mentee is “struggling.” The mentors emphasized the importance ofbeing comfortable with the mentee's questions, acknowledging their limitations as mentors, andappreciating the strengths that mentees bring with them to the program. A case in point, onementor noted, It [is] also about understanding their experiences, and like their backgrounds and where they’re coming from, and like really integrating that into- kind of like tailoring their research journey for them, what they’re looking to get out of it, what kind of impact they’re looking to make, and integrating them into what it’s like, in everyday life [in] graduate school.Comparatively, mentees have to “think about” and be passionate about their own inquiry. As
, agricultural, orliberal arts institutions.)Development of SurveyThe HBCU Leadership Impact and Implications Survey was developed by the research team forHBCU stakeholders to determine factors impacting President/ Chancellor turnover withinHBCUs. A thorough design, redesign, and review process was implemented to develop thesurvey using relevant research questions and best practices. Questions within the survey askedparticipants to report their relationship with HBCUs, their current role related to HBCUs, theirtime affiliated with HBCUs, information about the HBCU with which they were affiliated,factors impacting president/chancellor turnover, the impact of turnover on the university, andparticipant demographic information. The survey consisted of
say? What do I leave for next week? And so, I felt like this first semester is kind of like, I'mdisappointed in myself. I didn't get everything done; I didn't leave with the clear action item. So, like how to navigate, I guess, how to like design the perfect meeting, if that makes sense. But from like the researcher point of view, not from the advisor point of view”GradTrack alumni want tips and tricks to break down research papers. Another area alumni feltthey would have benefited more from was the proper understanding of the best ways to readthrough and summarize research papers. Referring to this need, an alumnus commented that: “I think one of the things, especially thinking back if like I were like a younger
% Graduate Studies 58.2% Scholar Satisfaction* Research Experience 100% Faculty Mentor Guidance and Direction 100% *Limited participation in the survey may have impacted these data.Implementation Characteristics at UTEP RecruitmentProgram staff acquired the funds and began the process of recruiting scholars. However, therecruitment fell short of initial expectations. Due to the constraints of a tight timeline, theprogram staff faced challenges in adhering to all selection criteria. For example, though thetarget population was former students who had not participated in undergraduate research, asignificant percentage (35%) of
enriching, fostering pridein learning diverse cultures and languages. The experience boosted their confidence in applyingand succeeding in STEM graduate programs, with some students reporting intentions of applyingto STEM graduate programs abroad. This program prepares underrepresented minority studentsfor the growing globalization in the STEM workforce. It builds confidence in research skills andnurtures culturally sensitive individuals capable of collaborating effectively with diverse teams.This program exemplifies a transformative approach to student engagement, offering valuableinsights for those seeking to replicate its success. Through this paper, we aim to shareperspectives on best practices, providing a roadmap for others interested in
, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition
in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received his PhD from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh, where he is currently working as an Assistant Professor. His research interests are engineering education, and in the area of optics; he specializes in developing optical fiber-based sensors for monitoring harsh environments.Dr. Irene Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. She has experience teaching programming, design, entrepreneurship, and sustainability topics, and is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the University
a discussionof the results. The paper will conclude with the major findings from this work and identifyavenues for future improvements of the proposed undergraduate research program.Structure and goals of the research programThe undergraduate research program (UGRP) for first-generation students is designed similar toa minority training program. The program comprised three components: a lecture series, aresearch experience, and a research conference. The program aimed to increase participation ingraduate enrollment among first-generation students and to motivate them to persist in STEMfields by pursuing a graduate degree. Thus, the research question can be stated as: • What is the impact on motivation to pursue a graduate STEM degree for
SBPs examined works published from the 1980s to 2012. Itfound a wide variety across various aspects of SBPs, including program curriculum,administration, and participation; [3] it also identified a lack of adequate research focused onidentifying promising practices for SBP design and implementation. Another review examinedliterature (including non-peer-reviewed literature) that had been published about STEM SBPsbetween 1992 and 2016, with a focus on program goals. [4] The authors identified 14 differentprogram goals, falling into three major categories: academic success, psychosocial, anddepartmental. Another review, published in 2023, focused on SBPs serving Native Americanstudents [5] and focused on identifying guidance; that guidance
National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE Catalyst grant. OurCatalyst grant team is comprised of a multi-disciplinary group of researchers leveraging expertisein quantitative and qualitative assessment in the social sciences, engineering, policy, and academicleadership. Our comprehensive data gathering effort seeks to assess equity in recruitment, hiring,renewal, promotion, and tenure activities at a large R1 public institution for both tenure-line andterm (contingent) faculty. We place an intersectional emphasis on this analysis, examining whetherinstitutional practices yield disparate outcomes on faculty not just along lines of gender and race,but also unique combinations thereof.The prior ASEE paper [1] focused on the data gathering effort for
