mentee is “struggling.” The mentors emphasized the importance ofbeing comfortable with the mentee's questions, acknowledging their limitations as mentors, andappreciating the strengths that mentees bring with them to the program. A case in point, onementor noted, It [is] also about understanding their experiences, and like their backgrounds and where they’re coming from, and like really integrating that into- kind of like tailoring their research journey for them, what they’re looking to get out of it, what kind of impact they’re looking to make, and integrating them into what it’s like, in everyday life [in] graduate school.Comparatively, mentees have to “think about” and be passionate about their own inquiry. As
posit these lead to lack of motivation to pursue cybersecurity as acareer [10]. Other researchers suggest that student employment and mentoring models can beused to successfully mentor women and other students underrepresented in the field [11].Building community among cybersecurity learners [12] and learning some of the technicalcontent of cybersecurity professions out of class [13] are suggested practices from the literatureon cybersecurity learning, which align with the notion of building a professional identity in atechnical field.Mountrouidou and colleagues [14] describe 2 gaps in the research literature regardingcybersecurity education that are addressed in this study—methods for mentoring minoritystudents in the field, and successful
Paper ID #37522Understanding the Impact of an LSAMP Scholar ProgramDr. Yang Lydia Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Inter- national University. Her research interest include quantitative educational research design and statistical analyses, Q methodology, and recruitment and retention in STEM fields.Dr. Brenee King, Kansas State UniversityDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is the Assistant Dean for Retention
, agricultural, orliberal arts institutions.)Development of SurveyThe HBCU Leadership Impact and Implications Survey was developed by the research team forHBCU stakeholders to determine factors impacting President/ Chancellor turnover withinHBCUs. A thorough design, redesign, and review process was implemented to develop thesurvey using relevant research questions and best practices. Questions within the survey askedparticipants to report their relationship with HBCUs, their current role related to HBCUs, theirtime affiliated with HBCUs, information about the HBCU with which they were affiliated,factors impacting president/chancellor turnover, the impact of turnover on the university, andparticipant demographic information. The survey consisted of
studies across different types of researchnetworks could also provide insights into best practices for fostering psychological safety indiverse contexts (e.g. academic departments).Fostering psychological safety is not merely a theoretical ideal but a practical necessity for thesuccess of multi-institutional research networks at the forefront of science and engineeringchallenges. By prioritizing well-being and inclusion, these networks can unlock their fullpotential for innovation and impact, ultimately advancing the collective capacity to address Creating Psychologically Safe Spaces for Researchers: Insights from Multi-Institutional Research Collaboration (Research)complex global challenges and provide spaces for
, teachers, and undergraduates in this role. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Quantitative Methodological Approaches to Understand the Impact ofInterventions: Exploring Black Engineering Student SuccessAbstractAs engineering educators and practitioners, we must broaden the participation of students fromracially minoritized populations to meet engineering education's social and ethical responsibilitiesto address problems and design solutions relevant to our diverse communities. However, theengineering profession in the United States has historically and continues to exclude certain racialand ethnic populations, including Black, Latinx, and Native people. As a result, engineeringremains a predominantly
say? What do I leave for next week? And so, I felt like this first semester is kind of like, I'mdisappointed in myself. I didn't get everything done; I didn't leave with the clear action item. So, like how to navigate, I guess, how to like design the perfect meeting, if that makes sense. But from like the researcher point of view, not from the advisor point of view”GradTrack alumni want tips and tricks to break down research papers. Another area alumni feltthey would have benefited more from was the proper understanding of the best ways to readthrough and summarize research papers. Referring to this need, an alumnus commented that: “I think one of the things, especially thinking back if like I were like a younger
of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underreprAbimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University Abimelec Mercado Rivera is a Puerto Rican doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the En- gineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. Abimelec received his ©American Society for
to develop and sustain an effective engineering workforce with specific emphasis on inclusion. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant; nearly 20 years of experience in academia; and extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related research and outreach. She holds civil engi- neering degrees (BS, MS, PhD) from Clemson University and is a registered Professional Engineer (PE), Project Management Professional (PMP), and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accred- ited Professional (LEED-AP).Jasmine McNealy, University of Florida ©American Society for
mentoring. Extremal effects areavoidable, so mentees do not need to exhibit the “extra-scientific effect.” A condition whereunderrepresented students minimize their identities (race or gender) to conform to the STEMcommunity [42].This study investigates the relationship between mentorship and the corresponding effects onengineering persistence for FTIC female students. The existing mentorship process in engineeringaccounts for surface-level similarities and rarely deep-level similarities in shared values, beliefs,and interests [17, 43]; however, the underlying mechanism by which the practice of mentorshipaffects female persistence in engineering remains an unmet challenge. We investigate differingmentorship structures and examine their impact on
