0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q8 Q9 Q 10 Q 11 Q 15 Q 16 Question # Figure 10: Technical assessment results. Q 17 Q 13 Strongly AgreeQuestion # Q 12 Agree Neutral Q6 Disagree
first, second, third, or fourth quartiles wereassigned final designations of Very Important, Important, Slightly Important, or Not Important,respectively. For a final designation of Very Important, the criterion was either categorized asVery Important in both the text mapping and survey studies or Very Important in one andImportant in the other. For a final designation of Not Important, the criterion was eithercategorized as Not Important in both the text mapping and survey studies or Not Important inone and Slightly Important in the other (Table 3). Please note that the total sum () value isrelative to only that particular framework, while quartile (Q) is comparable between frameworks.Table 3: Interpretation of final criteria designations
5. Select responses to the five-point Likert scale questions from Table 2The students also provided feedback to the open-ended questions. Select responses are shownhere along with a more summative assessment based on the instructor’s interpretation of thecomments. Q-16. Did this demonstration help you prepare for the final exam? If so, how? If not, why not? Not really only because I was already confident in my the final especially with mechanical energy portion, but it did not detract from the review. I had trouble making the connection from a mass flow rate to a mass balance in time for the experiment to give me a better understanding of the mechanical energy balance. No, it took a lot of time and our groups were too big. "too many cooks
hours each, over the course ofhalf a semester. Prior to Spring, 2019, LCs occurred twice a week for an hour each. The changeto two-hour LCs is expected to be more effective by allowing more time for learning activities,field trips, etc. LCs are generally flipped classroom style and are generally interactive, rather thanlecture-based. For each hour in a learning conversation, students generally spend two additionalhours outside of the meeting. By the end of a semester, students will have spent 40 hours on thecompetency, which is the requirement to earn one technical credit. Teachers scaffold the students’self-directed learning. A basic outline of a learning conversation is 10 minutes of Q & A, 60minutes of learning or retention activities
% 30% 30% 29% 25% Percentage 20% 15% 12% 10% 10% 10% 8% 5% 1% 0% Q P G K R A N Manufacturer Figure 5 Refined visualization showing the percentage of cereals produced by each
both mean value and standarddeviation, to return a numerical track quality indicator, which will inform the user whether or notthe given case of operation if feasible. In order to numerically determine the track quality, Q, anequation that effectively ranks each situation was elaborated.Additionally, serious wear marks were noticed on the Elizabethtown College outdoor athletictrack, which makes it one of the most difficult cases to achieve (Table 3). On the other hand,readings were collected from the new outdoor athletic track at Alvernia University (Reading,PA), to quantitatively rank more than one typical quality of outdoor tracks. It was found that theanalyses of these readings were much more conclusive, making it a far easier case. However
activities. The second week will also provide for discussionswith the teachers concerning the connections to mathematics, science, and engineering aswell as the appropriateness of the material and episodes. A future study will compare theeffectiveness of the two-week classroom workshop with the hybrid version.Bibliography1. Numb3rs, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numb3rs, accessed 1/082. http://www.weallusematheveryday.com/tools/files/waumed_taping_terms.pdf, accessed 1/083. Moskal, Barbara, Skokan, C., Kosbar, L., Dean, A., Westland, C., Barker, H., Nguyen, Q., and Tafoya, J., 2007, K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects: JEE, Vol. 96, No. 34. NUMB3RS: We All Use Math Every Day, http
Notebooks Grading Other Reports Grading & PrototypesTwo presentations are required of each team during the fall semester. One presentation is givenapproximately the 8th week of the semester when the students present the fall semester midtermdesign review. This presentation is 15 minutes in length with 15 minutes of Q&A. A secondpresentation is given during finals week when the team presents the end of semester review andis 30 minutes in length with 30 minutes of Q&A. A minimum of 3 to 4 faculty members arepresent at these presentations, with 2 to 3 outside engineering professionals present at the end ofsemester review. External reviewers and faculty members not
X X X X X X I 6 GM #2 X X X X X X I 8 GM #3 X X X X X X 5 GM #4 X X X X X X 6 GM #5 X X X X X X Q 5 GM #6 X X X X X X 5 GM #7 X X Y X X X 6(10) GM #8 X X X X X X Q 7 GM #9 X X X
instrumentation available to properlysupport their opinions. Each group was required to write a report, give a presentation, and give amock deposition.Figure 5: Images show the reconstructed skull of the infant as well as the sketch of the kitchenwhere the incident occurred. This information was provided to the students.An interesting aspect of the implementation was that the groups presented only to the faculty for10 minutes followed by 10 minutes of Questions and Answers (Q&A). This was instituted toprevent from later groups learning from the questioning of the previous ones. Simple rubricswere used for grading, which were broken down as 40%, 40% & 20% for facts, Q&A andconduct respectively. Performance was incentivized by 10 extra points
