Mechanical Engineering, “BSME Curriculum Requirements,” Clemson University, June 2021.[5] K. Del Re, S. Yun, E. Kozikowski, T. Fuerst, and J. Camba, “Integrating a Product Lifecycle Management System into a Freshman Level Classroom Environment”, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Engineering Graphics Division, Technical Session 2 – Design & Manufacturing, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[6] E. Fielding, J. McCardle, B. Eynard, N. Hartman, and A. Fraser, “Product Lifecycle Management in Design and Engineering Education: International Perspectives”, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 123-134, June 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X13520316. [7] N. Hartman and M. Springer, “A Distance
. For atmospheric temperature, relative humidity, pressure, wind speed and direction, andamount of water collected, the team used the La Crosse Technology® weather station. Thismodel has a Pro 2019 Station Model display, a rain bucket, solar powered anemometer, and athermo-hygro sensor. The rain bucket is a Rain 2.0 Sensor that is self-emptying and measures theamount of water collected by the WOTA system (LTV-R2 Rain Sensor, 2019). The solar-poweredanemometer is an LTV-WSDTH01 Breeze Pro Sensor attached to the roof of the fencing at thehighest point on site. It measures the outdoor air temperature, relative humidity, heat index,barometric pressure, and wind speed (LTV-WSDTH01 Breeze Pro Sensor, 2019). The displayallows workers to check the data
generations of engineers to address sustainability challenges in theircommunities and beyond.AcknowledgementThe authors express their sincere appreciation to Samantha Bortz, Director of The MacoskeyCenter, for her unwavering support and guidance throughout the development andimplementation of the projects.Reference [1] M. L. Sattler, V. C. P. Chen, B. H. Dennis, S. P. Mattingly, K. Rogers, Y. Pearson Weatherton, M. Rani, and K. Kositkanawuth, "Integrating Sustainability across the Curriculum: Engineering Sustainable Engineers," in Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2012. [2] J. Murray, "Student-Led Action for Sustainability in Higher Education: A Literature Review," International Journal of
-231. 2. Beheshti, B.D., “Strategies for Effective Delivery of Online Engineering Courses: Best Practices, Tips and Toolkits”, IEEE webinar, May 2020. 3. “What is POGIL?”, The POGIL Project, https://www.pogil.org/what-is-pogil (accessed December 16, 2023). 4. Simonson, S.R., editor, POGIL, Stylus Publishing, 2019. 5. Douglas, E.P., “Materials Science and Engineering: A Guided Inquiry”, Pearson, 2014. 6. Phillips, J.N., “Use of POGIL Methodology in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Courses”, ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2022. 7. Phillips, J.N, Google Shared Folder with Course-Specific Guided Inquiries, https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MU3y9ZLUmLuYCXcnq7Y6HQGMWeahVebZ ?usp=sharing, 2024
EngineeringStudents: A Case Study,” Proceedings of ASME, Nov. 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11424[9] J. Szwalek, Y. Siow, and Jaqueline Rojas Robles, “Design Course in a MechanicalEngineering Curriculum,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings,Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34394[10] R. S. Grover, S. Krishnan, T. E. Shoup, and M. Khanbaghi, “A competition-based approachfor undergraduate mechatronics education using the arduino platform,” Fourth InterdisciplinaryEngineering Design Education Conference, Mar. 2014, doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/iedec.2014.6784685[11] Manuel Alejandro Ojeda-Misses and Carlos Dávila Chavero, “Educational Platform Basedon a Mechanical Beam With Performance in Real Time,” Revista
startup and casting safety protocols aspart of her M.S. project.Referencesi R. W. Heckel, W. W. Milligan, C. L Nassaralla, J. Pilling, M. R. Plichta, “Benefits of CapstoneDesign Courses in Materials Education,” Science and Technology of Polymers and AdvancedMaterials, P. N. Prasad, J. E. Mark, S. H. Kandil, Z. H. Kafafi, (eds), Springer, Boston, MA., 1998.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0112-5_75ii M. Schaefer, “Use of Casting Simulation and Rapid Prototyping in an Undergraduate Course inManufacturing Processes,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.iii K. Molyet, “Providing a Meaningful Lab Experience for a Manufacturing Processes Course,”(,” ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, 2019. https://docs.https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/aseeil
time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2158244018824506, 2019. [6] E. K. Marler, M. J. Bruce, A. Abaoud, C. Henrichsen, W. Suksatan, S. Homvisetvongsa, and H. Matsuo, “The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2021. [7] L. A. Gelles and A. Walker, “Return to in-person learning and undergraduate student sense of belonging during the fall 2021 semester,” in 2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference, 2022. [8] D. A. Copp and A. J. Headley, “Test anxiety and its impact on diverse undergraduate engineering students during remote
course plan includes five quizzes prior to the midterm and three quizzes post-midterm. This plan allows students to study Particle Dynamics before the midterm and studyRigid Body Dynamics after the midterm. The course typically experiences a failure rate ofapproximately 20%, with an average grade falling within the range of 2.5 to 2.9 out of 4. Inresponse to this challenge, one of the authors of this paper with another colleague implemented astrategy in the Fall semesters of 2019 and 2020 aimed at elevating the overall outcomes of thecourse. This involved offering second-chance quizzes and midterms to students who struggledwith the initial assessments.As described in a prior study authored by one of the contributors [54], the rationale
