Conference Session

Dynamics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin, Stout

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Page 26.1639.14paperProceduresFigure 3: first stageThe first stage is triggered by group 2’s projectAfter triggered by group 2, we can assume the initial speed of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠.The second stage will happen when the plastic ball begins swinging. During the second stage, theplastic ball on the top would perform free fall with a string attached. Thus the projectile of theplastic ball will be circular. Since the team assume the initial condition of the ball is v0 = 0 𝑚/𝑠,thus at the beginning of second stage, the total energy is just potential energy where PE = mghwhere m is the mass of the plastic ball and h is the initial height of the ball. After the plastic ballfalls at the bottom location, it will swing back up and collide with a

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Price Barnett; Nick M. Safai, Salt Lake Community College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

-duty- vehicles-more-efficient. [Accessed: 25-Jan-2019].[6] O. Delgado and N. Lutsey, The U.S. SuperTruck Program: Expediting the Development of Advanced Heavy-Duty Vehicle Efficiency Technologies. Washington DC: International Council on Clean Transportation, 2014, p. 2.[7] J. Park, “How Navistar's SuperTruck Exceeded Goals,” Fleet Management - Trucking Info, 20-Dec-2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.truckinginfo.com/157131/how- navistars-supertruck-exceeded-goals. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2018].[8] “SuperTruck Powertrain Technologies for Efficiency Improvement.” United States Department of Energy, 10-Jun-2016.[9] S. Jensen, “It’s a bird…it’s a plane…its SuperTruck,” OEM Off-Highway, 01-Feb-2012

Conference Session

Innovative Mechanics Education Programs and Projects

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Morgan, Texas A&M University; Luciana Barroso, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

what they had gained, comments now include: “More problem solving techniques, taking what I know and applying to a problem that I have never seen or thought of working.”Additionally, some do begin to enjoy the material, as evidenced by comments such as:“I truly enjoyed the course and loved learning about dynamics of structures.”AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to thank the Zachry Department of Civil Engineering for providing support fora peer teacher used in this class. Also, the generous support provided by the National ScienceFoundation is acknowledged (Award Number 0536834).References:1. ABET (2000) Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commission.2. Barron, B. J. S. (1998). Doing with

Conference Session

Teaching Statics

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Orval Powell, USAF Academy; Michael Richards, U.S. Air Force Academy; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Nicholas Matthew Brown, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

,n3, July, 2002.[3] Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., Helmick, M. T., “Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering”,Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 10-18, 2008, pp. 777-786.[4] Hegarty, M. “Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions” Learning and Instruction14, pp. 343-351, 2004.[5] Flori, R. E., Koen, M. A. and Oglesby, D. B. (1996), Basic Engineering Software for Teaching (“BEST”)Dynamics, Journal of Engineering Education, 85: 61–68. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00209.x[6] Brophy, S. P., Walker, G. D., “Case study of the pedagogical impact of tablet PC’s as a presentation medium inlarge-scale engineering classrooms”, Proc. ASEE 2005.[7] Prince, M. "Does

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching: Statics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheryl A. Sorby, Michigan Technological University; Carl R. Vilmann P.E., Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. Table 2. Mean Scores from Common Test Items Online Course Recitation Course Significance of Difference in MeansTest #1 23.82 27.43 p<0.05(Std Deviation) (9.63) (8.19)Test #1 Adjusted 24.96 27.43 N. S.(Std Deviation) (9.74) (8.19)Test #2 24.14 17.10 p<0.001(Std Deviation) (8.81) (10.06)Test #3 9.93 24.29 p<0.0001(Std Deviation) (8.33

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University; Arun R. Srinivasa, Texas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering; Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. 58, 858-867.21. Thornton, 1996 forthcoming22. Thornton, R., & Sokoloff, D. (1998). Assessing Student Learning of Newton's Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66, Issue 4, 338-352.23. S. Ramlo, 2002 forthcoming24. Steif, P. (2004). Initial Data from a Statics Concept Inventory. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.25. Steif, P.S., and Dantzler, J.A. (2008). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education.26. Morris and Kraige 198527. Hestenes and Wells 1992 -- Hestenes, David, Wells, & Malcolm (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher

Conference Session

Teaching Statics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Phys., 66 (1), 64-74.3. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). “Cooperative Learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works?” Change, July/August, 27 - 35.4. MacGregor, Jean, Cooper, J., Smith, K., and Robinson, P. (2000). Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: From Small Groups to Learning Communities, Jossey Bass Publisher, San Francisco, CA.5. Mazur, Eric (1997). Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall, NJ.6. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and, Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 87 – 1017. Mechanics Readiness test. (http://comp.uark.edu/~jjrencis/aseemechanics/education/Mechanics

