consisted of a set ofhands-on laboratory experiments on material testing while for spring 2016 a non-hands-onproject was assigned. For spring 2016 the students were required to simulate a material propertyor a basic manufacturing process using any finite element analysis software, or write a shortreview article on a topic closely related to the subject of materials and manufacturing. It was 3intended to add enrichment to the learning experience beyond the confines of the traditionalclassroom and positively impact a students’ academic performance. This would also lead todevelopment of better pedagogical practices by the engineering faculty, help the college to bettermeet the ABET objectives by
understanding and explaining laboratory work, was one ofconceptual integration: of identifying logical relationships between concepts, rather thansequential relationships between actions. We also expected that students would more easilygrasp that structured thought and research in this field falls into recognizable patterns that canhelp one understand past research and plan new research. Finally, we hoped that students usingthe diagram would recognize that explanations of research are always rhetorical, responding toaudience, situation, and purpose, and that thus invoking the potential rhetorical situations ofexplanations as one does the work can aid in deepening understanding and making it moreflexible. Thus, as part of a grant-funded project to
a Scientist at Ames Laboratory, the Department of Energy national laboratory located on the ISU campus. His expertise is in the field of electron microscopy. He has taught the undergraduate Materials Characterization class and graduate level classes on electron microscopy. Page 12.233.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 An Undergraduate Materials Recruitment and Outreach ProgramAbstractAn aggressive recruitment strategy, building on previous efforts, began in the MaterialsScience and Engineering Department at Iowa State University in the late 1990s. Sincethen the population of undergraduate
the writing of laboratory reports and in-class presentations. The Green Projects-to-Pavements project was a proposed study funded in-part by theUniversity of Colorado – Presidential Teaching and Learning Collaborative Program. Theindividuals that contributed to this study included the faculty and teaching assistant thatdeveloped and administered the study, a peer-group of collaborators acting as an advisory panel,and the students of the class. The problem-based design project was a semester long projectbeginning with students being given a project objective, followed by students performing theirown literature research, material selection, obtaining materials, experimentation, testing, andpresentation. In regards to the course topic
aids’ is alast main aspect that academics gave feedback on. They felt those, especially the poster charts,which support the teaching for explaining concepts during the laboratory classes.From these case studies, it seems TRW inspire academics to develop and improve their courses,by using the resources available and to inspire many other academics by contributing with theirown resources to TRW.Subjects CoveredThe Teaching Resources Website contains a collection of hundreds of exercises, teaching aidsand background reading material on the topic of materials across many different disciplines andfor all years of study.Introductory and advanced resources have been developed for the following engineeringsubjects: Materials Science, Industrial Design
pursueresearch projects with faculty members, these programs also offer workshops,2,3,4 courses,5,6 andeven “boot-camp”-style summer research experiences7 that focus on topics such as performingscientific literature searches, the role of the engineer in society, research and engineering ethics,communicating research findings, careers in research and even applying to graduate school.The topics covered by these programs and the ones we describe below are among the issues thatthe Council on Undergraduate Research points to as critical for a successful undergraduateresearch experience associated with "socializ[ing] students in the research laboratory culture."8This ranges from topics as diverse as the values and ethics of research, safety, group dynamics
time the course is taught.They also have the option of using a different software that they are comfortable with and haveaccess to. One of the groups opted to use HyperMesh and OptiStruct as they were planning onusing that software to design bridges for the SAMPE student bridge contest. Students getintroduced to the composites workbench in the surfacing class with CATIA and strengthen theirknowledge about how models are designed using orthotropic materials. Two lectures are setaside to instruct the students with the FEA laboratory. Examples of a model setup and thedisplacement results obtained by one of the student groups for flexural testing are given below(Figures 1 & 2.) Figure 1. CATIA model of flexural test using Figure 2. FEA
