- Conference Session
- Global Roles and Societal Responsibilities of Engineers
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
YiXiang Shawn Sun, National Taiwan University; Sharon Tsai-hsuan Ku, University of Virginia; Jongmin Lee, University of Science and Technology; Sean Michael Ferguson, CSUCI
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
. Comparative case studies and analyses were introduced with breakout room discussion to help students comprehend the interplay among science, technology and the2Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world formation of world communities in various socio-political contexts.2. Prompt-based Interview: Students conducted three sets of prompt-based interviews with their global partners through which to exchange learning outcomes and detect biases and stereotypes in cross-cultural communication.3. PECE Digital Infrastructure for collaborative homework and research data curation: The digital archival platform PECE (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography) was implemented in this course to facilitate epistemic
- Conference Session
- Sociotechnical Systems in Practice
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nandini Sharma, The University of Texas at Austin; Jeffrey W. Treem, University of Texas at Austin; Megan Kenny Feister, CSUCI
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
was independent, their research goals were largely personal, that they most often workedalone, and they were not reliant on others especially when they had a good sense of their tasks.Commenting on the extent to which their work was interdependent, a graduate student workingin lab A acknowledged collaborating on experiments with outside members but also consideredtheir work as being primarily independent. Another graduate student from the same lab agreedwith this perspective and explicitly disputed the suggestion that work was collaborative. A postdoctoral associate who had been with the lab for upwards of 10 yearsacknowledged that lab members collectively valued independence in other lab members and thatthis was one of the goals of the
- Conference Session
- AI and Tools for Transdisciplinary Work
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Tammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship; Leslie Salgado, University of Calgary; Sreyoshi Bhaduri, ThatStatsGirl; Victoria Kuketz, Catalyst ; Solenne Savoia, Mila-Quebec AI Institute; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
event a success. Many havecontinued to create additional opportunities for education, public dialogue, and impact in their respectiveenvironments. Considering these indications that the program was a success, this study’s research objectives aremeant to draw from that collective experience and provide insight for engineering educators designing similar skill-sharing events between engineers and students and professionals from other disciplines, especially those stemmingfrom a specific need to take a multi-sectoral approach. With that in mind, this study of that program, as well asreflections on this interdisciplinary collaboration and measures of the program’s impacts, was a valuable opportunityto examine our research questions and derive
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LIBED) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Johanna Bodenhamer, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis ; Robert Weissbach, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Ruth Camille Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Corinne C. Renguette, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Annwesa Dasgupta; Immanuel Edinbarough P.E., The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
engineeringtechnology students’ written communication skills at these participating campuses, it haspotential use for other institutions to positively impact their students’ written communication.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2013467, 2013496, and 2013541.IntroductionCommunicating content knowledge effectively in oral and written formats is important forengineering and engineering technology students. Additionally, it is essential for the ABET-accredited programs from which they graduate to ensure that students hone and demonstratethese skills [1]. Anecdotal observations by engineering and engineering technology instructorsand prior research have shown that this is not the outcome observed by
- Conference Session
- Sociotechnical Integration and Programmatic Reform
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Xueni Fan, Texas Tech University; Joshua M. Cruz, Texas Tech University; John Carrell, Texas Tech University; Michael Scott Laver, Rochester Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Paper ID #42737Navigating Epistemological Borders: Considerations for Team Teaching atthe Intersection of Humanities and STEMXueni Fan, Texas Tech University Xueni Fan is currently a graduate student in the Doctor of Education program, specializing in instructional technology at Texas Tech University. Holding a Master’s degree in applied linguistics, Fan’s research focuses on qualitative research methods, interdisciplinary studies, online learner engagement, and interprofessional education in the medical field.Dr. Joshua M. Cruz, Texas Tech University Joshua Cruz is an assistant professor of education at Texas Tech
- Conference Session
- Sociotechnical Integration and Programmatic Reform
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park; Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park; Christin J. Salley, University of Michigan
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
to engineering. In recent years, some scholars have proposed ways toovercome this disengagement, for example Jon Leydens and Juan Lucena’s (2018) “Engineeringfor Social Justice Criteria.” However, little research has been conducted to trace how engineeringstudents are taking up these programs.This paper builds on an NSF-funded ethnographic study of cultural practices in a Science,Technology, and Society (STS) program that serves 1st and 2nd year engineering students [6, 22-23]. That research study sought to answer: How does this program cultivate engineering students'macro-ethical reasoning about science and technology? Radoff and colleagues [6] identified foursalient ways that students described the cultural practices of the STS program: 1
- Conference Session
- Wellness, Readiness, and Thriving
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Rachel Eve Gail Swan, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Bryan Watson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Paper ID #42551An Ecosystem Analysis of Engineering Thriving with Emergent Properties atthe Micro, Meso, and Macro LevelsDr. Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Julianna Gesun, Ph.D., is currently a postdoctoral research scholar at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Her research broadly focuses on understanding and supporting the process by which engineering programs facilitate the environments for students to develop optimal functioning in undergraduate engineering programs. Her research interests intersect the fields of positive psychology, engineering education, and human development to understand
- Conference Session
- Global Roles and Societal Responsibilities of Engineers
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Mateo F. Rojas, Colorado School of Mines; Sofia Lara Schlezak, Colorado School of Mines; Emma Chapman, Colorado School of Mines
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
students the “whys” and “hows” of the communities they want to serve. Theseexplorations lead graduate students in our Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES)Program to crave for understanding complex relationships among knowledge, power,technology, and society, domains that, thus far, they have learned to see as separate in largepart due to effects of mindsets and ideologies in engineering education and how these shapethe organization of curricula. For example, many students beginning to work on engineering forcommunity development (ECD) crave understanding of how knowledges and technologies canbe transferred across different places to be used by communities addressing a similar problemto gain power in front of more powerful actors (e.g., how
- Conference Session
- Stories, Communication, and Convergence in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Rider W. Foley, California State University, Channel Islands; Andrew Li; Rebecca Jun, University of Virginia
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
and non-technical dimensions of engineering and transformingengineering education so that it more effectively prepares graduates for workplace success.Previous research suggested that interest in “Engineering and …” permeates ASEE and isconcentrated in but not limited to the division most closely associated with the topic. This paperdescribes a transferable method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods to identifyareas of convergence using papers published in the Leadership Development (LEAD) and theEngineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENT) as evidence. These areas of convergenceare: (1) program design and effectiveness, (2) individual capabilities (including traits andthinking tools), (3) teams and groups, and (4