networks made up of multiple capacitors exclusively in series,parallel or hybrid series/parallel combinations. However, they were not asked in this course todetermine how the voltages split up across capacitors in a network (e.g. series) connected to avoltage source, as they were required to do with a series resistance (e.g. voltage divider) Page 26.362.10network. While they were expected to understand that the same amount of electric currentpasses through each and every one of the resistors in a purely series resistor circuit, they did notrecall or apply here the relationship between charge and voltage across a capacitor (Q = CV),that they
Dakota, United States -- South Dakota, 2012.[15] M. G. Brown and D. B. Knight, “Engineering Practice in the Academic Plan: External Influences, Faculty, and Their Teaching Roles,” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24.502.1-24.502.24.[16] J. M. Bryson, M. Q. Patton, and R. A. Bowman, “Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit,” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001.[17] M. C. Alkin, Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences. SAGE, 2004.[18] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation. SAGE Publications, 2008.[19] K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, and J
, 5, '| >');54 PutGPoint(White,' ',0,0,'O ');55 LabelJoint(White,0,0,xA,yA,' A');56 LabelLink(White,0,0,xA,yA,'');57 RRT_0(Magenta, xA,yA,vxA,vyA,axA,ayA, xP,yP,0,0,0,0,58 xQ,yQ,0,0,0,0, r3, +1, xB,yB,vxB,vyB,axB,ayB, Delta);59 PutGPoint(White,' ',xP,yP,'P ');60 PutGPoint(White,' ',xQ,yQ,' Q');61 PutDist(White, 0,0,xB,0, -15, '| >|');62 S:=LastDimValue;63 PutAng(White, xB,yB+20, xB,yB, xA,yA, 8, '| >');64 Theta3:=LastDimValue;65 LabelJoint(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,' B');66 LabelLink(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,'');67 WriteLn(FT,MyStr(t,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2*DEG,7),' ',68 MyStr(xB,9),' ',MyStr(vxB,9),' ',MyStr(axB,9),' ',MyStr(Theta3,9));69 END;70 until
Curriculum Development by Bulk Micromachining Technology”. Journal of Education and Human Development, vol. 1, no. 1, Page 14.1195.10 2007.[8] Novotny, P.M. and Ferrier, N.J., “Using Infrared Sensors and the Phong Illumination Model to Measure Distance,” IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics and Automation, pp. 1644-1649, 1999.[9] Um, D. and Hung, W.N.P., “A Novel Infrared Proximity Array Sensor for Micro-Workcell: Modeling and Applications,” submitted to IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, 2006.[10] Kornbluh, R., Pelrine, R., Pei, Q., Shastri, S., Application of Dielectric Elastomer EAP Actuators: Electroactive Polymer
-,inter- or trans-disciplinary classroom. Future research should investigate this approach acrossdifferent disciplines, using a larger subset of students, and incorporate additional quantitative andexplanatory data analysis.7. References[1] L. Ivanitskaya, D. Clark, G. Montgomery, and R. Primeau, "Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes," Innovative Higher Education, vol. 27, pp. 95-111, 2002.[2] L. Lattuca, D. Knight, T. Seifert, R. Reason, and Q. Liu, "Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary Programs on Student Learning.," Innovative Higher Education. Aug2017, p. 337, 2017.[3] C. D. Cowden and M. F. Santiago, "Interdisciplinary Explorations: Promoting Critical Thinking via Problem-Based Learning in an
Meeting2005: San Diego, CA.[8] Abdelrahman, M., Pardue, S., Baswell, M., and Currie, K., Addressing the Image and Human Resource Issues ofCasting Industry through Multidisciplinary Research Experience for undergraduates. AFS Transactions, 2007.115(07-051): p. 13.[9] Abdelrahman, M., and Pardue, S., Student as Principal Investigator, A Model for an REU Experience, in NSFEEC Awardees Conference2009: Reston, VA. Page 26.992.7[10] Jin, K., Li, H., Yang, Li, and Song, Q., Introducing Entrepreneurship Thinking into STEM Curriculum throughHands-on Projects, the 3rd International Conference New Perspectives in Science Education, 2014.[11] Xu, Y
we can obtain the grade of membership of a set in regard toanother set; in our case, the grade of membership of an individual profile with respect to an ideal Page 24.1009.8profile. We assimilate those grades as truth values that are in the interval [0,1]. Relationships arerepresented through rules “if ... then”; thus, truth values can be calculated with some T-normsor S-norms, as these kind of relationships (p → q) can be represented in terms of ∧ and ∨,respectively.13In this work, we use some fuzzy implications in order to find the values of the compliance levelof a common node from both trees, individual profile and ideal profile. This
Fields,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2010, Louisville, Kentucky, doi: 10.18260/1-2--1660[18] M. Ardis, E Hole and J. Manfredonia. “Creating a Marketplace for Multidisciplinary Multi-university Systems Engineering Capstone Projects,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 16, pp.1036-1042, March 2013, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.109[19] L. R. Lattuca, J. V., Lois and Q. F. Kimberly, “Does Interdisciplinarity Promote Learning? Theoretical and Researchable Questions,” The Review of Higher Education, vol 28, no. 1,pp. 23-48, Fall 2004, doi:10.1353/rhe.2004.0028 10
