Asee peer logo
Displaying all 10 results
Conference Session
Advanced Materials Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Somnath Chattopadhyay, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
  (2) I SWhere S = I/ym, which is also known as the sectional modulus of the cross section. Page 14.1046.4If we denote the cross-sectional area of the beam as A and the aspect ratio by , then wehave, A bd (3a )   b/d (3b)We also have, ym  d / 2 (3c)The quantity S = I/ym the section modulus can be written in terms of the quantities A and as: I A3 / 2 S  (4) ym 6 1 / 2Now we
Conference Session
Professional Development in Materials Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Barry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne
Tagged Divisions
Materials
choices do not cover all datapatterns, such as the S-curves for impact vs. temperature graphs.Student performance is assessed with a grading rubric which evaluates graphs within laboratoryreports. Low performance on three laboratory reports has led to instructional improvements,including additional focus in the lecture and detailed handouts. Subsequent assessment showscontinued improvement in skill levels from one laboratory report to the next, and from onesemester to the next.IntroductionTAC/ABET requires that engineering technology graduates have an ability to communicateeffectively (Criterion 3, Program Outcome g).1 The MET program at IPFW includes twocommunications courses and three English courses which develop students’ skills in
Conference Session
Professional Development in Materials Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Griffin, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Reza Rowshan, Texas A&M University, Qatar
Tagged Divisions
Materials
tested a 6061 aluminum alloy link. The students were able to directly see the results of theirdesign and the difficulties in translating an idea to a finished product.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the following students in MEEN 360, fall 2008 at Texas A&MUniversity at Qatar. The students were: OMAR ABDALLAH, SOHA HISHAM AABDELSATTAR, ZUHAIB SYED ABDIN, MOHAMMED A AL-KHORI, OMARMOHAMMAD J M AL-QATAMI, AHMAD MOHAMMED S A ALMANSOOR, COLLIN CDAVIS, ALI MOHAMAD FAYAD, MISAM ALI MEHMOOD JAFFER TIMOTHYRAYMOND, TAYLOR, DANI JAAFAR WANNOUS, and Ric Carusi the machinist. Page 14.882.6Page 14.882.7 Table
Conference Session
Emerging Issues in Materials Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Senay Purzer, Purdue University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
the Computer Age G. Forman and P. Pufall, Ed.4. Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science ( pp.129–186). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Press.5. Streveler, R.A., Litzinger, T.A., Miller, R.L., and Steif, P.S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279-294.6. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.7. Vosniadou, S. & Ioannides
Conference Session
Advanced Materials Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ajit Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University; Ronnie Bolick, North Carolina A&T State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
, strength etc. Furthermore, it is also stressed that the cost ofmaterials and manufacturing, is comparable to the parts that are being reengineered.Session 3: Reengineering of an actual engineering component made out of AluminumIn the lectures 1 and 2 of Session 3, a replacement for a typical aerospace part made out ofAluminum 2024- T3 is considered as a reengineering project. First students are provided withphysical properties of the aluminum and fiberglass/carbon composites. In general students followthe following procedure for reengineering the component using composite materials.Reengineering procedure≠ Tape properties are calculated using classical micro-mechanical theory for S-Glass fibers and Carbon fibers with Epoxy resin system
Conference Session
Introduction to Materials Courses
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen Kitto, Western Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Conference Session
Professional Development in Materials Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kalan Kucera, University of Kentucky; John Balk
Tagged Divisions
Materials
; pp 1-11[6] Felder, R. “Teach Engineering in the 21st Century with a 12th-Century Teaching Model: How Bright is That?” Chemical Engineering Education, 40(2), 110-113 (2006)[7] “Schaffer, J, et. al, “The Science and Design of Engineering Materials, Second Edition” (1999), McGraw-Hill Education.[8] Cairncross, S. and Mannion, M. “Interactive Multimedia and Learning: Realizing the Benefits” Innovations in education and teaching international [1470-3297] yr:2001 vol:38 iss:2 pg:156[9] Wankat, P., Felder, R., Smith, K., and Oreovicz, F. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering.” Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground. Eds. M. T. Huber
Conference Session
Emerging Issues in Materials Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diane Folz, Virginia Tech; Christine Burgoyne, Virginia Tech; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Tech; Richard Goff, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Materials
Learning through Inquiry: AGuidebook for Institutions and Instructors, edited by V. S. Lee (Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2004). Page 14.1017.10
Conference Session
Introduction to Materials Courses
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Surendra Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Materials
] P. Steif and M. Hansen, Feeding Back Results from a Statics Concept Inventory to improve Instruction, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.[4] R. Edwards, R. Englund and S. Sweeney, Direct Assessment of Mechanics of Materials Learning with Concept Inventory, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, 2007. Page 14.1143.12[5] B. Self, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, G. Gray, D. Evans and J. Lane, The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report and Some Results, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005
Conference Session
Emerging Issues in Materials Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tershia Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan; Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan; Crisca Bierwert, University of Michigan; Lindsay Shuller, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Materials
contributed to the extra lecturecovering example problems for this subject. The lecture recordings are archived for this courseand students are able to use them as a study tool, as well. Page 14.847.12 Figure 8. Polymer Structures Screencast usage for the Fall 2008 cohort6.3.1 Polymer Structures Homework AnalysisIn preparation for the quiz, students were asked the following questions on polymer structuresfrom Chapter 14 of Callister.2 Homework problem 14.23 states: For each of the following pairs of polymers, do the following: (1) state whether one polymer is more likely to crystallize than the other; (2) if it is possible, note which is the more likely and then cite reasons(s