Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Dale R. Baker, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Terry L. Alford, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University; Brady J. Gibbons, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

principles, which include the following. For moreeffective learning, instructors need to: 1) elicit students' prior knowledge to help informinstruction; 2) engage students to promote conceptual change so they can construct deepknowledge organized in a conceptual framework; and 3) encourage metacognition to build habitsof expert learners who define their learning goals and monitor their own progress. The pedagogyuses two-way formative feedback in which students reflect on their learning in a class with class-end Muddiest Point feedback and instructors respond to student misconceptions and learningissues by adjusting instruction and providing next class feedback to the students. The two-wayfeedback process promotes self reflection not only on the part

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle M. Blum, Syracuse University; Katie D. Cadwell, Syracuse University; Julie M. Hasenwinkel, Syracuse University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

. Finally, students are askedto reflect on their scaffold design. After a discussion on mechanics and the importance of fiberdirection, students are asked how they would change their design to better mimic the structureand function of the distal bicep. Finally students are asked to sketch a representative pattern of ascaffold design to be strong in shear, and to discuss within their group why this would result inthe desired the material response. Page 26.1.6Discussion & Student OutcomesThe described activity can be tailored toward different educational levels. This activity wasperformed successfully with 32 rising eighth grade girls as well as

Conference Session

A Virtual Community of Practice for Developing and Implementing Evidence-based Pedagogies

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida; Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Brittany Nelson-Cheeseman, School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas; Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Joseph De-Chung Shih, Stanford University; Daniel Lepek, The Cooper Union; Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University; Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Richard E Eitel, Stevens Institute of Technology (SSE)

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Materials

VCP.Leadership VCP The leadership VCP comprised 6 weekly sessions which prepared five pairs of faculty leadersto facilitate their own VCPs in different subject areas. These sessions, led by Karl Smith andCynthia Finelli, were conducted weekly and lasted approximately 1.5 hours; there were also twofollow-up sessions after the faculty leaders began leading their own VCPs. The six sessions pro-vided an introduction to the VCP and training in research-based practices of active learning, en-hancing motivation, learning objectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy, as well as student teams and Page 26.132.4cooperative learning. Final sessions focused on reflection

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard E Eitel, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Materials

on the outcome of the“Concept Checks,” further team based discussion, whole class discussions, or a mini lecture maybe used to address any specific areas of misunderstanding. Typically 3-5 cycles of POGILactivities, concept checks, and review/discussion are conducted during each class meeting.Class sessions are occasionally broken up by short (5-10 minute) in-class experiments ordemonstrations (preferably once per week). Example activities include: making Elmer’s gluesilly putty, super conductor levitation, zinc electroplating and inter-diffusion to make a “gold”penny, or observing the work hardening behavior of a paper clip. Finally, at the end of most classsessions students are asked to reflect on the material covered by completing an exit

Conference Session

Materials Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig Johnson P.E., Central Washington University; Charles Pringle, Central Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

the activity. A secondaspect was that a sizeable minority of students focused on the material or part more than thesocietal effects of the system or structure (20%). Last, a minority of students desired some sortof group interaction during some portion of the activity (12%). A summary of this results areshown in Table 1 below: Table 1: Results of Survey Data PercentFrom student comments: Did you enjoy this activity? 98From student comments: Did you find this activity valuable? 96From the data: Students reflecting on a poor initial topic choice: 15From

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Joseph Stuart P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Education, Life time member Society of Manufacturing Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers PUBLICATIONS (i)Most Closely Related [1] W.J. Stuart ’Problem Based Case Learning - Composite Materials Course De- velopment – Examples and classroom reflections’ NEW Conference, Oct 2011 [2] W.J. Stuart and Bedard R. (EPRI) ’Ocean Renewable Energy Course Evolution and Status’ presented at Energy Ocean Pacific & Oregon Wave Energy Trust Conference, Sept. 2010. [3] W.J. Stuart, Wave energy 101, presented at Ore- gon Wave Energy Symposium, Newport, OR, Sept. 2009. [4] W.J. Stuart, Corrosion considerations when designing with exotic metals and advanced composites, presented at Corrosion Conference of Exotic Met