command linefunction that handles valued ties. In this case, the variables a and b represent sums of tiestrengths instead of the number of ties. In the standard EI index, all ties are equal, with a valueof 1 or 0. In the valued EI index, ties maintain their values, with 1 for infrequent interaction and4 for interacting more than weekly. Both the EI index and valued EI index were used in theanalysis, to provide a more comprehensive description of interactions. − Eq. 1. = + Table 1: Ties used in the calculation of EI index and Yule’s Q Alter
Engagement in the Minimizing over stimulation, whilst encouraging engagement. environment. Document visit to Museum of Science & Technology (MOST). Guest speaker Angela First round of ideation. Gaige, Education Director at List of questions for Chelsea Leonard, Occupational Therapist. MOST. 4 Transcript of Q&A with Ideation, preliminary prototypes. Chelsea Leonard. Photograph models for the process book. Design and prototype. 5 Design and prototype. Ideation, secondary prototypes. Photograph models for the process book. 6 Design and
the data, e.g., when only one or two out offour members completed the assessment, and incorporating qualitative research methods such asfocus groups, interviews, and observations for a more thorough analysis.References[1] National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering inthe New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 - 2019," ABET, 2018.[Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/. [Accessed 30 Jan 2019].[3] Bodnar, L. J., & Lagoudas, M. Z., & Hodge, J. Q., & Smith, T. A., & Orozco, J. A., & Corso,J. G., & Sanchez, C
J K L M N O P Q R S T U 21 11 3 3 9 11 3Table 2 lists the research topics and physics associated with the 21 most successful models todate. Four topics
on their ability withrespect to the following four items: • Clearly describe a problem orally (Q15) Page 26.1178.6 • Clearly describe a problem in writing (Q16) • Explain my ability to others (Q17) • Ask probing questions that clarify fact, concepts, or relationships Q(22) 100% 80% Unanswered 60% A great deal Moderate 40
. 14Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Figure 14: Outcome 3 from ABET 15Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual ConferenceReferences:[1] Abou Hashem, Y., Dayal, M., Savanah, S., & Strkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing inanatomy education. Med Educ Online, 20, 29847.[2] Berry, R. Q., III, Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C. D., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010).Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering designprinciples in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and TeacherEducation, 10(2), 167-172.[3
.‘One More Thing’ was tailored to prompt further discussion during the Q&A sessionimmediately following an ‘AppTalk’. For this activity a student was assigned to share a topicarticle immediately following an ‘AppTalk’. The topic was directly relevant to the presentationpreceding the activity. ‘One More Thing’ often yielded a useful discussion for the students orgenerated more involved questions for the presenter. The activity was intended to avoid thepassive atmosphere for the audience by assisting students to engage.Based on the activities described above, scientific journal articles were a primary resource forthese assignments. Therefore success in these assignments was heavily dependent on thestudents’ ability to read journal articles
complete their tasks slowly. Tokens(then and now) are not allowed to exit PR until three (or more) reviews have been completed.Under the assignment model, five reviewers were assigned. If three of a token’s assignedreviewers fail to complete their review, the token is stuck. Several students expressed frustrationwith tokens in this state.Keep It FunA personal PR statistics dashboard was added. This feature seeks to enhance intrinsic motivationfor PRs by applying gamification. Instructors can give a star to a student’s PR. Students earn athumbs-up when a token is revised in response to their PR comment. Students also see the totalnumber of PRs they have completed and a Q (quality) statistic which is computed based on thewords used in their review
SimaPro 7, version 7.0, Pre Consultants, 2006.7 , Accessed January 17, 2007.8 Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002. Page 12.263.13AppendixCourse Learning Objectives:Having successfully completed this course, the student will be able to: 1. Identify the 4 phases of the life cycle of a product, process, or system 2. Understand the critical role of materials selection in the design 3. Understand the origin and meaning of data used to quantify environmental impact 4. Describe why Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a critical skill for engineers in terms of technical, economical, societal
asked to give personal information aboutyourself or your employee who is a TMP graduate. However, as this is a very short survey, wegreatly encourage you to provide us with any additional information you see fit in Q. # 10. 1. Were you aware of this person obtaining an interdisciplinary, graduate-level certificate in Transportation Management and Policy, in addition to their degree, prior to offering this person a position? (if yes, please answer Q2, otherwise please skip to Q3) Yes, No 2. If you answered “yes” to the previous question, was this a factor in extending this person an offer of employment? Yes, No 3. How would you rate this person’s understanding of transportation policy issues compared to others