studies materials and processes for electrochemical energy storage and conversion.Dr. Jennifer S Atchison, Drexel University Jennifer Atchison received her Ph.D in Materials Science and Engineering in 2012 from Drexel University. Dr. Atchison’s professional interests include nanofibrous textiles, engineering design, engineering education, especially active learning, diversity, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work In Progress: Metacognitive and social-emotional-learning interventions in first-year CalculusAbstractStudent performance and retention in STEM majors is a major concern in higher education.Individual attention and coaching are effective at
forTeaching and Learning Ordinary Differential Equations: A Systemic Literature Review andBibliometric Analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 745, Mar. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070745.[5] S. Arslan, “Do students really understand what an ordinary differential equationis?,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 7,pp. 873–888, Oct. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2010.486448.[6] C. L. Rasmussen and K. D. King, “Locating starting points in differential equations: arealistic mathematics education approach,” International Journal of Mathematical Education inScience and Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–172, Mar. 2000, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/002073900287219.[7] C. L
exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.[3] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.[4] Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self- efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232-258). New York: Cambridge.[5] Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, I. M., Borgen, F. H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 221-236.[6] Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006a). The role of interest in learning and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 517-540.[7] Hakkarainen, K., & Malmberg, J. (2004). Communities of networked expertise
choose the grading option before the end of the semester at a specific deadline: 04/28/2020, 11/06/2020, or 04/30/2021. All deadlines, even in Spring 21, were before Final Exams.Description of SurveyOur study participants (second, third-, and fourth-year students who had taken at least one APMA course)completed a ~50-question online survey [1] early in Spring 22 semester about their experiences in APMAcourse(s) from Spring 20 to Spring 21 semesters. Survey questions were related to demographic data,motivation, technological tools/ applications used, office hours, help sessions, quizzes/tests in an onlinesetting, grading options, and questions comparing APMA courses with major-related core courses.Analysis Methods, Results, and
experience as an engineer and a mathematics teacher, he promotes the expansion of equitable and high-quality learning opportunities for both engineering and K–12 students through mathematical modeling. His research focuses on exploring the process of refining mathematical ideas and engineering concepts that engineering students develop while engaging in model development sequences built in real engineering contexts.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an associate professor with joint appointment in the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies and the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Dr. Mejiaˆa C™s
engineering students as well as other engineering education efforts.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals and directs J.B. Speed School’s Center for Teaching and Learning Engineering. She teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in various educational research projects focused on the retention of engineering students as well as faculty development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Predicting academic behaviors of first-year engineering students by modeling non-cognitive factors and their interactionsIntroductionA common reason for many first-year
situation”[7, p. 17]. Under the MMP approach, models are “Conceptual systems (consisting of elements, relations, operations, and rules governing interactions) that are expressed using external notation systems, and that are used to construct, describe, or explain the behaviors of other system(s)—perhaps so that the other system can be manipulated or predicted intelligently. A mathematical model focuses on structural characteristics (rather than, for example, physical or musical characteristics) of the relevant systems” [14, p. 10]The evolution of these models is not linear but occurs through iterative development cycles [16,17, 18]. These iterative processes emerge as students solve MEAs and interact with peers
assignments.And attendance was high, with only a few students missing during each class period. In addition,all students successfully built a kalimba and an electronic piano.Students were surveyed prior to and after the mini-course to get feedback on their interests,background, and confidence. When asked to list the major(s) that they were considering, 44 ofthe 81 students (~54%) listed a STEM major, and 14 students listed engineering, specifically. Onboth the pre- and post-course surveys, students were asked to rank their confidence on differentactivities from breadboarding to succeeding in an engineering course using a scale from 1 (noconfidence) to 7 (full confidence). Pre/post responses for several of the questions asked are listedin Table 2. While
Paper ID #39362Elaboration of a contextualized event for teaching eigenvalues andeigenvectors in the control and automation engineering courseJuliana Martins Philot, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia - Brazil I hold a B.A. in Mathematics from Universidade Estadual Paulista J´ulio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP (2007), a M.Sc. in Mathematics from Universidade Estadual Paulista J´ulio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP (2010) and a Ph.D. in Mathematics Education from Pontif´ıcia Universidade Cat´olica de S˜ao Paulo - PUC- SP (2022). I have experience in Mathematics Teaching for Engineering courses since 2009 and currently I am a