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

‘depth-averaged’ model.However major subsequent contributions to the subject matter took place during the 1960’s,wherein ‘variable-depth’ models were introduced. Let us consider for example, the potential flow over a horizontal bed. Let us consider a three-dimensional space with co-ordinates, x, y, z. However, for this example let us consider only the two dimensional plane x and z. If h is the mean water depth, and z is the vertical coordinate, then z = – h. One can arrive at a Taylor Expansion of the velocity potential η∀(x,z,t) around the bed level, z = – h. Page 15.214.3 Assume that u is the

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanics of Materials & General Mechanics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ganapathy Narayanan, The University of Toledo

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

careful inthe bar random analysis to compute symbolically for the two statistical randomdisplacement values of bar for 4 cases. Even so, please do each analysisidentified to verify the random displacement results before using it for teaching oras such for any professional value of interest.Bibliography1. Ang, A.H-S. and Tang, W. H., “Probability Concepts in Engineering”, John Wiley, 20072. National Research Council, “Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment”, National Academy Press, 19943. US DOE, “Characterization of Uncertainties in Risk Assessment with special reference to Probabilistic Uncertainty Analysis”, 19964. NASA, “Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practioners”, 20025. National

Conference Session

Dynamics - Wow! They accelerate

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Brown Bankhead III, Highline Community College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

other ideas to help move a classroom away from a directlecture format.References 1. Hake, R., “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses” American Journal of Physics, 66, 64 (1998); doi: 10.1119/1.18809 2. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2005), “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education:, 94: 87–101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x 3. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Higher Education,” American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, Vol. 39, 1987, pp. 3–7. 4. R.C. Hibbeler, Engineering

Conference Session

Teaching Statics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Masoud Rais-Rohani, Mississippi State University; Andrew Walters, Mississippi State University; Anthony Vizzini, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Conference Session

Internet Delivery of Mechanics Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Carroll; Hong Sheng, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

10Performance on Final Exam. Each semester the department offers between eight and tensections of Statics and either seven or eight sections of Mechanics of Materials. All studentstake the same final exam at the same time during final exam week. Grading is divided so that thesame faculty member will grade the same problem(s) on the final for all students taking the finalexam. That is, faculty member A may be assigned to grade problems 1 and 2 for all studentstaking the final exam that semester. This insures that all of the finals are graded consistently.Performance on the common final is a good indicator of how well the students learned thematerial taught in the class. An average is generated each semester for each section of the class,and an overall

Conference Session

What's New in the Mechanics of Materials?

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karim Muci-Küchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Lidvin Kjerengtroen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

universities use the proposed approach and provide feedback.Besides the topic under consideration, the proposed approach can also be used when the subjectof strains analysis in two dimensions is presented in class. Once the equations for straintransformations have been obtained, identical steps to the ones presented here can be followed toderive the expressions for the in-plane principal strains, the maximum magnitude of the in-planeshear strain and their corresponding orientations. Page 12.76.13References1. Seely, F.B., Resistance of Materials, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1934.2. Timoshenko, S. and MacCullough, G.H., Elements of

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Hildebrand, Lake Superior State University; Wael Mokhtar, Grand Valley State University; Steve Bryan, Continental Automotive Systems

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

for a versatile graduate, capable of working professionally in various vehicle-related industries, but graduates of the options discussed are too few as yet to make anyquantitative assessment.Bibliography1. Hsu, Tai-Ran. “Development of an Undergraduate Curriculum in Mechatronics Systems Engineering” Journal of Engineering Education, Apr.1999, p.173 –1792. Landsberger S, Ellzey J, Hull B, Rosinski J, and Wright J. “Undergraduate Degree with an Emphasis in Nuclear and Energy Engineering for the University of Texas of the Permian Basin”, ASEE AC 2007-6233. Mokhtar W, Duesing P, and Hildebrand R, “Integration of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) into the Mechanical Engineering Programs”, International Journal of Learning, Common

Conference Session

Teaching Statics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Dollar, Miami University; Paul Steif, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 phone: (513) 529 - 0714 ; fax: (513) 529-0717; e-mail: dollar@muohio.eduPaul Steif, Carnegie Mellon University Paul S. Steif is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. He received a Sc.B. in engineering from Brown University (1979) and M.S. (1980) and Ph.D. (1982) degrees from Harvard University in applied mechanics. He has been active as a teacher and researcher in the field of engineering mechanics. In particular, Dr. Steif develops and implements new approaches and technologies to measure student understanding of engineering and to improve instruction. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon

Conference Session

Hybrid and Online Teaching of Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicolas Nytko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. McTigue, Julie S. Linsey, and Tracy Hammond. Mechanix: The development of a sketch recognition truss tutoring system. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/21684. [8] WeeSan Lee, Ruwanee de Silva, Eric J. Peterson, Robert C. Calfee, and Thomas F. Stahovich. Newton’s pen: A pen-based tutoring system for statics. Computers & Graphics, 32(5):511–524, October 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2008.05.009. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2008.05.009. [9] Robert J. Roselli, Larry Howard, Bryan Cinnamon, Sean Brophy, Patrick Norris, Megan Rothney, , and Derek Eggers. Integration of an interactive free body diagram assistant with a courseware authoring

Conference Session

Teaching Statics: What and How?

