Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Arizona State University; Andreas S. Spanias, Arizona State University, ECEE, SenSIP Center and I/UCRC ; Linda A. Hinnov, Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q8 Q9 Q 10 Q 11 Q 15 Q 16 Question # Figure 10: Technical assessment results. Q 17 Q 13 Strongly AgreeQuestion # Q 12 Agree Neutral Q6 Disagree

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pavlos George Mikellides, Arizona State University; Chen-Yuan Kuo, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

              Averages   5.81  9.33  2.94  4.33  4.40 7.45 6.07 8.31 4.93 7.93  2.19  3.24 Table 3. Test Performance from 21 students in EGR302/394. Columns headed by QZ*(*) denote scores before the project with (*) being the maximum points available, columns headed by Q*FX denote scores after the project, administered during the final exam. The bottom row denotes the average score from each column and is paired for each quiz for the relevant comparison.VI. Conclusion The study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a different approach to enhance students’competence in several technical areas during a junior level stand-alone project course. Specifically, theuniqueness of the