for each student.In 2015-2016, the first experiment with multidisciplinary senior design was predicated on thesupposition that students would benefit from being enrolled in the senior design coursesequences appropriate to their majors. Therefore, the students participating in multidisciplinaryprojects did not enroll in a dedicated class but instead enrolled in the traditional sequences ofcourses (as shown in Table 1). The 2015-2016 cohort integrated students from multiple majorson an extra-curricular basis; students took on an additional design experience that supplementedtheir required course or worked with students enrolled in other classes. This effort met with asignificant lack of success and became a source of frustration for students
Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires has nearly 30 years of professional experience and is an industry and research professor in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology in the School of Systems and Enterprises. She is a Primary Researcher for the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) and Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator projects. She has served as a Senior Sys- tems Engineer consultant to Lockheed Martin, IBM, and EDO Ceramics, for Advanced Systems Support- ability Engineering Technology and Tools (ASSETT), Inc. Alice previously served as a senior engineering manager for General Dynamics (GD), Lockheed Martin (LM) and as a technical lead for
students totruly engage in teamwork interaction as part of their multidisciplinary team. Previousresearchers of the pedagogical aspects of teamwork have discussed the challenges engineeringeducators have in motivating students to interact effectively on team-based projects. They statethat little in the professors’ backgrounds or experiences provide a basis for knowing howstudents might show an ability to work effectively in multidisciplinary teams.4 Manyresearchers have offered advice regarding this problem. It has been proposed that that teamteaching one integrated course results in the best opportunity for interdisciplinary interactions5.In the course used to evaluate the assessment instrument described in this paper, the professorsdemonstrated
Paper ID #20000The Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Interdisciplinary InstructionalInstitute (QMRAIII) – A Platform for Cross Disciplinary Training of Engi-neers with Social and Biological Scientists to Address Public Health IssuesDr. Jade Mitchell, Michigan Sate University, Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Dr. Jade Mitchell is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering at Michigan State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Pittsburgh in Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering, M.S. in Civil Engineering and Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from
engineering design stages?Research Question 2 and its sublevel questions of interest pertain to how a student’s curriculum relates tohow they engage on an interdisciplinary design team.RQ 2.0 How do undergraduate engineering students of differing curricular programs participate as members of interdisciplinary teams engaging in an engineering design activity? RQ 2.1 When interdisciplinary teams of differing student composition split into subgroups, how do those subgroups contribute to the engineering design stages? RQ 2.2 When interdisciplinary teams of differing student composition split into subgroups are those groups determined by majors, curriculum or other? RQ 2.3 How do individual students from
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Twenty Years of Multidisciplinary Capstone Projects: Design, Implementation, and AssessmentIntroductionThe Quality Enhancement Systems and Teams (QUEST) Honors Program at the University ofMaryland unites undergraduate students with business, engineering, and science backgrounds inorder to promote a multidisciplinary, hands-on, learning experience. QUEST’s curriculumfocuses on quality management, process improvement, and system design. This curriculum isdelivered in the form of three required courses and two elective courses. The first programcourse introduces the concepts of innovation, design, and quality. Multidisciplinary teams workon a series of three projects
: Page 15.1014.3 Vision Mission The U.A. Whitaker School of The mission of the U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering is to produce Engineering at Florida Gulf graduates and community leaders in selected engineering and computing Coast University will be disciplines with superior technical competence and business skills to meet the internationally recognized for engineering and computing challenges of Southwest Florida and beyond. This excellence in interdisciplinary is accomplished in an entrepreneurial and innovative educational engineering and computing environment that values diversity, service, integrity, leadership
’ integration in the industry, with constraints set from conception to delivery. It takes itfurther by using assessment tools to evaluate, not only the student knowledge about the variousdisciplines, but also by monitoring students’ change in perceptions about the roles andresponsibilities of the various disciplines, including their own roles.MethodologyThe proposed educational model consists of a thread developed in the Civil Engineering (CE)Curriculum in order to integrate students from different technical areas. The thread consists of thecombination of an existing Architectural course with a newly developed Senior Project experience.Through the overlap of the CE 491/492/493 civil engineering senior project sequence, the ETC461/462 construction
sustainability. At Drexel University [6], a graduate level programin peace engineering is dedicated to preventing and reducing violent conflict througheducation and research that integrates innovative technologies, approaches, and policieswith the studies and practices of peace builders. These programs serve an important nichein providing engineers with proper training to understand the global dimensions of theissues that impact peace in the world today.The fabric that makes up nations in this era of human history has significantly changedfrom what it used to be. Societies that are extremely homogeneous in terms of theirhuman composition are very few. The glue that keeps societies peaceful is much morethan absence of conflict or lack of tension
engineering curriculum necessitated incorporation of controls engineeringcoursework in their program of study. An existing dynamic modeling and controls courseexisted between two departments: electrical engineering and mechanical engineering. With theintroduction of chemical engineers in the course, the chemical engineering specific lessons aretaught by a chemical engineering instructor. This organizational structure is important, allowingthe multidisciplinary faculty team to synchronize their efforts, bringing their individual strengthsand resources together for the course to promote student learning. The instructors engage inmeaningful dialogue concerning their assignments, lesson preparations, laboratory exercises, andtheir results. The
at a large Western University.Since 1996, individuals from the Department of Communication and the University WritingProgram have provided instructional support in communication on an as needed, sometimesinformal basis. In 2003, thanks to the generous support from the William and Flora HewlettFoundation, the CLEAR Program was able to formalize communication instruction and developa four-year communication integration plan that includes curriculum development, directinstruction in the classroom, and student and faculty consultations, as well as researchingcommunication and engineering pedagogy.At the end of each semester, course evaluations are distributed in every course with formalizedCLEAR instruction. These evaluations, developed by the
Computer Science also participate voluntarily in the seniorengineering project under the leadership of the faculty and engineering students. For example, anundergraduate mathematician developed and calibrated Monte Carlo simulations of free-molecular aerodynamics to determine drag effects in ELEO orbits. An example of non-technicalinvolvement is business students who organized events to promote campus awareness of ELEO-Sat. Moreover, the senior capstone course involves local high school students considering STEMcareers through outreach programming including participation in high altitude balloon projects.Similarly, the project provides outreach opportunities to local elementary schools, using spacescience curriculums developed by Taylor University
Paper ID #25333Alumni Feedback and Reflections on Industrial Demands and Transdisci-plinary Engineering Design EducationMs. Alyona Sharunova, University of Alberta Alyona Sharunova, BSc., is an Education Consultant at the Faculty of Engineering and a former Research Assistant at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Alberta. Her background is in Psychology, Design, and Educational Development. The scope of her work lies in Transdisciplinary Engi- neering Education, Design Processes, Teaching and Learning Methodologies, Cognitive and Educational Psychology, and Curriculum Design and Enhancement.Miss
impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) A knowledge of contemporary issues (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.In accordance with these criteria, there is a progression in the curriculum where fundamentalscientific and other knowledge acquired within the earlier years is applied in later engineeringcourses through a well integrated experience. Through the progression of courses within anintegrated curriculum, a student can ideally experience all stages of the experiential learningmodel described
students.Figure 4: depicts the strategies of dealing with current environmental concerns as listed bysenior engineering students.Strategies currently employed for sustainable engineering education: Some universities require13 to 15% of credit hours earned as part of an undergraduate engineering degree to providebackground in environmental science and sustainability based courses. Some programs offerundergraduate courses with no prerequisites that are multidisciplinary in nature therebyintroducing to the young engineer sustainability topics as part of reform courses. Other signaturecourses cover sustainable engineering topics for a broad range of audience. Apart fromdeveloping dedicated sustainability courses, other programs integrate sustainable concepts
