organizations (student chapters and evendepartments) to be a part of and experience speakers, conferences, and community servicesurrounding the group’s basic needs. Some students look to socialize and begin to connect withlike-minded peers within activities and focused study areas for our veterans and active dutymilitary.References[1] Humphrey, J., “Getting Student Veterans Off the Sidelines,” accessed 5 February 2017,http://www.military.com/education/getting-veteran-students-off-the-sidelines.html[2] Kuh, G., et. al., Student Success in College, Josey-Bass, 2010.[3] Welch, R., Martin, A., Bower, K., Rabb, R., “Promoting Engagement through Innovative and PragmaticPrograms,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, New
Paper ID #30666A Systems Engineering Approach to Mentorship Program for Online Mili-taryand Veteran Engineering StudentsDr. Reza Rahdar, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Reza Rahdar, currently a full time faculty of the College of Aeronautics, have over 25 years of expe- rience in systems design/development, and engineering systems that include telecommunication systems and networks, Radio communications, air defenses systems, avionics systems, and Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS). Dr. Rahdar developed proficiency with systems engineering principles, pro- cess, and practices. He is an expert in taking
, many ‘traditional’ engineering students will enter careers where their work intersectswith military interests. Lucena describes how engineering education has consistently beeninfluenced by the defense needs of the United States since World War II [29]. Students mayactively seek military-related jobs, or more likely, will find themselves in them. A recentNational Academy of Engineering (NAE) report analyzed STEM workforce concerns of the U.S.Department of Defense (DOD), in terms of the ‘defense industrial base’ and DOD civilian andmilitary employees [30]. Many new technologies are developed with military funding orpotential military applications in mind, as acknowledged in a recent NAE report [31].Military issues in relation to engineering have
.[16] K. Beddoes and M. Borrego, “Feminist theory in three engineering educational journals:1995-2008,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 281-303, 2011.[17] M. F. Belenky, B. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. N. Tarule, Women’s Ways of Knowing:The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. Sterling, VA: Basic Books, 1997.[18] B. E. Rincón, and C. E. George-Jackson, “Examining department climate for women inengineering: The role of STEM interventions,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 57,no. 6, pp. 742-747, 2016.[19] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing AmongFive Traditions, 4th ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
too time intensive and thus interfere with hiseducational pursuits.Research Question # 2: Why did the RANGE students choose to major in engineering?The participants described a variety of motivators for deciding to major in engineering. As withjoining the military, family was an influential factor for choice of major. Reece (AFR-ECE)said that both his father and brother were engineers; Nikolas’ (AN-ME) father, grandfather, andbrother were engineers. Chase (AFR-ME), Isaac (AFR-ME), and Taylor (AFR-AE) wereinspired by their uncles who were engineers. Donovan (AFN-IE) credits his family forstimulating his interest in engineering and “having a critical mind.”Childhood influences were an important source of inspiration. As a child, Chase loved to
any cohort of students, there are strengths and opportunities for growth. Weintended to build upon the ability of millennials to interact with information from a wide range ofsources that is available digitally and introduce them to the professional dogma of both the Armyand environmental engineering. The intent of our course is to leverage their strengths to furtherdevelop cadets’ “higher-order” thinking through the correct application of “mind models”, withinthe engineering process [9]. This higher level thinking is both doctrinal [12] and pedagogical [9]in nature. Using the doctrinal framework as a critical thinking tool combined with creativethinking and engineering design principles, we teach students to apply “practical thinking
Paper ID #21963Integrating Veteran Experiences into Engineering Design: Veteran-led Stu-dent Development of High-power Rocket Competition TeamThomas L. Davis, Kent State University Thomas Davis is a graduate student in the Master of Technology program at Kent State University. He holds a bachelors degree in aeronautical systems engineering technology from Kent State University. Prior to joining the Kent State student body, Mr. Davis held operator and technical service request specialist positions at Forest City Technologies, Inc. for a total of 16 years. He is currently a staff sergeant in the Ohio Army National Guard
Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
belonging on their campuses and in their programs. Morework within the overall veteran community as well as the engineering education community maybe needed to understand this concern fully.Recommendations for ASEE support to veteransThe ultimate purpose of the roundtable was to identify ways that ASEE could support veteranengineering education, relevant veteran diversity research, and engagement within the veterancommunity. With discussion from the affinity mapping exercise fresh in mind, a brain writingexercise was used to develop actionable ideas.Each attendee was given a brain writing 6-3-5 worksheet [30] with the following prompt: “Howcan ASEE support 1) engineering education, 2) relevant diversity research, and 3) engagement ofthis community
Paper ID #17973Veteran’s Transition Course at the University of WyomingDr. Steven F. Barrett, University of Wyoming Dr. Steven F. Barrett, P.E., received the B.S. in Electronic Engineering Technology from the University of Nebraska at Omaha in 1979, the M.E.E.E. from the University of Idaho at Moscow in 1986, and the Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin in 1993. He was formally an active duty faculty member and professor at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado and is now professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and associate dean for Academic Programs, College of Engineering and Applied Science
Engineering M.S. andPh.D. degrees, a special recognition as part of a B.S. degree in Computer Science and supporting‘anytime, anywhere’ courses. Part of a larger state-wide initiative, NDSU identified a specificgoal of making the programs that were developed remotely accessible and, specifically, militaryaccessible. Military members (including active duty and veterans) are seen to be excellentcybersecurity students due to their warfighting background, which can be directly leveraged toprovide the appropriate frame of mind for cybersecurity operations, whether from an offensive ordefensive perspective. This paper covers on the development of the programs and courses at thedepartmental level. A key decision that was made early in the process was to
Paper ID #33967Adapting Online Learning for the United States Military AcademyMajor Raymond Vetter, United States Military Academy Raymond Vetter, PE, PMP is currently an instructor and analyst in the Department of Systems Engineer- ing at the United States Military Academy (West Point). He graduated from the United States Military Academy (West Point, New York, USA), 2010, with a Bachelor of Science in Systems Engineering with Honors. In 2014 Ray graduated from the Missouri University of Science and Technology, earning a Mas- ter of Science in Engineering Management. In 2019, he graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of