Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Judy Randi, University of New Haven; Jenna Pack Sheffield, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Paper ID #25301An Exploratory Study of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions about Tech-nical CommunicationDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006

Conference Session

Writing and Communication I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emre Selvi, Jacksonville University; Sandra Soto-Cabán, Muskingum University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

the ones in the past.The indirect assessment was done using course evaluations at the end of the semester. The courseevaluation is a set of eighteen questions that students answer using an agreement scale (5=strongly agree, 4= agree, 3=neutral, 2= disagree, 1= strongly disagree). These questions aregrouped into six categories. Four of the eighteen questions and two of the six categories wereused to assess students’ satisfaction with the course and, specifically, the RGM project. Theresults per year are presented in Table 2. Table 2: Results of the project assessment using mean scores of course evaluations. First Three RGM Question (Q) / Category (C

Conference Session

Social Justice: Pedagogy, Curricular Reform, and Activism

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph Valle, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Israa Ali, University of Michigan ; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Donna M Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Infusing Engineering with Art (and Vice Versa)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David M. Beams P.E., University of Texas - Tyler; Kyle Gullings, University of Texas - Tyler; Catherine Elizabeth Ross Ph.D., University of Texas - Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

opportunity to appreciate art more”Q. To what extent do you see yourself as atypical among your peers?  “Possibly more artistic than peers?”  “There seems to be a new stereotype of engineers—they all play guitars. We don’t fit that stereotype.”  “We may have greater dislike for rote learning—too confining.”Q. How do we re-structure this experiment to draw in more engineering students?  “Form partnerships with arts students; arts students are encouraged to “get out there,” build résumés, and gain exposure through extracurricular activities.”  “Show that we are not expecting symphonies or works at that level. The art we are doing should be good, but not daunting.”  “Other students may have chosen to

Conference Session

Panel Discussion: Global Engineering - What Does That Mean?

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado Boulder; Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder; Aaron Brown, Metropolitan State University of Denver; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California; Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh; John W Via III P.E., Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

’ Global Grand Challenges.The premise of this discussion will be that there is no single definition of “global engineer,” but rather arange of perspectives and methods of facilitating the incorporation of global engineering concepts intoindividual engineers and the engineering academy (and industry) in general.All listed co-authors have agreed to participate in this panel.Suggested Layout of 90-minute Session Brief introductions of panel topic and panelists 5 minutes Overview of Individual Activities Managed by Panelists (7 minutes/person) 35 minutes Brief Q&A session to engage audience and

Conference Session

Professional Formation and Career Experiences

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stephen Campbell Rea, Colorado School of Mines; Kylee Shiekh, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham and B. Newberry, Eds., Cham, Springer, 2015, pp. 203-216.[21] K. Walczak, C. Finelli, M. Holsapple, J. Sutkus, T. Harding and D. Carpenter, “Institutional obstacles to integrating ethics into the curriculum and strategies for overcoming them,” in Proceedings of the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[22] E. Blue, M. Levine and D. Nieusma, Engineering and war: Militarism, ethics, institutions, alternatives, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2014.[23] S. Rea, K. Shiekh, Q. Zhu and D. Nieusma, “Hidden ethics curriculum in the professional formation of engineers: Learning from medical ethics education,” in The 30th Annual Conference of the

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin A. Cech, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from

Conference Session

Teaching Communication II

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nabila A. Bousaba, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; James M. Conrad, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Jean L. Coco, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Mehdi Miri, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Robert W. Cox, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Rethinking Engineering Writing

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

assemble their carand then brainstorm and sketch a work flow diagram for automated assembly of the car. Theinstructor concluded the class with Q & A and a 10-minute freewrite. Phase two consumed oneclass period. The students were directed to complete a rough draft of their reports in-progress bythe start of week three.phase three = (rewrite) + (creative/iterate): This phase involved one class period and twospecial 2-hr office-hour sessions outside of class. The students exchanged report drafts andcritiqued each other’s work. Several emergent issues presented (see next section) and wereresolved in-class during lively Q & A sessions with the instructor and in general class-leveldialogue.phase four = (edit) + (perfect): During the final phase

Conference Session

Ethical and Global Concerns

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth A. Reddy, Colorado School of Mines; Stephen Campbell Rea, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[13] D. Milesko-Pytel, “With a dose of morality,” American Education, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 31-36, 1979.[14] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, Purdue: Purdue UniversityPress, 2015.[15] Q. Zhu, “Toward a globalized engineering education: Comparing dominant images ofengineering education in the United States and China,” presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[16] Infusing Ethics Selection Committee, Infusing Ethics into the Development of Engineers:Exemplary Education Activities and Programs, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press,2016.[17] K. Riley, M. Davis, A. C. Jackson, and J. Maciukenas, “‘Ethics in the details

