Development, Boston, Elsevier, 2016.9 Klotz, Leidy, et al., Sustainability as a Route to Broadening Participation in Engineering JEE103.1 : 137–153 (1/2014)10 Vanderburg, Willem H., et al., How Well Is Engineering Education Incorporating SocietalIssues? JEE 83.4 : 357–361 (10/1994)11 K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, pp. 1-1512 D. Melton, Stacking Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Alongside Other Pedagogies,KEENZine Intrepreneurship Edition, Kern Family Foundation, at website:http://online.fliphtml5.com/zyet/hofr/#p=713 Website: https://engineeringunleashed.com/Mindset-Matters/Framework.aspx
. Moazed, “Design a New Set of Strength Labs for the Course, Mechanics ofMaterials”, ASEE 2016 Annual Conference, June 26-29, New Orleans, Louisiana.[6] A. Xiao, K. Bryden, D. Brigham, “Virtual Reality Tools for Enhancing Interactive Learning”,ASEE 2004 Annual Conference, June 20-23, Salt Lake City, Utah.[7] A. Sampaio & P. Henriques, “The Use of Virtual Reality Models in Civil Engineering Training”,International Journal of Simulation Modelling, vol. 6, pp. 124-134, June 2007.[8] M. Capra, M. Aquino, A. Dodson, S. Benford, “A Visualisation Tool for Civil EngineeringVirtual Reality”, 1st FIG International Symposium on Engineering Surveys for Construction Worksand Structural Engineering, June 28-July 1, Nottingham, United Kingdom.[9] E. Biglari
2006-1921: INCORPORATION OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS INTO ANINTRODUCTORY MATERIALS ENGINEERING COURSEBrian Mitchell, Tulane University Brian S. Mitchell is Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. He is also Associate Director of the Tulane Institute for Macromolecular Engineering and Science (TIMES). He graduated with High Distinction with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana in 1986, and received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1987 and 1991, respectively. Nanostructured materials and materials processing are Brian’s primary research
within the course management system.AcknowledgementsProfessor Spencer Seung. Kim thanks Mrs. Susan Donovan and the members of 2004-5 of theFaculty Learning Community (FLC) at RIT for their encouragement and support. Page 11.280.6References 1. Weimer, M. G. “Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice,” San Francisco, Jossey- Bass, 2002. 2. McCombs, B. L. and Whisler, J. S. “The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997. 3. Razmov, V. and Anderson R. “Pedagogical Techniques Supported
related to sustainability included: (a) an individual assignment on material(s)choices for particular applications; (b) one group project on renewable energy (clean energy)issues; (c) a case study on the use of fly ash in concrete; a case study on the use of corroded drillpipe in walkways and other low load-bearing applications, and (d) one final project that was areport/presentation from each student on a corrosion issue (if possible, one with a sustainabilityfocus).Topics like wind energy, solar energy, biofuels, and carbon capture and sequestration are usuallyassociated with sustainable engineering. Often these names are considered to be synonymouswith sustainability; carefully thought out solutions to our current problems. However, each
Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April1993.4 “A Multi-university, Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project in Engineering,” P. Mellodge and D. Folz, Proceedingsof the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2009, Austin, TX, American Society forEngineering Education.5 “Microwave Processing of Polymeric Coatings for Guitar Woods,” C. Hammond, C. Hill, C. Sprinkle, A. Sorensenand S. Vera, Journal of Undergraduate Materials Research, Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Vol. 4, April 2010. Page 15.99.10
SystemStudents have to obtain XRD patterns using the virtual X-ray diffractometer at room, distinguishsuperlattice vs. fundamental peaks, calculate the structure factor “F” for ordered (tetragonal) anddisordered (face centered cubic) phases of CoPt, calculate order parameter “S” for all annealedsamples, calculate the average particle size of ordered phase, determine the effect of the order-disorder transition on an XRD pattern and understand order-disorder transitionExperiment #6: X-ray Diffraction Study of the Structural Development of UniaxiallyStretched Rubber.Using the virtual X-ray diffractometer students have to obtain X-ray patterns for several rubbersamples, compare diffraction patterns, identify the crystalline phase occurring at high strain
