Paper ID #37690Shaping the macro-ethical reasoning of engineers through deliberatecultural practicesDr. Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland College Park Jennifer Radoff is an assistant research professor at the University of Maryland in College Park. She stud- ies teaching and learning in K-16 STEM, with a focus on political, ideological, and axiological dimensions of learning. She also supports educators as they work to create more equitable learning environments for students.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics
Paper ID #39840Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethicalEngineering PracticeDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that analyze social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethical Engineering PracticeAbstractMary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is widely regarded as a foundational work of
Paper ID #38037The Amazon Effect: A Case Study of Corporate Influence on StudentMacro-Ethical ReasoningDr. Fatima Naeem Abdurrahman, University of Maryland, College Park After completing undergraduate degrees in Physics, Astronomy, and Middle Eastern Studies at the Univer- sity of Maryland, Fatima earned a Masters and PhD in astrophysics from UC Berkeley. Her doctoral thesis included astrophysical work on black hole detection and adaptive optics instrumentation in addition to a qualitative study on relationship between the culture of academic astronomy in the US and the persistence of identity-based inequity in graduate
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
Paper ID #47192Maintaining Hope Amidst Critique: The Role of Social Change Frameworksin Sociotechnical Engineering Ethics EducationNicholas Rabb, California State University Los Angeles Nicholas Rabb (he/him) is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University, Los Angeles, where he is working on the NSF-funded Eco-STEM project. He completed his PhD at Tufts University in the areas of computer science and cognitive science, contributing to the development of quantitative models and tools used to study the influence of news media on adoption of
: Engineering Communication: from principles to practice (with Dr. Peter Eliot Weiss) and Writing in Engineering: a brief guide, both with Oxford University Press. He teaches enginee ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Building Sociotechnical Competencies through an Integration of Engineering Ethics and Science, Technology and Society Studies: A Reflection on Instructional PracticesIntroductionWith the goal of providing engineering students with a solid grounding in sociotechnicalthinking, and an opportunity to explore the complexities of sociotechnical systems, engineeringcurriculum can draw from a combination of engineering ethics and STS (Science, Technologyand Society) studies to offer students
Paper ID #37665’It Gives Me a Bit of Anxiety’: Civil and Architectural EngineeringStudents’ Emotions Related to Their Future Responsibility as EngineersDr. Madeline Polmear, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Madeline Polmear is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie, EUTOPIA Science & Innovation Cofund Fellow at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelors in environmental engineering, Masters in civil engineering, and PhD in civil
ResearchersAbstractThis pilot study explores engineering students' views on social responsibility in undergraduateresearch experiences. Participants displayed high concern for human welfare and safety butneeded more education and training to understand the importance of being socially responsiblescientists and engineers. To address this, the authors recommend incorporating a formalcurriculum to facilitate students' understanding and articulation of their views on socialresponsibility in science and engineering research. The authors provide suggested case studiesfor engineering educators to incorporate social responsibility topics into their curriculum,enabling students to learn and debate the ethical and social implications of their research,promoting critical
student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Devyn Elizabeth ShaferDr. Brianne Gutmann, San Jos´e State University Brianne Gutmann (she/her) is an Assistant Professor at San Jos´e State University. She does physics education research with expertise in adaptive online learning tools, identity-responsive mentoring and community
Paper ID #43681Frankenstein Lives! Teaching Mary Shelley’s Novel in the Engineering ClassroomDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that consider social and ethical aspects of technology and engineering practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Frankenstein Lives! Teaching Mary Shelley’s Novel in the Engineering ClassroomIntroductionMary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, widely regarded as the first work of modern science-fiction
power through the design and deployment of structures, technologies, andcomplex systems. While contemporary corporate-driven Western engineering is often framed assolving problems and enhancing quality of life, the forces driving technological development—economic interests, techno-evolutionary pressures, political agendas, technological pathdependencies, national security concerns, individual ambitions, and considerations of ethics andecological sustainability—often conflict, ultimately undermining these aims. These systemic andpsychological dynamics are frequently obscured in engineering discourse and education.Recognizing them is essential to understanding how individual mental states and behaviors bothshape and are shaped by broader social
