Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaobin Le, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Masoud Olia P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

Wiley, Tenth Edition, Hoboken, NJ, ISBN 9781119321590[2]. Sullivan, G. (2005, June), Introductory Material Science: A Solid Modeling Approach Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15368 10[3]. Gentry, S. P., & Faltens, T. (2017, June), A Computer-Based Interactive Activity for Visualizing Crystal Structures in Introductory Materials Science Courses Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—27457[4]. Gentry, S. P., & Faltens, T., & Wheeler, W. A., & Schleife, A. (2018, June), Measuring Student Learning of Crystal Structures Using Computer-based Visualizations Paper

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Olubiyi Obada, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Simeon Akindele Abolade, Atlantic Technological University, Ireland; Shittu Babatunde Akinpelu, Atlantic Technological University, Ireland; Ayodeji Nathaniel Oyedeji, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Emmanuel Okafor, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia; Cynthia Ujuh Odili, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Vanessa Faustina Ogenyi; Sokoga Victor Ategbe, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Adrian Oshioname Eberemu, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Fatai Olukayode Anafi, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Abdulkarim Salawu Ahmed, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria; Akinlolu Akande, Atlantic Technological University. Ireland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

. Akinpelu3, Ayodeji N. Oyedeji1,Emmanuel Okafor4, Cynthia U. Odili5, Vanessa F. Ogenyi6, Victor S. Ategbe8, Adrian O.Eberemu7,10, Fatai O. Anafi1,10, Abdulkarim S. Ahmed8,10, Raymond B. Bako9,10, AkinloluAkande2,31 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria. 2 Mathematical Modelling and Intelligent Systems for Health and Environment Research Group, School of Science, Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. 3 Modelling and Computation for Health and Society, Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. 4 SDAIA-KFUPM Joint Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, King Fahd University of

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luciana Lisa Lao, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; LAY POH TAN

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

engineering education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2002, doi:10.1080/03043790210129603.[4] S. Monteiro, L. Almeida, and A. García-Aracil, “(Mis)matched perceptions: Graduatesand employers’ views about competencies in professional activities,” in Edulearn’19Proceedings, 2019, pp. 8662-8666, doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2019.2147[5] G. Rayner, and T. Papakonstantinou, “Employer perspectives of the current and futurevalue of STEM graduate skills and attributes: An Australian study,” Journal of Teaching andLearning for Graduate Employability, vol. 6, no.1, pp. 100-115, 2015, doi:10.21153/jtlge2015vol6no1art576[6] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Roberts, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

question is “Whichphase(s) are present at point G and in what fractions?” A figure would be included in this questionin which students interpret and use to answer the question.In the traditional class, there were three high stake exams which means a student’s final gradein the class relied heavily on these exams. The percentage of each test in the traditional classcontributed to 75% of total grade, 25% for each of the three exams. Figure 4 shows thepercentage of incorrect questions according to type, split up by the three different exams fromthe traditional class. When observing the total percentage of questions wrong, Figure 4 showsthat students struggled the least with Exam 1, the second least with Exam 2, and the most withExam 3. Figure 4