, “Research Experiences for Undergraduate Engineering Students,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, pp. 1-13. Accessed: Feb. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/research-experiences-for-undergraduate- engineering-students[10] F. Connolly and J. A. Gallian, “What Students Say About Their REU Experience,” in Conference on Promoting Undergraduate Research in Mathematics, 2007, pp. 233–236.[11] D. H. Hoe, “Undergraduate research experiences using FPGAS,” pp. 1-13, Jan. 2012.[12] D. G. Dimitriu and J. O’Connor, “Initiation of an Undergraduate Research Program,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, pp. 1-5. Accessed: Feb. 10, 2023. [Online
education,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2012.[3] ASEE, “The Green report - Engineering education for a changing world,” 1994. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/1834[4] ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering: Phase 1: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives,” American Society for Engineering Education, Arlington, VA, 2013.[5] S. M. Katz, “The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 171–174, 1993.[6] S. A. Male, M. B. Bush, and E. S. Chapman, “Identification of competencies required by engineers graduating in Australia,” in Proceedings of the 2009 AaeE Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 2009
. 185-208, 2015.13. Korte, R., Sheppard, S., and Jordan, W., “A qualitative study of the early work experiences of recent graduates in engineering,” Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Ann. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.14. Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(4), 481-506.15. Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2015, June). Engineering students' perceptions of the future: Exploratory instrument development. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-641).16. Lande, M. (2020, June), Learning Trajectories through Undergraduate Engineering Curricula and Experiences Paper
Tennessee Tech University and Cal Poly Pomona. He has also served as interim dean of engineering at the University at Albany, SUNY, and the University of Texas Permian Basin. He serves as interim department head of mechanical engineering at the University of Texas at Dallas. Dr. Rencis has served as chair of the ASME mechanical engineering department heads committee, chair of the ASEE mechanics division, ASEE mechanical engineering division, ASEE PIC III Chair, and president of the ASEE. He is a fellow of ASME and ASEE, and his research work is in computational solid mechanics and engineering education. Dr. Rencis has won several awards, including the ASEE Hall of Fame, ASEE Mechanical Engineering Division
. SAGE, October-December 2015, 1-13.(3) Trigwell, K.; Prosser, M. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education 22, 1991, 251-266.(4) Knight, M.; Cooper, R. Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 2019, 65-92.(5) Banerjee, J. K. Mastery Learning for Undergraduates in Engineering. Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July 2021. https://strategy.asee.org/37485.(6) Hjelmstad, K. D.; Baisley, A. A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment in a Sophomore-level Mechanics Courses. Proceedings of
received Best Paper Awards at the American Society Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2020. Dr. Liu earned his B.S. in Applied Physics from Caltech and S.M. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, under an MIT-SUTD fellowship and NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Educational Simulation for Understanding Atomic Force Microscopy Image ArtifactsAbstractThe atomic force microscope (AFM) is a fundamental imaging tool used to visualize minutefeatures, often on the scale of fractions of a nanometer. This is achieved by scanning a tip overa surface and monitoring the motions of the tip in response to forces between the tip
Paper ID #38425Student Engagement with Interactive Engineering Textbook ReadingAssignments When Tied to the GradeChelsea Gordon, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Chelsea Gordon received her PhD in Cognitive Science at University of California, Merced in 2019. Chelsea works as a research scientist for zyBooks, a Wiley company that creates and publishes interactive, web-native textbooks in STEM.Dr. Adrian Rodriguez, University of Texas at Austin Adrian Rodriguez is an Engineering Content Developer for zyBooks, a Wiley brand and a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include
, and graduate schoolacceptance. Nonetheless, the desire to attain a competitive grade-point-average may lead tonegative psychosocial effects such as increased mental exertion, physical exhaustion, anxiety, andoverall lack of work-life balance. In this paper, the authors extend their prior study on the impactof grades in engineering education. The first study was conducted in the spring of 2019 at a tierone, small private research university in Texas with the intention of understanding the mindset ongrades before, during, and at the end of the semester. The study extended herein aims to explorethe emotional and academic impact grades have on engineering undergraduate students in aminority-serving institution, and further understand the issues
. Minichiello and A. Iqbal, "Perceived Factors Contributing to the SubjectiveWellbeing of Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Study," International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, (23), 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316284.[3] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, "Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ EthicalDecision Making and Implications for Engineering Ethics Education," 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33666.[4] N. N. Kellam et al, "Uncovering the role of emotion in engineering education within an integratedcurricular experience," in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011.[5] L. F. Barrett, "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoceptionand categorization