://www.coexploration.org/howsthewater/html/overviewwater.html 6. Zeilik, Michael. University of New Mexico Department of Physics & Astronomy, Institute for Astrophysics. Retrieved on January 6, 2011 from http://flag.wceruw.org/tools/conmap/solar.php 7. Borrego, M., Newswander, C. B., McNair, L.D., McGinnis, S., & Paretti, M.C. (year). Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2009 Volume 1 Issue 3.AppendixFigure 3. Concept Map quiz on the Solar SystemFigure 4. Concept-in-Context Map on Diffusion of Solids.Figure 5. Concept-in-Context Map Quiz on Single Phase AlloysConcept-in-Context Map on Material Failures
/Documents/CP28-05.pdf5 Bylaws for the International Code Council, Inc., Seehttp://www.iccsafe.org/AboutICC/Documents/bylaws0109.pdf6 ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Seehttp://www.abet.org/forms.shtml#For_Engineering_Programs_Only7 See http://www.standardslearn.org/Standards_in_the_classroom.aspx8 See http://www.standardslearn.org/trainingcourse.aspx9 See http://www.ccrl.us/10 See http://www.astm.org/studentmember/Peer_to_peer_courses.html11 Used with permission by author Linda S. Schadler, PhD, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY12 Used with permission by author N.J. Delatte, P.E., Ph.D., Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH13 Used with permission by author Laura L. Sullivan, Ph.D., Kettering University
knowledge learned in the classroom. Students can then be guided totransfer the specific insights from one assignment into the potential of benefits of compositematerials in other engineering applications. Page 15.655.12References[1] Y. Dong and J. El-Sayed, Mechanics, Process, and Design Simulation of Fiber- Reinforced Composite Materials – a New Course Development, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper # AC 2007-1005, Honolulu, Hawaii (2007).[2] Boss, S., Krauss, J., Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in
Used to Load BridgeNewA 1000lb Q-Test tensile/compression machine was adapted for use in the bridge testing. Thebottom grip is removed and a support structure put in its place. This structure has a span of 22inches to accommodate the 24 inch long bridge. The upper grip is replaced with a welded steelU- shape. On the bottom of the U are openings for insertion of the steel rod(s). The machine isthen put into compression mode at a constant speed. The software controlling the machine isTestworks 3 from MTS. The loading is much smoother than before and the bridge top staysparallel to the ground. Since using this new method, the students are happier with the testingprocedure. More ‘A’ grades have resulted than with the old tester. The new tester is
Education vol. 6, 297–306, Winter 2007.[2] T.S. Ritchie, M. T. Perez Cardenas, and S. Ganapati, “Establishment and Implementation of aPeer-Supported Professional-Development Initiative by Doctoral Students, for DoctoralStudents.” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 95, pp 1947−1953, 2018.[3] Kendricks et al, “Aligning Best Practices in Student Success and Career Preparedness: AnExploratory Study to Establish Pathways to STEM Careers for Undergraduate MinorityStudents”, Journal of Research in Tech Careers, vol 3, No. 1, p 27, 2019.[4] Advance CTE. “Science, technology, engineering and mathematics career cluster knowledgeand skill statements.” 2008. Retrieved from https://cte.careertech.org/sites/default/files/K%26S-CareerCluster-ST-2008.pdf (Accessed October 2020
] P. Steif and M. Hansen, Feeding Back Results from a Statics Concept Inventory to improve Instruction, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.[4] R. Edwards, R. Englund and S. Sweeney, Direct Assessment of Mechanics of Materials Learning with Concept Inventory, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007. Page 14.1143.12[5] B. Self, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, G. Gray, D. Evans and J. Lane, The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report and Some Results, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005
Society, Vol. 30, Iss. 5.Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., and McCullough, J. D (2007). “Benefits of UndergraduateResearch Experiences”, Science, Vol. 316, pp. 548-549, 27 April.Turvill, W. (2013). “Africa as you’ve never seen it before”, Daily Mail Online,(www.dailymail.co.uk/news), 5 October.Windsor Plywood (2016). “Australian Bluegum”, http://www.windsorplywood.com, siteaccessed August 2016.Zziwa, A, Ziraba, Y.N. and Mwakali, J.A. (2010). “Strength Properties of Selected UgandaTimbers”, International Wood Products Journal, 1 (1): 21-27.
recognition of the material(s) tested and, thus,they can examine the validity of theoretical concepts as well as uncertainties resulted from alaboratory process. Students working with the team members were finally required to write apaper on the laboratory exercise after the completion of the lab experiment. We have reported theresults and findings in the development of POGIL based-materials and manufacturing curriculumin the ASEE conferences, the Materials Symposia, and other professional meetings.21-26 2) Results of the Student Survey in POGIL-based Materials Laboratory Course This new laboratory module in 3D printing, as a term project, emphasizes the needs togive students proper preparation in additive manufacturing (AM), so that
and Research, 2013. 14(1): p. 56. 5. Lee, V.S. and S. Ash, Unifying the undergraduate curriculum through inquiry‐guided learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010. 2010(121): p. 35-‐46. 6. Justice, C., et al., Inquiry-‐based learning in higher education: administrators’ perspectives on integrating inquiry pedagogy into the curriculum. Higher Education, 2009. 58(6): p. 841. 7. King, N., et al., A Scoping Study Investigating Student Perceptions towards Inquiry Based Learning in the Laboratory. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016. 4(3): p. 305-‐314. 8. Flora, J.R. and A.T
implemented muddiestpoints as a feedback mechanism.Muddiest points first entered the pedagogical toolbox in the late 1980’s through publications byMosteller [3,4] and Cross and Angelo [5]. Since then, their documented use and the study oftheir impacts has grown. It has only been in the last decade or so that significant interest hasappeared in the engineering education literature, however. Krause et al. [6] presented apedagogical toolkit including the use of muddiest points for improving the teaching of materialsscience. Carberry et al. [7] summarized results from studies of the implementation of muddiestpoints in several settings including chemistry and engineering. Researchers have correlated useof muddiest point-inspired explanatory materials with
, S. Gupta, and L. Pruitt, “Undergraduate Students Teaching Children:K-8 Outreach within the Core Engineering Curriculum,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2006.6 E. Rothstein, “At the Exploratorium and the Tech Museum, 2 Views of Science,” The New York Times,August 12, 2006; http://travel2.nytimes.com/2006/08/12/arts/12muse.html7 A. Daniel, “A Powerful Force,” Prism, Jan. 2005;http://www.prismmagazine.org/jan06/feature_powerful.cfm8 A. Chamberlain, “AT THE EXPLORATORIUM: Teaching Art and Science,”Journal of the College ofEducation, University of Hawaii, 1987.9 http://www.exploratorium.edu/10 http://www.thetech.org/11 http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/12 http://ice.chem.wisc.edu/catalogitems/ScienceKits.htm#Amorphous13
Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp 443- 461, 1998.4. Kuhn, Matthew and Vaught-Alexander, Karen, “Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum”, Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol 120, No 4, pp 392-400, 1994.5. Henderleiter, Julie, and Pringle, David, “Effects of Contextual-Based Laboratory Experiments on Attitudes ofAnalytical Chemistry Students”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol 76, No 1, pp 100-106, 1999.6. Paretti, Marie C. and Burgoyne, Christine , “Integrating Engineering and Communication: A Study of CapstoneDesign Courses,” Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2005. 7. Dragga, S., “Responding to Technical Writing”, The Technical Writing Teacher, Vol 18, No. 3, pp 202-221,1991
Experiences,” Published by Jossey-Bass, 2003.4 M. Ohring, “Materials Science of Thin Films,” Academic Press, 2002.5. L. Maissel and R. Glang, “Handbook of Thin Film Technology,” McGraw-Hill, 1970. Page 12.1332.126. L. B. Freund and S. Suresh, “Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation and Surface Evolution,” Cambridge, 2003.