emergencetheory. The goal of this section is to guide and ground our systematized literature review withinthe broader context.A Primer on Interdisciplinary Perspectives to Micro-Meso-Macro Perspectives (Levels)To understand Micro-thriving, Meso-thriving, and Macro-thriving, it is important to firstacknowledge the distinctions between the terms “Micro,” “Meso,” and “Macro”, and therelationships among these terms. The distinctions between Micro, Meso, and Macro have beenwidely acknowledged in engineering ethics and related fields such as economics, sociology, andpsychology, as they provide a framework for analyzing ethical considerations at varying levels ofscale and influence within complex systems [12], [13], [14]. The Micro-Level pertains toindividuals
justice and vocational psychologies and in recent years has examined the social cognitive factors that explain social justice and engineering engagement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Do Social Justice Case Studies Affect Engineering Professional Responsibility?IntroductionEngineers solve complex problems that incorporate specific constraints, including cost, time,federal regulation, racial and economic disparities, and political power. As we train ourundergraduate students to solve these problems, it is required by ABET Student Outcome (4) thatwe provide them with “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering
strategies. These results suggest the viability ofengineering education courses to not only increase students’ knowledge of their public welfareresponsibilities (the typical approach of ethics and professionalism courses), but to better equipthem to uphold their responsibilities as public welfare watchdogs.IntroductionFormal engineering education is one of the only institutional spaces with the explicit goal oftraining neophytes to become responsible members of the profession [1]. Once they graduate,engineering students are unlikely to receive effective public welfare responsibly training in theirworkplaces or professional societies [2]. Yet, due to curricular challenges like ever-expandingtechnical content that crowds out other topics and cultural
sociotechnical education in theclassroom. [5] For example, we examine approaches to engage technically-minded students toconsider sociotechnical skills as central to their engineering education. This holds for broadengineering ethics courses as well as ethics modules embedded within core technical courses.Courses that explore engineering culture by integrating ethics and history encourage students,many of whom are interested in using teamwork to solve problems, to think how they mightimprove upon past collaborations if equipped with hindsight. We also discuss classroomexperience with students who are technically-minded (or expertise-minded) but have their homein Colleges of Arts and Science and major in pre-med, pre-law, or pre-business fields such
Practices Related to Sociotechnical Thinking in the Teaching of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAs a global society, we face significant challenges, including environmental degradation andclimate change, increasing economic inequity, rapid urbanization and population growth, theexclusion of individuals and groups from different forms of social engagement, and concernswith privacy and security. Given the omnipresent nature of technology and its influence on ourlives, engineers must consider the ethical, environmental and sociological impacts of their work,and some engineering programs are considering new pedagogical methods and broaderframeworks to engage students in macroethics, sociotechnical thinking and engineering for
Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Scaling Responsible Data Science Education: The Role of a Teaching Assistant in Bridging the Sociotechnical DivideAbstractStudents in undergraduate-level data science (DS) programs undergo highly technicalengineering education only to enter the workforce underprepared to participate in technologicaldevelopment inherently enmeshed with social contexts. Responsible data science curriculumseeks to bridge this skill gap by directly teaching ethical, accountable, and socially responsibleDS practices alongside technical learning objectives, often within the same course. However, inundergraduate programs with hundreds of students per course, much of a student’s learninghappens outside of any
Paper ID #41641Engineering Identity Development Among International Students in UK FoundationYearDr. Madeline Polmear, King’s College London Madeline Polmear is a lecturer (assistant professor) in engineering education at King’s College London. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelor’s in environmental engineering, Master’s in civil engineering, and PhD in civil engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Prior to joining KCL, she was a Marie
of technical knowledge with social, ethical, and contextualconsiderations—is key to addressing these gaps and must be actively embedded intoengineering education (Reddy et al., 2023). Adopting sociotechnical approaches to engineering involves the intentionalconsideration of how the full realm of factors¾environmental, social, ethical,economical¾come to inform the needs of empathy-driven innovation. Of particularimportance in this approach is the need to proactively consider what the impact oftechnologies and innovations will be on people, society and the planet. To date, a hostof innovations have failed and/or proven to inconsistently perform as a function of usercharacteristics (i.e., hair texture in electroencephalography caps) due
Paper ID #46249Issues at the Intersection of Engineering and Human Rights: Insights from aSymposium of the National Academy of EngineeringMs. Casey Gibson, National Academy of Engineering Casey Gibson, M.S., was an Associate Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine from 2023-2025. She primarily helped lead initiatives related to the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson holds an M.S. in Humanitarian Engineering and Science with a specialization in Environmental Engineering from the
