Behavior, Lumen, 2019, pp. 1–18.[2] P. Adler, “Work Organization: From Taylorism to Teamwork,” Perspect. Work, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 1997.[3] R. B. Helfgott, “America ’ s Third Industrial Revolution,” Challenge, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 41–46, 1986.[4] S. Lund, “AI , automation , and the future of work : Implications for Engineering Deans,” 2019.[5] T. Chowdhury and H. Murzi, “Literature Review : Exploring Teamwork in Engineering Education,” in Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2019.[6] H. G. Murzi, T. M. Chowdhury, J. Karlovšek, and B. C. Ruiz Ulloa, “Working in large teams: Measuring the impact of a teamwork model to facilitate teamwork development in engineering students working in a real
theAPVAWT capstone team has passed will be introduced to show how the engineering students ofthe team design and build the APVAWT system with the Liberty art students. 2.1 Decision Gate 1 – Stakeholder RequirementsThe 1st decision gate is to identify and confirm stakeholder requirements that guide the capstoneteam in understanding what is needed to be accomplished for the project and the class. Here,stakeholders represent all entities who are involved in this project: the capstone team, theclient(s), and the class instructor. Table 1 shows stakeholder requirements the team presentedand is required to fulfill. Table 1 – Stakeholder Requirements for Design and Construction of the APVAWT Task ID Name Description
. Capstones courses can be somewhat limited and late in the coursesequence. What is needed is continuous exposure to support consumer value – true productivityto make the needed pedagogical impact. Sadly, recalls abound annually and there is no lack ofexamples.Recalls provide the needed context to engage and enhance a student’s intellectual interest; theneed to identify and solve a problem(s). As students enters individual courses these recalls,within the balanced scorecard milieu, girded by IoT can help to engage student’s intellectual Page 10 of 16curiosity. They can see the direct application of course content throughout their program ofstudy. In addition, the
solve the issues, and complete the tasks toachieve the project’s goal(s).At different stages of this project, students encouraged to design, build, and test the performanceof a propeller. While the hands-on experiences are essential, it is crucial to learn how to sharethose experiences concisely and clearly with others. These skills will be necessary to preparestudents for senior-level projects. Some of the concepts the students learned in this project are: Design and Build Testing and Troubleshooting Engineering Mechanics principles Manufacturing Processes Project Management Skills Communication Skills Problem Solving Skills Physics of Motion Measurement SkillsThe
senior students, Engineers Noura Al Dhaheri,Reem Al Nuaimi, Asmaa Al Dhanhani, and Asma Al Hebsi, on the senior design project [4], underthe tutelage of the first author.References[1] J. Huang, F. Ding, T. Fukuda, and T. Matsuno, Modeling and Velocity Control for a NovelNarrow Vehicle Based on Mobile Wheeled Inverted Pendulum, IEEE Transactions on ControlSystems Technology, Vol. 21, No. 5, September 2013[2] Y. Xu, S. K-W. Au, Stabilization and Path Following of a Single Wheel Robot, IEEE/ASMETransactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 9, No. 2, June 2004 407[3] S. Kim and S. Kwon, Nonlinear Optimal Control Design for Underactuated Two-WheeledInverted Pendulum Mobile Platform, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 22, No. 6,December 201[4] N. Al
projects andlarge number of students. In future, we will conduct more projects in the upcoming semester toassert the effectiveness of this approach.REFERENCES[1] R. Graham, "The global state of the art in engineering education," Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Massachusetts, 2018.[2] K. Zhou, T. Liu and L. Zhou, "Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges," in IEEE, 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD)., 2015.[3] I. Jawahir, F. Badurdeen and K. Rouch, "Innovation in Sustainable Manufacturing Education," in 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, Berlin-Germany, 2013.[4] C. E. S. da Silva, E. G. Salgado, C. H. P. Mello, E. d. S. Oliveria and
Future DirectionsIn this brief review of literature relating to Industry 4.0’s implications for South Korea, it is clearthat Industry 4.0 has the potential to transform South Korea’s future workforce. This developingphenomenon offers several opportunities for researchers. Promising areas for explorationinclude:1. What sorts of competency skills would be required for advanced manufacturing workers tosurvive in Industry 4.0?McKinsey Global Institute [9] recommended that workers seek additional education and trainingto adapt to an automated workplace. In the context of South Korea’s two-year technical collegeprograms, researchers may wish to investigate the extent to which current curricula containsadvanced manufacturing topics and reflects
