Wiley, Tenth Edition, Hoboken, NJ, ISBN 9781119321590[2]. Sullivan, G. (2005, June), Introductory Material Science: A Solid Modeling Approach Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2—15368 10[3]. Gentry, S. P., & Faltens, T. (2017, June), A Computer-Based Interactive Activity for Visualizing Crystal Structures in Introductory Materials Science Courses Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—27457[4]. Gentry, S. P., & Faltens, T., & Wheeler, W. A., & Schleife, A. (2018, June), Measuring Student Learning of Crystal Structures Using Computer-based Visualizations Paper
Reference(s) Chapter 22 Economic, environmental, and societal issues Callister and Rethwisch [32]; [38] in materials engineering; Wind power example Wind turbine blade materials [39] 2 Rare earth elements - mining [40] 8 Safety, testing – faked submarine material tests [41] 14 Plastic pollution during its lifecycle [42], [43], [44] 14 Nanoplastics prevalence and health concerns [45] 15 Road made of recycled plastic [46] 12, 13 Ceramics, carbon footprint, water usage, Bubble charts [47] recycled fraction 17 Corrosion of lead pipe and Flint [48] 17 Biodegradable
Answer?" Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2-16, 2003. 3. Maldonado, S., Khan, M. A., & Moon, S. K., "Designing for the Future: AI and Machine Learning in Engineering Education," Computers & Education, vol. 123, pp. 100-113, 2018. 4. Bordogna, J., Fromm, E., & Ernst, E. W., "Engineering Education: Innovation through Integration," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 3-8, 1993. 5. Reynolds, A., & Lewis, D., "Teams Solve Problems Faster When They’re More Cognitively Diverse," Harvard Business Review, March 30, 2017. 6. Freeman, S., et al., "Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics," Proceedings
. Akinpelu3, Ayodeji N. Oyedeji1,Emmanuel Okafor4, Cynthia U. Odili5, Vanessa F. Ogenyi6, Victor S. Ategbe8, Adrian O.Eberemu7,10, Fatai O. Anafi1,10, Abdulkarim S. Ahmed8,10, Raymond B. Bako9,10, AkinloluAkande2,31 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria. 2 Mathematical Modelling and Intelligent Systems for Health and Environment Research Group, School of Science, Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. 3 Modelling and Computation for Health and Society, Atlantic Technological University, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. 4 SDAIA-KFUPM Joint Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, King Fahd University of
discussions to be an effective tool forencouraging class participation in both small and large classes from the sophomore throughsenior level. These issues can be explored in detail in future work by comparing anonymous andnon-anonymous settings and using student surveys about their perceptions of the classroomenvironment and efficacy of the technique.Bibliography[1] A. S. N. Kim, S. Shakory, A. Azad, C. Popovic, and L. Park, “Understanding the impact of attendance and participation on academic achievement,” Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 272–284, 2020, doi: 10.1037/stl0000151.[2] T. Newkirk, Embarrassment: And the Emotional Underlife of Learning. Heinemann, 2017.[3] C. Reddington and R. Cañada, “How does student
engineering education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2002, doi:10.1080/03043790210129603.[4] S. Monteiro, L. Almeida, and A. García-Aracil, “(Mis)matched perceptions: Graduatesand employers’ views about competencies in professional activities,” in Edulearn’19Proceedings, 2019, pp. 8662-8666, doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2019.2147[5] G. Rayner, and T. Papakonstantinou, “Employer perspectives of the current and futurevalue of STEM graduate skills and attributes: An Australian study,” Journal of Teaching andLearning for Graduate Employability, vol. 6, no.1, pp. 100-115, 2015, doi:10.21153/jtlge2015vol6no1art576[6] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
question is “Whichphase(s) are present at point G and in what fractions?” A figure would be included in this questionin which students interpret and use to answer the question.In the traditional class, there were three high stake exams which means a student’s final gradein the class relied heavily on these exams. The percentage of each test in the traditional classcontributed to 75% of total grade, 25% for each of the three exams. Figure 4 shows thepercentage of incorrect questions according to type, split up by the three different exams fromthe traditional class. When observing the total percentage of questions wrong, Figure 4 showsthat students struggled the least with Exam 1, the second least with Exam 2, and the most withExam 3. Figure 4
introduces the core aspect of constructive alignment, thatlearning outcomes, activities, and assessments should be aligned and support one another. Biggs’development was to pair instructional alignment with a strong focus on the role of studentactivities in creating meaning, which he identified as the common core of constructivist learningtheories [1]. Biggs has periodically published updates of the model of constructive alignment in“Teaching for Quality Learning at University”, starting in 1999 and with the most recent 5thedition published in 2022 [6].Since the 1970’s, engineering education and the professional engineering field have becomeincreasingly diverse [7]. However, despite decades of concerted institutional efforts, parity in thefield
, 2001, pp. 1550-1558.[5] Kemet. “Rock Thin Sections (Petrographic Thin Section Preparation).” https://www.kemet.co.uk/blog/petrography/rock-thin-sections (retrieved January 8, 2025).[6] P. C. Robinson and M. W. Davidson. “Polarized Light Microscopy.” https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/polarized-light/polarized-light-microscopy (retrieved January 15, 2025).[7] Northern Geological Supplies Limited “Ironstone Slide.” https://www.geologysuperstore.com/product/ironstone-slide/ (retrieved August 15, 2024).[8] C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 671-675, 2012/07/01 2012.[9] Microtrac Particle
and instructor quality (3.43-3.57out of 4, in-person vs 3.74-3.94 out of 4, online) indicates that the higher self-assessedknowledge improvement for in-person training is not an artifact of unhappiness online or"better" instructor performance in-person.It has not been possible to follow-up differences in retention of these two models, due topractical circumstances of professional development within VBG Group, but hope that the resultfrom the question in-person: 7. How well do you think this course will contribute to thesustainability work within VBG Group? is closer to very good than pretty good, as in the survey.References[1] C. Fredriksson and S. Bohlin, "Life-cycle inventory study of biogas production for vehiclesin Trollhättan, a medium
: https://www.activeminds.org/press-releases/new-data-emphasizes-correlation-loneliness- student-mental-health/[15] S. Vossoughi, P. K. Hooper, and M. Escudé, “Making through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 206–232, 2016, doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.