solving, and 3) to provide students with a strongerbackground in dynamics for follow-on courses.Course CohortsAs part of a California State University graduation rate initiative, in the past we were able tooffer the special section of the course three different times. Because of the lower number ofstudents enrolled in these sections, it takes additional resources and we are considering if weshould offer it again. All offerings were presented in a flipped format, with numerous exampleproblems and lecture material offered in short videos for students to watch before class. The firstoffering was in Spring of 2019 – the winter quarter provides our largest number of students,typically 13-15 sections of approximately 32 students each. This first
links betweenthe mechanical vibration theory and its real-world implementation. Per the class survey, 88.24% 7of students agreed that the class design projects significantly facilitated them to have a betterunderstanding of mechanical vibration theory. 94.22% of students agreed that the class designprojects helped them to establish the connection between mechanical vibration theory and itsapplications. 82.35% of students agreed that the class design projects should be kept for themechanical vibration course in the future.6. REFERENCES[1]. Ma, G. G., & Le, X. (2019, June), Utilize Project to Help Students Learning in Mechanical Vibration Course Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award in 2019 from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: The Effect of a Required Core Mechanics Course on Student MindsetAbstractIn this study, we will be examining how a required engineering course, Mechanical Engineering220 – Fundamentals of Mechanics (ME 220), at the United States Air Force Academy influencesstudent mindset. ME 220 is the
. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1436–1460, 2007.[2] J. Filgona, F. Jacob, S. John, and D. M. Gwany, “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Students’ Academic Achievement: a Theoretical Overview,” J. Glob. Res. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 14–44, 2020.[3] Sergeyev and N. Alaraje, “Effectiveness of traditional, blended and on-line teaching of electrical machinery course,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015.[4] J. Baughman, L. Hassall, and X. Xu, “Comparison of student team dynamics between nonflipped and flipped versions of a large-enrollment sophomore
States Air Force Academy Phillip Cornwell is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1989 and his present interests include structural dynamics, structural health monitoring, and undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Cornwell has received an SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award in 1992, and the Dean’s Outstanding Teacher award at Rose-Hulman in 2000, the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustee’s Outstanding Scholar Award in 2001, and the Archie Higdon Distinguished Educator Award in 2019 from the Mechanics Division of ASEE. He was one of the developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept
: The Ups and Downs of Project-Based Learning of static equilibrium,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Columbus, Ohio), ASEE Conferences, June 2017.[18] J. Kadlowec, M. Amadoro, and A. Osta, “A Statics and Dynamics Project Infusing Entrepreneurial Mindset,” in 2021 ASEE North Central Section Conference, (University of Toledo, Ohio), ASEE Conferences, March 2021.[19] E. Constans, K. Dyer, and S. Sangelkar, “A New Method for Teaching The Fourbar Linkage and its Application to Other Linkages,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Tampa, Florida), ASEE Conferences, June 2019.[20] J. Lahmann, B. Halsey, A. Danesh-Yazdi, S. Sangelkar, and E. Constans, “Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for
. Trinkle, M. West, and G. L. Herman, “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” Journal of Materials Education, vol. 38, p. 161–174, 2019. [7] A. Kononov, P. Bellon, T. Bretl, A. L. Ferguson, G. L. Herman, K. A. Kilian, J. A. Krogstad, C. Leal, R. Maass, A. Schleife, J. K. Shang, D. R. Trinkle, and M. West, “Computational curriculum for MatSE undergraduates,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [8] X. Zhang, A. Schleife, A. Ferguson, P. Bellon, T. Bretl, G. L. Herman, J. A. Krogstad, R. Maass, C. Leal, D. R. Trinkle, and M. West, “Computational curriculum for MatSE undergraduates and the influence on senior classes,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &
125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 35 – 27, 2018. Paper ID #21605.[6] A. Badir, J. Liao, G. Papkov and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics – Part II,” in the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 15 – 19, 2019. Paper ID #26761.[7] H. Trussell and E., “A Study of the Effect of Graded Homework in a Preparatory Math Course for Electrical Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 141-146., 2003.[8] A. Kaw and A. Yalcin, “Does Collecting Homework Improve Examination Performance
. Pellegrino, and V. Berry, “Impacts of implementing up-to-date industry problems on engineering identity development,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41707.pdf[2] J. Baughman, L. Hassall, and X. Xu, “Comparison of student team dynamics between non- flipped and flipped versions of a large-enrollment sophomore design engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 103–118, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20251.[3] A. Godwin and B. W. Boudouris, “Fostering motivation for chemical engineering students’ academic success: An example from a sophomore materials and energy balances course,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 121–128, 2020.[4
