Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin A. Cech, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Satisfaction Measures:question was missing). (m) Personal satisfaction from work (n) Satisfaction with quality of work unitSurvey respondents were asked “do you consider (o) Satisfaction with working conditionsyourself to be one or more of the following,” with (p) Employee empowermentthe following response categories offered: (q) Co-workers cooperation“Heterosexual or Straight,” “Gay, Lesbian, (r) Satisfaction with procedures (s) Overall job satisfactionBisexual, or Transgender,” or “Prefer not to say.”Respondents who answered “prefer not to say” were excluded from

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I: Communication in Engineering Disciplines

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Ekoniak, Virginia Tech; Molly Scanlon, Virginia Tech; M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. IEEE Trans., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999.[19] R. Straub and R. Lunsford, 12 Readers Reading: Responding to College Student Writing. 1996.[20] S. Smith Taylor, “‘I Really Don’t Know What He Meant by That’: How Well Do Engineering Students Understand Teachers’ Comments on Their Writing?,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 139–166, Mar. Page 26.1482.20 2011.[21] S. Smith, “What is ‘Good’Technical Communication? A Comparison of the Standards of Writing and Engineering Instructors,” Tech. Commun. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–24, Jan. 2003.[22] S. Smith Taylor and M. D. Patton, “Ten Engineers Reading