sequential slides in a PP show cannot be displayed in a row or column. There is no flexibility in PP for printing five slides on one page, two on the second page, three across the width of a third, with strategically planned whitespace. 6. Homework assignments were limited to what would fit easily on a slide, which made it difficult to assign wordy problems, or problems using graphs or pictures. 7. Supplemental handouts, such as Figure 1, were stapled to the end of the PP handout, not in the order of discussion during the class. The only way to insert this material within a PP printout is to create a new slide within the PP show. The solution to all of these problems was to import figures, tables, graphs, and text
occurand, possibly survive. The problem with these numbers is the computer execution time requiredto evaluate all of the created circuits. One solution well suited to this problem is the use ofparallel processing to reduce computation time. An effort to adapt this software to a parallel-processor system is currently underway by the co-author as a two semester Senior DesignProject.Instructor’s Notes: This project is suitable for student research in a 10 week, 40 hours/weektimeframe. Approximately three weeks should be planned for the design of the user interfacethat establishes the habitat and fauna, sets initial conditions and performance parameters, reportsintermediate results and displays final circuitry and analyses. Three to four weeks should
processing and applications(performance) of metals, polymers, ceramics and composites.7-8 As one-semester courses, theseclasses do not discuss in-depth about thermal, electrical, optical and magnetic properties, ormodern materials such as semiconductors, biomaterials, and smart materials. Students areencouraged to engage in independent study of these topics if necessary to complete their groupprojects.In the first week of the semester, each group of three or four students is tasked to pick anyengineering material of their choice and submit an abstract consisting of a brief description of thematerial, and their plans to present this material to the class. Subsequently, students spend thenext eight weeks investigating their material of choice in
Operating Board (BEGOB) as a representative to the Committee on Administration and Finance of the ASME (2011-2013) and a two-year term (2013-2015) on BEGOB as a rep. to the strategic planning committee. He has also served as a judge for the ASME Scholarship Program’s University applications from March from 2016 to 2018.Prof. Mohammad Elahinia, The University of Toledo Dr. Elahinia is a University Distinguished Professor in Engineering and Chair in the Mechanical, Indus- trial, and Manufacturing Engineering (MIME) Department at The University of Toledo. He graduated with his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in August 2004. After graduation, he joined the faculty
of RBIS in engineering courses. The virtual aspect ofthe project aims to overcome the barriers of cost, scale and physical location that are inherentwith local (face-to-face) communities. A previous paper described the structure, goals, organization and technology of the VCP forChemical, Materials, and Biological Engineering12, but the previous paper did not include anydetailed information on the instructional innovations developed and implemented by individualmembers of the community. This paper specifically focuses on the experiences of eight partici-pants who transformed their courses through the implementation of a variety of RBIS. Facultyparticipants developed individual action plans to transform their course through RBIS using ap
corresponding allowable stresses.Separate lectures were presented on materials selection. The students were made aware of thefact that a designer had to choose the material best suited for the specific situation from a vastmenu of materials. The material selection decision could be effectively performed usingAshby’s book [3] and elements from the Cambridge Engineering Selector [4]. The software CESEduPack[4] was not used, but was planned to be used the next offering of the course. To establishthe rational way of material selection, the concept of the material indices as discussed in Ashby’s Page 26.265.4text [3] was briefly mentioned. These indices
semesters I will invite a librarian to class toshow students how to perform more successful internet searches. I also plan to encourage moreinterest and engagement by designing problems requiring group effort, as recommended byLight.viMaterials engineers routinely use the internet as a source of several kinds of information: pricing;materials properties; safety and handling; fractography and failure analysis; microstructures;viisupplier locations; etc. My hope is that carefully designed homework assignments which helpstudents learn these skills will be transferable to the workplace after graduation.Referencesi Kalpakjian & Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, 2006.ii McKeachie, W., McKeachie’s Teaching