nanotubes and or alumina particles using high energy mixing (usingultrasonication, high shear and pulverization), (b) electrospinning technique to manufacture anddeposit nanofibers (c) X-Y Computer controlled spray technique to deposit single wall carbonnanotubes on the woven fabric. The fabricated nanocomposite materials are then tested bystudents in Strength of Materials Laboratory using conventional tensile testing machine. Thispaper demonstrates limitless bounds of nanomaterials, as well as would eventually help tomodify and strengthen the existing engineering curriculums in materials, manufacturing, andmechanical and engineering technology.Introduction For the past five years, the research involving the fabrication and processing of
Science Foundation; and Mentor for the Louis Stokes Louisiana Alliance for Minority Participation. Material and Energy Balances, Heat Transfer, Materials Science, Unit Operations Laboratory, and Statistics and Probability are some of the courses he has taught. He is also a Senator from Engineering to Tulane’s University Senate. In addition to his current teaching and research duties, his research experiences include an NSF-NATO Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University Karlsruhe, a German Academic Exchange Fellowship at the University of Freiberg/Sachsen and the German Federal Materials Laboratory, and an Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship at the German Aerospace Agency. He has
AC 2010-1459: A SUMMER TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM FOR ANUNDERGRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROJECT: PLANNINGAND ASSESSMENTPatricia Mellodge, University of Hartford Patricia Mellodge is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Hartford. She received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Rhode Island. Her graduate work was completed at Virginia Tech where she received an M.S. in Mathematics and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. Research interests include control system design, mathematical modeling of microwave processing, and bio-instrumentation.Diane Folz, Virginia Tech Diane Folz is a Senior Research Associate and Laboratory
preparatory workin math, physics, chemistry, mechanics, and liberal arts, the program has a full schedule ofmaterials science and engineering focussed courses in the final two years. The foundationaltopics of thermodynamics and kinetics, including diffusion, are lecture courses in the junior yearas is a course on numerical methods in materials science and engineering. Each of the fiveclasses of engineering materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, electronic materials andcomposites) is covered in its own lecture class with a focus on structure and properties. Three ofthese classes are in the junior year (metals, electronic materials, polymers) and two are in thesenior year (ceramics, composites). There is a laboratory-based class each semester. In
/05/T001-15-16-ETAC-Criteria-05-04-15.pdf[2] Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and M. Mamodapur, “Understanding additive manufacturing partperformance through modeling and laboratory experiments,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, T523B·Integrating Curriculum and Labs in ET Programs, Seattle, WA June 14-17,2015.[3] Fused filament fabrication, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fused_filament_fabrication[4] MakerBot Method X, https://www.makerbot.com/3d-printers/method/[5] STL (file format), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STL_(file_format)[6] Topology optimization, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology_optimization#:~:text=Topology%20optimization%2 0(TO)%20is%20a,the%20performance%20of%20the%20system.Appendix AFigure A-1. Page one of Lever
were primarily distributed around thestate to three junior high school teachers in conjunction with visits from the WSU students.Initial anecdotal feedback has been quite positive. Kit distribution is continuing in the 2008-9academic year to another five schools.Acknowledgements The fabrication, development, and distribution of these kits would not have been possiblewithout the financial support of the ASM International Foundation, HiRel Laboratories, CastleMetals, Pacific Metals and Recycling, and the DeVlieg Foundation. The students whoconstructed, tested, and delivered these kits across Washington include Kale Stephenson, SarahMiller, Monica Zosel, Nicole Overman, David Koch, Megan Dahl, Stefhanni Jennerjohn, andmany others from the
ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID #13545. 2. Sohail Anwar, Todd Batzel, and Ed Sell, “Integration of Project Based Learning into A Freshman Engineering Design Course”, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 23625. 3. Sven K. Esche, and Hamid A. Hadim, “Introduction of Project-based Learning into Mechanical Engineering Courses”. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2366. 4. Eric Constans, Jennifer Kadlowec, “Using a Project-Based Learning Approach to Teach Mechanical Design to First-Year Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, AC 2011-511. 5. Narendra Sharma , “Project-Based Laboratory Experiences in Mechanical Engineering”, Systemics
