projects are appropriate to run as full-fledged interdepartmental multi-discipline efforts,the course coordinators must use their judgment, and be somewhat selective.Collaborations with Non-Engineering Departments Over the years, a number of Senior Design projects at our College have also involvedcollaborations with departments outside of the engineering school, thereby further extending themultidisciplinary reach and scope of our program. For example, for the last three years, two of our departments (ECE and ME) haveengaged in a partnership with Florida State’s department of Earth, Ocean & AtmosphericSciences department, and two of its associated research laboratories, to have teams of ourengineering students develop various new
Paper ID #33723Investigating Team Roles Within Long-Term Project-Based LearningExperiencesMs. Amy Dunford, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Amy K. Dunford is the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program Manager at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering. Amy earned a master’s degree in Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering from the Uni- versity of California, Irvine and a master’s in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Amy spe- cializes in project-based learning management and curriculum development, and has prior experience as a first-year engineering laboratory course developer and instructor at UC Irvine.Dr
ensuring achievement of these competencies. In order to facilitate transfer oflearning from the classroom to the workforce, Bransford, Brown, and Cocking8 suggest thatstudents initially be provided with opportunities for working on scaled-down versions ofproblems. These practical ideas can be used in the design of technology capstone projects.The capstone project at Eastern Kentucky University is a synthesis experience, whereinstudents are required to select a topic for independent research and implementation. This one-semester course provides students with an opportunity to design, develop, test, troubleshoot,and manage an integrated research- and laboratory-based project in an area of their interest.Students deploy their projects in homes, work
Abstract: Undergraduate (UG) research is an important component of today’s engineeringeducation. Research experiences allow students to explore beyond the classroom by applyingconcepts towards scientific discovery and the development of products and technologies thatimpact society. The number of UG engineering students interested in participating in research isincreasing. However, UG research opportunities are often limited to students finding a project,laboratory, and mentor on their own. Therefore, only a handful of students typically benefit froma mentored UG research experience. In addition, students seeking UG research opportunities andprojects have little, if any, knowledge on how to conduct research. A well-structured, guided
. Dr. Bhandari leads a multi-disciplinary team of faculty and students from several departments within the Colleges of Engineering and Science at Cal Poly Pomona for research on unmanned systems. He has also been collaborating with other uni- versities and aerospace industry. He has obtained federal and industry support for his research on UAV’s including funding from National Science Foundation, Army Research Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and Northrop Grumman Corporation. He has published several papers on his UAV research. He is a senior member of AIAA and a member of ASEE, American Helicopter Society (AHS), Association for Unmanned Vehicles International (AUVSI), and Sigma Gamma Tau, the Aerospace
received a bachelor of science degree in aerospace engineering from Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn in 1974 and a master of science degree in engineering science from George Washington University in 1980. In 1990, he received a doctorate in aerospace engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Upon completing his B.S. degree from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Camarda began work for NASA’s Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, in 1974. He was a research scientist in the Ther- mal Structures Branch of the Structures and Materials Division and was responsible for demonstrating the feasibility of a heat-pipe-cooled leading edge for Space Shuttle by analysis, laboratory experiments
this multidisciplinary engineering project along withcourse goals and capstone project documentation will be documented and disseminated in thefinal paper March 2012. Page 25.959.3OverviewThe College of Applied Science and Technology (COAST) is eagerly updating curriculum toinclude instruction on the various forms of alternative energy. We engage our engineeringtechnology students in active learning through applied laboratory experimentation. But, thedevelopment process of applicable laboratory experiments has proven to be costly to the collegewith expensive equipment and duplicated efforts from the various engineering technologyprograms. To
Participant InformationThe Leaders in Engineering Program (LEP) at Southeastern University is an interdisciplinaryundergraduate engineering program, which combines concepts and methodologies from SystemsEngineering (SE) as well as Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). One of the mainobjectives of this program is to enable students to work on interdisciplinary engineering projectsrequiring an understanding of electrical and computer design as well as systems analysis. Overthe course of three years in the program, students will be required to complete coursework inboth the SE and ECE departments, including two joint laboratory courses in the third year and ateam-based, interdisciplinary capstone project in the fourth year.In fall of 2009, 15
was the sum of these aspects.This was confirmed when studying the correlation of the 2D grades assigned in each subject withthe overall final grades in each subject. In the systems course, the correlation was 44%, and in Page 24.763.15the thermodynamics course the correlation was 30%, which is about what one would expectbetween hands on laboratory grades and overall subject matter grades. When each subjectcourse grades a 2D project alone on the subject matter contribution to 2D, then those grades willnot correlate, and do not grade the multidisciplinary nature of the 2D
engineering profession in their respective Page 24.765.3disciplines. The course differs from other lecture and laboratory based courses in the engineeringcurriculum in fundamental ways.ASEE Annual Conference, 2014The purpose of capstone design course, required of all seniors, is to provide a realistic experience byintegrating basic material learned during the engineering undergraduate program to address real-lifedesign problem from schematic phase into the construction design levels, including advanced engineeringdesign aspects in certain selected focus areas of technical discipline.There is no unique model for teaching multidisciplinary
involves more technical issues than those covered in a traditionalengineering analysis course, the teaching approach presented in this paper provides a broad, flexiblecontextualized alternative to cover technical competence that is different from traditional engineeringprograms which are made up of structured sequences of lecture-based and laboratory courses. Page 22.1389.2I. Introduction Project-based learning (PBL), or project-centered learning (PCL) to distinguish it from thepedagogy of problem-based learning1, was first adopted by Aalborg University in Denmark2. In a PBLcourse, students are given project assignments and they work in
AC 2011-23: AN MULTIDISCIPLINARY ENERGY BASED CURRICULUMC.S. Chen, Miami University Dr. C.S.Chen is a professor and founding chair of electrical and computer engineering (ECE) depart- ment at Miami University (Ohio). He was the electrical engineering department head and the interim engineering dean at the University of AkronSteven Elliott, Miami University Dept. of Economics Dr. Steven Elliott is an Associate Professor in the Department of Economics at Miami University. He has been a research associate at Oak Ridge National Laboratory before entering academics. His professional interests include energy and environmental economics and behavioral economics.Mark Boardman, Miami University
://www.usfirst.org/aboutus/gracious-professionalism Accessed: 5/17/2012.12. Williams, A. B., 2003, "The qualitative impact of using LEGO MINDSTORMS robots to teach computer engineering," IEEE Transactions on Education, v. 46, n. 1, Feb. 2003, p. 206.13. J. Hatfield, D. Scott, D. Szmyd, “A freshman electrical engineering course and laboratory for all engineering majors,” ASEE- IEEE Frontier in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 4c2.1-4c2.4, Vol.2, 1995.14. Makarov, S., Ludwig, R., Win, K.M., “Basic Class Materials and Laboratory Projects With DC Motors in an Introductory Undergraduate ECE Class for Non-Majors,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, AC 2011-1184, 2011
of mathematics andengineering science, accompanied by laboratory and workshop experiences. The formative yearsshould be devoted to individual learning, followed by team activities and peer group interactions,and then immersion in creativity and innovation in the workplace, e.g. research participation.Some global trends are evident in engineering education over the past two decades: Page 23.1174.31. Global adoption6,7,8,9 of the ABET2000 model of self-assessment processes as the basis for accreditation of undergraduate programs, where showing “improvement” replaces standards.2. Uncritical adoption of the US K-12 model of teaching
theory with applications to mechatronics and aerospace systems. Andrew worked as a postdoctoral re- searcher at the Centre for Mechatronics and Hybrid Technology (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). He also worked as a Project Manager in the pharmaceutical industry (Apotex Inc.) for about three years. Before joining the University of Guelph, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Andrew worked with a number of colleagues in NASA, the US Army Research Laboratory (ARL), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). He is an elected Fellow of
the Center for Digital Education’s Top 30 Technologists, Transformers and Trailblazers for 2016.Dr. Mark H. Weichold, Texas A&M University Dr. Mark H. Weichold, Regents Professor and Halliburton Engineering Global Programs Professor, is an electrical engineer and has worked for General Dynamics Ft. Worth Division, Motorola in Austin, TX and the U.S. Army Electronic Technology and Devices Laboratory in Ft. Monmouth, NJ. He joined the Electrical Engineering faculty at Texas A&M University in 1982 and now holds the rank of Professor. In January 2007, he became Dean and CEO of Texas A&M University’s branch campus in Doha, Qatar. After completing nine years as the Dean and CEO of Texas A&M at Qatar, he
, quality of writing, scientific integrity, and depth of analysis [17].The course evaluated by this research is a 2-credit lecture and lab course, including 2-hours oflaboratory exercises and 1 hour of lecture each week. Typically, the laboratory time includes anintroduction to the method of experimentation, related physics and engineering concepts, keystatistical principles required for data analysis and the establishment of the theoretical frameworkfor each experiment. Students also identify key variables, constraints and potential sources forerror within their methodology during this lab time. Lecture periods are used to discuss technicalwriting best practices, key concepts in engineering writing, appropriate methods for presentationof data
Mechanical Engineering (ONU 1997).Dr. John-David S. Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder is Professor and Chair of the mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH. He has previously served as Proposal Engineer and Proposal Engineering Supervisor at Grob Sys- tem, Inc. and Software Engineer at Shaum Manufacturing, Inc. He has held a number of leadership and advisory positions in various entrepreneurial ventures. He is currently a KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Ed- ucation Network) Fellow, and has served as a Faculty Fellow at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA and an Invited Professor at INRIA Rhone-Alpes, Monbonnot, France. Research interests include computer vision, mobile robotics
at Crime Scenes Laboratory • Logic Problems and Math GamesFri 7/20 • Evaluation Forms • Lunch to Celebrate!Day 10 Page 13.1324.5 • PosttestAcademic Year Follow-upThe first phase of this program was the implementation of the summer workshop. Thesecond phase occurred during the academic year. Throughout the academic year, a CSMgraduate student visited each of the participating teachers on a weekly basis and providedassistance as the teachers
-disciplinary teams”1. Western New England College has a long history of incorporatingengineering design into laboratory and course work. Additionally, interdisciplinary team effortsare initiated in the freshman year and continue for all four years.2,3 This paper describes theassessment instrument used in a senior-level interdisciplinary course that students take during thefall semester. The design project brings together students from mechanical, electrical, andcomputer engineering in teams typically consisting of 4-5 members. During the most recentdelivery of the course, due to a limited number of platforms and a larger senior class, the teamsconsisted of 7-8 students.To achieve a good level of interdisciplinary teamwork, educators need to motivate
system, light stimulationsystem, digital RF remote control unit, and motor driving unit. The whole circuit including themotors is supplied by eight rechargeable Ni-MH batteries. The layout of a printed circuit board(PCB) was designed and the PCB was fabricated in the laboratory of Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology Department at IPFW. Figure 5 shows an image of the actual PCB. ThePCB was mounted to the underside of the mounting tray shown in Figure 4 that has beendescribed in the previous paragraph.The operation of the ISPU is controlled by a microcontroller. The microcontroller senses soundvia a microphone, and the units’ motion via two accelerometers. Based on those inputs and pre-programmed algorithms the units’ motors will be
. Previous work by the authors has focused onimproving the integration of CAE1,2 into mechanical engineering programs. Noble3 writes thatthere is “a need for a broad based individual that is capable of working in an integrated fashion ina team environment.” According to King and Lin4, “Industries need engineers who are versed instreamlining processes from design to planning to manufacturing.” Tsang and Wilhelm5developed a one-credit laboratory to “integrate the disciplines of materials science andengineering, manufacturing and design.” Noble3 also notes that “little is done to provide anysynthesis between the courses.”The goal of this paper is to document efforts to improve the experiences of students working inintegrated design project teams and
- F INBIBLIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION1. Gallow, De, “What is Problem Based Learning?” Instructional Resource Center, The William and Flora HewlettGrant.” http://www.pbl.uci.edu/whatispbl.html, 2006.2. Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter C. “Student communities for the advancement of knowledge,” Communicationsof the ACM Volume 39 No. 4 pp. 36 – 37, 19963. Mehta, Y. and Najafi, F “Teaching Methodology of Flexible Pavement Materials and Pavement Systems,”Journal of SMET Education, 2003a.4. Mehta, Y. A, Orlins, J. and Lubelski, D. “Innovative Teaching Methods for Surveying and EngineeringGraphics,” Proceedings of Mi-Atlantic Conference, Kean University, NJ 2003b.5. Mehta, Y. A. “Innovative Techniques To Teach Civil Engineering Materials Laboratory
of Outcome 5, 100 students enrolled inRobotics Programming over three years. Fifty-four students enrolled in the first year alone, andwe have scheduled additional sections for next year, based upon student interest.Future WorkThe first stages in the development of an undergraduate multidisciplinary robotics certificatehave proven to be very successful and beneficial to the institution and the student body. In thefuture, the PIs will seek federal and corporate grants to expand the certificate programming toinsure institutionalization and long term sustainability. This funding will be used to develop orrevise courses in the curriculum and to develop an integrated robotics research laboratory. Thislaboratory will be directed by the PIs of the
AC 2009-750: EDUCATING GENERATION Y IN ROBOTICSDavid Chang, United States Military AcademyPeter Hanlon, United States Military AcademyKirk Ingold, United States Military AcademyRobert Rabb, United States Military Academy Page 14.510.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Educating Generation ‘Y’ In RoboticsAbstractWe present our approach to educating the new Generation ‘Y’ using robotics in undergraduateeducation. This course is a laboratory based education for life-long learners through a look at anew course for non engineering majors in the senior year. As the centerpiece of this course, weuse a robotics platform to integrate introductory
technology programs have sought to establish the correct balance of theory andpractice to maximize student learning. It is often difficult to overcome preconceived notions thatstudents bring with them, such as the comparative speeds at which objects of different weightsfall under the force of gravity [1]. By engaging students through demonstrations, hands-ondesign and fabrication projects, and physical laboratories, misconceptions can be overcome, thusreinforcing the fundamental principles needed in engineering education [2], [3].Eight years ago, the School of Engineering and Technology restructured its undergraduatecurricula to include the PBL core in each program. Each academic year BSEE, BSECET, BSE,and BSET students experience one or more PBL
mechanical engineering students have developed autonomousground vehicles2, and civil engineering students have gone through the design/build process tocreate concrete canoes for competitions.3 Many of these competitions have corporate andgovernmental agency sponsors. NASA has sponsored an annual Lunabotics Mining Competitionsince 2010, where student engineering teams design and build a remote-controlled excavator forharvesting lunar soil.4,5 The Shell Eco-Marathon challenges students to design, build and drive aself-built energy efficient car.6 The Air Force Research Laboratory University NanosatelliteProgram competition tasks teams to design and deliver a small satellite that will accomplish areal-world mission.7 Others have reported on their
2018].[7] G. S. May and D. E. Chubin, "A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for UnderrepresentedMinority Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 27-39, 2003.[8] D. Shetty and J. Xu, "Strategies to Address "Design Thinking" in Engineering Cirriculum," ASME InternationalMechanical Engineering Congress and Expositio, vol. 5, pp. 1-8, 2018.[9] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.
computer components of different electrical systems suchas radios, phones, and microprocessors, and their basic operation. Basic design and testing ofcircuits; principles of thinking about the engineering process; an “under the cover” look at suchsystems. Practice with basic control and basics of analog-to-digital conversion and digital-to-analog conversion; interconnection among various subsystems.While the above is really interesting and fun, one should note that it is meant for non-engineeringstudents. The focus should be on concepts, perhaps hands-on laboratories that are rich indiscovery but not in typical engineering challenges. The purpose of the labs is for the students toget to know the concepts and know the essence of the ideas and
students to graduate education who otherwise wouldnot be interested. The emphasis on solving a pressing societal problem may be particularlyattractive to students from minority groups and women, as well as to individuals, who havedisabilities themselves. Page 12.72.7References1. Bargerhuff, M. E., Wheatly, M, “Teaching with CLASS: Creating Laboratory Access for Science Students withDisabilities”, Teacher Education and Special Education, Volume 27, No. 3, 2004.2. Bautista, M., “Technology-based Learning with Disability PhD Program at Wright State University”, PosterPresentation at the 6th Annual Multiple Perspectives on Access, Inclusion, and