Conference Session

Ethics, Mindfulness, and Reform During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexis Powe Nordin, Mississippi State University; Amy K. Barton, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

where needed during your presentation. ● Engage the class in discussion throughout your presentation by asking open-ended questions or soliciting comments. Consider the types of questions that will promote an interesting discussion (opinion questions, hypothetical questions, questions about how your classmates might react in a given situation, and so forth). Also think about asking follow-up questions if you want to advance a particular point. However, always be keenly aware of the clock and curtail class discussion when necessary to stay within your time limit. After your presentation, we will reserve 5 minutes for audience Q & A.APPENDIX B. Course resource (engineering codes of ethics quick links provided

Conference Session

Engineering Communication II: Curricular Practices, Integrations, and Collaborations

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kali Lynn Morgan, Georgia Institute of Technology; Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Janece Shaffer, StoryReady LLC; Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

development of autobiographical memory,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, pp. 499-523, 1997.12. D. B. Pillemer, Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.13. M. C. Green & T. C. Brock, “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 701-721, 2000.14. Q. Wang, Q. Song, & J. B. K. Koh, “Culture, Memory, and Narrative Self-Making,” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 199-223.15. H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen, “Determinants and mechanism in ego identity development: A review and synthesis,” Developmental Review, vol. 21, pp. 39-66, 2001.16. A. Thorne, “Culture and cognitive development

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

.[13] J. Cha and Y. He, Zhongguo gongcheng jiaoyu gaige san da zhanlue (Three Straetgies in Chinese Engineering Education Reform), Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2009.[14] Q. Gu, "The work, lives and professional development of teachers in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 235-238, 2013.[15] Y. Wei, "Yingjie jiaoyu yanjiu de xin fanshi: Shenjing jiaoyuxue [Embracing a new paradigm for educational research: Neuroeducation]," 19 December 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cae.cn/cae/html/main/col35/2012-12/27/20121227152437045647584_1.html. [Accessed 4 February 2019].[16] D. Starr, "China and the Confucian education model," Universitas, vol. 21, pp. 1-27, 2012.[17] R. L

Conference Session

Ethical Awareness and Social Responsibility in a Corporate/Team Context

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Battalora and B.A. Teschner, “Industry–University Partnerships: Engineering Education and Corporate Social Responsibility,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, p. 04018002, Jul. 2018.[10] E. Conlon and H. Zandvoort, “Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217–232, Jun. 2011.[11] C. Mitcham, “A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use and convenience to policy engagement,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–53, Mar. 2009.[12] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment

Conference Session

Writing and Communication I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Pulford, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

this work suggestthat, contrary to common perception of engineering students, these students in aggregatereadily identified their writing courses as equally useful to their non-writing courses.However, these students were significantly less interested in their writing courses’ contentthan that of other concurrent engineering classes. We conclude by providing actionableinsights for educators that are suggested by our data. Q: Imagine that you are the instructor of an engineering writing class. What would you do to ensure that students stayed interested and motivated to learn? A: Ha! Good one. Honestly, I'm glad that's really not my problem, 'cause I have no clue. Best of luck with that, though. –Participant ID

Conference Session

Why Industry Says that our Engineering Students Cannot Write

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Duncan, Valparaiso University; Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso University; Jeffrey Will, Valparaiso University; Peter E. Johnson, Valparaiso University; Shahin S. Nudehi, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Mechanical Engineering

. equally. Page 22.1135.14 Answers questions, Cannot answer Far exceeds Q&A but behaves improperly Meets expectations questions expectations during Q & A session D = 24 - 27 C = 28 - 31 B = 32 - 35 A = 36

Conference Session

Linking Engineering and Liberal Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gayle E. Ermer, Calvin College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. It is hoped that aconsideration of the kinds of complexity described in this paper with provide reasons to integratethis practice into student experiences while they are in school.i Shannon Flumerfelt, Gary Halada, and Franz-Josef Kahlen, “Complexity By Design.” Mechanical Engineering,134 (2012): 28-33.ii Louis J. Thibodeaux, Kalliat T. Valsaraj, Vijay T. John, “Marine Oil Fate: Knowledge Gaps, Basic Research, andDevelopment Needs; A Perspective Based on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill,” Environmental EngineeringScience 28:2 (2011) 87-93.iii Oxford Dictionary on-line: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/complex?q=complex

Conference Session

Learning Outcomes and Pedagogical Strategies: Problems of Alignment

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Melnyk, United States Military Academy; Brian J. Novoselich, United States Military Academy; Gregory Martin Freisinger, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, “Andragogy in Practice: Clarifying the Andragogical Model of Adult Learning,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 118– 143, 2001.