volume ratio increases—at the nanoscale, this ratio is huge. learning goals 1 - The physical form of a solid influences the degree to which it interacts with its environment: the smaller it is in three, two, or one dimension(s), the more readily it interacts. 2 - The magnitudes involved with the nanoscale can be represented with powers of 10 and scaling. 3 - The surface area to volume ratio changes with the shape or size of an object. This ratio changes dramatically in the nanoscale.There is a section for each learning goal. Each of the three sections begins with anintroductory article about something familiar, yet describing an aspect
Bridge Decks”, Intl. SAMPE Technical Conf., p. 2903 (2004).10. K. C. Chen, B. London, L. Vanasupa, T.T Orling, and L. Christensen, “Travelogue from the Materials World: A First Week Laboratory Activity”, ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., 3664 (2004).11. W. D. Callister, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: 6th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, (2001).12. PRIME website: http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/sgleixner/PRIME/13. M. Alley, M. Schreiber, and J. Muffo, “Pilot Testing of a New Design for Presentation Slides to Teach Science and Engineering,” 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., T1A-1 (2005).14. S. Krause, J.L. Decker, J.L. Niska, T.L. Alford, and R. Griffin, “Identifying Student
of "yielding". Page 11.1387.3When asked to straighten the tubing, each student immediately feels the increased resistance,which is further enhanced for those able to bend and straighten the piece more than once. Moststudents are surprised and impressed by the large force required for straightening. The tubing islong enough so each student can try a second time, now knowing what to expect, using the otherend of the piece. After experiencing the effect of cold-work on the copper, students use pliers tohold the worked region(s) in the flame of a propane torch. The tubing is heated until it is red hot,then cooled completely under cold water
sharing the topic with current and future students. Our interdisciplinary approachgave us perspectives from each other’s disciplines we could not have gained by studying thesubject individually. Additionally, we are modelling this interdisciplinary behavior for ourstudents. REFERENCES[1] K. Frydenborg, Chocolate Sweet Science and Dark Secrets of the World’s Favorite Treat. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2015.[2] C. Teubner, The Chocolate Bible. Chartwell Books Inc, 1997.[3] S. Beckett, The Science of Chocolate. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008.[4] “Code of Federal Regulations Title 21” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, April 1, 2015. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov
contributed to the extra lecturecovering example problems for this subject. The lecture recordings are archived for this courseand students are able to use them as a study tool, as well. Page 14.847.12 Figure 8. Polymer Structures Screencast usage for the Fall 2008 cohort6.3.1 Polymer Structures Homework AnalysisIn preparation for the quiz, students were asked the following questions on polymer structuresfrom Chapter 14 of Callister.2 Homework problem 14.23 states: For each of the following pairs of polymers, do the following: (1) state whether one polymer is more likely to crystallize than the other; (2) if it is possible, note which is the more likely and then cite reasons(s
There are a wide range of student perceptions about the panels, and this is unlikely to change Creating competitiveness between students is difficult and that these panels seem to have failed in that endeavor6.0 AcknowledgementsThanks are due to the individuals who served as panel members alongside the authors of thispaper. Dr. Dennis D. Truax is also owed thanks for helping to facilitate several items associatedwith the 2014 CE 3311 offering, and for working toward a solution allowing SPM’s. Page 26.832.137.0 Bibliography1. Larson, D., McKean, R., Cramer, S. (2014). “Learning Outcomes: Less is More-ABET’s Criterion 3 Needs
, pp. 917-924.7. Muryanto, S., “Concept Mapping: An Interesting and Useful Learning Tool forChemical Engineering Laboratories,” Int. J. Engng. Ed., Vol. 22, No. 5, 2006, pp. 979-985.8. Evans, D. L., McNeill, B. W. and Beakley, G. C., “Design in Engineering Education:Past views and future directions,” Engineering Education, July/August, 1990, pp. 517-522.9. Dym, C. L., Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views, Cambridge University Press,New York, 1994.10. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, Longman, NewYork, 1956.11. Safoutin, M. J., Atman, C. J., Adams, R., Rutar, T., Kramlich, J. C. and Fridley, J. L.,“A Design Attribute Framework for Course Planning and Learning Assessment,” IEEETransactions on Education, Vol
Paper ID #10870Eliminating Lectures (and video lectures) in Large Introductory MaterialsScience and Engineering Courses: Large Gains in Student LearningProf. Steven M. Yalisove, University of Michigan S. M. Yalisove obtained a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Pennsylvania in 1986. After a post doc at Bell Laboratories, he joined the Michigan faculty in 1989. In 1996 he was a Fulbright scholar at the FOM institute in the Netherlands. He is currently the Associate Director of the Materials Laboratory at the Center for Ultrafast Optical Sciences at the University of Michigan. Yalisove’s
learners: active learners have the opportunity to “do” experiments, sequentiallearners follow step by step instructions revealing the concept(s) piece by piece, and summaryquestions are provided for reflective learners. An example experiment is shown in the Appendix. For the first time, students have remarked that the labs are fun (emotionally engaging),and the demonstrations have improved understanding of concepts as measured by targetedproblems and through formative assessment. 4 5 2
habits.These students did not produce much non-recyclable trash in the assigned week, but for fear ofnot completing the assignment, filled the bag with items they might normally recycle, thusengendering greater emphasis be placed on recycling in class than might have been necessaryhad the instructions been clearer. Examples of such responses are: The trash collected is not an accurate account of an individual[’]s waste. For instance I cook with a lot of fresh meat and vegetables, I had to leave out almost all of my trash (fat from steak trimmings, the base from lettuce heads, lots of egg shells, pineapple...). The only trash I was able to bring in was trash I would of put into the recycling if I didn't have this assignment. Maybe the