, and veteran undergraduates in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Methodological Promise of ‘Narrative Inquiry’ for Exploring Student Veteran and Service Member Experience as ‘People in Relation’AbstractStudent veterans and service members (SVSM) represent a significant, yet vastly underutilized,human resource for strengthening and diversifying the nation’s science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) workforce. It is estimated that, by the year 2020, over 5 million post9/11 service members will have transitioned out of the U. S. Armed Forces. Yet, despiteadvanced technical skills and training and access to unprecedented levels of educational benefits,today’s
the knowledge and skills that student veterans bring to higher education and toengineering education.23Following Minnis and Wang’s research on military veterans’ career decisions17 and Musgrove’sinvestigation of career planning of military veterans enrolled in college,24 our study draws onSampson et al.’s Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) approach to career intentions anddecision making.25 This theoretical framework has been used to better understand veterans’transitions into the workforce.20 Our student interviews highlight how two elements of thisapproach, Developing Self-Knowledge and Building Occupational Knowledge, may apply toSVE’s decision to enter the engineering education pathway. As a foundational step, developingself-knowledge
education.References[1] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, “Education program beneficiaries,” 2014.[2] ABET, “Accreditation policy and procedure manual (APPM), 2016 – 2017,” 2016.[3] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, and S. M. Lord, “Using focus groups to understand military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, pp. 1–9.[4] US Department of Veterans Affairs, “Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs,” 2018.[5] K. McBain, L.; Kim, Y.; Cook, B.; Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members.,” Washington D.C., American Council on Education, 2012.[6] R. Ackerman, R., Diramio, D
for the National Center for Women in Information Tech- nology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM pro- grams.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is
with assessment from self on the first line and peerassessment on the subsequent lines. The normalized scores are on the right and listed as with andwithout self-assessment to check if the student’s self-perception matches the group’s. Softwarewas formatted to color cells when assessment data was +/- 0.05 or greater (< 0.95 = orange, >1.05 = green), making it easy to find low and high performers. Table 3: Student X Assessment at Project Initiation Student X L E A D E R S w/self w/o self 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0.901 0.911
, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Prof. Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle M. Camacho is Professor of Sociology at the University of San Diego. She began her career at UC San Diego in 1999 as a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for US Mexican Studies, and later as a UC Faculty Fellow in Ethnic Studies. In 2015-16, she returned to UC San Diego as a fellow of the American c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
a greater impact to graduationrates online or off-line.References[1] I. F. Liu, Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. , "Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors that Affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community," Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp. 600-610, 2010.[2] M. Chmura, "Babson Study: Distance Education Enrollment Growth Continues," ed. Wellesley, MA: Babson University, 2016.[3] P. Blau, Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press, 1977.[4] S. B. Eom, Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. , "The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation.," Decision Sciences Journal of
. Issues in Information Systems, 2020. 21(4).3. Dwivedi, Y.K., et al., Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 2020. 55: p. 102211.4. Georgiadou, A., S. Mouzakitis, and D. Askounis, Working from home during COVID-19 crisis: a cyber security culture assessment survey. Security Journal, 2021: p. 1-20.5. Lallie, H.S., et al., Cyber security in the age of covid-19: A timeline and analysis of cyber-crime and cyber-attacks during the pandemic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11929, 2020.6. Furnell, S. and J.N. Shah, Home working and cyber security–an outbreak of unpreparedness? Computer Fraud