],and several other metacognitive measures (see Section 1).In both simulation activities, students build the car toy according to a set of customer requirementsshown in Table 1. The simulation activities also require that all the tasks are performed by onestudent for the individual activity (craft production) and by four students for the group activity(mass production). The student(s) need to minimize the total cost of producing the car toy whilesatisfying the requirements of the customer. Hence, there are four main functions: design, sourcing,manufacturing, and inspection. The simulation also involves a customer and a supplier (see Figure2). The descriptions of the four jobs are as follows: (1) Design Engineer: the design engineer
immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 2019. 60: p. 225-236.6. Huang, H.-M., U. Rauch, and S.-S. Liaw, Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 2010. 55(3): p. 1171-1182.7. Lee, E.A.-L. and K.W. Wong, Learning with desktop virtual reality: Low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Computers & Education, 2014. 79: p. 49-58.8. Felder, R.M., and R. Brent,, Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(1): p. 7-25.9
shown on the 2D screen and provide feedback verbally. The conference call functioncould allow a second individual to participate the discussion in the immersive environment.Nevertheless, whether this function is only limited to one-to-one sessions, or how the bandwidthwill be hit if one-to-many sessions are allowed (e.g. a virtual classroom) is still underinvestigation.Acknowledgement The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for the financial support fromthe College of Applied Science and Technology and from the SoTL Center, both at Illinois StateUniversity.Reference[1] Z. Pan, J. Polden, N. Larkin, S. Van Duin, and J. Norrish, “Recent progress on programming methods for industrial robots,” in ISR 2010 (41st
, IN. 589–592, 1991.[2] Munir, S. and Book, W.J. “Control Techniques and Programming Issues for Time Delayed Internet Based Teleoperation,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, v125 n2, June 2003, pp.205-214.[3] Book, W.J. and Swanson, D.K. “Reach Out and Touch Someone: Controlling Haptic Manipulators Near and Far,” Annual Reviews in Control, International Federation of Automatic Control, Elsevier Science (Oxford, UK), vol 28, pp 87-95, 2003[4] Gomes, L., and Bogosyan, S., "Current Trends in Remote Laboratories," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4744-4756, Dec. 2009.[5] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering
executed only when requested, rather than loading the entire program at the beginning.We will also provide a better view of the 3D rendering model using multiple images fromwebcams positioned at different locations within the machine work envelope. Finally, we willconduct a formal assessment of students’ learning.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Advanced TechnologyEducation Program (award no. 1304843). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation
. Eng. Educ. 2015, 23, 846–853.[9] Vergara, D., Rubio, M.P., and Lorenzo, M., “Multidisciplinary methodology for improving students’ spatialabilities in technical drawing,” Sci. J. Educ. Technol. 2015, 5, 1–8. 39.[10] Villagrasa, S., Fonseca, D., and Durán, J., “Teaching case: Applying gamification techniques and virtual realityfor learning building engineering 3D arts,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on TechnologicalEcosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca, Spain, 1–3 October 2014; ACM: New York, NY, USA, pp.171–177.[11] Fletcher, C., Ritchie, J. M., and Lim, T., “Virtual machining and expert knowledge capture. Paper presented atDigital Engagement 2011, Newcastle, United Kingdom. Mujber, T. S., T. Szecsi, and
are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Reference[1] F. Chance, J. Robinson, and J. Fowler, “Supporting manufacturing with simulation: modeldesign, development, and deployment”, Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference,December 8-11, 1996, San Diego, CA.[2] Imai, M., Kaizen-The key to Japan's competitive success, New York, N.Y., Random House,1986.[3] S. Barraza, M. R. González, F. Gabriel.. “Bringing Kaizen to the classroom: lessons learned inan Operations Management course”. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 26. 1-15,2015.10.1080/14783363.2015.1068594.[4] W. D. Kelton, R. P. Sadowski, and D. T. Sturrock, Simulation with Arena, 6e, McGraw Hill,2013.[5
during the Summer 2020 semester. These sessions will consist of at least3 spaced training sessions before the scheduled session class (traditional). The periodic trainingwill be one training session per week for the “experimental” section, and it will be comparedwith the “control” section. The student's feedback pointed out that more training sessions couldhelp to improve the approach to achieve the targeted tolerance dimensions. Therefore, a feedbacksurvey will be implemented for the Summer 2020 cohort.Bibliography[1] Y. Weinstein, C. R. Madan, and M. A. Sumeracki, “Teaching the science of learning.,” Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2, 2018.[2] S. H. K. Kang, “Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning
