- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 9: Collaboration and Community
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology; Morgan L Hooper, University of Toronto; Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California; Maria Jose Azcona Baez, California Institute of Technology; Meredith Hooper, California Institute of Technology; Matthew Alexander Langley; Nina Mohebbi, California Institute of Technology; Micah Kalaihi Kushi Nishimoto, California Institute of Technology; Kay T Xia, California Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
-held assumptions and encouragedme to approach advocacy with renewed clarity and optimism.”Conclusions: Impacts of the Pilot CourseSociotechnical thinking, identity development, and building confidenceAt its core, the Pilot Course discussed throughout this work was meant to create a curricular spacewhere social and community-centered concerns held by students could be validated, discussed,and approached using tools that are less commonly taught in engineering curricula. Facilitatorscaptured this aspect of the course through its learning outcomes, in particular: “By participating,students will articulate their scientific and/or engineering identity and how it relates to criticalconsciousness and their unique potential to shape the world.”While
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 4: Sociotechnical Integration
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley; Lisa Yan, University of California, Berkeley; Ari Edmundson, University of California, Berkeley; Alexander Strang, University of California, Berkeley
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
Paper ID #49216Sociotechnical integration in data science educationProf. Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley Cathryn Carson is an STS scholar and a historian of science and technology who has been active in interdisciplinary collaborations in undergraduate and graduate education, including nuclear engineering and data science. Ari Edmundson is an STS scholar and intellectual historian who has collaboratively developed integrated course materials and dedicated courses to embed critical thinking about human contexts and ethics in data science curricula. Ramesh Sridharan is a computer scientist
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 2: Identity, Professionalization, and Belonging I
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Junko Munakata Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Jeffrey C Shragge, Colorado School of Mines; Jonah Klemm-Toole, Colorado School of Mines
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
, “So Iguess, thinking about my place in engineering, I was always thinking about more of the technicalapproach of engineering application. But through my [graduate] experience… I’ve realized thatthere is this gap in understanding engineering application and communication, and there’s amissing piece… let’s bring trust back into engineering and application by using these themes of[humanitarian engineering and science].”We also tracked the evolution of STEM identity using the survey. The survey follows [9], [29] intheorizing STEM role identity as a combination of recognition as a scientist or engineer (bothinternal – “I see myself as a scientist/engineer” – and external – “Others see me as ascientist/engineer”); interest in science or engineering
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 4: Sociotechnical Integration
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
contributed tothe formation of social structures and early technologies, particularly during pivotal periods inhuman history beginning around 50000 years ago [7]. These values continue to inform the designethics of many Indigenous cultures—from North America to the Brazilian Amazon toAustralia—whose communities have long practiced sustainable living through technologiesgrounded in reciprocity, relationality, and respect for the natural world [8], [9].While this paper focuses on Western engineering education in the United States (U.S.), itacknowledges these longstanding design traditions and recognizes U.S. engineering programsthat incorporate humanitarian or human-centered approaches. Building on these diverse legacies,it suggests a shift away from
- Conference Session
- Wellness, Readiness, and Thriving
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vanessa Tran, Utah State University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
aimed at promoting student narratives through audio-based methods.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition Services at Utah State University. Her research centers the intersection identity formation, engineering culture, and disability studies. Her work has received several awards including best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education and the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech as well as M.S. and B.S. degrees in civil engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and
- Conference Session
- Interdisciplinary Integration at the Course Level
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin; Ramakrishna Sai Annaluru, University of Texas, Austin; Christine Julien, University of Texas, Austin; Pedro Enrique Santacruz, University of Texas, Austin
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
students from underrepresentedpopulations face in engineering learning spaces. Having these discussions during lecture or in thecontext of the course can also address the issue of stereotype threat [4] faced by certain culturalstudent groups, which is known to impact student success. Further, intentionally incorporatingthese exercises into the course design communicates to students a strong desire to create aninclusive learning environment. Walden et al. recommended based on research that for creatingan inclusive atmosphere for diversity and equity within engineering education, it is important tohave a positive academic culture for people from excluded identity groups [5]. Additionally,diversity, equity and inclusion within engineering education
- Conference Session
- Equity and Belonging
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Felicity Bilow, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lucas Adams, Clarkson University; Mohammad Meysami, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
structure previously determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysisrevealed five latent variables that align with a framework proposed by Fila et al. [1] for teachingengineering within a humanistic lens to help students develop a sense of belonging and theirengineering identity. Our SEM analysis showed that for all students, academic self-confidenceand self-efficacy and a broad understanding of engineering both have a significant positiveinfluence on their sense of belonging, which in turn has a significant influence on their attitudestoward persisting and succeeding in engineering. Appreciating the importance of non-technicalskills in engineering had no significant influence on most students’ sense of belonging with theexception