- Conference Session
- Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
Photovoice reflections as well as written and oral presentations during andat the end of the term and are based on evaluating the level of practical knowledge gained by the studentsduring the development of such projects. As a general outcome, students became more involved duringclass time, and also they have shown interest in other research areas, being involved in extra courseresearch activities. Details related to the intervention and lessons learned will be provided so otherengineering instructors can easily re-create in the classroom. Overall, many different fields ofengineering instructors can benefit from this project-based approach to combine theory and practice toprepare the students to become better problem solvers and obtain practical
- Conference Session
- Refining Manufacturing Education Practices
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; Jameela Al-Jaroodi; Anthony Moretti, Robert Morris University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
six individual skillmodules covering skills such as dependability, responsibility, independence, persistence,integrity, and ethics. The main goal is to create multiple opportunities to teach and reinforcesoft skills within the regular technical curriculum in the high schools. This paper discussesthe integration of the soft skills modules into the technical curriculum developed viaexamples, and outlines its potential uses in this engineering department’s curriculumincluding its manufacturing engineering program. The paper concludes with a discussion ofthe implementation of this project and provides some preliminary feedback from theparticipating high schools and reflections of the authors. It also includes future workopportunities such as
- Conference Session
- Manufacturing Division (MFG) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eunseob Kim, Purdue University; Lucas Wiese, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hector Will, Oakland City University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Martin Jun, Purdue University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
, reflectiveobservation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, created by contextualdemands. Thus, ELT's implications for the course's design consisted of guiding learners throughrecursive processes of experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting to respond to the learningsituation. That is, "immediate or concrete experiences are the basis for observations andreflections. These reflections are assimilated and distilled into abstract concepts from which newimplications for action can be drawn. These implications can be actively tested and serve asguides in creating new experiences" [5]. Specifics of how ELT guided the course implementationare described in the section below.3. The CourseThe course titled Industrial IoT Implementation for Smart
- Conference Session
- Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Susan Pedersen, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
more of the things that were positiveand do them even better.Future directions include implementation of the improvements above; development of newmodules focusing on interfacing other devices (such as robots); and development of modulesfocused on industrial applications of automated systems—such as manufacturing systems—tohelp learners see the big picture of how systems are integrated.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) Program (award no. 2044449). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Giffi
- Conference Session
- Virtual and Augmented Reality Application in Manufacturing Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Isher Singh; Arjuna Karthikeyan Senthilvel Kavitha, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Md Fashiar Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Nijanthan Vasudevan, Drexel University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
components involves strategic utilization ofBlender and SolidWorks software. Blender's “. blend" file format seamlessly integrates into Unity'sassets for designing the fan. SolidWorks-generated components are reimagined in Blender forcompatibility with Unity as shown in Figure 2. The wind turbine model is sourced from the Unity3D Asset Store, providing a pre-built foundation [3].Within Unity 3D, the design process continues with the creation of essential elements, leveragingmesh colliders and scripting for user interaction as shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. The additionof reflections enhances visual appeal, contributing to a more immersive and realistic userexperience. The design process seamlessly integrates Blender, SolidWorks, and Unity 3D
- Conference Session
- Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Akbar M. Eslami, Elizabeth City State University; Kuldeep S Rawat, Elizabeth City State University; Chandra Bhushan Asthana P.E., Elizabeth City State University; Scott Bradshaw, Elizabeth City State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
to comprise anAdditive Manufacturing Skills sub-scale. The content reflects the specific skills identified in theproject design. Students respond using a 6-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Completely Uncertain)to 6 (Completely Certain).Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of each scale. TheEngineering Skills Self-Efficacy sub-scale values were good and consistent with those reportedin previous research. The value was borderline for the newly developed Additive ManufacturingSkills scale, suggesting that the number or content of the items may need to be reviewed.The means for all the scales were above the mid-point, suggesting that students had confidencein their abilities. As more data is collected in
- Conference Session
- Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
studies to develop; 4) create more case studies; and 5) evaluate transfer oflearning by varying the sequence of operations in the case study.6. AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) Program (award no. 2044449). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Hsieh, S. and Pedersen, S. “Design and evaluation of modules to teach PLC Interfacing Concepts,” Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference, June 25-28, 2023, Baltimore, MD.2. Hsi, S. and Agogino, A.M. “The impact and instructional benefit of using
- Conference Session
- Manufacturing Workforce Development
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Marilyn Barger, FLATE (Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence); Suzy Gorospes Marzano, Society of Manufacturing Engineers; Juan Song, Alamo Colleges District
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Zheng, P., Wang, H., Sang, Z, Zhong, R.Y., Liu, Y, Liu, C., Mubarok, K., Yu, S., and Xu, X., “Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives,” Frontier Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13(2): 137–150[2] Industry 4.0, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_4.0, last accessed on 3/1/2020.[3] Manyika, J., Ramaswamy, S., Khanna, S., Sarrazin, H., Pinkus, G., Sethupathy, G. and Yaffe, A. Digital America: A tale of the haves and have-mores, McKinsey Global Institute Report. New York, 2015.[4] McLeman, A. (2014). Manufacturing skills gap: Training is the answer. Control Engineering, 61(10
- Conference Session
- Manufacturing Workforce Development
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee University; Stephen Baker; Mandoye Ndoye, Tuskegee University; David Shannon, Auburn University; josiah e blocus, Tuskegee University; Eugene Thompson
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
power the four drone arms’ motor/electronic speed controller and three optional outlets3.3 Function Testing of PDBAfter the conceptual design in adopted, the next step towards developing this concept into aworking model is to test the function of PDB. The basic electric connectivity between the mainpower node and the utility (distribution) nodes was tested and verified to reflect the circuitdesign. Another important operational consideration is the heating of the board due the highcurrent it delivers from the battery to the motors- through the electronic speed controllers (ESC)-and other utilities. With guidance from the electrical engineering faculty mentor, student withmechanical engineering background set up a test to monitor the temperature