignment had been formally introducedin the second studio class. Their enthusiasm actually impeded their process as their plans wereentrenched by the time they learnt that their poster was to be their primary creative source. As aresult, one team member who developed an entire storyline over the weekend was forced to letgo of his project when teammates argued that it did not align with the content of their poster.Despite the eventual rejection of his story, his systematic approach to story
-engineering studentsshared similar beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions regarding the role of communication in theirrespective fields. However, observations of patterns of student engagement in each sessionsuggest that students in the “Speak Up!” pilot program may not have utilized this commonground to achieve interdisciplinary engagement. Student attendees tended to enter the sessionswith members of their research groups and sit with the same group. This resulted in interactivesession activities often being completed with peers in their own discipline. In future iterations ofthe program, we plan to experiment with randomization of seat assignments which would furtherour goal of encouraging students to practice communicating with people outside their
SDGs “… seek tobuild on the [previous] Millennium Development Goals and complete what they did not achieve(United Nations General Assembly 2015).” In launching the SDGs in 2015, the GeneralAssembly of the United Nations “recognize[s] that eradicating poverty in all its forms anddimensions (including extreme poverty) is the greatest global challenge and an indispensablerequirement for sustainable development (United Nations General Assembly 2015).” To thatend, the SDGs represent “a plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity,” which in additionto peace and partnership, define the five “P’s” of the mission of the SDGs. To accomplish thatmission, there needs to be a “balance [between] the three dimensions of sustainabledevelopment: the
discussed above. There is little, if any,subjective evaluation involved in the scientific method.The Engineering Design ProcessIn engineering curricula, many programs introduce students to an engineering design process.One description of this process is “a series of steps that guides engineering teams as we solveproblems. The design process is iterative, meaning that we repeat the steps as many times asneeded, making improvements along the way as we learn from failure and uncover new designpossibilities to arrive at great solutions.” This source goes on to describe seven steps: (1) “Ask:Identify the need & constraints”, (2) “Research the problem”, (3) “Imagine: develop possiblesolutions”, (4) “Plan: select a promising solution”, (5) “Create
engineering "Grand Challenges" lately developed by the National Academy ofEngineering enter a long historical tradition of such epically scaled to-do lists, dating back to theprofession's origins in the mid-nineteenth century. The mission statements, codes of ethics, and,later, lists of so-called grand challenges that have issued from engineering societies have servedthe dual function of directing engineers' work and supporting particular cultural roles for thesebodies of experts. Almost all such plans, regardless of period or sponsoring body, have alsoblended highly practical aims of industrial and infrastructural development with more inchoateprojects of societal uplift. The Grand Challenges of the NAE, currently playing a formative rolein many
criticalsubsystem.Oral Progress Reports: As individuals, students provide a five minute presentation that updatesthe course participants on the status of their team's project. A question and answer periodfollows the presentation.Semester 2Project Status Reports: As individuals, students write and review a one page technical report thatsummarizes the status of their project.Milestone Demonstration: As a team, students manufacture and present a prototype of a criticalsubsystem.Final Test Plan: As a team, students develop a test plan for their system that assures all systemdesign requirements have been met if the system passes all tests.Video: As a team, students develop a five minute video that summarizes their entire project.Poster: As a team, students create a
in both directions. In the process, non-major students can also gainappreciation for essential concepts, controversies and current areas of exploration, whiledeveloping increased technological literacy for critiquing scientific or technologicalclaims in presentations of various forms. Teaching an STS course, however, requires avery different pedagogical approach than a faculty member may use for a traditionalengineering course. Rather than an emphasis on rigorous quantitative problem solving orproject planning, non-major students benefit much more from an approach that providessufficient historical context and biographical details of explorers and their contributions.The instructor should effectively guide discussions on key questions