interpolated the ideas of caring and respect for lives by focusing on a specificaspect of the course contents and its peaceful applications in civilian society, it was hard for thispopulation of students to develop a professional identity in the field of military science andtechnology. The Military Science and Technology (S&E) workforce was a double male-dominated sphere in terms of scarcity of women and its contradiction with women’s moraldevelopment where the ethics of caring and non-violence play a pivotal role.Hands-on Learning, Authentic Knowledge, and Varied Focus in Learning All students in this study recognized the value of hands-on lab experiences and havingmilitary veterans in the class—either the TAs or peer students—who made the
teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include inclusive pedagogies, electronics, optoelectronics, materials sci- ence, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education
(hereinafterreferredtoasScholars)selectedfortheprogramwillreceiveone-yearscholarships,withanoptiontocontinuecontingentuponreceiptofadditionalprogramfunds:1.Tuition2.Mandatoryorgeneralfeesasdeterminedbytheinstitution.Optionalormiscellaneousfeeswillnotbecovered.3.Bookallowance4.TravelfundingforonecybersecurityconferenceperacademicyeartocontinentalUS-heldconferencesonly.5.One-timecostoflaptoportabletforcourseworkand/orelectronicbooks(returningscholarswhocontinuefromprioryear(s)and/orcontinueforanadditionaldegree/certificatewillonlyreceiveonelaptop)Rightnowthisprogramisfocusedonourdistanceeducation–offeredMasterofScienceinInformationSystemsprogram,butweareworkingtoexpandourdistance
—an effort that we have already begun. ● Fully implement the portfolio initiative.References[1] Harding, T., Mertz, T. E., Genereux, W. E., Guzek, S. A., Bower, T. (2017). Reinventing a computer technology curriculum to meet the needs of students and future employers. Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28790.[2] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor (2018). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Web Developers. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and- information-technology/web-developers.htm.[3] Koo, T. S. (2012). Integrating design
as well as several areas of potential future enhancement. Cybersecurityprogram and course development at NDSU is still an area of ongoing rapid growth. New courseofferings as well as additional delivery enhancements should enhance the student experienceboth for on-campus and distance students and civilian, active duty military and veterans alike.References[1] J. P. Merisotis, “President’s Message,” Lumina Foundation Focus, p. 1, 2013.[2] D. Lederman, “What Makes a College ‘Military Friendly’?,” Inside Higher Ed, 28-Feb- 2008.[3] S. E. Minnis, “Take the right steps to become more veteran-friendly,” Recruit. Retaining Adult Learn., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 5–5, Mar. 2015.[4] S. E. Minnis, “Consider whether your institution
of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 4, 2010. [0022- 1546]. Available: https://tandfonline.com. [Accessed Oct. 10, 2019].[9] C. Interiano-Shiverdecker, J. H. Lim, P. T. Tkacik, and J. L. Dahlberg, “From the barracks: A multi-dimensional model of student veterans’ cultural transition,” The Journal of Military and Government Counseling, vol. 7, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://mgcaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2]019/11/JMGC-Vol-7-Is-3.pdf. [Accessed Sept. 15, 2019].[10] B. J. Novoselich, J. C. Bruhl, M. Scheidt, C. N. Willis, and M. S. Sheppard, “ASEE support to student veterans: Results of a 2018 leadership roundtable,” Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [Online
Related Careers," National Science Foundation, Washington D.C., 2013.[5] J. Arminio, T. K. Grabosky and J. Lang, Student Veterans and Service Members in Higher Education, New York: Routledge, 2015.[6] S. M. Lord, K. A. Kramer and R. T. Olson, "Work in Progress- Conecting Veterans to Customized Engineering Educaiton ath the University of San Diego," in 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington D. C., 2010.[7] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner and S. M. Lord, "Understanding the Military Veteran's Human Resource Needs - Transition from Military Service to the Engineering Profession," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , New Orleans, LA, 2016.[8] K. A