oral presentations and written documentation.While team-based product design is part of the curriculum, formal and sustained interaction withend users to inform the design process is an integral of the Interdisciplinary ProductDevelopment capstone courses. The department of Bioengineering is jointly within both theCollege of Engineering and the College of Medicine, which facilitates student exposure to a widevariety of clinical environments with medical faculty engagement. The course is sponsored byan industry partner, who, in conjunction with faculty, provides project statements that are ofstrategic business interest. For this reason, all students participate under a Non-DisclosureAgreement. The first semester focuses on early front-end
can empowerstudents to later advocate for safety considerations, especially when unlegislated, in theirorganization’s behavior and decision-making.3.2 Process-centric arguments: multidisciplinary awareness, collaboration, and safetycultureWhy teach engineering students about accident causation and system safety? Beyond theargument of the usefulness of specific lessons learned and technical content noted in the previoussubsection, teaching this subject can make an important process-centric contribution by “equip[ping] graduates with a broader perspective on their disciplines, in order to be able to look beyond the technical issues and integrate multidisciplinary safety considerations into their decision-making [later in their
to as the Atkins Report (Atkins et al., 2003) onCyberinfrastructure (CI), launched an NSF funded program towards the integration ofInformation technology (IT)-enabled systems, tools, and services to create a nationalcyberinfrastructure directorate. The premise was that integration of the multitude of tools andservices into a national cyberinfrastructure directorate would enable access to multidisciplinaryinformation for many individuals and groups that had previously been marginalized and therebyrevolutionize the way science is done. Specifically, the goals were to harness the full power ofcyberinfrastructure for discovery, learning, and innovation across and within all areas of scienceand engineering in the preparation of a workforce with
,where the traditional 18-week course is split into three one-credit hour 6-week modules. Withthis separation, different disciplines are able to build their curriculum to the needs of theirstudents. The first two courses (ENGR 2431: DC Circuits and ENGR 2531: AC Circuits)primarily cover topics that non-majors are required to know for the FE exam. The final 6-weekcourse (ENGR 3431: Electromechanical Systems) includes advanced topics not typically taughtin an introductory circuits course, such as LabView programming, digital logic, computercommunications, sensors, and motors. To provide a more practical and hands-on approach to thestructure of ENGR 3431 a robotics project was implemented in the Spring 2011 semester. Thispaper focuses primarily on
practices(Brophy et al., 2008; NRC, 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013; Roth, 1996).Methods Context and Participants. This study took place at a medium-sized land grant universityin the eastern United States. Students from two separate undergraduate programs, MechanicalEngineering (ENG) and Early Childhood Education (ECE) participated in the study. Participantswere enrolled in one of three courses; namely, ENG students were enrolled in a 200-level designcourse that covered 3D drafting and modeling, while ECE students were enrolled in either a 400-level course on inclusive curriculum and assessment for infants and toddlers, or a 400-levelcourse on integrated early childhood teaching that emphasized science curriculum, instructionand assessment for
a continuing pipeline forinteresting project ideas, as there is significant room in the NRM field for technologicallyinnovative approaches to existing problems. We further expect this relationship tocontinue if we are able to secure additional funding (as discussed later in this document).Meeting SLOsAs mentioned above, these projects match up well with the goals of the senior designcapstone course. In particular, this course includes the following Stated LearningOutcomes (SLOs): 1. Integrate and enhance the knowledge acquired in the various prerequisite courses and co-op experience of your undergraduate engineering curriculum. Apply this knowledge to an industry-sponsored, open-ended design and build project. 2
department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the ”Engineering Society Teaching Award” in 2016 and the ”Outstanding Performance Award” in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement.Ms. Maria Barichello, University of Waterloo Maria Barichello is an Academic Development Specialist in the Student Success Office at the University of Waterloo.Mr. Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo Mr. Christopher
for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 9. Oblinger, D. and Oblinger, J. “Educating the Net Generation.” Boulder, CO: Educause, 2005. 10. Skokan, C. and Gosink, J. “Gender Participation in Humanitarian vs. Traditional Multidisciplinary Senior Design Projects,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 11. Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Borriello, G., and Pal, J., “An Approach to Integrating ICTD Projects into an Undergraduate Curriculum,” SIGCSE 2010. 12. Brewer, E. et al., “The Case for Technology in Developing Regions,” IEEE Computer, 38(6), June 2005, pp. 25-38. 13. Dias, M. and Brewer, E., “How Computer Science Serves
