- Conference Session
- Design and Making
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
/10.18260/p.25671McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology & EducationQuarterly, 26(3), 324-348.Mihelcic, J. R., Paterson, K. G., Phillips, L. D., Zhang, Q., Watkins, D. W., Barkdoll, B. D.,Fuchs, V. J., Fry, L. M., & Hokanson, D. R. (2008). Educating engineers in the sustainablefutures model with a global perspective. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 25(4),255-263.Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how thesociology of. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociologyand history of technology, 17.Ramírez, M. C., Bengo, I., Mereu, R., & Silva, J. C. (2011). Participative methodology for
- Conference Session
- Innovation and Reflection
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Kirsten A. Davis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ramon Benitez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
the team presentations, theinstructors controlled the Q&A sessions. Since they were in the front and facing the front, theyoften did not notice when people in the audience had their hands raised, which resulted in eitherthe question being ignored or forcing the presenting team to be brave enough to override theinstructors and call on audience members to ask their questions. This act, through a learningpartnership lens, is tantamount to taking the floor from an authority figure. In the course thishierarchical structure may have led to tighter teams in which students learned to self-author andindependently collaborate. However, this hierarchical obstacle also may have restricted theamount of co-learning that can happen between the different
- Conference Session
- Writing and Communication
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Katie Snyder, University of Michigan
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
creative solutions, but the rubrics didn’t encourage orvalue that creativity.Students were focused on points instead of learningAnalytic rubrics can lead students to focus more on their targeted score or grade and less onwhether their product is an effective example of what they were expected to produce (Panadero& Jonsson, 2013). It’s not surprising that our students are focused on their grades or that theycare about how their score on a particular assignment could have been higher; however, theassociation of points with the specific categories on the analytic rubric (e.g., 5pts for includingcenter of buoyancy and center of gravity calculations; 10pts for performance during the Q&A)seemed to lead students to focus too intently on the
- Conference Session
- Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: The Role of Engineering Education towards Attaining UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David Zelinka, University of Colorado, Boulder; Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Divisions
-
Civil Engineering, Community Engagement Division, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering
-44 0.000 Figure 4. Values of influence, Figure 3. SDGs influence (I) vs. dependence (D) diagram dependence, influence ratio, net influence, and priority index Figure 2 shows that the double causality table has a total of Q = n2 – n = 272 interactionswhere n = 17 (number of SDGs). The diagonal terms are assumed to be 0 since they represent agoal influencing itself, which mathematically
- Conference Session
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
some interesting questions, and poses another potentialfactor to be considered in student retention.References1. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2008. Grand Challenges for Engineering. National Academies Press, Washington DC. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/File.aspx?id=11574&v=ba24e2ed Accessed Jan. 31, 2017.2. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press. Washington DC.3. Mihelcic, J.R., C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q. Zhang, R.W. Schweitzer, S.M. Oakley, E.C. Wells, L.M. Whiteford. 2017. The Grandest Challenge of All: The Role of Environmental Engineering to Achieve Sustainability in the World’s Developing
- Conference Session
- Flexible Engineering Curricula
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Leland Giovannelli, University of Colorado, Boulder; Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
of engineering education. In G. L. Downey & K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA.: Morgan and Claypool.Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Hompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), Article 1, 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1Knight, D., & Sullivan, J., & Louie, B. (2007, June), Expanding Understanding of First Year Engineering Student Retention and Team Effectiveness Through Social Styles Assessment Paper presented at 2007 Annual
- Conference Session
- Social Justice, Social Responsibility, and Critical Pedagogies
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech; Nathan E. Canney, Seattle University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society