more focused learning targets through performanceindicators. For example, we have devised performance indicators to expanded ABET EACStudent outcome 4: “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts” [8]. Theseperformance indicators are: • Recognize mutual impact between engineering designs and global, environmental, and societal contexts • Anticipate the likelihood of engineered solutions impact on global, economic, environmental, or social settings • Acknowledge variations of ethics • Redefine ethical solution requirements in
are prioritized while social, ethical, and environmental dimensions aresidelined. This dualistic framing limits engineers' ability to engage in sociotechnical thinking[4], which is essential for addressing complex sustainability challenges.To effectively address the climate crisis, it is crucial for engineering education to go beyondthe traditional focus on technical skills. There is an urgent need to cultivate a deepunderstanding of the social, ethical, and environmental implications of engineering projects[5], integrating principles of environmental justice [6], [7] and sustainability into thecurriculum. This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of teaching methods, incorporatinginterdisciplinary learning, emphasizing real-world case studies
Paper ID #43129Design Iterations as Material Culture Artifacts: A Qualitative Methodologyfor Design Education ResearchDr. Grant Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Grant A. Fore, Ph.D. is the Assistant Director of Research and Evaluation in the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. As a trained anthropologist, he possesses expertise in qualitative methods and ethnographic writing. His primary research interest is in the teaching and learning of ethics in higher education through community-engaged and place-based pedagogies. ©American Society for
misunderstandings. TheInternational Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) required air traffic controllers and pilots to becertified in aeronautical communication by March 2011 – although tests for certification did notexist in 2004 when the ICAO published the requirements [5]. The industry scrambled to meet therequirements, and have still not been entirely successful according to one review, includinginadequate testing and policy implementation [5]. However, with these first steps, the ICAOpublicly recognized the importance of improving communication; measuring success will follow.The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics [6] includes responsibilities(4b) to “make clear to clients and employers any real, potential, or perceived conflicts
Paper ID #42803Countering Passive Engagement: STS Postures and Analyzing Student Agencyin Everyday EngineeringDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology.Dr. Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park Nicole Mogul is a professor of engineering ethics and Science, Technology and Society at the University of Maryland, College Park.Christin J. Salley, University of Michigan
Conferenceengineering school. Others incorporate STS material into traditional engineering courses, e.g., bymaking ethical or societal impact assessments part of a capstone project.”2 While theinterdisciplinary nature of STS makes it difficult to define, the foundational concepts draw onrelated fields such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, history, cultural studies, and feministstudies. Bringing this interdisciplinary approach to educating engineering students allows themto approach their profession in ways that enhance their problem-solving skills and professionalcommunication skills. Given these benefits, the problem engineering programs face is how tointegrate these skills within the curriculum as opposed to outsourcing these course offerings toother
in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Chrystal S JohnsonSiddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project DECIDE: A K12 Civics and Engineering Education Curricular Partnership (Works in Progress)IntroductionMany have expressed concern about ethics and civic-mindedness of engineers and theirreflection on their responsibility and public impact of their work[1]. Universities hope tograduate ethical engineers, but may not have intentionality about the education towards civicresponsibility. Lin and Hess[2] argued that civic responsibility requires special attention inengineering education. Hess and Zola[3] found that few youth
Paper ID #49216Sociotechnical integration in data science educationProf. Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley Cathryn Carson is an STS scholar and a historian of science and technology who has been active in interdisciplinary collaborations in undergraduate and graduate education, including nuclear engineering and data science. Ari Edmundson is an STS scholar and intellectual historian who has collaboratively developed integrated course materials and dedicated courses to embed critical thinking about human contexts and ethics in data science curricula. Ramesh Sridharan is a computer scientist
competencies. ABET, the European Network forEngineering Education (ENAEE), and the Federation of Engineering Institutions in Asia and thePacific (FEIAP) highlight the need for engineers to recognize and account for the impacts ofengineering practice and design in broad contexts that impact human and environmentalconditions throughout their guidelines. ABET (2021) mandates that engineering graduates have“an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors,” and “an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must
Technology Studies (STS), cultural studies, innovation studies, communication, and the scholarship of teaching and leaDr. Shannon Conley Shannon N. Conley is an assistant professor in the Bachelors Program in Integrated Science and Tech- nology (ISAT) at James Madison University. She holds a PhD in Political Science from Arizona State University, and her research and teaching focus on sociaDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does public engagement with science andDr. Nicole Farkas Mogul