reviews each of the demos/videos,discuss how they are incorporated into the class, and describe how to fabricate/procure the demoequipment.1. Introduction In the last few years, there has been an increasing trend in the debate about the pros andcons of active learning in the classroom, and many have moved away from the traditional lectureformat.1 While active learning comes in several forms, most agree that activities that aredesigned to engage the students, pique their interest, and are carefully selected to coordinate andsupplement the lesson plans tend to improve students’ understanding and retention of keyconcepts.1 Although active or experiential learning has been highly promoted as of late, it hasbeen researched for several decades
of students who ranked at least one scenario as making learning “almost impossible” or“highly challenging” was higher in the 2021 cohort.Student comments supported the idea that in the summer, they felt as if they were missing out ona key piece of their engineering education – “As an engineering major, I feel that this is noreplacement for hands-on learning in a classroom… Our major is simply more difficult to dovirtually, and because of this I think it should be planned for differently. We rely too much on inperson instruction to keep being virtual.” Students learning from home also experienced a shiftin learning environment. On campus, they are surrounded by peers who are in similar academicmindsets. For students who moved to their family
and I wish that I had been aware of the amount of information that would be covered in the course before I planned out my semester. I suffered in other courses as well as this one trying to keep up.”One student wanted an additional credit hour to adequately cover the current material, plus onemore credit hour to add more material: “There is way too much information to cover in 3credits. I think the class should be (5) five credits and cover more material.” Another studentsuggested an additional course in thermodynamics: “I think an ‘intro’ course might be morebeneficial than an extra credit hour to accommodate all the material covered. An extra credithour for examples is a plus too, but there is still way too much
assess student performance in a chemical engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the Fall 2016 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference, 2016. [6] J. C. Guarino, J. R. Ferguson, and V. K. C. Pakala, “Quantitative assessment of program outcomes using longitudinal data from the FE exam,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 23, p. 1, 2013. [7] R. Helgeson and E. Wheeler, “Passing the Fundamentals of Engineering examination as a graduation requirement in a general engineering program: Lessons learned,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006. [8] O. Pierrakos and H. Watson, “A comprehensive ABET-focused assessment plan designed to involve all program faculty
with a power assist robot in harmonic motion: analysis of human features and object motions for control modification,” in Proc. of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Mechanical and Electronics Engineering, 1-3 August, 2010, Kyoto, Japan, Vol.1, pp.290-295.35. S. M. M. Rahman, R. Ikeura, H. Sawai, “Analysis of weight perception, load forces, and objects’ motions in lifting objects with a power assist robot system to modify the control,” in Proc. of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Mechanical and Electronics Engineering, 1-3 August, 2010, Kyoto, Japan,Vol.1, pp.261-266.36. S. M. M. Rahman, “Bioinspiration in affective motion planning of an anthropomorphic robot for affect-based human-robot collaborative manufacturing
“an abilityto apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration ofpublic health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors.” The new general criteria has added a detailed definition for Engineering Design [1]. Inthe new general criteria, SO5 replaces student outcome (d) in the old general criteria. It states “anability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” In thenew general criteria a definition is added for term “Team” which is expressed as “a team consistsof more than one person working toward a common goal and
into their device, as well as any materials necessary tomend device damage incurred during Lesson 3. Following approximately thirty minutes of cali-bration and testing, the students reconvene and attempt one shot at each of two targets spaced anindeterminant distance between five and fifteen feet. The group with the smallest composite targeterror is declared the competition’s winner.Learning Assessment: Given the nature of the project and the duration of the interactive presenta-tion, a group discussion on the results of this project is typically omitted. Likewise, as the students’weekend is filled with other planned activities, homework is not assigned.Unit Assessment: Despite the fact that the control systems unit is the most technical unit
run various mill operations.This was attempted on some Newcomen-type engines, but was mostly satisfied by both Savery andNewcomen engines pumping water up to a reservoir and then running the water through waterwheels. This overall scheme included additional energy conversions, each with non-unityefficiency. Watt developed rotating shaft output engines in the 1780s. Watt’s plan to use acrankshaft was delayed until the expiration of a patent for use of this device in 1794. As a result, hedeveloped and patented a double gear rotational drive in 1781. After 1794, the crankshaft andflywheel were generally used.incorporating historic engines into current instructionThe graphics, description of operation, and calculations presented in this article
per cycle or the thermalefficiency of the engine directly.We are writing to request your assistance with developing a thermodynamic model which accuratelyestimates the work produced by our engine per cycle, and determines the thermal efficiency of the engine.Please perform your primary analysis using the data we have provided. We plan to make frequent enginemodifications out in the field which will change the cycle details, so please also make your model easy toadjust with additional p-V data. Hopefully with the help of your model, we will be able to see how makingsmall changes to the cycle affects work produced and thermal efficiency. To keep the model easy to use, weask that you: 1) treat the fuel-air mixture in the combustion chamber as
iii Page 24.958.12 Therefore, the thermal resistances are a function of the convective heat transfercoefficients, and the conductivity and geometry of the channels and fins. For this systemanalysis, it is assumed the fin and channel geometries, except for the length of the channels, andflow rates have been optimized. Geometry and flow optimization is beyond the scope of thispaper but is planned for a future work. With these geometries and flows, the convective heattransfer coefficients, conductivity of the channels and the fin efficiency are fixed. This in turnfixes the overall heat transfer coefficient. For the area of the
a title.Purpose:The purpose of this assignment is for students to reflect on how the facts, techniques, and skillslearned in MECH 210 can be useful in their co-op job, and/or how their co-op job impacts theirview of the material learned in class.Structure:The essay should contain the following elements. These are not separate questions; there shouldbe a logical flow and transitions between the paragraphs. A description of your co-op assignment, with sufficient detail so that a reader could understand what industry the company is in, what they do in general, and what your specific role is. You may also include information on what you plan or hope to do in future co-op terms, if this is different than what you’ve done
with them in December and we saw that they did not have anything manufactured on the bike yet and the competition was in April. It was just bad planning, just “let's get this over with type thing.”One competition organization representative, as well as the advisors of some of the moresuccessful teams, told us that most students and many faculty view these competitions asengineering design-build competitions, yet they are actually engineering managementcompetitions. One advisor offered the analogy of the difference between making a movie on thestudio set, where all resources are at hand and making a movie on location, where all resourcesmust be taken to the remote locale. Successful productions have anticipated all eventualities
on an active-learning exercise, I found that many more students raised theirhands when I asked a question. In previous semesters, student participation in class was oftenpoor. To increase student participation in the past, I prepared simple questions to ask during thelecture, but asking these questions did not significantly improve student participation. Addingactive-learning components in Fall 2007 required some planning before class, but not any morethan I had done previously in preparing questions to ask the class. The resulting studentparticipation, however, was greatly improved when I added the active-learning exercises. Theauthors encourage others to also try these simple techniques to improve student participation andstudent learning