Conference Session

Pedagogical Issues in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jitendra Tate, Texas State University-San Marcos; Vedraman Sriraman, Texas State University-San Marcos

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, Basics 10 8.05 1.44 80.50 Final Q4-8Composite Materials Calculations 10 6.95 3.62 69.50 Final Q9-11Composite Lay-up Processes 10 8.9 1.29 89.00 Final Q12-15Vacuum Bagging Processes 10 7.8 2.04 78.00 Final Q 16-19Filament winding 10 8.2 2.86 82.00 Final Q 20-22Research paper: Report 100 85.4 3.72 85.40 Research paperResearch paper: Presentation 50 33.2 11.88 66.40 PresentationTable 4. Student learning outcomesTopic Max Average Std. DeviationPolymer materials – Chemistry 8

Conference Session

Technology Integration in the Classroom for Manufacturing I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yongjin Kwon, Drexel University; Shreepud Rauniar, Drexel University; Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Horacio Sosa, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

) q /1 yi ? yr - Â S y ,m © bm / bm/1 - S y ,q ÇÉbi / bq /1 Ú - g y m ?1where n = the number of columns, m = the number of rows, p and q = the number of grids fromthe origin where P (ai , bi ) is located, and g x & g y = imprecision involved in the scaling. In order tocapture the moving objects on a conveyor, a series of images is taken at a fixed rate of 75 framesper second and the time interval between each frame is calculated. The algorithms in the APIautomatically detect the center of moving object and translate that into robot coordinates. Thespeed of the object is defined as

Conference Session

Technology Integration in the Classroom for Manufacturing II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jahangir Ansari, Virginia State University; Amir Javaheri, Virginia State University; Nasser Ghariban, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

of the project. After planning, they proceeded to the designactivities composed of creating solid model of parts and assembly considering the machines androbots dimensional specifications. Students then conducted the manufacturing process andfinally did a final review and evaluation of their project. c) Responsibility description and team organization o Student 1(M)/ Project Manager + Assembly process o Student 2 (Q)/Product Design Coordinator + o Student 3 (D)/ Manufacturing Process Design Coordinator/ Milling FMC Coordinator o Student 4 (C)/ Manufacturing Support Coordinator + Fixture design and fabrication o Student 5 (A)/ Turning FMC Coordinator + SecretaryTeam

Conference Session

Teaching Design in Manufacturing Curriculum I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University; Cathleen Jones, Robert Morris University; Jon Radermacher, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

1,000,000/year. Assume that the manufacturing company has hired a single distributor who would account for 30% of the total sales of the school bags. The company would like to estimate the quantity to manufacture (Q) per year given that their customer survey has resulted in the following data: Cdefinitely = 0.4, Cprobably = 0.2, Fdefinitely = 0.4, Page 12.503.7 Fprobably = 0.3Table 2: Examples of student evaluation tasks in the context of