teachers and fromother students. This improved social comfort aids group effectiveness, but also increases studentintegration, provides social incentives for attendance, improves self-esteem, and adds tostudents’ sense of belonging.28All project work in the materials science course is collaborative. From the first day of class,teams work together to set goals, plan experiments, acquire and interpret information, anddevelop skills and understandings. In addition, the instructor encourages collaboration on allhomework assignments. The emphasis on team engagement with problems creates a communitylearning environment in the materials laboratory, and an awareness of team support appears todecrease the students’ cognitive load.Teacher’s Approaches and
implementing such a program are discussed, as well as the successes, challenges, andlessons learned during the first year of Materials Camp at UAB, along with plans for the futureof the program.Advertising and Application ProcessThe decision to hold a Materials Camp in 2011 was made relatively late, and efforts to promotethe camp did not begin until after the spring semester ended. A webpage with information aboutthe camp was added to the department website the second week of May, and several days later anemail was sent to science and math teachers at local high schools announcing the camp andincluding a printable promotional flier with a link to the website. A notice was also run severaltimes in the bi-weekly electronic newsletter distributed to all
engineering technology programs.Three undergraduate students conducted the research project under the guidance of Dr. S.Kim for approximately six months. Not only did this research project prove to bemotivational for the students, but also it provided them an opportunity to seek work in therelated industries. Student testimonials are presented as follows: “ I just wanted to send you a note as I said I would to update you on my fall plans. I haveaccepted a double block of Co-op with GE Global Research in the materials lab. I wantto thank you for sparking my interest in the field and giving the opportunity to be in thelab, which gave me the confidence to go after a position like this. I will be returning toRIT in the spring. Thanks again Prof. Kim!”“I
writing. o Create a course structure that is clear and predictable to help students manage their remote work. • Set reasonable expectations for the instructors: o Select learning activities that can be done in the short preparation time and leverage the instructional team’s expertise.These priorities reflected the effect of the pandemic on both the students and the instructionalteam.The instructional team opted to reuse prior laboratory modules to ensure that each unit was well-planned. These modules already had lab manuals that provided background information,experimental procedures, and grading expectations. Data for these experiments was availablefrom past course offerings, and the
dynamic viewing on footage instructor’s face experience 30 minutes of preparation No additional Time time to plan video No additional time; preparation time; face- Commitment content and learning face-to-face lecture to-face lecture was for Instructor objectives and 11-20 was recorded recorded
: participantsThere were 26 students enrolled in the course in the fall of 2016. For a student following atypical four-year plan, this course is taken in the fall of the third year. The demographiccharacteristics of the students are summarized in Figure 1. There were 20 males and 6 females.Of the students in the course, 14 graduated from high school in 2013 or later (i.e., were, at most,three years out from high school (HS)), 4 graduated from high school in 2010 to 2012 (i.e., were4 to 6 years out from HS), 1 graduated from high school in 2007-2009 (i.e., was 7 to 9 years outfrom HS), and 7 students graduated from high school in 2006 or earlier (i.e., were 10+ years outfrom HS). As a point of reference, in fall 2016 when the study was conducted, Boise
, especially, often look for ways to give math more meaning to students.Unfortunately, in our initial testing of the module, we have encountered numerous roadblocks tosuch collaboration, even when teachers appreciate the benefits. All that we can do is encouragesuch teamwork.DesignThe Sections are guided activities; as such, there are a number of features of inquiry that may notoccur. They include posing questions, examining information sources, planning investigations, Page 11.864.7identifying assumptions, thinking critically, and considering alternative explanations.Engineering design projects provide opportunities to develop these thinking skills
.12Assessment Plans Page 11.1040.11To date only qualitative assessment of the modules have been carried out. Written feedback onstudent evaluations have indicated that, in general, most students enjoy learning about thetechnologies and working on the projects. Students also recognize and appreciate the fact thatthe fundamental material is repeated in the modules helping them see it from differentperspectives and understand it at a deeper level. Negative comments indicate some students arebothered by not following the textbook order and having to learn extra material outside of thetext. Extensive quantitative assessment is planned for the 2006-2007
