- Conference Session
- Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Board of Directors
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Civil Engineering Course," presented at the ASEE, St. Louis, Missouri, 2000.[10] O. Buzzi, S. Grimes, and A. Rolls, "Writing for the discipline in the discipline?," Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 479-484, 2012.[11] H. Drury, T. Langrish, and P. O Carroll, "Online approach to teaching report writing in chemical engineering: implementation and evaluation," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, p. 858, 2006.[12] F. S. Johnson, C. C. Sun, A. J. Marchese, H. L. Newell, J. L. Schmalzel, R. Harvey, et al., "Improving The Engineering And Writing Interface: An Assessment Of A Team Taught Integrated Course," presented at the ASEE, St. Louis, Missouri, 2000.[13] J. A. Leydens and J
- Conference Session
- Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Hannah Sabo; Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Board of Directors, Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
of thinking that roughly capture patterns in LAs’descriptions and diagnoses of, and imagined responses to, the teamwork troubles: individualaccountability, where the trouble is seen as caused by individual(s) described as “off task” or“checked out” or demonstrating some level of incompetence; delegation of work, where thetrouble was located in the team leader’s inability to delegate tasks effectively to team members,or in the group’s general lack of communication about what tasks need to be completed, whoshould execute the tasks, and what work other groups in the team were doing; and emergentsystems, where trouble was described as a group-level phenomenon emerging from the patternsof interaction amongst group members, contextual features
- Conference Session
- Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
YunJeong Chang, University of Virginia; Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Board of Directors
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
ofVirginia nor the participants.References[1] J. Kabo, X. Tang, D. Nieusma, J. Currie H. Wenlong and C. Baillie, “Visions of SocialCompetence: Comparing Engineering Education Accreditation in Australia, China, Sweden, andthe United States,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, USA, June 10-12, 2012.[2] R. M. Marra, S. M. Kim, C. Plumb, D. J. Hacker and S. Bossaller, “Beyond the Technical:Developing Lifelong Learning and Metacognition for the Engineering Workplace ProfessionalDevelopment and Lifelong Learning” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,OH, USA, June 24-28.[3] P. Strauss and S. Young, “I know the type of people I work well with”: student anxiety inmulticultural group projects,” S. Higher Education
- Conference Session
- Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
- Tagged Topics
-
ASEE Board of Directors
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
. Informal language: contractions (I’ve), wording (a lot) or starting a sentence with and or butThe language of engineering writing is more formal than other types of writing such as fiction. For thatreason, using contractions or beginning a sentence with a conjunction is too informal for most engineeringdocuments.References1. R. House, A. Watt, and J. Williams (2007, June), “Assessing The Impact of Pen Based Computing on Students’ Peer Review Strategies Using the Peer Review Comment Inventory,” 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/2052.2. C. Nicometo, K. Anderson, T. Nathans-Kelly, S. Courter, and T. McGlamery (2010, June), “More Than Just Engineers―How Engineers Define and Value Communication