lecture topics. Because of the large class, individual oralproject presentations were not scheduled in the interest of time. A project of this magnitude wasa big challenge for students. The students got access to all the facilities and resources of theuniversity. There was a dissection laboratory which was equipped with power tools, hand tools,and measurement devices. In addition, the facilities of the Engineering Machine Shop wereaccessible for difficult disassembly and assembly tasks.MATERIALS SCIENCE PERSPECTIVESThe work reported here addressed the material selection aspect associated with each individualproduct that was reverse engineered. This provided the material science perspectives of theproduct archaeology. Typically this originated in
visits each teacher four times throughout the academic year to give support with teaching and experimental methods. Guskey and Yoon note that “educators at all levels need just-in-time, job-embedded assistance as they struggle to adapt new curricula and new instructional practices to their unique classroom contexts”[3] Full Group Meetings These meetings were held four times throughout the year, and a new materials science topic and classroom laboratory was introduced at each one. Time was also allotted for the teachers to share experiences, strategies, and pedagogical best practices with each other. Spending over 70 hours together between the camp and full-day sessions
that a significant portion of students are visual, sensing, and active learnerswho are at a disadvantage when taking traditional engineering lecture courses that do not allowthem to experience the technology and concepts being taught in class1,2,3. It is necessary forthem to touch, feel, and see examples before they can fully understand and process the course Page 12.525.2concepts. To assist in the teaching of smart materials and to expose SMA to a wider, STEMbased student body, a series of demonstrations and experiments have been developed eitherdirectly or with the support of The Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory in theDepartment of
AC 2008-35: USING INTERNET SOURCES TO SOLVE MATERIALSHOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTSBarry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen worked for 9 years in the automotive industry as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and laboratory manager. For the past 5 years, he has taught Mechanical Engineering Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW). His primary interests are in materials engineering, mechanics, contra dancing, and engineering technology education. Page 13.1342.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Using Internet Sources
AC 2010-210: EFFECTIVENESS OF VIDEO IN CASTING EDUCATIONCraig Johnson, Central Washington University Page 15.444.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Effectiveness of Video in Casting Education Craig Johnson, Ph.D., P.E. Central Washington University (CWU)AbstractOur traditional casting course features both lecture and laboratory venues. However it is notedthat many students have never interacted with foundry equipment, and there is a significantlearning curve associated with the ability of a student to execute basic green sand foundryoperations. Education methods were sought to reduce
of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for a courses on Connecting Mathematics with Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop
Paper ID #12605Using Graphical Data Presentation Techniques to Improve Student Success,Teaching Effectiveness, and Program AssessmentDr. Barry Dupen, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Indiana University – Pur- due University Fort Wayne (IPFW). He has 9 years’ experience as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. His primary interests lie in materials engineer- ing, mechanics, and engineering technology education. He is also an experienced contra dance caller
interests include physics and engineering education, collaborating with Prof. Genaro Zavala’s Physics Education Research and Innovation Group at Tecnologico de Monterrey (Monterrey, Mexico).Prof. Mathieu Brochu, McGill University Prof. Brochu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mining and Materials Engineering at McGill University, a Gerald Hatch Engineering Faculty Fellow on Additive Manufacturing and the Director of the Powder Processing and Additive Manufacturing of Advanced Materials Laboratory. He is codirector of the NSERC network on Holistic Innovation on Additive Manufacturing and co-director of the Canadian Additive Manufacturing Network. Prior to Joining McGill in 2004, Prof. Brochu held key AM
class: hands-on experienceAs a part of this course, each student was required to complete a project (Table 3). Depending onthe number of students enrolled in the course, the project work involved working individually orin groups on an experiment and then writing an individual or a group report. At the end of theproject, each individual/group was required to make an oral presentation on his/her/their workcontribution and findings. The individual/group report was 10-15 pages in length with adequatetechnical content and literature survey.Guest Lectures and Laboratory Tours: The special feature of this course was lectures by a limitednumber of guest speakers (maximum two). In Spring 2005, one of the guest speakers (from ourDepartment of Electrical