discounts. Crash-resistance, the abilityto produce high-resolution diagrams, formatting control of equations, and final pdf file size werethe main criteria. Page 23.673.4Apache Open Office met the needs best, and had the least significant disadvantages. Graphics areoutstanding, equations are easier to create with vertical lines separating unit conversions, and thesoftware is less prone to crashing than MS Word.The next step in planning the book was to select a common set of symbols. All Strengthtextbooks use E for Young's modulus, but there is less agreement between textbook authors forquantities such as normal stress, shear stress, radius
survey was used to assess the confidence of the students in their ability to meetthe course objectives. These assessments will allow for adjustment of future lesson plans,homework assignments, and projects.This paper presents an overview of the course, lessons learned, and the feedback obtained fromthe pilot offering. The plans for further modifications and improvements based on the evaluationof the pilot offering are discussed.IntroductionAs battery manufacturing increases in the United States, there will be an increase in demand foremployees with the skills and training necessary to work in this industry. To meet this demand,colleges and universities will need to update existing curricula with alternative energy conceptsand skills, as well as
the mini- presentations, class discussions, POGIL activities, classroomdemonstrations were helpful in assisting them learn materials science.The author’s experience in implementing this new hybrid curriculum was positive and plans to implementit again in Fall 2013 with some changes as follows. In addition to using the MCI to measure learning, theauthor plans to develop assignments or tests to measure how well students learned the basic “ConceptsBeing Taught” and how well the mini-presentations accomplished the “Purposes” in Table 1 and Table 2,respectively. Assignments that will require higher level of critical thinking such as case studies or open-ended project assignments are in consideration
explore something that they find interesting about this course.” – “The freedom to do the test we wanted to do. It satisfied my curiosity.” – “This lab allows us to learn more about what we find interesting. We learn more from labs that we designed ourselves.” – “I liked that we were able to select our own project based on things that interested us, and also that we had to figure out our own procedures which allowed us to really learn what I was doing.” – “I liked the idea of planning our own lab and figuring out how to properly create samples and perform the experiment.” – “I like how we had to be responsible and complete a lab on our own.” – “Experience in using the equipment
interrupting and talking over eachother, at three minutes they begin to build a conversation.Speaker A: How many pellets do we want to make, because she said it was like uh five grams.Speaker B: No, because we are not going to do just one pellet so we are definitely going to need controlsand stuffSpeaker A: Yeah that's trueSpeaker C: For the 0.6 it says about 1g?Speaker D: How expensive were the dopants?At six minutesSpeaker B : So should we plan to do like 3 pellets per thing so that we have uh error bars?Speaker A: Yeah that would be goodSpeaker D: Yeah I think 3 or fiveSpeaker B : Wait, point 3 or moreSpeaker D, A, B: YeahSpeaker A: So which, so whichSpeaker D: interrupting - 9 pelletsSpeaker A: 9 pellets?Speaker A, C, B: Three, three three dopants
bachelor level in public universities does not have an external advisory council, so thispractice is highly recommended for programs that envision an international accreditation. Page 26.574.4The Program Committee is integrated by the program coordinator, the head of the MaterialsEngineering Division and three full time faculty members of the program, this collegiate bodywork as a team and plans and monitors all the academic aspects of the program, this team isresponsible for the outcomes and competencies assessment processes and collect and analyze allthe necessary materials. The Program Advisory Council was created, among other reasons, inorder to
reinforce the significance of metacognitive skills, as they showhow experts spend more time planning,11 or that novices continue to use a strategy after it hasfailed.14 In the sections that follow we will describe our approach towards constructing aconceptual framework and will present some of the outcomes of this innovation from anintroductory level lab-based class in Materials Science.ApproachIn light of this research on how students learn, integrate, and apply complex knowledge frommultiple domains, our visual representation of central Materials Engineering concepts and theirlogical relationships attempts to ease and enable the transition of students new to the field bymaking the tacit knowledge of seasoned professionals more explicit and
times middle school students find science uninteresting simplybecause they do not see a relevance to their live experiences11. By having an influential and encouragingteacher presenting the significance of science in their lives, a positive effect has been shown in students12.By providing engineering concepts student show an increased interest in science especially in the studentsgenerally disengaged in science and therefore focusing on a group of students often forgotten10,13.Despite materials and engineering being vital to our current society, few school curriculum plans providestudents a chance to explore concepts about materials and engineering. This case study outlines aninteractive way where students learn broader concepts and at times
