dynamics of parametrically-excited systems and coupled oscillators; the thermomechanics of energetic materials; additive manufacturing; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a Member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and a Fellow of the American Society of Mechan- ical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design Engineering Division’s Technical Committees on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound, as well as the Design, Materials, and Manufacturing (DMM) Segment Leadership Team. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, including the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical
. A. Lawless, and M. A. Boyer, “Promoting Positive Academic Dispositions Using a Web-based PBL Environment: The GlobalEd 2 Project,” Interdiscip. J. Probl. Learn., vol. 7, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1389.[7] V. L. Holmes and Y. Hwang, “Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 449–463, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.979911.[8] M. E. Beier, M. H. Kim, A. Saterbak, V. Leautaud, S. Bishnoi, and J. M. Gilberto, “The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–23, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21465.[9] A. Bandura, “Self
pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Dr. Michele J. Grimm, Michigan State University Michele J. Grimm is the Wielenga Creative Engineering Endowed Professor of Mechanical Engineering. In addition to her scientific research, Dr. Grimm has spent a large part of her career focused on curriculum development and enhancement of student learning in engineering. She served on the faculty of Wayne State University for 25 years, where she developed and implemented both undergraduate
on the current course, andprovides a slow path to improvement. This study presents a student-centered assessment modelthat provides timely actionable feedback allowing optimization of course instruction during thesemester with the objective of maximizing student learning and the overall student satisfaction.The proposed model uses a simple structured approach that incorporates questions requiringnumerical scores and open-ended questions to solicit student feedback.This model includes four surveys administered over the semester. The first survey is given on thefirst week of classes to familiarize the instructor with the background and career goals of eachstudent and their course expectations. Based on the findings of this survey, the
shift toward more active learning practices in highereducation [1]. Active learning methodologies can provide students with opportunities to developthe skills needed by graduates in the 21st century. These skills include learning and innovationskills such as critical thinking, problem solving, and life and career skills such as collaboration[2]. Through engagement in firsthand learning experiences, students begin to figure things outfor themselves, develop confidence in their analytical abilities, learn to connect with the worldaround them, and discover how to use their innate curiosity to uncover the power of their ownlearning abilities [3].The early core engineering science courses set the foundational knowledge on which futurecontent is
the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Stanford University and the Department of Mathematics at the University of California, Davis. Prof. West holds a Ph.D. in Control and Dynamical Systems from the California Institute of Technology and a B.Sc. in Pure and Applied Mathematics from the University of Western Australia. His research is in the field of scientific computing and numerical analysis, where he works on computational algorithms for simulating complex stochastic systems such as atmospheric aerosols and feedback control. Prof. West is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award and is a University of Illinois Distinguished Teacher-Scholar and College of Engineering Education Innovation Fellow.Prof
difficulty (Figure 2). Taking all these facts together, one can conclude that the “corequisite” was simply not as prepared for Exam 1 as their counterparts. One possible reason for this is that the “corequisite” first encountered particle equilibrium in Week 4 of their Physics I class, which occurred after Exam 1 had already been administered. They simply did not have as much reinforcement and repetition on this material as their “prerequisite” counterparts. They are also likely less prepared for the rigors of a college exam. For most of the “corequisite” group, Exam 1 was their first or second exam in their college careers and that might also have been a factor in their poor performance. The
students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre authored and co-authored 3 chapter books, 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 60 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 8 gradu- ate students and mentored over 30 undergraduate students. He has collaborated with scholars from several countries, including Iran, China, Slovenia, Canada, and the US. He also served as a reviewer for 6 journals and a committee member of 5 conferences. He is the recipient of the University of Missouri President Award for Innovative Teaching (2018), the Teaching with Technology Award in the Focus on Teaching and technology conference (2018), Joseph H Senne Jr. Academy of Civil Engineering Faculty Teaching and Service Achievement
graduate research student in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological, where he received his Bachelors degree in the spring of 2020 . He has been working in the IDREEM lab under the guidance of Dr. Julie Linsey for most of his career at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Josh has been a part of the research into Maker Spaces and Engineering Education conducted within the IDREEM lab, and is currently focusing on Engineering Education.Dr. Tracy Anne Hammond PhD, Texas A&M University Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engi- neering at Texas A&M University, Dr. Hammond is an international leader in
. non-technical topics. We see that the amotivation only increases markedly for theactivities focused on non-technical topics. Once again, this is a small sample size, but points tointeresting questions for future studies. How can we increase students’ identified motivationtoward the non-technical aspects of their education and careers? Have we effectivelycommunicated the value of non-technical skills? Figure 3: Situational Motivation in Technical vs Non-Technical Active Learningd. Situational Motivations are Influenced by the Arc of a CourseOne of the more interesting discoveries in this case study was the students’ increased motivationtoward activity L2LNK, a passive lecture on linkage design. When considering the classroomactivities
engineering education and has taught a vast array of under- graduate and graduate courses in applied mechanics. Apart from her academic experience she has worked in numerous industries as an Engineering Consultant. Finally, since the beginning of her career, Dr. Singh has been very active in K-12 outreach and in promoting Women in Science and Engineering. Dr. Singh is a registered Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) in the province of Alberta. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Using Assessments to Improve Student Outcomes in Engineering DynamicsAbstractEngineering Dynamics has historically been one of the most challenging courses in theengineering