plans on pursuing a career in the automotive industry or manufacturing industry.Dr. John William Bridge, University of Washington, Bothell Dr. John Bridge, P.E. Dr. Bridge is a former Lt. Colonel and mechanical engineer in the U.S. Air Force with over twenty years of R&D experience with numerous aerospace vehicles to include aircraft and rocket systems. In addition, he has performed advanced materials characterization while in the mil- itary and at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He has previous teaching experience at several institutions to include Bowdoin College, the U.S. Air Force Academy, and the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. Dr. Bridge is currently working with composite materials used in
Paper ID #17243The Impact of Fluid Dynamics Research on Undergraduate EducationAric Martin Gillispie, University of Central Oklahoma Aric Gillispie has been actively involved in fluid dynamics research since 2012, writing and receiving several grants for his research and co-authoring numerous papers. Aric received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Central Oklahoma in May 2016, and will be completing his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering by May 2017. After completion of his M.S. he plans to pursue a career in academia either through continued education in a PhD program or by entering the workforce.Mr. Adam
Paper ID #15609Designing with Lessons from the Machine Design Course: A Capstone Expe-rienceDr. Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University Dr Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan – Siva is a Srilankan by birth and a citizen of the United Kingdom. His experience in Sri-lanka started with an year’s post-graduate apprenticeship in the manufacturing shops of the Government Railway and nine years in the Cement Industry. He graduated as a Mechanical Engineer from University of Srilanka, and obtained his Masters from the University of Aston and PhD from City University of London, both in the UK. He started his career
TED talk What makes us feel good about our work? This talk is really focused on what people need to feel that their work is rewarding, and leads into a discussion of design careers, the relative importance of money as students make career decisions, etc.RESULTS:Impact of these changes will be measured and discussed in terms of three measurements –teaching evaluations, final exam averages, and student surveys. The authors acknowledgethat none of these tools are perfect assessment tools, but all can provide some insight. Thedata used will be from the two years prior to this change, and the two years since thechange.The same instructor has taught the course for the four years being considered. In the 2years before the change, the
to them (mechanical advantage).What surprised the author when first introducing the can crusher activity in 2012 was that thestudents were truly troubled with how to represent the force from the can onto the can crusher.The vast majority of students would draw the force in the wrong direction. Steif et al.5 state“Certainly, the initial stage of surveying a physical system, the true modeling stage, can be themost difficult.” The author has found this to be true, and it relates to the students reluctance touse mathematical models later in their coursework or in their careers. If the student cannot makethe first connection between the real system and the mathematical model, all the mathematicalanalysis tools they’ve learned become useless.The
engineering problems during their upperdivisional years. The exam also provides a checkpoint to see how well students are prepared totake the FE during their last year of study. And lastly, data from the exam allow for analysis ofindividual subjects and questions, allowing for exploration of how well students understand eachsubject tested, as well as individual topics.Overall, our faculty has found the sophomore exam to be a helpful tool in assessing both theknowledge of our students, as well as the effectiveness of some of our early engineering courses.The MME department also requires that all students take the FE exam to graduate, giving a set ofassessment data at two different time points in their career as a student.IntroductionSuccessful
based on the need of the program constituencies. The current PEOs for the MEprogram at UTSA states that the within a few years after graduation, the graduates will: (1) haveengineering careers in industry, government, and/or will pursue advanced graduate orprofessional degrees, (2) apply their engineering skills to their careers, (3) continue to advancetheir knowledge, communication and leadership skills by using technology, continuingeducation, solving problems, and serving in technical or professional societies, and (4) applytheir understanding of societal, environmental, and ethical issues to their professional activities.These PEOs are consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs.ABET EAC used to require
description of thesecourses to include the topics covered in the training sessions, thus making them an essential partof the course content.What We Hope to Achieve: We want to expose our students, faculty, and staff to inclusion anddiversity issues of which they might not be aware. By requiring students to go through training inboth the sophomore and seniors years, we hope to achieve maximum impact. The early exposureas sophomores will give the students a chance to apply the concepts they learn throughout theiracademic careers, while the second round of training as seniors will serve as a refresher coursebefore they begin their team-based senior projects and, later, enter the engineering workforce.We specifically designed this training curriculum to
Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating instrumentation and mechatronics education in Mechanical Engineering curriculumAbstractA diverse and effective undergraduate mechanical curriculum should integrate learning from thedifferent spheres of mechanical engineering, educate students about recent technologicaladvances, and motivate them to pursue careers in this field. However, a seamless integration ofvaried topics in mechanical engineering curriculum is challenging, as courses range fromtraditional engineering classes in thermal fluids, solids and controls, to courses coveringemerging technological aspects of instrumentation, sensors, measurement techniques, advancedcontrol algorithms, electronics, and electrical