Conference Session

Design, Assessment, and Redesign of Writing Instruction for Engineers

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Livingston, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sarah Summers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Mary Jane Szabo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

brought many of my online activities--like demonstrating tostudents how I would research a company--into my face-to-face course. More broadly, I’ve usedmy LMS page to be more transparent about course and assignment-level goals and objectives. Inan online course, it’s important to present those clearly to students in each unit to promote theself-regulation and reflection. I often discuss those objectives in my face-to-face course, but I’vebeen more intentional about using the LMS to highlight them. Similarly, I (Prof. Livingston) have incorporated several elements into my face-to-faceclasses, such as weekly checklists and Q & A discussion forums. I use the discussion forums tohave students apply course concepts which both prepares them

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

., 2014.[9] B. D. Davis and R. H. Krapels, “Designation of ‘Communication Skills’ in Position Listings,” Bus. Commun. Q., 66(2), pp. 90–96, 2003.[10] L. Kohn, “How Professional Writing Pedagogy and University-Workplace Partnerships Can Shape the Mentoring of Workplace Writing,” J. Tech. Writ. Commun., 45(2), pp. 166–188, 2015.[11] C. M. Allwood and T. Kalén, “Evaluating and Improving the Usability of a User Manual,” Behav. Inf. Technol., 16(1), pp. 43–57, 1997.[12] iFixit, retrieved from www.ifixit.com.[13] iFixit EDU, retrieved from https://edu.ifixit.com/student-roadmap.[14] S. Nelson and B. McCrigler. (2014). A service-learning collaborative project in a mechanical engineering technical writing class. Proceedings of the 2014

Conference Session

Institutional Perspectives and Boundary Work

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Valerie C. Lundy-Wagner, New York University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 101–125.13. Ishitani, T. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861–885.14. National Center for Education Statistics (2012). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Washington, DC.15. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.16. Geiger, R. L., & Heller, D. E. (2011). Financial Trends in Higher Education: The United States. Working Paper.17. Alexitch, L. R. (2006). Help seeking and the role of academic advising in higher education. Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups, and contexts, 175

Conference Session

Institutional Perspectives and Boundary Work

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University; Tyler J Hertenstein, Ohio Northern University; Graham Talmadge Fennell, Ohio Northern University; Elizabeth Marie Spingola, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Annual Conference Proceedings (ERM Division), June 2010.[9] Jin, Q., P.K. Imbrie, J.J. Lin, & X. Chen, 2011. “A multi-outcome hybrid model for predicting student success in engineering”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings (ERM Division), June 2011.[10] American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 2009. Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Phase 1 report, National Science Foundation. Page 23.238.9[11] Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.[12] Hackett, G., N.E. Betz, J.M. Casas

Conference Session

Communication: From Pecha Kucha to Bullets

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Soto-Caban, Muskingum University; Emre Selvi, Muskingum University; Ferdinand Avila-Medina, Ohio State University, Newark

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

assessment of the presentations. The rubric used in theElectromagnetics course is included in Appendix B. A similar one was used in the Statics andDynamics course. The presentations were graded using the following criteria: • Organization • Grammar • Content • Eye contact • Creativity • Audience interaction, Q&A • Presentation style • Audience response • Use of language: word choice, voice • Length of presentationThis rubric is similar to the rubric used to assess traditional style presentations, except in thepresentation style criterion that was added to

Conference Session

Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom A. Eppes, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Frederick Sweitzer, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

documents seemed veryuseful to evaluate any of the 3 skill areas for a pilot. However, an interesting idea surfacedregarding the team status meetings with the instructor in which an interview Q&A style could beused to gather sufficient evidence.A pilot was conducted in spring 2010 involving the capstone for Electrical Engineering as wellas Computer Engineering majors. The face-to-face meetings with the teams provided anexcellent opportunity to evaluate the skill levels. The instructor reported that each teamemployed all 3 skills at one or more point(s) during the semester. The results are shown in Table5 for all 6 teams. Good performance was observed in 2-3 teams for each skill; however, the bestteams were not always the same. No team

Conference Session

Socially Responsible Engineering I: Context, Innovation, and Reflection

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia; Rachel Sinclair, University of Virginia; Araba Dennis, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E

Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cijy Elizabeth Sunny, Baylor University; Kathleen Koenig, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Minoritization Processes and Critical Responses

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University; Rod D. Roscoe, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Suren Jayasuriya, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Design, Assessment, and Redesign of Writing Instruction for Engineers

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Y. Yoritomo, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Turnipseed, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; S. Lance Cooper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Celia Mathews Elliott, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; John R. Gallagher, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; John S. Popovics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Paul Prior, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Julie L Zilles, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Ekoniak, Virginia Tech; Molly Scanlon, Virginia Tech; M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. IEEE Trans., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999.[19] R. Straub and R. Lunsford, 12 Readers Reading: Responding to College Student Writing. 1996.[20] S. Smith Taylor, “‘I Really Don’t Know What He Meant by That’: How Well Do Engineering Students Understand Teachers’ Comments on Their Writing?,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 139–166, Mar. Page 26.1482.20 2011.[21] S. Smith, “What is ‘Good’Technical Communication? A Comparison of the Standards of Writing and Engineering Instructors,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–24, Jan. 2003.[22] S. Smith Taylor and M. D. Patton, “Ten Engineers Reading

Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angelina Nicole Rivera, Colorado School of Mines; Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Robin Bullock, Colorado School of Mines; Thomas J. Phelan, United States Air Force Academy; Kathleen M. Smits, The University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

insophistication of stakeholders also results in higher confidence. 13Bibliography[1] T. D. Sadler, “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–42, 2009.[2] A. Johri and B. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J Eng Educ, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011.[3] B. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global Engineering Competency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.[4] G. Downey, “Are Engineers Losing Control of Technology