was 1.54% higher than the increases in non-veteran student grades in theMECH 351 section that contained no veteran students. This initial conclusion drives the point thatveterans are an asset in the classroom and that leveraging their professionalism, leadership skills,and adaptability can have a positive influence on non-veteran student academics. Future work willfollow additional veterans to increase the study’s sample size and to enhance the ability to performa statistical analysis on the results. Additionally, the authors are looking to expand the research toinclude findings from other institutions to study the broader impacts of veteran presence in theclassroom.References[1] M. Kirchner, L. Coryell and S. Biniecki, "Promising practices
also testing if different interventions are moreeffective for different cohorts (e.g., Veteran students, students in different majors, students withdifferent social responsibility perceptions).Finally more research is needed to identify and test interventions that increase student retentionin engineering, specifically among underrepresented populations such as Veteran students.AcknowledgementsFunding provided by the National Science Foundation (Award #1738145). Opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authors express their gratitude to all surveyparticipants and members of the advisory board for their role in this
, workforce, andgovernment the research catalog will expand. Figure 8. Digital Shipbuilding Research Strategy.For CY 2020, VDSP has a robust plan that includes outreach, conferences, papers/publications,research and expansion of curriculum. In conclusion, VDSP is just getting started inreinvigorating the industry in preparation of Industry 4.0 Revolution and beyond.References:[1] K Amadeo, "Current US Employment Rate Statistics and News," The Balance, 2019.[2] USNI News, "FY2020 US Navy 30 Year Shipbuilding Plan," USNI News, Mar 21, 2019. [Online}. Available: https://news.usni.org/2019/03/21/fy-2020-u-s-navy-30-year-shipbuilding-plan. [Accessed Feb 3, 2020].[3] Crestom, "Tips for Managing Multiple
: http://science.dodlive.mil/2018/01/04/marine-maker-a-course-in-innovation/[5] Marine Maker, “Make Your Future,” MD5, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://community.md5.net/md5/marinemaker[6] M.A. Audette, V. Jovanovic, O. Bilgen, K. Arcaute, A.W. Dean, “Creating the Fleet Maker: a 3D Printing-centered STEM Learning Environment for the Stimulation of Innovative Thinking and Empowerment of Sailors,” presented at the ASNE Day 2017 - Technology, Systems and Ships, Arlington, VA. 2017.[7] A.W. Dean, V. Jovanovic, K. Arcaute, O. Bilgen, M.A. Audette, S. Bawab, M. Tomovic, R. McKenzie, and S. Chaturvedi, “Creating the Fleet Maker: An Informal STEM Learning Environment to Stimulate Innovative Thinking, Broaden Participation in STEM
National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is
Engineering Education, Volume 33, 2017, pp. 1737-1750.[7] P. S. Chinowsky, H. Brown, A. Szajnman, and A. Realph, “Developing Knowledge Landscapes through Project-Based Learning,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 118–124, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(2006)132:2(118).[8] M. Jollands, L. Jolly, and T. Molyneaux, “Project-based learning as a contributing factor to graduates’ work readiness,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 143–154, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.665848.[9] Y. Sumer, “DETERMINING PLASTIC HINGE LENGTH OF HIGH PERFORMANCE RC BEAMS,” 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Jan
, June 24-27, 2018.[9] D. Molina and A. Morse, “Military-connected undergraduates: The current state of research and future work,” Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 2015.[10] R. Rabb, K. Bower, R. Barsanti, and R. Welch, Veteran Students in Engineering Leadership Roles, Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Columbus, OH, June 25-28, 2017.[11] M. Loughry, M. Ohland, and D. Moore, “Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 67 (3), pp. 505-524, 2007.[12] T. O’Neil, S. Park, N. Larson, A. Deacon, G. Hoffart, B. Brennan, M. Eggermont, and W. Rosehart, Peer Ratings and Intentions to Change: Adopting the
(PID) Controls and TrackingThe lecture focuses on autonomous military vehicles and how they operate. Emphasis is placedon the complex math behind UAV design and PID controllers. The lab session is a demonstrationon quad-copter flight and autonomous tracking. A second autonomous vehicle is tracked by thequad-copter at a known distance and altitude.Water Channel and Particle Image Velocimetry OperationUNCC has the nation’s fourth largest water channel (by flow rate) and one of only a handful ofTomographic Particle Image Velocimetry (TomoPIV) systems. This research tool has a 1m high x1m deep x 3m long test section and with a maximum flow velocity of around 1 m/s. Each iterationof the class has utilized a different model in the water channel