classroom is still in development (one Page 12.69.6notable exception being University of Washington’s “Flock of Birds” [7]). Herein, we havepresented an ongoing program at the University of Vermont in which wireless sensors networksare not only studied as a course topic but also utilized to enable new laboratory and fieldexperiences in a wide variety of courses which support multiple engineering disciplines. Weview our implementation of wireless sensors in the curriculum to be readily repeatable at otherinstitutions; this being especially true for the low-cost CricketSat platform ($15/node).Investigators however should be aware that commercial
assesses the project concept, discusses the professional involvement,institutional constraints, administrative support and the results of the five semesters work.Recommendations for improvements for implementation of similar projects at other institutionsare included.IntroductionEngineering projects are increasingly complex due to client needs, system integration efforts,advances in technology, and computer aided design tools. A common concern of nationaladvisory boards is that students must function better in team projects and improvecommunication skills. This is reflected in ABET requirements for multidisciplinary seniordesign activities. In many situations, these objectives are met by defining “multidisciplinary” asusing different skill sets
-guided problem solver • Experience the design process and be able to converse thoughtfully about alternate design methodologies • Practice leadership, communication, and project management in a multi-d setting • Reduce an open-ended design challenge to manageable, quantifiable problems that allow math and reason to guide a student’s decision making • Develop prototyping skills (and have fun making stuff) • Recognize that integration of different prototype subsystems takes planning and communication between disciplines in order to be successful. • Employ discipline specific hard skills to solve real problems • Develop a student’s resume through construction of a portfolio page highlighting the
, project management,interpersonal skills, leadership, marketing skills, and life-long learning skills. While teamworkhas long been considered an integral part of a design program, not all universities, includingours, offer multidisciplinary courses or courses that expose students to “concurrent design work”methodology.1 The practice of these more recently recognized methodologies trains students toperform parallel and integrated tasks in the design process and to practice importantinterpersonal communication with colleagues in other disciplines.The second-year multidisciplinary engineering design course described in this paper broughtmultidisciplinary design education back to a The Petroleum Institute of Abu Dhabi, UAE.Although the original model
integrating the variables that matter to them is a step thatwe can take to increase the number of women and underrepresented minority graduates inengineering. This paper shares an evaluative case study as we report findings from data gatheringtools guiding our continuous improvement process. The findings illuminate students’ perceptionsof their engineering design course and curriculum. We conclude by discussing the pedagogicaldecisions the teaching team is making as a result of listening to our students’ voices.IntroductionAccording to a 2012 report from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology, the U.S. needs approximately one million additional science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) college graduates in order to
incorporated with just this end in mind. The prerequisite for the course was set attwo years of high school Spanish, a level that would not intimidate prospective students.This proficiency allowed the course to be taught at the intermediate level. Wirelesslaptop technology was integrated throughout the course, appealing to engineers’ interestin and love of technology. To make the course even more attractive to engineers, it wasdesigned to satisfy the science, technology, and society (STS) requirement of curricula inthe College of Engineering. This was crucial, as the engineering curriculum is Page 12.53.3particularly tight. If the class didn’t satisfy a
://www.firstinspires.org/robotics/frc). development initiative: Relevance, content, and results—Part I.” IEEE Transactions on Education, 53.2, pp. 194–201, 2010.4. Ruzzenente, Marco, et al. “A review of robotics kits for tertiary education.” Proceedings of the International Workshop Teaching Robotics Teaching with Robotics: Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum, 2012.5. Grandgenett, Neal, et al. “Robotics and Problem-Based Learning in STEM Formal Educational Environments.” Robots in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning: A New Technology for Learning, 94, 2012.6. George, Sébastien, and Pascal Leroux. “Project-based learning as a basis for a CSCL environment: An example in educational robotics.” First European Conference on