research teams as well as theconceptualization, design and development of interdisciplinary curricula. This type ofcollaboration and interaction is especially important for small and medium-sized schools anduniversities where undergraduate / graduate teaching accounts for a major portion of the facultyworkload. Thus the paper describes the interdisciplinary research collaborations as well as thedevelopment of interdisciplinary educational curricula and their role in reaching educationalobjectives of the department, the school and the institution.Following section gives brief information about ROC and the subsequent sections describe themechanisms implemented to trigger and sustain faculty development over a longer period oftime.2. Research and
analysis:The student focus group and interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and uploaded toDedoose, a qualitative analysis software [19]. A thematic analysis was used to identify majorpatterns within the narrative. The best practices for completing a thematic analysis recommendedby Braun and Clarke [20] and Creswell [21] were adhered to. The researcher that facilitated theinterviews and focus groups initially made several passes through the data and then generated aninitial codebook consisting of six themes and twenty-four codes. An inter-rater reliability testwas completed, which involved a second researcher applying this codebook to the data. A pooledCohen’s kappa score of 0.44 was produced suggested poor to fair agreement [19, 22, 23]. Thetwo
experiences within theEFRI_REM Mentoring Catalyst Initiative and identify best practices in mentorship training andcommunity building.Goals and Components of the Mentoring Catalyst Initiative The EFRI-REM Mentoring Catalyst initiative has three main goals, which are: 1) Providemeaningful and effective training of ERFI-REM faculty, graduate students, and post- doctoralmentors to impact the overall research experiences of their mentees; 2) Build a peer-mentoringcommunity for EFRI-REM mentors to share ideas and provide support for real-time mentoringissues; 3) Strengthen mentoring relationships between faculty mentors and their graduate andpostdoctoral mentees. There are four major activities associated with the EFRI-REM MentoringCatalyst
designed toalso enhance the educational experience. Over 92% of students participants agreed that theexperience enriched their education (Figure 3C). Four percent of students disagreed. Page 26.25.9 Figure 2: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on (a) mentorship and (a) the overall value of the experience. Figure 3: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on the impact of the research experience on (a) interest in pursuing additional undergraduate research experience and/or graduate school, (b) seeking a career in research
several university teaching awards, outreach awards, and best paper awards. His passion is creating engaging learning environments by bringing useful research results and industry practices into the classroom as well as using design research results to inform engineering practice. Page 26.1606.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Travel for a Penny a Mile: An Engineering Design Challenge Inspiring Student Engagement and Sustainable LivingAbstractStudent engagement and success in engineering and science is paramount in developing thecountry’s needed
Science and Mathematics, Engineering, and Technical EducationAbstractSTEM students face general education requirements in humanities as a part of theirdegree programs. Many students believe these courses are of little value to theireducation and career goals. Policy discussions at all levels of government has politicizedhistory education. History curriculum focusing on societal and political developmentsseems obscure to the high school or undergraduate STEM student. STEMstory focuses onengaging STEM students by examining history general education courses through thelens of history of technology. The study proposes curriculum for a U.S. history surveycourse focusing on progress in science and technology incorporating best practices
10-weeksummer program where students are paired with faculty to engage in a research or design project.The student is paid a weekly stipend of $400 while being mentored one-to-one by a full-timefaculty member. Approximately 29 students took part in this program during the summer of 2019,culminating in a presentation to their peers and faculty mentors, and members of the Dean’sAdvisory Board for the school.It is hypothesized that the process and completion of the research or design project through theprogram positively impacted the students’ confidence and self-efficacy. To determine if thehypothesis is true, the students were assessed through a simple survey, the results of which arepresented. In addition, two of the 29 students were asked
. Prior to joining QUEST, Jessica was the Graduate Assistant in Columbia University’s Office of Student Engagement.Ms. Amanda Yard, University of Maryland, College Park Amanda Yard is a graduating senior from the University of Maryland, Robert H. Smith School of Busi- ness. She is receiving a major in Supply Chain Management and a minor in Spanish Language and Cultures. She will be working for PepsiCo as an Integrated Supply Chain Associate in Schaumburg, IL. Amanda has been a member of the QUEST Honors Program since Spring 2013 where she has served as a mentor, as well as on the capstone project scoping team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Impact of
for community college students at the four-year institution.Although a majority of the programs seemed to have more of a focus on the development ofskills to help students with coursework upon transition to the four-year institution, there areprograms that have the research focus similar to SCCORE’s. The following programs offer aresearch focus or a research component, serving as models of best practices for the SCCOREprogram and pointing to ways our alliance can improve SCCORE.Two programs that offer research in the biomedical field to underrepresented students includethe Bridge Summer Research Program at University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) thatprovides students at eight (8) community colleges training in lab techniques