Entrepreneurship Program. She is the former Interim Dean of the College of Business at Albany State University and served three years as Chair, Department of Accounting, Information Systems, and Marketing at the same university. Her research interests include design thinking, homeschooling, and mentoring girls in STEM.Monica Stephens Cooley, Spelman College Dr. Monica Stephens is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Spelman College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Understanding the Experiences of Black Women in STEM: A Framework for InterruptionAbstractEnhanced participation of Black women in science, technology engineering, and mathematics(STEM) is of
sustainabilityduring the planning and design phases of construction projects [16]. However, research on CMstudents' current understanding of infrastructure disparities is limited within the currentliterature. By utilizing the Envision sustainability rating system, instructors may teach studentshow to better understand these concerns and how to address them as engineers. As the nation'sfuture workforce is made up of diverse students, the resolution process should start with them inorder to build equitable, sustainable, and effective infrastructures.To this end, the Envision rating system is briefly described in the following section.The Envision™ Rating SystemThe Envision rating system provides a structured framework to evaluate sustainabilityrequirements for
participation in engineering graduate programs through her engineering education research. Prior to academia, Dr. Godwin worked for many Fortune 100 companies, including Intel Corporation.Dr. John K. Wagner, University of New Mexico Dr. John K. Wagner is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) joint project between the University of New Mexico, Arizona State University, and the University of Oregon. His research interests focus on improving equity in higher education, and the impacts of technology on public opinion and political psychology. Specifically, Dr. Wagner’s research explores how to improve equity and inclusion by measuring latent support for exclusionary practices
% Graduate Studies 58.2% Scholar Satisfaction* Research Experience 100% Faculty Mentor Guidance and Direction 100% *Limited participation in the survey may have impacted these data.Implementation Characteristics at UTEP RecruitmentProgram staff acquired the funds and began the process of recruiting scholars. However, therecruitment fell short of initial expectations. Due to the constraints of a tight timeline, theprogram staff faced challenges in adhering to all selection criteria. For example, though thetarget population was former students who had not participated in undergraduate research, asignificant percentage (35%) of
enriching, fostering pridein learning diverse cultures and languages. The experience boosted their confidence in applyingand succeeding in STEM graduate programs, with some students reporting intentions of applyingto STEM graduate programs abroad. This program prepares underrepresented minority studentsfor the growing globalization in the STEM workforce. It builds confidence in research skills andnurtures culturally sensitive individuals capable of collaborating effectively with diverse teams.This program exemplifies a transformative approach to student engagement, offering valuableinsights for those seeking to replicate its success. Through this paper, we aim to shareperspectives on best practices, providing a roadmap for others interested in
practice of engineering. However, many studentsin this population attend a university very close to home; data from a 2018 survey of U.S.undergraduates shows that Hispanic/Latino students attend school closer to home than any otherrace/ethnic group, with a median distance from home to institution of 11 miles [2]. It follows thata significant number of Hispanic graduates of an undergraduate engineering program who seekto enter the engineering workforce face, for the first time, the prospect and challenge ofrelocating away from home.For example, over 95% of students (more than 22,000) at the research team’s universitycommute to campus. In 2023, the metro area in which the university is located hadapproximately 4550 jobs in architecture and
professoriate, the disciplineremains primarily White (64.7%), with only 2.5% of engineering faculty identifying as Black(American Society for Engineering Education [ASEE], 2022). An intrinsic case study design(Stake, 1995) explores the keys to successful cross-race mentoring of mentees and mentorsinvolved in the Increasing Minority Presence within Academia through Continuous Training(IMPACT) mentoring program. The research question guiding this study is: What do IMPACTmentoring program mentors and mentees believe are the keys to successful cross-race mentoringin engineering academia? This study is sponsored by a National Science Foundation BroadeningParticipation in Engineering Track 3 award.The IMPACT Mentoring ProgramThe IMPACT mentoring program was
Paper ID #38765Career Outcomes of New York City Louis Stokes Alliance for MinorityParticipation Graduate Student Activities Coordinators 1998 to PresentDr. Claude Brathwaite, City University of New York, City College Dr. Claude Brathwaite currently serves as the Director of Student Resources and Services at the City Col- lege Grove School of Engineering, utilizing a model of High Impact Practices and Engagement (HIPE). Dr. Brathwaite previously served as the Project Administrator and later Executive Director of the NYC Louis Stokes Alliance. He has also served as the Deputy Director of the City College Black Studies Pro
minority,” Amber reiterates her sense ofoutsiderness, emphasizing the social isolation resulting from these differences. In line 109, Amber asks aquestion (“Would I change any of this about me?) and answers unprompted. She concludes she is “stuckwith” the basic circumstances of her life: being adopted from China by a white family, being only a fewwomen in her engineering programs, therefore decides to “make best out of it.”In lines 114-116, we notice that Amber uses a number of “or” to enumerate the various negativeexperiences due to her identity. Amber’s experiences of discrimination, racism, and stereotyping mighthave an impact on her mental health and wellbeing since the consequences of marginalizing experiencesget even more complicated for
, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition
setting [16], [17], [18], [19]. Drawing studentsfrom majors across the university’s colleges, the program emphasizes the value of diverseperspectives, promoting rich interdisciplinary collaboration. Students are offered a mix ofindividual research opportunities, team-driven design projects, technical training related to theseprojects, and various activities that promote community engagement and all-arounddevelopment. The program prides itself on its holistic approach to learning, preparing studentsnot only for the laboratory but for a balanced life and career after graduation. Fairness anddiversity are thus necessary guiding values for the program to cultivate a culture of collaborativeinnovation and personal and professional growth. This
in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received his PhD from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is currently working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University
. As a rising engineering education scholar, she aims to use her research to provide tools to design more inclusive and supportive learning spaces for students from diverse backgrounds.Jameka Wiggins, The Ohio State University Jameka Wiggins is a graduate student at The Ohio State University, pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Ed- ucation with a specialization in Organizational Change in Higher Education and Industry and a Master’s in Engineering Management. As a scholar and advocate, she seeks to amplify the voices of underrepre- sented groups in engineering by exploring their experiences, encouraging student and faculty engagement through critical questioning, and supporting these groups both personally and
presents the NextGen roadmap to address theparticipation of underrepresented minorities in the STEM disciplines by Alumni participants ofthe programs, now represented in the Professoriate, the K-12, Industry and Agency settings. Theupdated responses to the 2022 survey will be presented along with data from the LinkedIntracking data.IntroductionParticipation from all communities across our nation is a national imperative for the US toremain competitive and US higher education programs must produce more graduates in theSTEM disciplines. A comprehensive evaluation of Alliance programs nationally in 2006 by theUrban Institute provided a blueprint and recommendations building on best practices by NYCLSAMP members (1991-2004) [1]. In the past two and a
organizational backing needed to succeed [37], [38].Thus, there is a compelling need to explore how diversity within graduate engineering programs,particularly in HBCUs, impacts innovation in problem-solving, research, and creativity. Thisstudy aims to fill this gap by focusing on the dynamic relationship between diverse teamcomposition and innovation outcomes in engineering fields [39], [40]. By investigating teamsfrom various engineering disciplines at an HBCU, this research seeks to provide insights intohow diversity contributes to the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving and innovation,with the goal of informing best practices for both academic and industrial settings [41].3.0 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKThis research is grounded in two theories
, Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Family Health International, 2005. [Online]. Available: www.fhi360.org.[17] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[18] M. S. Linneberg and S. Korsgaard, “Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 259–270, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012.[19] M. Freeman, Modes of Thinking for Qualitative Data Analysis, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2016. doi: 10.4324
undergraduate engineering students,using disproportionality impact indices. Angelo State University (ASU), a primarily undergraduateinstitution, located in San Angelo, Texas, USA, serves students from this city and neighboringrural regions of West Texas. The student subgroups of interest include Latinx and female studentsin an undergraduate engineering program. Adequately serving these subgroups is critical giventhat it is expected that new Latino workers will account for 78% of all new workers between 2020and 2030 [18] hence colleges must adopt best practices to prepare Latino and remove obstaclesthat hamper their graduation rates. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the effects ofuntimed exams having high context versus timed exams with
M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Comparing the attitudes and outcomes of first-time, continuing, and first-generation students in an engineering undergraduate research program(Research)AbstractMany researchers have implemented undergraduate research programs in STEM with the goal ofinvestigating their impact on student success and persistence. These programs further aim tobroaden participation in STEM and create pathways for first-generation undergraduate studentsto pursue a graduate degree in STEM. This paper builds on a previous work that developed anundergraduate research program targeted for first
a discussionof the results. The paper will conclude with the major findings from this work and identifyavenues for future improvements of the proposed undergraduate research program.Structure and goals of the research programThe undergraduate research program (UGRP) for first-generation students is designed similar toa minority training program. The program comprised three components: a lecture series, aresearch experience, and a research conference. The program aimed to increase participation ingraduate enrollment among first-generation students and to motivate them to persist in STEMfields by pursuing a graduate degree. Thus, the research question can be stated as: • What is the impact on motivation to pursue a graduate STEM degree for
SBPs examined works published from the 1980s to 2012. Itfound a wide variety across various aspects of SBPs, including program curriculum,administration, and participation; [3] it also identified a lack of adequate research focused onidentifying promising practices for SBP design and implementation. Another review examinedliterature (including non-peer-reviewed literature) that had been published about STEM SBPsbetween 1992 and 2016, with a focus on program goals. [4] The authors identified 14 differentprogram goals, falling into three major categories: academic success, psychosocial, anddepartmental. Another review, published in 2023, focused on SBPs serving Native Americanstudents [5] and focused on identifying guidance; that guidance