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amir H. Danesh-Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Aimee Monique Cloutier, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

3’s was about the same. It is fascinating that in the span of 3 midterm exams, the performance of “corequisite” group improved by nearly 20 points, to the point that their overall mean score was statistically better than the “prerequisite” group (with up to 94% confidence), a complete reversal of the results of Exam 1. It is clear in this case that the “corequisite” group of students started to develop a better understanding of the course material between the first and second exams and continued to improve until the end of the quarter.  On the cumulative Final Exam, which was identical in the two quarters, the two groups performed in a virtually identical manner. This suggests that by the

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for Engineering Mechanics Courses

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashraf Badir P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Jiehong Liao, Florida Gulf Coast University; Tanya Kunberger P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Galen I. Papkov, Florida Gulf Coast University; Long D. Nguyen, Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert O'Neill P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Methods in Engineering Mechanics: Part Three,” 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25 – 28, 2017.5. Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C. and Norman, M.K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.6. Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY: Random House.7. McGuire, S.Y., and McGuire, S. (2015). Teach Students How to Learn. Sterling, VA: Stylus.8. Nilson, L.B. (2013). Creating Self-Regulated Learners. Sterling, VA: Stylus.9. Lovett, M.C. (2013). Making Exams Worth More Than the Grade. In M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty and D. Meizlish

Conference Session

Curriculum and Instruction in Engineering Mechanics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott R. Hamilton P.E., York College of Pennsylvania; Jakob C. Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Joshua Richard Wyrick, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Student Inquiry," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[2] J. C. Bruhl, J. L. Klosky, T. Mainwaring, and J. P. Hanus, "Accelerating the Development of Engineering Judgment in Students through Inquiry-Based Learning Activities," presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. (2017). Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Available: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/[4] R. W. Welch, S. J. Ressler, and A. C. Estes, "A Model for Instructional Design," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 131, July 2005 2005.[5] T

Conference Session

Enhancing the Statics Classroom

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna K.T. Howard, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. “The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game.” The Scrum Guide™, Nov. 2017, http://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide- US.pdf#zoom=100.[16] Rubin, Kenneth S. Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2012.[17] Pedrosa, K., Tubbesing, R., Stansbury, R., and Liu, J. “Fostering Agile Methodologies In Crossdisciplinary Capstone Design Course Through Process Management Tools”, Proceedings of the 2016 ASEESE Annual Conference, ASEE-SE (2016).[18] de Jager, T. W. "Using eduScrum to introduce projectlike features in Dutch secondary Computer Science Education." (2015).[19] Delhij, Arno, et al. “The EduScrum Guide.” The eduScrum Guide: The

Conference Session

Flipped Classrooms in Mechanics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yufeng Hu P.E., Western Michigan University; Javier Martin Montefort P.E., Western Michigan University; Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

/Hybrid-Teaching-Seeks-to/18487[12] Everett JW, Morgan, JK, Stanzione III JF. “A Hybrid Flipped First Year Engineering Course.” Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014[13] Riffell S, Sibley D. “Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: Anevaluation of a hybrid course format.” Computers & Education, Vol. 44, No. 3, 217-235, 2005[14] Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in OnlineLearning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.” U.S. Department of Education, Office ofPlanning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service, Washington D.C., 2010[15] Allen DE, Duch BJ, Groh SE

Conference Session

Statics Online

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carisa H. Ramming, Oklahoma State University; John J. Phillips, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Online StaticsTextbook Hibbeler, R.C., “Engineering Same textbook and website Mechanics Statics”, plus use of the publisher’s website “Mastering Engineering”Theory sessions 3 times weekly for 50 minutes Videos posted on website each, covering theory/examples covering same theory/examplesDiscussion Lab sessions Once weekly for 50 minutes, No Discussion Lab max. class size of 24 studentsTeaching Assistant(s) One TA per 24 students One TA for every 25

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Echempati, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

better prepared for each class to some extent; thus theytook less time to solve problems as a group, if not correctly all the time. Some times thestudents are asked to show only the methodology and steps for solving the problem. Theywere then asked to complete the solution as group homework. Some times the data in thesame problems is changed for each group (for example the magnitude of a load or theangle of application of a load), so that their results can be plotted on the board as trendlines. Those who get wrong answers fall out of bounds of the trend line(s) and theyimmediately realize their mistakes. Careful design of classwork problems seems to helpstudents to a great extent as they learn the problem solving techniques just in time. Thefeed

