Page 22.561.3 COSC 2336 Programming Fundamentals III 3 COSC 3345 Algorithm Analysis 3 COSC 4313 Computer Networks 3 COSC 4342 Database Management Systems 3 Senior Project 1Digital ForensicsThe field of Digital Forensics is among the most growing in the nation. Unfortunately, theintegration of computer science into crime forensics has not been fully appreciated by manyeducational
) outcomes. Accordingly, the instrument is directlyaligned to engineering ”soft skills” that are often difficult to measure via individual course examsand projects. The EGPI is not a student survey of perception of their learning; rather, it is a directmeasure of how prepared students are for global workforces in areas of communication,professional ethical responsibility, understanding of global issues and lifelong learning.Subscales for the index were developed accordingly, while also aligning with sound theoreticaland empirical research on global citizenry9, 10 and the National Academy’s expectations forglobal preparedness. The following four subscales are utilized as metrics in the engineeringglobal preparedness index (EGPI). These metrics are
exponential notation; problem solving Table 5. HSTI ModulesIn a nation-wide survey near the end of the project, 74.5% of respondents sampled from the over Page 23.913.10300 teachers participating in HSTI professional training, felt that their students do not or onlysometimes make the connection between science, technology, and the objects they encounter ineveryday life and these modules could help them make those connections while reinforcing basicSTEM principles. Other results from this sample include demographic data and revealed thatthese modules were being
12 E 5 12 12About the Author Page 23.1223.10ReferencesABET (2011), Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2012 – 2013, ABET.org.Chakravorty, S., (2010), Where Process-Improvement Projects Go Wrong, Wall Street Journal, January 25, 2010, N.Y.Deming, W. E., (1986), Out of the Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA.Gabor, A., (1990). The Man Who
in-person laboratory experiences. The course used the video conferencing clientZoom as the primary method of communication. If virtual and in-person learning was happeningsynchronously, the Zoom call was projected in the classroom so that all students could see andhear each other. A video and audio feed was also available from the classroom so that studentscould hear each other across platforms.ResultsThe results of both Cohort A and Cohort B’s activities were extremely promising. Students inCohort A had statistically significant improvements in the number of other students they feltcomfortable working with over the course of the semester. At the start of the semester, studentsidentified in the survey that they were willing to work with an
JEE and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE ToE. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research. She is on the USD team implementing ”Developing Changemaking Engineers”, an NSF-sponsored Revolutionizing Engineering Education (RED) project. Dr. Lord is the 2018 recipient of the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020What is Energy? Examining Engineering Students’ Conceptions of EnergyAbstract Public opinion about energy issues has created an ideological divide between renewableand non-renewable energy sources. In engineering
developed to administer this new responsibility, 2) the experiences of the first three years of program evaluator visits, 3) the institutions with ABET EAC-accredited multidisciplinary engineering programs, 4) the number and names of the multidisciplinary engineering program(s) at each institution, 5) the ABET EAC accreditation history of these programs, 6) a look ahead at the projected future evaluator workload, and 7) other issues related to this new accreditation role and to recent changes in the process.IntroductionOne of the significant distinctions of a substantial number of baccalaureate engineering programsis that they intentionally do not align naturally with a currently so-called “traditional discipline”(such as
courses in carpentry, metalworking, or carshop. Teaching and learning today often happens online with advanced educationaltechnology. Humanities and soft-skills have taken a backseat teaching to the test. CADdrafting systems produces renderings for projects. Standards-based education nearlyobliterated vocational education in the late-20th century but CareerTech has reemergedtoday as pre-engineering, information technology, entrepreneurship, and culinary arts.The purpose of this paper is to present a new history curriculum incorporating the historyof technology for STEM students at our community and technical colleges that speaks totheir academic and career interests. The paper demonstrates how history of technologyfulfills outcomes expected of
in the literature in recent years,with numerous publications on several variations of this concept. Broadly, this approach isunderstood to mean swapping the traditionally in-class lecture with the out-of class activities likeproblem solving and projects. Generally this means students are assigned some form of online orvideo lectures to watch at home, opening up class time for a variety of active and/orcollaborative learning experiences.Despite the fact that the term “flipped classroom” has been around for some years, severalsurveys of the literature conclude that there is a need for further research in this area.1-3 This isdue in part to the fact that instructor implementation of this educational model varies widely,meaning there is not one
Lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering at the University of Limerick. He leads a number of research groups, including one in sustainable design and engineering, which includes sustainability strategies for SMEs, waste minimisation in manufacturing, and sustainability in schools and colleges. He is a research partner with the EU INTERREG IIIC/DQE project (Towards a Sustainable Region), and contributes to developing strategies, which inform environmental sustainability policy in EU states. He has developed educational intervention modules for SMEs as well as for engineering and design undergraduates for Interregional EU application. He lectures in design for