FrenchAcademy of Sciences (French/Russian) and the specialized technical school system.In this system, majors and other institutions in schools were carefully designed torespond to social needs. Both of the particular domestic and international situation ,and the implementation of the first Five-year Plan (1953-1957), promoted asignificant expansion of engineering colleges in a short time.In his first report to the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, JiangNanxiang as the president of Tsinghua University wrote, one of the most fundamentalissues that must be addressed by Tsinghua University in the next five years is to gainpractical experience in training a large number of new engineers equipped with hightechnology and political quality
framework.A Framework for Thinking about Public Communication of EngineeringThe three dimensions of S&E communication discussed above are related to the goals organizershave for any given event or program. Figure 2 presents a framework that combines theseelements. Figures 3 and 4 show that these dimensions influence the type of forum that is selectedfor a communication event. The framework can be used to help engineering educators andstudents reflect upon and plan their own communication initiatives, ideally working to overcomelimitations or problems that are created when relying solely on DM communication. We intendthe framework to help engineering educators and future engineers think through dimensions oftheir communication projects and
Paper ID #32692The Virtues of Teamwork: A Course Module to Cultivate the Virtuous TeamWorkerDr. Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University Dr. Michael Gross is a Founding Faculty and Associate Professor of Engineering and the David and Leila Farr Faculty Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship at Wake Forest University. He is part of the team that is planning, developing, and delivering the brand new Engineering program, a program viewed as an opportunity to break down silos across campus and creatively think about reimagining the undergraduate engineering educational experience, integration and collaboration across
. 9Individual value propositions are blended into team value propositions, and teams present oncustomer discovery (primary and secondary research), financials, a technology roadmap, aventure plan, and final presentation comprising all their previous work. This approachunderscores the process approach as students build the final presentation throughout thesemester. Using a process approach allows them to refine their final presentation and helps thembuild confidence in their presentation skills.All presentations are evaluated via the Google Survey tool, which offers immediate feedback(see Figure 7). Students receive numerical feedback as well as comments from classmates andinstructors. Students also upload their files so the writing instructor can coach
of the model offered opportunities to explicitly definestakeholders as well as to illuminate and discuss both the recourses provided and the valuegained by each of the various stakeholders through the engagement project deliverables andprocess.IntroductionCommunity-engaged learning or service-learning is the integration of academic learning withwork that supports the greater good within local or global communities in order to enhance theacademic learning, address needs within the community, and to give students broader learningopportunities about themselves and society at large. Within engineering, the pedagogy is oftenused in design or project-based experiences where a physical deliverable, software program,design, or plan is produced as a
Engineering Stress Culture," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," Journal of engineering education, vol. 99, pp. 319-336, 2010.[10] Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane, Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2006. 5(1): p: 80-92.[11] MacQueen, K. M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein, B, Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cam
description of this case, documentation, archival records, interviews,direct observations, surveys, and both physical and digital artifacts were be used for datacollection and analysis. Data collection included direct observations of participants using fieldnotes, photography, and audio/video recordings. Both physical and digital artifacts wherecollected throughout the study including planning documents, the final “demo reel” of the movieeffect, blogs, Slack conversations, Trello project boards, and student-generated photos/videosthat were shared in a course repository.AnalysisAnalysis for this work-in-progress paper focuses on findings from exit interviews and end-of-course survey. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed in NVivo 12 qualitative
visualevidence (not bullet lists), and to explain that evidence by fashioning sentences on the spot (butonly after planning and practice). Research shows that presentations with the AE approach lead todeeper understanding of the content not only by the audience [5-7], but also by the speaker [8].Given its advantages, the AE approach is being increasingly introduced to college students throughcommunications courses and organizations such as the Engineering Ambassadors Network [9-10]. This paper is an exploratory study on the experiences of students presenting in post-graduate settings after learning the AE approach. In order to gage the resistance to and potentialof the AE approach in such settings, we surveyed thirty college students and young
