teaches advanced undergraduate laboratory courses and manages the senior capstone program in the Micron School. He ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Building a Communication-Integrated Curriculum in Materials ScienceAbstractWith the need to meet ABET outcomes around professional skills, such as communication andteamwork, engineering programs have long explored approaches to ensure their graduates areable to participate in the workplace in ways that employers demand. While approaches vary andsuccess depends on a number of factors, research demonstrates that an integrated approach toprofessional skill development is the most impactful for student learning. How can anengineering program build an
, veneration of engineering’s “hardness” persists, including as symbolically yetpotently represented through the endurance of weed-out culture. At our institution, discoursearound engineering’s inherent difficulty, a celebration of our students’ “grit” in the face ofacademic adversity, and a hazing-like narrative around student “suffering” all endure despiteextensive, systematic attention to student mental health and the importance of “work-lifebalance” across the university community. Research indicates that emotionally unsafeenvironments lead to stress, lower attendance at school, and less engagement in learning,whereas emotionally safe environments are related to more positive identity development, betterlearning experiences, and greater feelings
research. In our classes,they learn how to apply the socially responsible engineering (SRE) framework, whichemphasizes “contextual listening” [63] and identification of opportunities to create value withstakeholders so they can empathically engage communities before, during and after their fieldresearch [64]. Through specific coursework assignments, they explore and reflect with otherson the reasons for being in HES and for wanting to do sustainable community development, toexplore the constraints, opportunities, and pathways placed in front of them by the histories oftheir families, of engineering, of development, and by the multiple dimensions of their identity(gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, etc.). Then
Paper ID #39174Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Mi-norsProf. MC Forelle, University of Virginia MC Forelle is an assistant professor, teaching track, in Engineering & Society at the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. Their work examines the intersection of law, technology, and culture, with particular interests in materiality, sustainability, and practices of resistance and change. Currently, they are developing a a book project that studies the technological challenges faced by users, tinkerers, and repair communities working to repair, maintain, and
-world engineering problems rarely have such tidyformulations, so to conflate this type of solution generation with a core identity as expert“problem solver” is analytically clumsy if not presumptuous. It also radically collapsesengineers’ imagination for the breadth and complexity of most problems worth solving and thecontextual sophistication needed to effectively navigate most real-world problems.To explore how engineering education can engage more holistic and complex problems byelevating problem framing as a precursor skillset to problem solving, we review a variety ofprovocations based on our experience in program and curriculum building throughsociotechnical integration in multiple academic initiatives within the Engineering, Design
the perspective of work asactivity systems and framed this study based on Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT),which has been recognized as a robust and holistic theory for the study of work and technology[8], [9], [10]. It is through activities that we create, innovate, and accomplish our goals in work.Also, through activities we develop and maintain our organizations, systems, communities, andsocieties [8].Many studies of technology and work have focused on novel contexts of work, such asinnovation and disruption [6], [11]. Against this trend in work studies, Russell and Vinsel [12]advocated for more attention to the workers and work in routine maintenance jobs that are farmore prevalent in societies around the world. They claimed
students from underrepresentedpopulations face in engineering learning spaces. Having these discussions during lecture or in thecontext of the course can also address the issue of stereotype threat [4] faced by certain culturalstudent groups, which is known to impact student success. Further, intentionally incorporatingthese exercises into the course design communicates to students a strong desire to create aninclusive learning environment. Walden et al. recommended based on research that for creatingan inclusive atmosphere for diversity and equity within engineering education, it is important tohave a positive academic culture for people from excluded identity groups [5]. Additionally,diversity, equity and inclusion within engineering education
Paper ID #37665’It Gives Me a Bit of Anxiety’: Civil and Architectural EngineeringStudents’ Emotions Related to Their Future Responsibility as EngineersDr. Madeline Polmear, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Madeline Polmear is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie, EUTOPIA Science & Innovation Cofund Fellow at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelors in environmental engineering, Masters in civil engineering, and PhD in civil
development of “trading zones” between Faculty Fellowsin different disciplines. Even by analyzing just pre-activity interviews with Faculty Fellows andfinal interviews with Student Fellows, we can build insights related to this engineering-focusedcontext which frames conditions for both the interdisciplinarity pedagogy and the studentengagement that we are working to foster. Our findings illustrate that both interdisciplinarity andengagement are limited by the institutional context of engineering education, while alsorevealing how this kind of work can help students reflect on the limits of a traditionalengineering education and consider their own ability to advocate for change.Interdisciplinary Trading Zones In and Through PedagogyOur CREATE/STS
still perhaps not a “hottopic” in engineering education, its developing prominence in the conversation [8].We feel the most useful way to think about discourse is through the way Gee [9] describes small-d discourse and big-D Discourse. Small-d discourse is simply the features of a language,including the way it is spoken or written, whereas big-D Discourse is “the ways in which peopleenact and recognize socially and historically significant identities or ‘kinds of people’ throughwell-integrated combinations of language, actions, interactions, objects, tools, technologies,beliefs, and values” (p. 418). By examining how people use language (little discourse), we candetermine how they align themselves with different social groups (big Discourse