STEM Education: A STEM Teacher Preparation Program,” Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification, Volume 10, Number 2, 2015, pp 3-16. [6] Bracey G, Brooks M, Marlette S, and Locke S, “Teachers 'n Training: Building Formal STEM Teaching Efficacy through Informal Science Teaching Experience,” 3-2, ASQ Advancing the STEM Agenda Conference, 2013. [7] Nathan MJ, Tran NA, Atwood AK, Prevost A, and Phelps LA, “Beliefs and Expectations about Engineering Preparation Exhibited by High School STEM Teachers,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, pp 409-426. [8] Yang J, Lee Y, Park S, Wong-Ratcliff M, Ahangar R, Mundy MA, “Discovering the Needs Assessment of Qualified STEM Teachers
Conceptual Framework for Measurement Planning Integration, 14th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (CAT). 3. Yuchu Qin, Qunfen Qi, Wenlong Lu, Xiaojun Liu, Paul J. Scott, Xiangqian Jiang, 2018, A review of representation models of tolerance information, the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 95, Issue 5–8. 4. F. Litwa, M. Gottwalda, S. Spudeikob, K. Paetzold, M.Vielhaber, 2016, Optimization coupling approach for/with non-static point-based CAT models, 14th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (CAT). 5. Sayed Mohammad Hejazi, Deepanjan Biswas, Adarsh Venkiteswaran, Jami J. Shah and Joseph K., 2016, Automated 1st order Tolerancing: Schema Generation, Proceedings
cycles are undertaken with accumulated knowledge. Such knowledgecan be gained through experimentation. The purpose of experimentation is to gain the knowledge aboutreducing and controlling variation in the process or the product by determining which process factor(s)significantly impact the outcome [7]. Figure 4: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle For experiments to be run and analyzed efficiently, a scientific approach in planning must befollowed [D]. While one-factor-at-a-time is extensively used in experimentation, design of experiment(DoE) methods, particularly factorial design, have advantages over the one-factor-at-a-time method.These advantages include, but not limited to, the ability to estimate
engineeringworkplace skills development in favor of graduating engineers with stronger analytical skillsbased on their ability to apply sound scientific principles. Though laudable and well intentioned,it became apparent in the 80’s and 90’s with the emergence of globalized economies that thependulum had swung too far in this direction and that a correction was needed. ABET’sEngineering Criteria 2000 [2] approved in 1996 and used until recently for accreditingengineering programs, sought to achieve this by balancing the need for outcomes related toengineering problem solving with outcomes that promoted the societal context for engineering.This has resulted in a strong emphasis on introducing and assessing the professional skills intocurricula. There has been
OrganizationFigure 4. Existing Corporate Division of Labor Model:Direct and Indirect Labor First Thing We Do, Let s Kill All The Lawyers Henry VI, Part 2 William Shakespeare Manager Manager Manager Engineering Engineering Mechanical Process Finance Manager Manager Manager Purchasing Production MarketingFigure 5. Existing
Criteria & Supporting Documents.https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/ (accessed on 12/01/2019)[2] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016).Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study. Journal ofEngineering Education, 105(2), 366-395.[3] Newberry, B., Austin, K., Lawson, W., Gorsuch, G., & Darwin, T. (2011). Acclimatinginternational graduate students to professional engineering ethics. Science and engineeringethics, 17(1), 171-194.[4] Li, H., Jin, K., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A Curriculum Innovation Framework to IntegrateManufacturing related Materials and Quality Control Standards into Different Level EngineeringEducation. The 2018 Annual
. manufacturing: 2015 and beyond,” 2015.2. Spak, G.T., “US advanced manufacturing skills gap: Innovation education solutions,” 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Elsevier, 2013.3. Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., and Rockland, R., “Bringing Engineering into K-12 Schools: A Problem Looking for Solutions,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.4. Sharma, S., Siwach, B., Ghoshal, S.K. and Mohan, D., “Dye sensitized solar cells: From genesis to recent drifts,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, 2007, pp. 529- 537.5. Gonçalves, L.M., de Zea Bermudez, V., Ribeiro, H.A. and Mendes, A.M., “Dye-sensitized solar cells: A safe bet for the future