like an engineer”. Problem development, experimental design, and technicalcommunication skills have been increasingly prioritized in engineering programs, butimplementing curriculum that both addresses these skills and integrates them with essentialtechnical content has proved challenging. In this work, we present a framework for incorporatingresearch, design, and communication learning outcomes into the materials science andengineering undergraduate curriculum. Through this framework, we explore how course designand the use of continuous self-assessment influence student metacognition and self-perception.IntroductionUndergraduate engineering programs tout the importance of laboratory, design, and capstonecourses as crucial to a student’s
(materials, 5-8 questions),electrical (properties of electrical materials, 4-6 questions), mechanical (material properties andprocessing, 7-11 questions), and other disciplines (materials, 6-9 questions). The integration ofsustainability topics into materials science is therefore an opportunity to promote asociotechnical mindset among students and might be part of a large curriculum wide effort.A number of examples of sustainability integration into materials science courses have beenpreviously published. Ruzycki embedded sustainability into a laboratory-based materials course,including case studies, life cycle analysis, and the Granta CES software [14], [15]. Dr. Jordan’smaterials science course at Baylor University incorporated two modules with
Paper ID #45630Human-Powered Tensile Tests: an Experiential Introduction to the Conceptsof Stress, Strain, and Elastic ModulusDr. Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College Derek Breid is an associate professor of Engineering at Saint Vincent College. His interests include integrating active learning techniques into classic engineering courses, and studying the mechanical behavior of soft materials. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Human-Powered Tensile Tests: an Experiential Introduction to the Concepts of Stress, Strain, and Elastic ModulusThe concepts of stress and
Foundations and Curriculum, Faculty of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria7 Africa Centre of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria8 Multifunctional Materials Laboratory, Shell Office Complex, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria Corresponding author*: David O. Obada (doobada@abu.edu.ng)AbstractThis article explores the effectiveness of integrating a modified jigsaw teaching approach withinthe framework of a new teaching pedagogy called CACPLA (Collaborate, Assessment,Communicate, Problem
the usage of Ansys tools in academia, with an emphasis on materials teaching and pre-university engagement. She is also the lead for the Ansys Academic Content Development Program, which focuses on developing instructional content to support integration of Ansys tools in curriculum. Her background is in materials science, with a PhD in the subject from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is very involved in ASEE. At the publication of this paper, she is the Awards Chair (past Division Chair) for the Materials Division and Chair Elect for the Corporate Members Council.Dr. Bosco Yu, University of Victoria Dr. Bosco Yu joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UVic as an Assistant Professor in
engineeringcourses [8]. The study reported that PBL fosters a deeper commitment to the students’ learningjourney as they develop a better sense of ownership over their projects.Overall, the literature reiterates that PBL is a highly effective approach for preparing engineeringstudents with the technical knowledge, problem-solving capabilities, and interpersonal skillsneeded to succeed in both academic and professional settings.Implementation of PBLThe course focused on the theoretical aspects of material properties and concrete mix design,among other topics. To supplement the curriculum with practical experience, the course includedlab sessions, though it was not a standalone lab course like others typically found in theengineering curriculum. Upon
Grunenfelder, University of Southern California Lessa Grunenfelder has a BS in astronautical engineering and a MS and PhD in materials science, all from the University of Southern California. In 2015 she joined the USC Mork Family Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science as teaching faculty. She teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses on material properties, processing, selection, and design. She is passionate about sharing her love of materials science with students through curriculum that combines fundamental science and engineering application. Her research interest is in efficient manufacturing of high performance composites. She is an active member of the Society for the Advancement of Material
skills gap forengineering graduates: Recent trends in higher education Paper presented at 2023 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43338[2] M.S. Kleine, K. Zacharias, and D. Ozkan, D. Contextualization in engineering education: Ascoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 2024.113(4), pp.894-918.[3] J. Goggins, M. Hajdukiewicz. The role of community-engaged learning in engineeringeducation for sustainable development. Sustainability, 2022. 14(13), p.8208.[4] M. Mosleh, K.A. Shirvani, K.A. Design, Build, and Test Projects in an Engineering MaterialsLaboratory. In 2017 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference.[5] A. Verma, K. Snyder. Integrating community-engaged research and energy justice
], [22],biology [23], [24], probability [25], social sciences [26], [27], and materials science [15]. Therehave been calls to integrate computational modeling, and the perspective of emergence ithighlights, across K-16 STEM curricula in general [28], [29] and specifically to make “one-to-many” computational models the backbone of the MSE curriculum [15]. However, prior work oncomputational restructurations have only designed learning interventions for specific topicswithin a subject. The course redesign reported in this paper is the first time that a project rootedin restructuration theory has taken on the task of redesigning an entire course.2.3 Prior workIn [1], we described the course redesign in detail, including conceptual explanations of
presenting technical results clearly and concisely. This paper describes thecombined approach, which can serve as a model for future courses aiming to developtechnical and writing proficiency in undergraduate engineering courses.IntroductionLaboratory courses have been a part of the engineering curriculum for the last two centuriesto provide students with a practical experience of applying the engineering concepts taught inlectures [1]. Generally, laboratory courses have been designed to address ABET studentoutcomes 3, 4, and 6. The ABET outcomes are: • Outcome 3 - "an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences" [2]. • Outcome 4 - "an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering
. Taylor Parks, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Taylor Parks is a course development fellow in engineering education at the Siebel Center for Design. She earned her bachelor’s in engineering mechanics and master’s in curriculum and instruction from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on promoting teamwork in complex engineering problem solving through collaborative task design. She currently co-leads the integration of human-centered design principles within select courses across the Grainger College of Engineering.jean-charles stinville, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a
Python or Matlab) and many other students areintroduced to Mathematica in at least one other course.To address these gaps, this course introduces an innovative framework that integrates an openeducational resource (OER) textbook, YouTube-based Mathematica programming tutorials, andAI-driven computational tools. The OER textbook provides theoretical foundations while linkingto curated video tutorials that teach advanced programming in Mathematica and the use of AI toolsfor engineering problem-solving. These resources empower students to build strong computationaland analytical skills, seamlessly integrated with their experimental work.Laboratory activities retain traditional materials testing components but emphasize studentautonomy and
achieved with awidely used discussion-based class format. The approach to reach the third goal is to guide thestudent project to ensure that the students become exposed to materials characterizationtechniques or methods that may not have been covered in this class but will be included in thesubsequent curriculum. An implicit overarching goal was also to make the new MSE programknown as interesting and fun to a broader student population at NJIT facilitating the interestamong undecided students in this new major.A project, that leads to an efficient learning experience, should have two important components [2]:it should address a question or a problem interesting enough to motivate the student interest andactivities, and the activities must yield
, 11th, and 12th grade science, and has worked for two science education nonprofits.Mr. Louis Oh, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Louis Oh is a Design Laboratories Manager at Stevens Institute of Technology and a student of the Mechanical Engineering Masters program. With 10 years of experience in CNC machine spindles, Louis has developed expertise in failure inspection, spindle condition analysis, and monitoring using vibration signals and sound emissions. His recent research area focuses on integrated machine condition monitoring using an AI-based architecture.Elizabeth Zarr Paolella, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science