EPIC through their MEPchapter, so many students may have felt that they were placed in the camp versus selecting it forthemselves, and for most students, it was their first experience at an overnight camp. In ourattempt to ensure a positive EPIC experience for all students, we provided an inclusivity trainingfor camp counselors and lab instructors. We also translated some camp materials in Spanish, andsome of the EPIC counselors and staff members were bilingual.With this work-in-progress paper, we share our reflections and lessons learned, and we welcomefeedback from the engineering education community. We present the steps taken in preparationfor the MEP students, and examine how effective those steps were. Preliminary data from thepost
2018). 3) Develop an expanded curriculum for a new stand-alone honors course (to be taught in Autumn 2018).The general format of our curriculum is: lecture to introduce topic, pre-assignment includingreading and written reflection, in-class discussion, and post-class reflection. We will sharecurricular materials such as lectures, assignments, reading lists, and in-class discussion promptsat the conference. Please see the honors course schedule in Appendix A.Preliminary AssessmentOver three quarters, we have introduced parts of our curriculum in an introductorybioengineering course through the addition of two class sessions and a reflective assignment. Inaddition, we made an effort throughout the course to explicitly relate ethics and
which the university will: become an anchorinstitution, demonstrate engaged scholarship, practice changemaking, advance access andinclusion, demonstrate care for our common home, and integrate our liberal arts education.In addition, the University Core curriculum recently underwent an overhaul with a new CoreCurriculum in place in Fall 2017. One significant outcome of the new Core reflects theUniversity’s commitment to Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice (DISJ). Whereas studentspreviously were required to take a single Diversity course, the new Core requires students to taketwo Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice (DISJ) courses recognizing a developmental modelof achieving these outcomes. In addition, the DISJ designation is now based
observational protocol includes the identified observational settings, developed descriptionsof what was witnessed, and particularly interesting and surprising occurrences. Field notationwas guided by the following prompts: How do Black youth develop engineering skills within diverse sociocultural informal contexts? What does engineering learning look like in these informal contexts? How did the space allow kids to design/create? How did they interact with others while doing engineering? How they interact with parents and vice versa?Research ReflectionsIn this section, we present a summary of the field notes from each of the preliminary sites asreflections. We share our initial insights and reflections related
concepts. During summer 2017, a southeastern universityparticipated in hosting one of the seventeen Verizon sponsored STEM Camps. The universityhosted 144 URM middle school boys for three weeks on campus to explore engineering habits ofmind, engineering design principles, and computer science application developmentfundamentals. The camp was primarily facilitated by fourteen student mentors. One of theprinciple elements of the camp was to have mentors that reflected the demographics of thestudent population. As such, the mentor demographics consisted of 12 URM male mentors and 2URM female mentors. Upon conclusion of the summer camp all of the student mentors wereasked to participate in an open-ended survey that inquired about their experiences as
their own group.”Scientific historical accounts reflect Homo sapiens, essentially our human evolutionary ancestry,has only existed for a meager 200,000 years in the 4.6 billion years since the origin of the Earth.During this short stint in history, we have experienced an unending series of conflicts. History isproliferated with these many human recorded conflicts; conflicts premised on differences inreligion, ethnicity, race, gender, geography and so many more. Our very limited circumference oftrust is illustrated even here in our great United States, through a myopic lens and ethnocentricminds-eye. Who should we like? Who should we trust? Who should we not like and/or trust? Inthe end, who is the next person or group that individually or
CC-HSIs. KickStarter interacts at three levels within each CC-HSI - individual, team,and organizational. All three levels are key to institutionalizing successful organizationalchange. For example, KickStarter facilitates STEM planning discussions that increase facultyengagement, leadership, and collaboration, with visibility to CC-HSI executives to gainendorsement of a college-wide STEM plan. KickStarter also tailors its technical guidance to theCC-HSI experience level and provides a safe place for learning, resulting in NSF awards forSTEM education innovations. This paper will describe the experience and details for theimplementation and evaluation of the KickStarter program, including reflections, benefits anddrawbacks of the approach
contains multiple probing questions to help participants reflect deeply ontheir experiences as they relate to the research question. The protocol includes probing questionsdesigned to discover why people behave in a certain way by uncovering the assumed, mutualknowledge, symbolic meanings, motives and rules that provide the context for their actions [42].Analysis: Grounded theory was used as an analytic methodology to identify themes, whichincludes a two-stage, open, and axial coding process to analyze the data, followed by memowriting, theoretical sampling, and theoretical saturation [37]. The content analysis consisted ofresearchers coding themes independently followed by the five-member research team meeting asa group to reach consensus about
);• regular dialogue with the Board of Directors; and• diversity booth at Annual Conference & Exhibition (sponsored by industry).This time period included some struggles to get critical momentum going, although perseveranceprevailed until the committee reached a critical mass of members. Much of this progress was theimpact of Bevlee Watford’s role as a charismatic and direct-speaking leader. Processes becamemore institutionalized, which helped set ASEE precedents to move from good ideas, to actionand implementation, to institutionalization and sustainability. A reflection on this period isprovided in the Spring 2014 Diversity Committee newsletter by J.P. Mohsen, ASEE formerPresident [14].3.3. 2013-2014 (Chairs: Teri Reed & Adrienne Minerick
student reflects on the culture shock of growing up in a largely Latinxneighborhood and entering a predominantly White institution: “I didn't necessarily feel comfortable. I just felt kind of weird. And out of place... [The PEEPS students] met before school started, and it definitely helped seeing people of different backgrounds, minority groups. I was like ‘This is great’... I'm really glad not only because I got the scholarship, but that I'm able to be a part of this wonderful group of people. And the different experience they have, or backgrounds that they have, it's nice because I have my own story. They have their own” Yeah, so that was my first welcoming group and little cohort that I felt-- Yeah I
context to the data. The memos will also capture researcher reflections anddecision-making processes during analysis. The memos may also provide details about thecommunity and participants.Preliminary ResultsThis work in progress is transitioning from secondary to final data analysis. At this point, thereare five categories which will help develop themes for this research. One category linksengineering as a cultural strategy to survive. Another category points to engineering as a processfor community development. A third category maps Tohono O’odham values to engineeringdesign traits. Two other categories are not directly associated to engineering but rather tocommunity self-perceptions as a result of engineering impacts.SignificanceQualitative
making apps isconsidered part of engineering”.Another participant indicated that the camp helped them to learn more about engineering. Hesaid:“I learned that there is a wide variety of engineering. I thought there was only, like, four parts ofengineering in the career section, but I learned that there is a lot more and they all do differentthings and it’s not just building stuff”.Another participant indicated a change in his understanding about how engineering can be used.He said:“I thought engineering was mostly math and like mechanical things but I didn’t know that youcan tailor engineering to business”.Shifts in Attitudes after Workshop CompletionResults reflect that participants’ attitudes towards engineering changed upon the completion
=Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, 6 = Not Sure) for participants to rate their opinion of experiences inSTEM majors at their HBCU. Survey items were developed to reflect the common reasons forstudent departure as outlined in the published text Talking About Leaving and the experiences ofsenior leaders on the project from STEM fields and at HBCUs [4]. To ensure the survey focusedon the intended areas and that the researchers engaged in a comprehensive approach, each surveyitem was aligned with a research thrust area and compared with the theoretical framework. Toaccount for differences in demographic information needed, two parallel surveys were createdfor each group (Group 1 and 2).Data Collection Data were collected from students (Group 1
participation criteria. The survey instrument included the aforementioned published andpreviously validated measurement scales. The measurement scales included the following: 1)identification with engineering 17 to measure engineering identity; 2) ethnic identity scale 19 tomeasure the level of identification with racial or ethnic identity; 3) Womanist Identity Attitudescale (WIAS) 20 to measure attitudes reflective of the four stages of womanist identitydevelopment (i.e., Pre-encounter, Encounter, Immersion–Emersion, Internalization); the RacialMicroaggressions Scale (RMAS) 21 to measure students perceptions of racial microaggressions;and 4) the Patients Health Questionnaire 22 is a self-report measure of symptoms of depression.Each scale include
of recommendation 8 To enhance my resume 7 To have a good intellectual challenge 6 To work more closely with a particular faculty member 6 Other Option 1In Tables 4 and 5 on the following page, the responses indicate that the students had a greatworking relationship with each other as well as with their faculty mentors, at least mostly. Thiscertainly reflects the assessment of the seed vibrations team. Further, Table 6 indicates thatstudents generally felt well supported during their summer work
resonated well with my personal experience in the past withfemale mentorship. Reflecting on how I got to where I am today, I owe much of my success tothe female mentors that have influenced me so positively throughout my high school and collegeyears.Recommendations for Future Camps:For many of the activities there was a scripted part and an additional challenge planned, but timeprohibited most of the girls from thoroughly exploring the additional challenges. In the futuremore time will be allocated to each activity. According to these results, 75-90 minutes peractivity would be sufficient. This will of course limit the number of activities, but the additionaltime spent to master the nuances of each activity is worth the limited exposure.Extending
because of thescholarships, there is opportunity for greater promotion of student performance and recognitionas S-STEM scholars.References[1] Gates, A. Q., Thiry, H., & Hug, S. (2016). Reflections: The Computing Alliance of Hispanic- Serving Institutions. ACM Inroads, 7(4), 69-73.[2] Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of college student development, 46(3), 223-236.[3] Eagan Jr, M. K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A., Herrera, F. A., & Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: the impact of undergraduate research
. Johnson, and D. Lee, “How to Engage More African Americans in STEM,”Sigma XI Today, 2016.[38] N. O’Neill, “Internships as a high-impact practice: Some reflections on quality,” 12(4), 4-8,2010.[39] P. Orchowski, “Minorities Flatlined in STEM Fields,” 18(23), 21, NACME 2008.
-related identities in a variety of ways including those we categorized as each of the threedimensions of communities of practice.When considering the joint enterprise dimension of communities of practice, we recognized thatour datasets included 83 artifacts that were evidence of this dimension. Artifacts that we codedas referring to NSBE communities as family or “fam”, and those in which young adults publiclyacknowledged ties between the multiple communities where they held identities, illustrated thejoint enterprise dimension. Hashtags such as #FoYoMama and #NSBEFam, and various heartemoji were elements of those artifacts. Artifacts that reflected awareness of the importance offinancial matters to members of these communities of practice
tofirst reflect upon and identify HC and then to respond and react to HC from an emotional, self-efficacy, and self-advocacy standpoint.C. Preliminary considerations for appropriate interventions for HC in engineeringRecent literature has indicated that when engineering educators and students fail to recognize thepersistence of a cultural influence in engineering education, undesirable consequences can result[51]. For example, a lack of culturally-responsive and holistic curricular content may limit students'understanding of their future professional roles [52], which may hinder students’ sense of"ownership" (i.e., self-efficacy) of their professional actions and beliefs [53], [54]. In addition, a lackof social capital for underrepresented groups