.Dr. Wesley E. Marshall, University of Colorado, Denver Wesley Marshall is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Co-director of the Active Communities Transportation (ACT) research group. He focuses on transporta- tion research dedicated to building a more sustainable infrastructure, particularly in terms of improving road safety, active transportation, and transit-oriented communities. Other recent research topics involve transportation planning, congestion pricing, human behaviors, parking, and street networks. A native of Watertown, Mass., Marshall is a recipient of the Dwight Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship and winner of the Charley V. Wootan Award for
in safety, design and all processes available to perform any kind of work for a raw material. It would be important to have a space in the course to perform cost management analysis for the raw material, for the elaboration process, for maintenance. It would be interesting to perform statistical analysis, design, planning, operations management, simulations and problem solving. - We were completely lost when the professor was mentioning all the concepts he was going to teach us in the semester. But thanks to the professor’s easy to understand teaching, we survived. Impressively, the professor explained the concepts with real life problems that made it incredibly easy to understand. He
processing. 2) Describe two variations of the technology and the manufacturing process that you observed in the video. 3) List three issues or factors important to the implementation of the process described in question #1 and #2. 4) Describe examples of two parts (or components) that are produced using this manufacturing process and best illustrate the important factors in the process.Industrial field trips are planned to coincide with the topics in lectures and in the readingsassigned for homework. The logistics for getting the entire class to attend are a bit tricky and thelocation of the industrial facility must be within 20-25 minutes of the college. With a 1 hour tour,the trip can be completed in the 2 hour lab
($2.95ea.)and 16 receiver circuits ($2.75ea). We also need at least 16 power transistors ($1.30ea.).If we use the mechanical/optical switch at the user interface dashboard we expect to use60 meters ($1.70/meter) of fiber optic cable. This design would cost us approximately$200. If we use just the electrical/optical switch at the user interface dashboard weexpect to use 30 meters of fiber ($1.70/meter) and 30 meters copper wire ($.24/meter).This design would cost approximately $160. We originally planned on using bothdesigns on our test bed, but ultimately only employed the electrical/optical switch.Therefore to construct the prototype electrical system on the cart only cost usapproximately $160.The second component of cost involves the testing
teamsand pursue different topics.The last two thirds of the semester had the students first plan, and then conduct, a set ofexperiments to test out their hypotheses. The final result of the class was a group report andpresentation. There was an open invitation to the M.E. program to come and observe the finalpresentations. The deliverables for the course were typically: Final group presentation Final group report Individual executive summary of their work Peer assessment of their fellow team membersSince the composite materials elective course is offered about every other year, there was noassumption that the students had taken that course before they took this one. Students wererequired to have taken the strength course so
taxonomy of significant learning and the associatedintegrated course design approach in the teaching of the MS course at our university. Asurvey was conducted at the end of the semester to collect student responses on theachievement of course outcomes using this methodology. Full survey results would becomemore meaningful after the course is offered a few more times using this approach. However,student responses during class activities and discussions, and the course survey indicate thatthe new approach (description of course outcomes, and planning and execution of learningactivities and assessments) is well received. Students feel that they are learning the basics ofMSE in a more well-structured, and lively, energetic, and interactive
time the course is taught.They also have the option of using a different software that they are comfortable with and haveaccess to. One of the groups opted to use HyperMesh and OptiStruct as they were planning onusing that software to design bridges for the SAMPE student bridge contest. Students getintroduced to the composites workbench in the surfacing class with CATIA and strengthen theirknowledge about how models are designed using orthotropic materials. Two lectures are setaside to instruct the students with the FEA laboratory. Examples of a model setup and thedisplacement results obtained by one of the student groups for flexural testing are given below(Figures 1 & 2.) Figure 1. CATIA model of flexural test using Figure 2. FEA