, 3) Design slides that increase effectiveness of communication anddelivery of content, 4) Interact in teams to design slides and present topics. Table 1: Weekly Schedule for Technical Communications Course WEEK LECTURES DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT Week 1 Changing the Conversation Journal on Pair up and make 4-5 slides on theme Changing (no guidance) prep 4 min team the Conversation presentation Week 2 Presentation Planning and Rubric PRESENT 1 Presentation Review – Feedback & help on
minority students enrolling and graduating with graduate level de- grees. Dr. Banks also has experience in program evaluation and research involving health disparities and psychosocial issues and is a lecturer in the psychology and interdisciplinary studies program.Ms. Sharon A Stauffer, NC State University Genetic Engineering and Society Center Sharon joined the Genetic Engineering and Society Center in the fall of 2013, at the beginning of its inaugural year. She brings to the Center many years of experience in event planning, office management, project management, and financial management. She is the current project manager on the Centers’ NSF- funded grant titled ”Cultivating Cultures in Ethics STEM:Comparing Meanings
con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark is the Co-Founder and Managing Director of One Page Solutions, a consulting firm that uses the OGSP R process to help technology and branded product clients develop better strategic plans. Mark is a member of The Band of Angels, Silicon Valley’s oldest organization dedicated exclusively to funding seed stage start-ups. In addition, he
pedagogies with more traditional engineering programs such as mining and petroleum engineering; these programs had mutual goals towards improving the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) offerings on campus. • An established campus program offers minors in Engineering for Community Development and Leadership in Social Responsibility • The authors attended a PBL workshop at Worcester Polytechnic Institute where the following interventions could be intensively planned in a supportive and productive environment over 3 days. These efforts led to some of the classroom interventions explained below.MethodsProject-Based Learning was employed in three different classes to help engineering students linktechnical
resources, creating a profile, and registering student teams. Example successful Project Proposals are detailed, and students are asked to complete a resource checklist and then send all proposals to iFixit. 2) Milestone 1: Provides resources for the creation of a Troubleshooting wiki for each device, with planned repair guides linked under appropriate sections. Troubleshooting wikis provide general device information, and require students to research known common repairs as well as anticipate repairs that are likely to be needed due to the normal wear of moving parts and device design choices. 3) Milestone 2: Provides tips for the creation of a Device page that will house all device- related information
[1-8], but also widely viewed as deficient [9]. The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) [4] and National Science Foundation (NSF) [10] have devoted resources andattention to improving the ethics education of students. This includes both microethics, orindividual responsibilities, and macroethics, addressing the “role of engineers in societalimplications about technology” and the broader societal and environmental responsibilities of theprofession [11].Although accreditation requires some degree of ESI education [7,8], the precise nature is notconstrained and seems to be largely at the discretion of individual programs and their faculty.Lattuca and Stark’s Academic Plan Model [12] describes faculty teaching choices. It is similar toother
a license was, “Do you plan to get aconcealed carry license in the future?” Students had the choice to choose from yes, no, andProcedure After recruiting participants, students were given a hard-copy of the survey and consentform. The recruitment script was presented verbally. The survey and consent form were thenadministered and collected. The process for recruiting and completing the survey and consentform lasted approximately 15 minutes. The data was then collected and analyzed using SPSSsoftware.Results Prior to the main analyses, data were screened for systematic patterns of missing data(e.g., when no value was stored for the variable within variable sets) and found that the missingvalues were found to be scattered evenly
. Throughout the evolutionof the interdisciplinary teaching strategies, the authors gained knowledge, experience andconvictions that guided future experimentation. This article aims to share these experiences anddescribe future plans to measure the impact on learning. A subsequent article will discussattempts to measure changes in students’ learning.The theme of the interdisciplinary, experiential learning in the two courses is the societal impactsof new technologies. The courses are elective courses from different departments; Nanoscienceand Nanotechnology, a science elective, and Science Fiction, a general studies elective, areintegrated with three activities focused around this theme. In the nanotechnology course, societalimpacts of nanotechnology