Conference Session

Internet Delivery of Mechanics Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Boyle, Saint Mary's University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

AC 2007-117: ELECTRONIC COURSE PACKAGING FOR STATICS ANDDYNAMICS: A REVIEW OF EFFORT, REWARD AND POTENTIALPeter Boyle, Saint Mary's University W. Peter Boyle holds B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Queen's University of Belfast, is Professor of Engineering at Saint Mary's University, Halifax, N. S., and was previously Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Cape Town. He is the author of a McGraw-Hill textbook on introductory fluid mechanics, and about forty publications in a variety of topics in mechanical engineering. A current interest is in the search for superior cost and time effective course delivery methods

Conference Session

Mechanics, Hands-on Demo - Show & Tell!

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward J. Berger, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

teaching and learning, and encompasses a wide range of file types (examples: videoand audio files in Quicktime or MP4, Matlab .m files, java applets, PDF files, etc.). The specificsof each multimedia asset depend upon context; we currently have files spanning a range ofdifferent teaching and learning tools, including: (i) lecture videos, (ii) video problem solutions,(iii) simulations/animations, (iv) Matlab .m files and other executables, (v) text-based resources inPDF. Many others are possible and the EGP can admit these and many other file types.Learning “content” is, however, not enough; we want students to understand the relationshipsamong seemingly disparate pieces of content. Since at least the 1970’s, there have been persistentcalls 5;6;7

Conference Session

Statics & Strength of Materials - A nice couple

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Douglas, University of Wisconsin Colleges; Mark H Holdhusen, University of Wisconsin, Marathon County

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

gains Page 23.433.11over the course of the semester, and work to address the ongoing challenges described above.Also, the labs must be implemented to the online delivery of the course. The online mechanicsof materials course is currently being developed and the first offering, including these labs, willoccur in an upcoming semester.Bibliography 1. Allen, I. Elaine and Seaman, Jeff, Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010, Babson Survey Research Group, November 2010. 2. Fisher, F., Hadim, H., Esche, S., Ubell, R., and Chassapis, C. "Feasibility of a fully online undergraduate mechanical engineering

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Josue Njock-Libii, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, pp. 101,97, 111.12. S. K. Foong, D Kiang, P Lee, R H March and B E Paton, How long does it take a bouncing ball to bounce aninfinite number of times? Physics Education, January 2004, 40- 43.13. Audacity(http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.14. Goldwave (http://www.goldwave.com/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.15. Holly M. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, Why do Students choose Engineering? AQualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values, Journal of Engineering Education, October2010, October 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3886/is_201010/ai_n56442207/?tag=content;col1Retrieved on January 4, 2011.16. Holly M

Conference Session

Alternative Methods of Teaching and Learning Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Amie Baisley, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

cognitive revolution on science learning and teaching,” The Impact of the Cognitive Revolution on Educational Psychology. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT., pp. 119–164, 2005.[9] H. L. Dreyfus and S. E. Dreyfus, “Five steps from novice to expert,” Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. pp. 16–51, 1986.

Conference Session

Mechanics Education Programs and Projects

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cliff Lissenden, Pennsylvania State University; Nicholas Salamon, Pennsylvania State University; Andrew Miller, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

sheet. It is recommended that the project assignment sheet(s) be used as a cover. The report must include inorder the following ten sections; some sections include subsections.1. Project Drawings, Parts List and Bill of Materials (15%). These summarize and communicate your design and must be sufficient to fabricate the design. Drawings must be roughly to scale and must include (1) a rendering of your design, (2) an isometric assembly with components ‘called-out’ and correlated by number or part name with the parts list, (3) details to clarify component connections and joints and (4) other details as necessary. Use professional conventions. Include all dimensions. Do not draw details of standard ‘off-the- shelf’ hardware

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benson Tongue, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

take place evenin the face of large enrollments.References [1] Bloom, B.S. (ed), (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain, White Plains, NY, Longman. [2] Bowman, J.S. (1979), Lecture-Discussion Format Revisited, Improving College and University Teaching 27, pp 25-27. [3] Duck, S. and McMahan, D.T. (2008) The Basics of Communication, SAGE. [4] Higbee, K.L. (2001) Your Memory : How It Works and How to Improve It, 2nd Ed, Da Capo Press. [5] Lowman, J. (1995), Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd Ed, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. [6] McKeachie, W.J. and Svincicki, M. (2006), Teaching Tips, Houghton Mifflin Company, NY. [7] Neisser, U., Hyman, I. (1999