in Engineering Technology.Courses such as Robotics and Mechatronics, Quality Control, Manufacturing Materials,Microcontrollers, and Applied Mechanics can benefit from the laboratory experience inapplications of sustainability and eco design as well as material and processes selection. As wellas helping in the teaching of various courses, such experience benefits students who are pursuingdegrees in the engineering field. Students in the Mechanical, Electrical, Industrial andBiomedical fields along with many others can learn many new skills from case study projectssuch as designing and fabricating various consumer products, machines and equipment. Suchprojects show students how to use different types of technology, and demonstrate how
the biodegradable polymers as a mechanism to deliver chemical oxidants to remediate chemical and bio- logical contaminants in wastewater and soil. She conducts educational research where she has creatively works to change educational instruction in laboratory courses by introducing topics in sustainability us- ing case studies. In 2010 she led the NCA&T team that developed the National 4-H Science Youth Day experiment which was used to teach millions of K-8 students about water quality, energy use, and global warming. Her work and research involvement includes over $2,000,000 of research funding. To date she has received a number of teaching and research awards including the 2005 National Women of Color in
participation in engineering and providing international experiences and perspectives to undergraduate students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Teaching Report Writing in Undergraduate LabsAbstractFor undergraduate engineering students in lower level laboratory classes, writing up the resultsfrom their lab activities is often far more of a challenge than performing the activity itself oreven analyzing the results. The instructor’s challenge is therefore not just to teach concepts liketensile testing or cooling curve analysis, but also to teach technical communication and theaccepted reporting standards and vocabulary of the field. Over the last
Society for Engineering Education Annu. Conf. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/27117.[16] S. P. Gentry. (2018). Scaffolding Simulations in a Rate Processes of Materials Course. Available: https://nanohub.org/resources/28793[17] K. R. Galloway and S. L. Bretz, "Measuring Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate General Chemistry and Organic Chemistry Laboratories: A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 2019-2030, Dec. 8 2015.[18] K. R. Galloway and S. L. Bretz, "Measuring Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory: A National, Cross-Sectional Study," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 2006-2018, Dec. 8 2015.[19] N. Singer
Paper ID #10870Eliminating Lectures (and video lectures) in Large Introductory MaterialsScience and Engineering Courses: Large Gains in Student LearningProf. Steven M. Yalisove, University of Michigan S. M. Yalisove obtained a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania in 1986. After a post doc at Bell Laboratories, he joined the Michigan faculty in 1989. In 1996 he was a Fulbright scholar at the FOM institute in the Netherlands. He is currently the Associate Director of the Materials Laboratory at the Center for Ultrafast Optical Sciences at the University of Michigan. Yalisove’s
Page 22.1266.3concepts is an active process involving visual thinking; looking is not seeing, nor is seeingnecessarily believing, understanding, and being able to demonstrate knowledge. Upon viewing anew concept students often reflect about their own tacit knowledge and try to make a connectionto the new concept, thereby creating their own knowledge. Unfortunately, as educators we oftenassume we don’t have control, or even awareness, of such connections in each of our students’minds, thus it is exceedingly difficult to correct miss-steps along the way. However, by taking aproactive and creative approach, we can guide the visualization process through seeded commonexperiences generated in the classroom, study hall, or laboratory. Setting
course has six objectives: 1. to become familiar with equipment and procedures to determine properties of engineering materials; 2. to learn to prepare metallographic specimens, examine the microstructures, and understand the effects of heat treatments; 3. to become familiar with the ASTM standards for materials testing; 4. to develop spreadsheet skills in processing, plotting and analyzing experimental data; 5. to interpret experimental results and compare them to expected results; and 6. to create professional and concise laboratory reports using spreadsheet and word processing software.In fall 2020, faculty at my university chose their own modality of instruction – in-person, online or ahybrid model. I chose