in all kinds of research –both disciplinary and interdisciplinary – encompassing efforts by individual investigators,groups, centers, national facilities, and others” [1]. Therefore, the goal is the integration ofresearch and education to provide students superior undergraduate education [1]. In addition toNSF efforts, universities have long recognized the importance of training students in researchearly in their academic careers as doing so fosters academic preparation and motivation to attendgraduate school [2]. Towards those ends, and considering the demographic composition ofengineering and other technical fields compared to the United States at large, universities havecreated educational centers and programs to increase the
Paper ID #14703Enhancing Student Learning through Extracurricular Energy ProjectsMs. Caitlyn Clark, University of Notre Dame Caitlyn Clark is a first year graduate student pursuing a Ph.D. at the University of Notre Dame. Her research involves using particle image velocimetry techniques for various flow analyses. She is also a recent alumni of Western Kentucky University where she served as a thermo-fluids research assistant. During her undergraduate career she carried out multiple research projects funded through internal grants and industry sponsorships.Prof. Robert E. Choate III, Western Kentucky University Robert
week.Approximately 400 incoming mechanical engineering students take this class every year. Since itsinception almost two decades ago, ME 100L introduced students to the field of mechanicalengineering and various career options, emphasized team work, and culminated in a rubber bandcar competition. The course was outdated and was long overdue for a change. With theintroduction of a new first year experience course (EGR 100) common for all engineering studentsat Cal Poly Pomona, most of the topics of ME 100L have become redundant creating theopportunity to overhaul the course. Our students are called Net Generation [9]. They are technology savvy, impatient and look forinstant gratification. Additionally, they want to know the relevance of the material they
program was highlycorrelated to “confidence in math and computer skills, actual math and science knowledge/skills,and career goals”3.Faculty conducted one-hour math review sessions Monday through Thursday evenings for 10sessions. All freshmen engineering majors take an Introduction to Mechanical Engineeringcourse, so classrooms were identified based on the sectioning of the course. The faculty memberwho taught the section was the lead instructor for the Math Review sessions. When an instructorcould not be present in the evening, another instructor was able to substitute in for the session.Instructors worked problems or had students work problems on the boards and discussed thesolutions. Often when the session was over, students stayed in the
theavailable literature (over 6700 papers are found when searching the ASEE conferenceproceeding search engine for “real world”) to encourage incorporation of these examples inindividual classrooms. Such examples may be found in many fields and increase the depth oflearning for a given principle while exposing the students to different career choices.Students in many engineering programs, including the one at the authors’ institution, are inmanufacturing dominated geographical areas. As students studying biomedical engineering arenot a large proportion of the population, most students are less likely to have been exposed tobiomedical applications of engineering principles than industrial ones. This lack of exposureblinds them to the potential of
. This wasnoted by a number of students who were positive about the Active Learning approach but felt toomany topics were covered in the class. One final concern of teachers new to Active Learning,especially those who are in the tenure process, is the effect on their student evaluations. Table 6contains the average student evaluation ratings from the MD/MSD course in Spring 2015 for thetwo instructors as compared to the average value the instructor received over his career whileteaching this course. The results here are a little mixed. Instructor A, with experience with ActiveLearning techniques, received higher student evaluation ratings for the Active Learning course.However, Instructor B, a novice with Active Learning techniques, was assessed
Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal manuscripts and more than 50
Paper ID #15020World Energy in Engineering DesignDr. Michele Putko P.E., University of Massachusetts - Lowell Michele is a lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UMass, Lowell. She earned her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Old Dominion University and her M.S. from Auburn University. She also holds a Masters of Strategic Studies form the U.S. Army War College, and a B.S. from the United States Military Academy. She retired as a Colonel from the United States Army after a 28-year career in multi-functional logistics. Her research interests include energy literacy, climate change literacy, and
content and what questions or misconceptions the professormight need to address at the beginning of the next class. This might also provide students withmore of a sense of professor-student interaction.Recording Participation and Attendance in a Flipped ClassroomClass participation and attendance are important. Attending and engaging in class is similar toprofessional career skills that employers value. Class participation also supports the professor’sability to formatively assess students’ understanding of content through questioning, and usestudent responses to guide instruction.12 In addition, students learn from each other and from theprofessor. So, recording participation and attendance, and providing a grade incentive wasworthwhile in this
Paper ID #14448Design, Build, and Installation of an Automated Bike Rental System as a Partof Capstone DesignDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past fifteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University
interesting motion.The goal is to motivate students to think about designing and prototyping programmable, electro-mechanical devices at an early stage of their engineering career. In doing so, they apply funda-mentals to a fun and exciting design problem of their choice, learn to think critically, communicateideas, and work in a team.ResourcesAlthough, the aforementioned CLOs comprise of a fairly comprehensive range of topics seeking toprepare students for their final project, it would be naive to assume that at freshman level studentscan apply a basic knowledge of Statics, Kinematics, Dynamics, Strength of Materials, DesignMethodology, Mechanisms and Machines, Sensors, Actuation, and Micro-controller programmingto carry out a project of such