Designfor Manufacturing in the Engineering Curriculum," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, pp. 26.564. 1-26.564. 14, 2015.[14] M.S. Carpenter, C. Yakymyshyn, L.E. Micher and A. Locke, "Improved studentengagement through project-based learning in freshman engineering design," 2016.[15] N.D. Martin, C. Dornfeld Tissenbaum, D. Gnesdilow and S. Puntambekar, "Fadingdistributed scaffolds: The importance of complementarity between teacher and materialscaffolds," Instructional Science, vol. 47, pp. 69-98, 2019.[16] D. Wood, J.S. Bruner and G. Ross, "The role of tutoring in problem solving," Journal ofChild Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 17, pp. 89-100, 1976.[17] R. Azevedo, J.G. Cromley, D.C. Moos, J.A. Greene and F.I. Winters, "Adaptive
," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 205-210, 2004.[2] R. Taraban, "Information Fluency Growth Through Engineering Curricula: Analysis of Students' Text‐Processing Skills and Beliefs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 397-416, 2011.[3] C. M. Campbell and A. F. Cabrera, "Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related?," Research in Higher Education, vol. 55, pp. 494-507, 2014.[4] C. Habibi, A. S. R. Roti, and M. Alaei, "Are Solution Manuals Detrimental to Student Learning?," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.231. 1-26.231. 14.[5] I. Olwi, "An active learning fluid mechanics course based on outcomes assessment," in 2006 Annual
successful implementation of ABET student outcomes 1-7,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021. [2] ABET, “Fundamentals of program assessment workshop,” ABET, Tech. Rep., 2019. [3] G. Watkins, “Incorporating new ABET outcomes into a two-semester capstone design course,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Capstone Design Conference, Dallas, Texas, 2022. [4] K. Meah, D. Hake, and S. D. Wilkerson, “A multidisciplinary capstone design project to satisfy ABET student outcomes,” Education Research International, vol. 2020, 2020. [5] D. C. Davis, K. L. Gentili, M. S. Trevisan, and D. E. Calkins, “Engineering design assessment processes and scoring scales for program improvement and accountability,” Journal of Engineering
• Optimize • Iterate • Set Final Specifications Implement • Communicate • ReflectReferences[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 23, 2023).[2] R. Graham, “Global state of the art in engineering education - March 2018,” p. 170.[3] S. S. Tolman and M. J. Jensen, “Design Across The Curriculum: An Evaluation Of Design Instruction in a New Mechanical Engineering Program.,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual
, technologies and methods of implementation,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7(8), pp.1765-1771, 2019.[7] M.W. Keyser, “Active learning and cooperative learning: understanding the difference and using both styles effectively,” Research Strategies, vol. 17 (1), pp. 35-44, Spring 2000.[8] A. Bandyopadhyay, H. Kim, and P. Charoenphol, “Facilitate Improved Student Learning through Bloom’s Taxonomy-Based Assignments in an Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics Course,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June, 2023.[9] P. Charoenphol, H. Kim and A. Bandyopadhyay, "Was it Active Learning all Along?: Investigating the Effectiveness of the Mode of Exposure to Bloom's Taxonomy-Based Assignments
, Mechanics and material engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 467–478, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1299/jsmea1993.39.4_467.[2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineeering Education: The CDIO Approach, 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.[3] Lindsay Ellis, “TK Corporate Ed Boeing Wanted Better Engineers. Higher Education Would Never Be the Same.,” Chron High Educ, vol. 66, no. 7, Oct. 2019.[4] E. F. Crawley, “The CDIO Syllabus A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education,” 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org[5] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, and J. Fredricks Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of EC2000,” 2006. [Online]. Available: www.abet.orgwww.ed.psu.edu
,” Research Strategies, vol. 17 (1), pp. 35-44, Spring 2000.[2] H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, and S. Marshall, Eds., A Handbook of Teaching and Learning in HigherEducation: Enhancing Academic Practice. Routledge, 2008.[3] S. Manuel Brito, Ed., Active Learning - Beyond the Future. IntechOpen, 2019.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, and M.P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increasesstudent performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Psychological and CognitiveSciences, vol. 111 (23), pp. 8410-8415, May 2014.[5] J. Shaaruddin and M. Mohamad, “Identifying the Effectiveness of Active Learning Strategiesand Benefits in Curriculum and Pedagogy Course for Undergraduate TESL Students,” CreativeEducation, vol. 8 (14), pp. 2312-2324. November 2017.[6] E
Foundation has supported Dr. Solomon’s research through grants such as the Research Initiation Award, Excellence in Research (EiR), and Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE). He was selected as a summer faculty research fellow at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (Caltech), in 2019 and 2020. Dr. Solomon received the Faculty Achievement Award from Tuskegee University in 2023. Dr. Solomon has published and presented 50 technical papers in various journals and AIAA and ASEE conferences.Mr. Hang Song, Auburn University Hang Song is currently affiliated with Auburn University, where he plays a pivotal role in the field of environmental research, particularly in the application of