– Intelligent Systems (4 credits). Interdisciplinary student teams work to control complex, nonlinear systems. Students are introduced to neural networks, fuzzy logic, and genetic algorithms. The course also includes a project involving students at multiple universities. The prerequisite is ME 419 or ECCS 444. This is an elective course for either electrical or mechanical engineers. This course is running for the first time in Spring 2006. The typical enrollment is expected to be about 15 students. • ECCS 444 and ECCS 445 – Control Systems 1 and 2 (4 credits each). Classical feedback control systems. Mathematical modeling of systems. Design of feedback control systems using root locus, frequency
should not diminish their success in helping students not only to understand,but to successfully practice the unfamiliar ‘modes of thought’ that characterize a liberal artsclassroom.Bibliography:[1] Kastenberg, William E., Gloria Hauser-Kastenberg, David Norris. “An Approach to Undergraduate Engineering Education for the 21st Century,” American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, 2006.[2] Duderstadt, James J. Engineering for a Changing World. A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. The Millenium Project, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2008.[3] Akera, Atsushi. “Liberal Learning Revisited: A Historical Examination of the Underlying Reasons, Frustrations, and Continued
suited to resolve certain types of environmental disputes wherethe inherent level of technical uncertainty in the facts of the case makes the outcome of ajury or judge trial highly uncertain. Modern methods on the ADR include: • Dispute review boards: Panel of experts established to review and provide nonbinding recommendations on disputes during project implementation. • Facilitation: Third-party neutral assists participants in nonsubstantive issues related to dispute. • Formal fact finding: Neutral assists parties in developing reliable information. • Mediation: Mediator or co-mediator facilitates the mutual negotiation of dispute. • Mini-trials: Parties present case before third party neutral; follows rules of
offeringappointments in December 2018. The Comm Lab is staffed by 5 advanced undergraduate peertutors, all of whom are engineering students. During the two-year pilot phase funded through agrant from a private foundation, the Comm Lab is tailoring its services to student competitionteams in Rose-Hulman’s makerspace, where students work on co-curricular projects like HumanPowered Vehicle and Concrete Canoe (Figure 1). These teams must submit design and safetyreports and make presentations as part of their national competitions, but because these teams’activities happen outside the context of a course, students received no formal writing orcommunication support, and team leaders and faculty advisors do not have the expertise or timeto devote to enhancing teams
. Advised by Parent / Teacher / Mentor b. Heard about it on the News / Internet c. Personal Experience d. School Project e. Internship f. Other: ____________________________________________________________ 4. What are your expectations for the week? 5. How did you hear about the summer camp at LTU? a. Advertisement b. Email/Newsletter c. Facebook d. Family or Friend e. Newspaper or Magazine Article f. Website/Search Engine g. Other: _____________________Appendix CNANOTECHNOLOGYENGINEERINGSUMMERCAMP2015We hope you enjoyed the Nanotechnology Summer Camp. To help us improve the quality of the camp, please complete this survey. Thank you
firststudent cohort matriculated into the GE+ degree program in fall 2014, with 25 first-year studentsand 19 sophomore through senior transfer students.Students in the GE+ program complete four or more project-centered design courses, fiverequired core engineering courses, choose a 15-credit-hour engineering discipline emphasis(aerospace, architectural, civil, electrical, environmental or mechanical), and 12 or more credithours in a technical or non-technical “concentration” of their own choosing. Concentrations mustbe pre-approved, purposeful sequences of courses, generally culminating in at least one senior-level course. Concentration examples include engineering management, entrepreneurship,environmental policy, business, pre-med, and Spanish
, 1990). Boyer’s argumenthas elevated teaching to a level of importance so far not realized. This is because of the fact thatacademia always focuses, on research. It is important to recognize that Ernest Boyer’s proposalactually pioneered the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) movement. This hasresulted in a number of federally and privately funded efforts to improve teaching in colleges anduniversities (Atkinson, 2001). Assessment helps us understand which students learn best under what conditions. Overthe past several years, the author has experimented on a wide variety of research projects and hascollected lot of data on several topics of interest. He has also reported on his findings at anumber of other ASEE conferences
, delegating andaccepting responsibility, and dealing with the interpersonal conflicts that inevitably arise—maybe more vital to the success of a project than technical expertise” [5, p. 18]. Whether these aremore important than technical expertise may be debated—the best approach to teamwork maynot solve the problem if no one on the team has the requisite knowledge and experience—butperhaps the two can be seen on an equal footing as necessary-but-not-sufficient conditions forsuccessful engineering design.Lee, in a paper presented at the ASEE Southeast Section Conference in 2002 [6], pulls nopunches when it comes to stating the role of an understanding of philosophy of science inbattling junk science, or fraud, as part of engineers’ responsibility to
accident causation and system safety, and for some of the more analytically maturestudents, stochastic modeling an analysis of particular events or topics.Criterion 3 student outcomes: f, g, h, j, kOther options for assignments are being considered for the course, such as group term projects,and some form (TBD) of interaction with government regulatory agencies, and accidentinvestigation boards.4.6 Assessment and EvaluationWhen devising a new course, it is important to reflect on the material to be delivered, how todeliver it, and how to evaluate the teaching effectiveness and impact. The course has not beentaught long enough to assess what is known in education research as “far transfer” or its long-term impact.5 But the short-term evaluation of