curriculum. We argue that the pandemic impacted student math readiness, which subsequently impacted their transition to the university and into engineering, as illustrated in Figure 1. igure 1FRelationship between Pandemic, Math Readiness, and Transition to University/Engineering . COVID-19’s Effect on EducationAThe COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to the education system, and many students struggled. Due to school and home life disruptions during the pandemic, students reported difficulty completing their schoolwork. Specifically, female and underrepresented minority (URM) students reported having more difficulty completing schoolwork[9]. With varying restrictions across states and school
, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1993.[12] J. A. Middleton, S. Krause, S. Maass, K. Beeley, J. Collofello and R. Culbertson, "Early course and grade predictors of persistence in undergraduate engineering majors," 2014 IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 2014, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044367.[13] M. W. Ohland, A.G. Yuhasz, and B.L. Sill, “Identifying and removing a calculus prerequisite as a bottleneck in Clemson's General Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 253-257. 2004.[14] J. Pearson, L.A. Giacumo
score corresponds to the student's firstattempt to solve the worksheet, where no educational resources are available. In other words,these results come exclusively from the student's prior knowledge. In contrast, the maximumscore may match the student's final try, i.e., when the student solves the worksheet successfullyafter studying MATH 101's material. Of course, there are cases where the students only require asingle attempt to solve the worksheet satisfactorily; in these cases, the minimum and maximumscores are equal. Finally, note that the average number of attempts is a relative measure of thetopic's difficulty; the closer to 1, the easier it was for the student to pass to the next module.With the following topic-by-topic analysis, we can
Foundation under Grant No.(2221638).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C.J. and Shuman, L.J. (1997), Characteristics of FreshmanEngineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering. Journal ofEngineering Education, 86: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x[2] Veenstra, C. P., Dey, E.L., Herrin, G.D.. "A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention."Advances in Engineering Education 1, no. 3 (2009): n3.[3] Nelavai, N., & Ramesh, S. (2020). An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year EngineeringStudents
Journal of Research in Educaiton and Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 355-373, 2019.[2] C. F. Oretaga-Barba, H. X. Ramirez-Perez and S. M.-P. Andrade, "Who are we receiving at the university? The impact of COVID-19 on mathematics and reading learning in high school," Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, 2024.[3] D. Dewey, E. Fahle, T. J. Kane, S. F. Reardon and D. O. Staiger, "Federal Pandemic Relief and Academic Recovery," 2024.[4] M. Polikoff, I. Clay and D. Silver, "Beyond test scores: Broader academic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on American students," Center for Reinventing Public Education, 2023.[5] J. Hampikian, J. Gardner, A. Moll, P. Pyke and C. Schrader, "Integrated Pre-Freshman Engineering and Precalculus
specifies eight different mathematical competencies, and defines amathematical competency as “a well-informed readiness to act appropriately in situationsinvolving a certain type of mathematical challenge” [11, p. 49, italics in original]. Thesecompetencies cover two broader capabilities: 1) asking and answering mathematical questionsand 2) working and communicating with mathematical language and tools. While competenciescan overlap in that one competency may be needed to achieve other(s), each competency isindividually distinct from the others. Table 1 provides the working definitions of eachcompetency, redefined based on the authors’ interpretation. Table 1: KOM Competencies and Definitions Competency Definition
National Academies Gathering Storm committee concluded several years ago that theprimary driver of the future economy, security of the United States (US) as a nation, andconcomitant creation of jobs would be innovation—largely derived from advances in scienceand, particularly, in engineering [1]. It has been estimated that close to 50% of the students whobegin their education in engineering do not follow through to the completion of an engineeringdegree [2]-[5]. Some studies have further documented that the propensity for engineeringstudents to attrit is particularly high during their first two years of college [2], [4]. Givenengineers’ critical role in the growth of the U.S.’s economy, security as a nation, and creation ofjobs, this high-level of
(2020) Raisingthe Bar with Standards-Based Grading, PRIMUS, 30:8-10, 1110-1126, DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695237[6] Carlisle, S. 2020. Simple specifications grading. PRIMUS. 30(8–10): 926–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1695238.[7] Lewis, D. (2022). Impacts of Standards-Based Grading on Students’ Mindset and TestAnxiety. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(2), 67-77.[8] Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory intopractice, 41(4), 212-218.[9] Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validationstudy. Contemporary educational psychology, 34(1), 89-101.[10] Dweck, C. S. (2014). Mindsets and math/science achievement.[11] Taylor, J., &
Course Design and Instructional Practices.”[18] Y. Akbulut and C. S. Cardak, “Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011,” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 835–842, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008.[19] H. L. Eyre, “The Behavior Analyst Today Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction: Was it a Fleeting Fancy or is there a Revival on the Horizon?” [Online]. Available: http://www.webcapsi.com[20] S. Purao, M. Sein, H. Nilsen, and E. A. Larsen, “Setting the Pace: Experiments with Keller’s PSI,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 97–104, May 2017, doi: 10.1109/TE.2016.2588460.[21] A