, “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,” in Handbook: The Cognitive Domain, David McKay, New York, 1956.[8] M. Lande, “Roles for Take-Home Exams from the Perspective of Engineering Students and Instructors,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44163.[9] J. Tao, and Z. Li, “A Case Study on Computerized Take-Home Testing: Benefits and Pitfalls,” International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1):33–43, 2012. Available: https://sicet.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ijttl-12-01-3_Tao.pdf.[10] L. Bengtsson, “Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4. MDPI AG, p. 267, Nov. 06, 2019. doi: 10.3390
.tb01067.x19. De Rosa, A. J., Reed, T. K., & Arndt, A. E. (2023, June). Work in Progress: Promoting the Transfer of Math Skills to Engineering Statics. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.20. De Rosa, A. J. (2020, June). Examining Knowledge Transfer Between Thermodynamics and Mathematics. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/examining-knowledge-transfer-between-thermodynamics-and-mathemat ics21. De Rosa, A. J., Serbin, D., & Lee, S. (2019, November). Facilitating Cross-Course Connections & Knowledge Transfer between Engineering Thermodynamics and Mathematics (WIP). In 2019 Fall Mid Atlantic States Conference
significant resources into developing hands-on and virtual resources for educators to use[9]. As technology has improved, the development of educational videos or virtual resources hasbecome widespread. Researchers have released videos of failures, finite element and behaviorsimulations, and technical content videos [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].In 2008, Timothy Philpot et al. released their first edition of the textbook “Mechanics ofMaterials: An Integrated Learning System [17].” Coupled with this textbook release werevisualization tools called “MecMovies” developed using Macromedia Flash 5 software [12].These videos allowed students to interact with the course content as they progressed through thecurriculum. In 2019, the Efficient
. However, more work must first becompleted to develop and evaluate BML approaches for other upper-level, mechanical engineeringcourses.References[1] Y. Yin, Y. Wang, J. A. Evans and D. Wang, "Quantifying the dynamics of failure across science, startups and security," Nature, vol. 575, pp. 190-194, 2019.[2] L. Eskreis-Winkler and A. Fishbach, "Not Learning from Failure - The Greatest Failure of All," Psychological Science, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1733-1744, 2019.[3] S. Atwood, M. T. Siniawski and A. R. Carberry, "Using Standards-based Grading to Effectively Assess Project-based Design Courses," in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Anual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] M. Henri, D. Johnson and B. Nepal, "A review of
Roccabianca, and Ricardo Mejia-Alvarez. "TheNeed for Holistic Implementation of SMART Assessment". 2020 ASEE North Central Sectionconference, Morgantown, West Virginia, 2020, March. ASEE Conferences, 2020.[2] Ronald C. Averill, Sara Roccabianca and Geoffrey Recktenwald. “A Multi-Instructor Studyof Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses.” Conference Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019.[3] Hjelmstad, K. D., & Baisley, A., “A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment inSophomore-level Mechanics Courses” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, Online,2020.[4] Recktenwald, G., & Grimm, M. J., & Averill, R., & Roccabianca, S., “Effects of a NewAssessment Model on
S. Cheng, “Using natural language processing tools on individual stories from first year students to summarize emotions, sentiments and concerns of transition from high school to college,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[16] Hjelmstad, K. D., & Baisley, A. (2020, June), A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment in Sophomore-level Mechanics Courses Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2—34028[17] Kearney, S., “Improving engagement: The use of ‘Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 875–891, 2013.[18] Baisley, A., & Hjelmstad, K.D
Engineering and Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) to enhance teaching and learning effectiveness of engineering courses. She is the winner of 2021 University Teaching Fellow award, 2019 Distinguished Engineering Educator Award, and recipient of 2016, 2017, and 2018 Klewin Excellence in teaching award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Experiential Assessment in Mechanics of Materials: A Departure from Traditional ExaminationsAbstractMechanics of Materials is a pivotal junior-level course that is essential for various engineeringdisciplines (including Civil, Mechanical, Material Science, Biomedical, and ManufacturingEngineering) at the
for theircontributions to this study's assessment components.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2141984. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.10. References[1] A. Vidak, I. Movre Šapić, and V. Mešić, "An augmented reality approach to learning about the force of gravity," Physics Education, vol. 56, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac21a3.[2] R. A. Serway and J. W. Jewett, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 10 ed. Cengage Learning, 2019, p. 1162.[3] A. Bedford and W. Fowler, Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 6th ed. Upper Saddle