emailaddresses (N=2301) via repeated emails (Constant Contact) with links to an online survey(Qualtrics). Responses were solicited for a two-week period from mid-September to earlyOctober 2015.The survey began with questions about our current curriculum and our alumni’s satisfaction withtheir overall level of preparation for their respective careers. This was followed by questionsabout self-perceptions and the importance of three core areas of emphasis for our undergraduateprogram: Active Learning, Professional Development, and New Technologies. Assessment itemsfor the Design Studio were embedded in the Active Learning section, which included ratings ofthe quality and importance of undergraduate laboratory and design spaces, design projects, in-class
allMechanical Engineering students, and is typically taken in their sophomore or junior years in theprogram. Most of these students at this point in their academic career have only had minorexposure to MATLAB within their introduction to engineering course, which is a commonapproach taken by many institutions3,4,17. The goal of the MATLAB portion of the class was toteach students about computer programming using MATLAB as well as to leverage andreinforce engineering concepts from dynamics in the process. Each week typically contained 25minutes of MATLAB demonstration from the instructor, 25 minutes of in-class time to work onexercises facilitated by the instructor, and one MATLAB programming assignment which wastied into the dynamics course content for
. The student must show deepened methodological knowledge within the main area of the program.MSc degree (five years) For the MSc degree, the student must show knowledge about the scientific base and proven experience of the chosen area, and insight in current research- and development activities.Table 2: learning goals of four types of program and the related degrees.Summarizing the differences between degreesThe professional 5-year degree is recognized by industry as a professional engineering degree,where the program prepares students for an engineering career. Key differences between the5-year MSc degree and the 2-year masters degree are
laboratory experiment is that it does not do much to develop thestudent for a career in modern engineering. While understanding how an evaporative coolingtower works may provide value to a few of the students, it is impossible for the faculty to exposestudents to every type of system, in only one semester. What will provide more value to theundergraduate student is a focus on open-ended problem solving, teamwork, and experimentaldesign.BackgroundThe science of engineering education has advanced significantly in the last few decades. Severalmethods emerged that may provide measureable improvement in traditional laboratory coursesincluding deep learning approaches, backward design, and concept inventories. Nelson, andother education pedagogy experts
sessions, design teamsmaintained high spirits because the experience gained was directly applicable for their comingsenior capstone design, it was a real product design, and experience would be directly applicableto their future career. Design teams presented PowerPoint presentations and submitted technicalreports of the major project upon completing the project.4. Comments on students’ feedback and students survey analysisComments on students’ feedbackStudents needed to submit technical reports for the minor project and the major project. Theyneeded to present PowerPoint presentation on the major project. The followings were somecomments and discussions on the reports. • For the minor project, they mentioned in their reports that they learned
that are not readily available in textbooksor even on-line sources. Secondly, many design problems require the use of moderncomputational tools such as commercial or other software programs. Having been introduced tothe use of these particularly for solving heat transfer problems prepares them better for theirfuture career as practicing engineers. The modeling and simulation part of the project instills abetter understanding of how one implements the boundary conditions to the numerical solutionof a heat transfer problem as opposed to how boundary conditions are applied in the theoretical/analytical solution of the governing equation for simple problems that can be solved that way.This particular project also forced students to consider
students for careers in evolving engineering industries. Theseindustries rely on innovation through understanding and developing complex multidisciplinarysystems for product development. As students progress through these courses, theirunderstanding, insight, and ability to solve real-world problems will be assessed, mainly throughtheir performance in senior capstone design and through after-graduation surveys. Results willbe reported as they become available.5 References 1. Male, S.A., Bush, M.B., and Chapman, E.S., “Perceptions of Competency Deficiencies in Engineering Graduates”, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 16, no. 1., 2010. 2. Cilliers, F. and Greyvenstein, H. “The Impact of Silo Mentality on Team
biological sensing, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the dynamics of parametrically-excited systems and coupled oscillators; the behavior of electromechanical and thermomechanical systems, including energetic materials, operating in rich, multi- physics environments; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design, Materials and Manufacturing Segment Leadership Team and the Design Engineer- ing Division’s Technical Committees on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career
Paper ID #15704Creation of an Undergraduate Engineering Laboratory with Minimal Fund-ingDr. Amanie N. Abdelmessih, California Baptist University Before joining California Baptist University fall 2013, Dr. Abdelmessih taught in several universities, starting with Northrop University at the beginning of her career, and spent the last 16 years at Saint Mar- tin’s University, where she was the director of the Thermal Engineering Laboratory, which she founded and developed. She led the efforts to start the Master of Mechanical Engineering program, which started fall 2012 at Saint Martin’s University. She developed and taught
Technological University After an 18 year career in the automotive industry, Dr. De Clerck joined the Michigan Tech Department of Mechanical Engineering - Engineering Mechanics in August 2009. His areas of expertise include noise and vibration, structural dynamics, design, modal analysis, model validation, inverse methods applied to design, and advanced measurement techniques.Dr. Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. She teaches classes on manufacturing and does research in engineering education with particular interest in hands-on ability, lifelong learning, and project-based learning.Dr. Ibrahim Miskioglu, Michigan