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claes Fredriksson, Granta Design, Ltd.; Hannah Melia, Granta Design, Ltd.; Justinas Cesonis, University of Cambridge

Tagged Divisions

Materials

  Materials Engineering 2  Cambridge University (UK), Material Science Dep. MSci Materials Science 3  University West (Sweden)  BEng  Materials Science and Engineering 4  University of Illinois (US)  BSc  Materials Science and Engineering 5  McMaster University (Canada)  BSc  Materials Engineering This set of courses was selected in order to reflect the different needs in North America,continental Europe, and the UK. Figure 3 indicates how they compare to each other. Page 26.201.4Figure 3. Curricula/syllabus assignment to the scope of Materials Science

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Materials

knowledge using the uniqueliteracy tools and language of the discipline2.The broader outcomes of disciplinary literacy practice are to build reflection and sense making instudents, bringing them conceptually forward from their novice understanding. The link between sensemaking, and conceptual understanding has a research history in engineering 6, and is explicitly linked forK12 science7,8. The purpose of infusing disciplinary literacy into engineering curriculum is to buildhabits of thinking, and to help students develop a deeper understanding of core content ideas. This alignswith development of expertise, as disciplinary literacy practices build towards effective communicationusing discipline specific content language9-15. The U.S. Accreditation

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen Meehan, University of Glasgow; Robert H. Hadfield, University of Glasgow; Andrew Phillips

Tagged Divisions

Materials

for First Year Undergraduates that Connects the Electrical and Thermal Properties of MetalsAbstractThe undergraduate engineering programmes at the University of Glasgow were recently revisedto include a common core of classes in Year 1 and Year 2. Materials I, an introductory materialsscience course, is now taken by all Year 1 engineering students. The lectures in the course weremodified to include topics that are of interest to electronic and electrical engineering students,electrical and optical properties of materials. A hands-on laboratory experience has been developedto support student learning on electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity. The hands-onexperiment about optical reflectivity will be added to the

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University; Natasha Mamaril, University of Kentucky; David Ross Economy, Clemson University; Ellen L. Usher, University of Kentucky; Caihong Li, University of Kentucky; Julia L. Sharp, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

redundancy. MSE-2 was removed because of redundancies withMSE-1 and to reduce the length of the final MSE-SE scale. MSE-3 was also removed forunclear wording (i.e., because of the initial use of the term qualities rather than properties).Because MSE-7 and MSE-8 were examining the same concepts as MSE-9, they were removedfrom the scale. MSE-10 was similar to MSE-11 and hence removed. MSE-16 was removed as itwas similar to MSE-15. After discussion, both MSE-17 and MSE-18 were eliminated becausethese concepts were emphasized in general chemistry classes. MSE-20 was also taken out of thescale because some of the course instructors did not believe the reflected content that wasadequately covered during the course (time constraints in certain sections of

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Robert J. Prins, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

developmental platform oflife-cycle and systems thinking introduced in the freshman and sophomore years. The moduleproject concentrated on analyzing and comparing the lifecycle phases of a wooden pencil versusa mechanical pencil to determine ecological impacts and to answer the question as to which wasmore of a sustainable product.Other changes to the project in FA13 further reflect changes to the course content. With theRapid Prototyping Laboratory coming online in the summer of 2013, the production of aconceptual prototype via 3D printing was added. The addition provided an opportunity forstudents to practice using CAD software and to become familiar with the capabilities of thelaboratory.An economic feasibility study was also added in FA13 to

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isaac L. Howard P.E., Mississippi State University; Braden T. Smith, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

or concerns. 6. I learned a great deal in this class. 7. The presentation of course content helped me to learn this class. 8. The tests were fair. 9. The tests reflected material presented in lecture and/or assigned reading. 10. Tests and/or assignments were graded in a reasonable period of time. 11. I would recommend this instructor to other students if they wanted to learn this subject. 12. The lecturer for the course also taught this lab. 13. The lab sessions related to the lectures and improved my understanding. 14. The lab sessions were properly supervised for safety. 15. The lab instructor provided assistance when needed. 16. The lab instructions