Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from
development of autobiographical memory,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, pp. 499-523, 1997.12. D. B. Pillemer, Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.13. M. C. Green & T. C. Brock, “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 701-721, 2000.14. Q. Wang, Q. Song, & J. B. K. Koh, “Culture, Memory, and Narrative Self-Making,” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 199-223.15. H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen, “Determinants and mechanism in ego identity development: A review and synthesis,” Developmental Review, vol. 21, pp. 39-66, 2001.16. A. Thorne, “Culture and cognitive development
.[13] J. Cha and Y. He, Zhongguo gongcheng jiaoyu gaige san da zhanlue (Three Straetgies in Chinese Engineering Education Reform), Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2009.[14] Q. Gu, "The work, lives and professional development of teachers in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 235-238, 2013.[15] Y. Wei, "Yingjie jiaoyu yanjiu de xin fanshi: Shenjing jiaoyuxue [Embracing a new paradigm for educational research: Neuroeducation]," 19 December 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cae.cn/cae/html/main/col35/2012-12/27/20121227152437045647584_1.html. [Accessed 4 February 2019].[16] D. Starr, "China and the Confucian education model," Universitas, vol. 21, pp. 1-27, 2012.[17] R. L
. Battalora and B.A. Teschner, “Industry–University Partnerships: Engineering Education and Corporate Social Responsibility,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, p. 04018002, Jul. 2018.[10] E. Conlon and H. Zandvoort, “Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217–232, Jun. 2011.[11] C. Mitcham, “A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use and convenience to policy engagement,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–53, Mar. 2009.[12] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek, “A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment
brought many of my online activities--like demonstrating tostudents how I would research a company--into my face-to-face course. More broadly, I’ve usedmy LMS page to be more transparent about course and assignment-level goals and objectives. Inan online course, it’s important to present those clearly to students in each unit to promote theself-regulation and reflection. I often discuss those objectives in my face-to-face course, but I’vebeen more intentional about using the LMS to highlight them. Similarly, I (Prof. Livingston) have incorporated several elements into my face-to-faceclasses, such as weekly checklists and Q & A discussion forums. I use the discussion forums tohave students apply course concepts which both prepares them
look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
, doi: 10.1177/0146167203261885.[2] I. H. Settles, R. C. O’Connor, and S. C. Y. Yap, “Climate Perceptions and Identity Interference Among Undergraduate Women in STEM: The Protective Role of Gender Identity,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 488–503, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0361684316655806.[3] W. J. Schell, B. E. Hughes, and B. Tallman, “Exploring the Conflict Between an Engineering Identity and Leadership,” Dec. 2018, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.13100.[4] B. Tedlock, “Braiding narrative ethnography with memoir and creative nonfiction,” in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (Kindle edition), 4th ed., N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2011.[5] T
toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 38–70, Jan. 2004.[40] G. Geneva, Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. Teachers College, 2000.[41] S. Guzey, T. Moore, and G. Roehrig, “Bridge design on the reservation: A study of curriculum implementation with American Indian youth,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2009.[42] S. S. Jordan, “CAREER : Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture , Community , and Society,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2014.[43] S. S. Jordan et al., “Culturally-Relevant Engineering Design Curriculum for the Navajo Nation,” in ASEE Annual
provides insight to the up and coming technology. Ms. Monereau, presently is an active member of the Associated General Contractors (AGC), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Through her tenure within these organizations she has served on the Board of Directors for NSBE, and multiple leadership roles throughout her undergraduate career with AGC and ASME. For more insight into her research, review her paper: Reality in the Nuclear Industry: Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual (https://peer.asee.org/?q=monereau).Dr. Makita R. PhillipsMs. Arielle M. Benjamin
design for innovative concept generation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(5).24. Fila, N. D., Hess, J. L., Dringenberg, E., & Purzer, Ş. (in press). Exploring the role of empathy in a decontextualized engineering design task. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2).25. Postma, C. E., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E., & Du, J. (2012). Challenges of doing empathic design: Experiences from industry. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 59-70.26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.27. Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism
Brain Break 2:05 pm - 3:00 pm Forum and Panel Discussions Figure 3. Representative Camp ScheduleThe following on-line platforms and tools were utilized as a method to support campassignments and deliver daily instruction:Webex – Webex is an on-line platform, utilized by our university, to host real-time, virtualmeetings and large-scale virtual events. Webex Events, a tool offered by Webex, provides accessto features such as web-polling, Q&A, and chat. By utilizing WebEx Events our students wereable to participate in fun and interactive polling, post questions to instructors, as well as chatwith participants.Canvas – Canvas is an on-line course management system, utilized by our University Professors,to
Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, Psychology Press, 2004.[36] D. Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Fem. Stud., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 575–599, 1988, doi: 10.2307/3178066.[37] J. W. Malazita and K. Resetar, “Infrastructures of abstraction: how computer science education produces anti-political subjects,” Digit. Creat., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 300–312, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14626268.2019.1682616.[38] L. Nakamura, “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronic Manufacture,” Am. Q., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 919–941, 2014.[39] L. T. Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed
of engineering education. In G. L. Downey & K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA.: Morgan and Claypool.Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Hompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), Article 1, 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1Knight, D., & Sullivan, J., & Louie, B. (2007, June), Expanding Understanding of First Year Engineering Student Retention and Team Effectiveness Through Social Styles Assessment Paper presented at 2007 Annual
semester.Following examination of student responses to the sociotechnical thinking survey, only certainquestions pointed towards potential delineations in responses based on gender. The fullsociotechnical thinking survey is attached in Appendix B. Questions (Q) that showed gender-based differences and were thus most relevant to our research questions in this paper include Q1, 7Q2, Q4, Q9, and Q10. Additional quantitative and qualitative results from this survey that are notspecific to gender differentiation appear in [35].Q1, Q2, and Q4 were analyzed by scaling student responses. Most questions allowed for fourdifferent responses, which were assigned a value of