UC Merced. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Psychology and in Spanish from UC Santa Barbara as well as a Ph.D. in Psychological Studies in Education from the UC, Los Angeles. Dr. Aguirre-Mu˜noz’s research integrates cognitive science, linguistics, learning sciences, and model-based assessment applied to the following areas: (a) STEM education and identity development; (b) model-based assessment and instruction; (c) the impact of opportunity to learn on learning and achievement; and (d) discipline-based education research for culturally and linguistically diverse students.Maribel Viveros, University of California, Merced ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Sparking
thatinterven�ons designed in harmony with organiza�onal norms are more likely to garner support fromleadership, increase employee engagement, and foster a culture that values diversity and inclusion. Byincorpora�ng these organiza�onally integrated interven�on tac�cs, organiza�ons can ac�vely contributeto the well-being of Black engineers, mi�ga�ng the impact of challenges such as Racial Batle Fa�gue andpromo�ng a more suppor�ve and inclusive professional environment.Our claims advocate for a deeper explora�on of Racial Batle Fa�gue in the professional context,recognizing that a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences of Black professionals isessen�al for addressing the mental health challenges associated with RBF throughout various stages
companies such as Ecopetrol, Texas Instruments, and Ericsson. His research interests focus on inclusive STEM learning and teaching methodologies for students with physical disabilities.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Experiences of Students
and its impact on Hispanic-Americans is supported by consolidating resources from diverse collections within the Library of Congress, university libraries, and other trusted sources, into a centralized web module. The designated module will offer an extensive range of educational resources, organized to encourage investigation of the Rio Grande Basin from an engineering perspective: Using these resources highlights the history and impacts of the Rio Grande Basin upon the lives of Hispanic-Americans, and is bolstered by our university’s educational technology resources designed for serving Spanish-English bilingual audiences. Additionally, a bilingual user-friendly interface will provide convenient access to the
, identity, and culture. Potential implications for practice, policy, andresearch are briefly summarized below in Table 2. Table 2: Servingness-Oriented Implications of Results Implications for Implications for Policy Implications for Research PracticeTheme 1: Self-Directed Programs should Educational policymakers Future research shouldLearning as a Prerequisite support differentiated should focus on examine mechanisms offor Mentees scaffolding of self- differentiation, support for students’ self- regulation, content abandoning a “one-size- directed learning
constituting changed power dynamics. To the extent that these officestend to be risk adverse and to focus on risk management [12], their guidance may limitopportunities to respond boldly and creatively to the new legal landscape.Based on the results of this work as described above and the research on best practices for HEFSprofessional development [13], we recommend that efforts to serve all students begin byaddressing the needs of the HEFS who impact student experiences: • Recognize and acknowledge that HEFS have a variety of intense feelings and opinions about legal changes. Our results show that some opinions are strongly held and that there are intense feelings about the changes as well. It is essential that those working with HEFS
research experience, which is a well-studied, high-impact practice with strong support from the National Science Foundation(AAC&U, 2008). Undergraduate research positively affects retention in STEM (Eagan et al.,2013), particularly for URM students (NAP, 2019). Mentorship in undergraduate research spaceshas also been positively associated with students’ identity and confidence as a STEMprofessional and their sense of belonging (Byars-Winston, Branchaw, Pfund, Leverett, &Newton, 2015). Productive protégés increase the research productivity of their facultymentors. Other mentor benefits include a sense of personal fulfillment, leadership skilldevelopment, and cognitive growth (Laursen et al., 2010). It is reasonable to expect that
received over $7 M in external research funding. She was recognized as a Fellow of the Society of Plastics Engineers in 2013 and American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2023. She received the 2015 Distinguished Engineering Educator Award by the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), 2022 WEPAN Exemplary Service Award, 2022 SAMPE DEI Impact Award for her efforts to be inclusive. As a board member of WEPAN, she hosted 12 webinars to provide best practices to implementing DEI with cultural humility as the framework (bidirectional learning). She has integrated Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, National Society of Black Engineers and SWE together with cross-department honor societies to form a Diversity and
) have many names across institution types, such as lecturer, professor ofteaching etcetera, the findings of this research project have the potential to better inform bothUniversity's support of and inclusion for Latine students on the pathway to the professoriate. Byunderstanding how students experience the transition from the role of the graduate student intothe role of a professor, we can offer Ph.D. granting institutions valuable information about how 5to best support their minoritized students and their minoritized faculty. Additionally, to thoseeither on or on the track to this pathway, this research offers a roadmap that can illuminate
, GameSec, and journals including Human Factors, Topics in Cognitive Science, and Computers & Security. Her papers in HICSS-2020 and GameSec-2020 received the best paper awards. Her professional activities include journal reviews for Computers & Security, Cybersecurity, Frontiers in Psychology, and conference reviews for HFES, AHFE, HICSS, Euro S&P, and CyberSA. She is also an advocate for the Cybersecurity Community of Practice at UTEP and a member of the Special Cyber Operations Research and Engineering (SCORE) Interagency Working Group.Xiwei Wang, Northeastern Illinois University Xiwei Wang is the Department Chair and an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Northeastern Illinois University. He earned
Paper ID #41873Coping Strategies of Minoritized Students in STEM Higher EducationMr. Nagash Clarke, Nagash Clarke is a doctoral student at the University of Michigan working with Dr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa. In his research, he examines mentoring as well as racial allyship for broadening minoritized participation in STEM higher education. He received a Bachelor’s in Chemistry from Pace University.Dr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor