, June 13, 2010.13. McHenry, A., Depew, D., Dyrenfurth, M., Dunlap, D., Keating, D. Stamford, T., Lee, P. and Deloatch, G. (2005). “Constructivism: The learning theory that supports competency development of engineers for engineering practice and technology leadership through graduate education,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.14. Prince, M. and Felder, R. (2006). “Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases,” Journal of Engineering Education,!95(2), 123-138, pp. 123-13815. Ohland, M., Pomeranz, H. and Feinstein, H. (2006). “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: A New Peer Evaluation Instruments
. Prior to this Dr. Karen was at Oklahoma State University where she was a professor for 24 years and served as the Director of Student Services as well as the Women in Engineering Coordinator. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering from University of Michigan in 1985 and she received her M.S. in 1988 and her Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational emphasis includes: critical thinking, enhancing mathematics, engineering entrepreneurship in education, communication skills, K-12 engineering education, and promoting women in engineering. Her technical work and research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, mixed integer
systems. Topics here includesystem modeling using Laplace transform, frequency domain, and state variable methods.Mathematical models are developed for various systems to include electrical, mechanical,aeronautical, and chemical systems. Control systems analysis and design techniques are studiedwithin the context of how each system is physically controlled in practice. Laboratory exercisesinclude feedback design and system identification. Computer design exercises include dynamicmodeling and control of various engineering systems. The course learning objectives are: a. Model the dynamics of various physical systems that include mechanical, electrical, and chemical components. b. Analyze a physical system that utilizes a
2006-1932: YOU’VE BEEN SLIMED!: PROCESS AND PRODUCT DESIGNEXPERIENCES FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF CHEMICAL ANDINDUSTRIAL ENGINEERSKaren High, Oklahoma State University KAREN HIGH earned her B.S. from the University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. High is an Associate Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University where she has been since 1991. Her main research interests are Sustainable Process Design, Industrial Catalysis, and Multicriteria Decision Making. Other scholarly activities include enhancing creativity in engineering practice and teaching science to education students and
lecture hall and place it instead in the discovery environment ofthe laboratory, the design studio, or the experiential environment of practice.” Addressing thisneed and helping to define a path forward in determining how we should educate in the 21stCentury differently than was done in the 20th Century represents an over arching goal for the MDProgram.As an institution with strong emphasis on research, large student populations, and a graduate toundergraduate student ratio of approximately 1:2, this engineering program must address twoimportant challenges: (1) scalability: the CoE currently enrolls nearly 5500 undergraduatestudents, and (2) breadth of programs: the CoE currently offers 15 academic bachelor degrees.The Multidisciplinary Design
. Jariwala has more than nine years of research experi- ence in modeling, simulation, engineering design, and manufacturing process development, with research focus on design of polymer based micro additive manufacturing process. During his Ph.D. studies, he was also a participant of the innovative TI:GER R program (funded by NSF:IGERT), which prepares students to commercialize high impact scientific research results. Dr. Jariwala has participated and led several research projects from funded by NSF, the State of Georgia and Industry sponsors. At Georgia Tech, he is responsible for enhancing corporate support for design courses, managing design and fabrica- tion/prototyping facilities, coordinating the design competitions
12.1571.3Due to the nature of the capstone design experience coupled with its timing which closely alignswith graduation, the learning outcomes for the MSD program directly support attributesidentified by ABET. The MSD experience also relies heavily on technical skills and knowledgethat students acquire through their respective engineering program coursework as well asfoundational courses. After a comprehensive MSD course assessment and evaluation during thesummer of 2006, the MSD program educational outcomes (student learning expectations),describing what students are expected to know and be able to do by the end of the MSDexperience, are as follows:1. Ability to explain the product development process in the context of the product life cycle.2
leveraged in a multi-semester undergraduate research course at ClemsonUniversity with focus on creating holistic and sustainable community impacts in developingcountries. Through a cycle of three stages (moving between basic research, field testing, andpractice ready implementation and cycling back), students from more than 30 disciplines acrossthe university and from all levels (freshman through graduate students) work in teams toinnovate solutions to the most critical problems facing humanity in the 21st century using newknowledge from basic research. Translational research is especially appropriate formultidisciplinary work, as it takes numerous expertise areas to move a solution from conceptualresearch to practical application. Minimal
, but also the costs and benefits of nuclear energy and other energy sources.They appreciated the complexities of the field, the physics and chemistry behind it, and thesociopolitical issues surrounding it. They demonstrated critical thinking, learned how to questionand verify sources of information, and practiced their independent research skills andresourcefulness. At the end of the course, the students walked away with knowledge and skillsthat has solidly contributed to their preparation for a university-level engineering class.Introduction to Civil Engineering: Course Objectives and ComponentsThe Introduction to Civil Engineering course exposed student to both the art and the science ofengineered structures. Using principles of math and
) on a project connected tothe faculty member’s work. Participation in REU’s is competitive and generally done through aprocess designed to pair students interested in a particular research area with faculty doing workin that area. REUs are also generally flexible in design with hosting institutions having a greatdeal of control over the organization and content of the program. These factors allow hostinguniversities to create REUs that can maximize local resources to provide unique educationalprograms to best benefit student participants.An interdisciplinary approach to summer REU programs can help address the challenge ofproviding soft-skills training within an engineering education environment (see for example [2],[3], [4]). In so doing
Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at James Madison University, who focuses teaching, scholarship, service, and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engi- neering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she con- ducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. She is currently engaged in course development and instruction for the junior design sequence (ENGR 331 and 332) and
AC 2008-161: MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OF STUDENT PROJECTS INDEVELOPING COUNTRIESJim Chamberlain, Clemson University Jim F. Chamberlain is a Ph.D. student at Clemson University in Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences. He received his M.S. in Environmental Systems Engineering from Clemson in 1994 and has worked as an environmental consultant for 12 years. His research interests are in the environmental impacts of growing monocultural switchgrass as a biofuel. Jim is a registered professional engineer and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education. Page 13.913.1© American
, forexample, and at the micro-level, related to instrument design and usage, depending on the projectfocus. A holistic view will help students understand the broader impact that device design canhave on overall improved interactions, experiences and outcomes in these environments.For most of the students, who are primarily undergraduates (although there are some first yearmedical students, and occasionally MFA Design graduate students and MBA students), this is adrastically different approach to problem solving than they have learned in previous classes, andperhaps more so for the bioengineering students. Usually, the subject matter of focus for aparticular team’s problem is new to all of the students, regardless of discipline, and
, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distin-guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipientof 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 63 journal articles, and 164 conference pa-pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 40 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 64 undergraduate research studentsand 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 130 high school studentresearchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di-rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM
pedagogy may be actually deleterious to professional education. Aldred et al37 observedthat PBL pedagogies in professional curricula are driven by instrumental perspectives leading Page 14.100.9to a reduced capacity for critical thought among graduates. Boud and Feletti38 warn that manyPBL courses reduce professional practice to a perception of problematic routines tackledusing existing schema. Students focus on what is needed to solve a problem leading them toinvest only equation learning with practical value. Fenwick39 condenses professionaleducation onto developing an understanding and the practice of framing ill-structuredproblems and solving them
, thinking as part of a team, and thinking and communicating inseveral “languages” of design. Fry12 has also discussed the importance of “design thinking” inengineering education and underscores the value of multidisciplinary teams. Until designpractices are fully integrated into engineering curricula, capstone design programs will bear asubstantial burden to better prepare undergraduates for careers that inevitably emphasize the“practice” of design.At RIT, the infusion of multidisciplinary design into the curriculum represents a strategicimperative for the KGCOE. Without strong top-down commitment, the likelihood of making anoticeable impact on the broader challenge outlined above seems remote. In addition to theMSD program discussed in this paper
characteristics, and required deliverables. Project selection criteria mayinclude fulfilling institutional objectives, matching available student disciplines with projectneeds, and fulfilling educational objectives. The faculty agreed that projects available for seniordesign would come from four sources: 1. Intercollegiate competitions 2. Funded research projects needing design development 3. Industry projects 4. Humanitarian/service projectsAdditional observations for our courses include the following: 1. A wide variety of project types have existed. Not all projects will have the same scope or requirements. Flexibility is essential. 2. Ideally, the original client should submit a written RFP (Request for
engaged in team projects. This integration ofengineering with other disciplines would further enhance the experience of students and betterprepare them for teamwork after graduation by enhancing learning and facilitating self-efficacyand innovation.References 1. Holley, K.A., 2009, "Best Practices Related to Interdisciplinary Education," ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 89-99. 2. Hotaling, N., Hermann, C. D., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., and Foresta, C. R., 2012, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. 3. Zohar, Ori. Letter to the author. 25 Jan 2015. TS
engineeringeducation in the United States, extensively exchanged with ABET officials and key membersof the Committee, explored the uniqueness, complexity and practical effect of the qualityassurance in engineering education, so as to have a more comprehensive perceptualunderstanding of the quality assurance in higher engineering education. In the process ofresearch, interviews were conducted by face-to-face interview. The interview time for eachinterviewee was approximately one hour. Prior to the interview, the researchers developedscientific interview outline and interview questions through repeated discussions with theadvisor, which provided a good expert validity.3.4. Data Collection3.4.1. Design of Research ProtocolThe researcher visited Purdue University
. Page 14.1034.3Educational Program ObjectivesThe Robotics Engineering Program strives to educate men and women to; ≠ Have a basic understanding of the fundamentals of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Systems Engineering. ≠ Apply these abstract concepts and practical skills to design and construct robots and robotic systems for diverse applications. ≠ Have the imagination to see how robotics can be used to improve society and the entrepreneurial background and spirit to make their ideas become reality. ≠ Demonstrate the ethical behavior and standards expected of responsible professionals functioning in a diverse society.Educational OutcomesGraduating students will have
course deliverables. Deliverablesinclude: final working product (hardware, source code, and binaries), research paper (completedindividually), time logs (completed individually), system requirements specification, systemdesign specification, project plan, design review presentation, socio-economic impact statement,ethical impact study, test document, traceability matrix, test logs, user manual, and finalpresentation.Literature Survey: Competition-based Capstone ProjectsCompetition-based capstones are not uncommon as was found from a literature survey. In aconference paper by Paulik and Krishnan4, they discuss the use of competitions for capstonedesign courses at the University of Detroit, Mercy’s department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering
). Students increasingly need to becomecognizant of how decisions are irrationally impacted by human cognition, and how suchdecisions can be improved to foster more sustainable outcomes to engineers and designers, theirclients, and society at large. The Presidential Task Force of the American Psychological Association has asserted theimportance of psychology as a STEM discipline and an “effective interdisciplinary bridge” (APA2010). The time has come for this bridge to be crossed to help address the psychology ofcomplex decisions, which engineers face regarding sustainability. The authors have aimed toaccomplish this through a new type of case study that integrates cognitive barriers with theEnvision sustainable infrastructure rating
regarding graduates’ knowledge base and qualifications that industrial employers look fortoday as well as what is missed in graduates’ knowledge base, which points out to the gaps in theFaculty curriculum. In addition, alumni provided a fresh perspective on how to approachengineering curriculum enhancement in light of expectations of contemporary employers. Thesefindings are important to consider when developing and/or re-designing engineering designcurriculum to account for industrial demands as of today.Introduction This paper is one in a series from an empirical research study and regards engineeringeducation and design theory, methodology and practical applications. The new transdisciplinarynature of industrial product design requires new
literature have addressed the development of assistivetechnologies as a focus for engineering project applications. Over the past eight years, theCollaboratory for Strategic Partnerships and Applied Research at Messiah College has fosteredseveral interdisciplinary undergraduate student and faculty projects, such as the assistivecommunication technology Wireless-Enabled Remote Co-presence (WERCware) described here.WERCware is designed for those who depend on job- or life-coaching, to ameliorate cognitiveand behavioral challenges that affect performance at home or in the workplace. It facilitatesremote communication between coach and consumer, for training and/or other support asneeded, to increase independence of the consumer. WERCware development
conditions and health promotion in developing countries, and epidemiological research designs and their practical application using appropriate technologies for eradicating water-related illnesses in Benin, West Africa. Students will work in multidisciplinary project teams and use course content as the foundation for developing and implementing educational interventions. This course is a service-learning course and addresses issues of social justice in West Africa, including but not limited to health interventions, discussions of contemporary third-world development, exploitation, and a critical examination of political and economic conditions affecting individual and population health in “periphery
knowledge aboutthe process, but lacking confidence in procedural knowledge required in each stage of theprocess. The worksheets were developed using Bloom’s Taxonomy of hierarchical learning withthe premise of factual and conceptual knowledge would improve students’ data visualizationcapacity. Factual and conceptual knowledge maps to lower-order skills in Bloom’s Taxonomywith procedural knowledge aligning with higher-order thinking skills. The relationship betweenhigher-order skills and fact learning remains an open area for research. Agarwal [8], reportedbuilding a foundation of knowledge via fact-based retrieval practice may be less effective thanengaging in higher order retrieval practices. Agarwal used a mixture of methods (fact questions
orientation. Overtime, these guide dogs become their best friends, and an essential part of their daily life. TheRFID based assistive devices reduce the dependency on guide dog, affecting the overallrelationship between the user and the dog. On the positive side, these devices reduce the usersdependency on family and friends, and help them become more active in the community. As itcan be seen here, the RFID-AD projects have both positive and negative impacts on the enduser. It is up to the design engineer to qualitatively assess both the pros and cons incontemporary issues and make a judgment as to the directions to pursue in this project. Overall, the RFID-AD serves as an excellent platform for students to enhance theirknowledge and understanding
needs. • We should help our students to prepare themselves to be makers, discoverers or along this spectrum, and we should teach engineering fundamentals as a foundation for careers both in research and in practice. • We should build our education around the way our students best learn, engaging them in their learning, and implementing pilots to understand the desirable balance of classroom, project and digital education. • In view of the speed of scientific and technological development, we should teach students the NEET Ways of Thinking, how to think, and how to learn more effectively by themselves.We should be prepared to embark on a bold change, with widespread impact at MIT andpotentially
Paper ID #14939The Bucknell Poetry Path App Experiment: A Collaboration Across CampusProf. Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University Prof. Thompson is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer engineering electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. His research interests
approachof the course did not translate well because it was more difficult to effectively use hands-ondemonstrations. While researching other pedagogical approaches1,2,13,14 to circuits for non-majors courses, two common themes emerged. First, incorporating hands-on experimentallearning opportunities is a best practice for this type of course. Second, it is desirable to makethe courses with electrical subject matter as practical and relevant as possible. Since theinfrastructure for a lab-based course was not available, a method to bring a hands-on elementinto the large lecture hall was desired. After discussing the situation with another professor whoimplemented a robotics project into a freshman orientation course5 and seeing