dailyquestionnaire about their personal well-being and were placed into breakout rooms to completean activity through a web-based service. This course was an interdisciplinary introductoryengineering course. The course is traditionally taken in the first semester of the first year, so thisis one of the first experiences the students have at the college level.Literature ReviewOnline learning has consistently received limited attention from researchers in comparison totraditional classroom environments [1]. This lack of research on various virtual classroomengagement methods has made it difficult for instructors to decide how to best cater to theirstudents and how to maintain a classroom community despite changes in delivery modality.Some studies prior to the
workingtogether, Florence Nightingale’s Environmental Theory served as the organizingprinciple for teaching practice to the environmental engineers as facilitated throughcoaching and interaction with community health nurses. This paper provides a side-by-side comparison of the professions of engineering and nursing, and includes the results ofassessments using mixed methods to document the impacts of exposure to nursingpractice on the formation of emergent engineers.IntroductionEngineering education emphasizes exposure to real-world application often throughexperiential learning. Mentored, student design experiences, including programs such asEngineers Without Borders-USA, provide opportunities for engineering students fromdiverse disciplines to learn
develop hybrid educational modules linked to engineering grandchallenges to improve science and math concepts in k-12 curriculum.References 1. Ward, J. S., & Fontecchio, A. (2012, October). Work in progress: The NAE Grand Challenges, high school curricula and Graduate student research. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012 (pp. 1-2). IEEE. 2. Davis, V., Raju, P. K., Lakin, J., Davis, E. (2016). Nanotechnology Solutions to Engineering Grand Challenges. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. 3. Mote Jr, C. D., Dowling, D. A., & Zhou, J. (2016). The Power of an Idea: The International Impacts of the Grand Challenges for Engineering. Engineering, 2(1), 4-7 4. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A
environment.Project PathThe semester-long project was organized according to the user-centered design thinking process[4], navigating from the understanding phase to the ideation phase and concluding in the refiningphase. At the beginning of the project students researched the topic mixed reality, learned aboutits origin about 50 years ago [5] and explored MR capabilities with the Microsoft HoloLens, astate of the art MR device.Student teams were asked to respond the question “How could mixed reality impact machinerysolutions for industrial process automation and integration”. Over the course of the semester,students were expected to respond to these important issues: • Explore and identify a design opportunity around a specific theme in which mixed
alsorevealing evidence of increasing efforts to promote and institutionalize multidisciplinary engineering education,including courses, capstone design experiences, and entire degree programs. Yet while lots of attention has beenpaid to multidisciplinary engineering education, few if any efforts have been made to survey the overalllandscape of multidisciplinary efforts in engineering education, including to identify effective approaches andpractices. Due to this lacking and even ill-defined picture of multidisciplinary engineering education, effectiveefforts and best practices might be overlooked by both researchers and educators. To address this gap in theliterature, a comprehensive review of multidisciplinary engineering education is needed to make
leveraged in a multi-semester undergraduate research course at ClemsonUniversity with focus on creating holistic and sustainable community impacts in developingcountries. Through a cycle of three stages (moving between basic research, field testing, andpractice ready implementation and cycling back), students from more than 30 disciplines acrossthe university and from all levels (freshman through graduate students) work in teams toinnovate solutions to the most critical problems facing humanity in the 21st century using newknowledge from basic research. Translational research is especially appropriate formultidisciplinary work, as it takes numerous expertise areas to move a solution from conceptualresearch to practical application. Minimal
, but also the costs and benefits of nuclear energy and other energy sources.They appreciated the complexities of the field, the physics and chemistry behind it, and thesociopolitical issues surrounding it. They demonstrated critical thinking, learned how to questionand verify sources of information, and practiced their independent research skills andresourcefulness. At the end of the course, the students walked away with knowledge and skillsthat has solidly contributed to their preparation for a university-level engineering class.Introduction to Civil Engineering: Course Objectives and ComponentsThe Introduction to Civil Engineering course exposed student to both the art and the science ofengineered structures. Using principles of math and
Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at James Madison University, who focuses teaching, scholarship, service, and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engi- neering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she con- ducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. She is currently engaged in course development and instruction for the junior design sequence (ENGR 331 and 332) and
regarding graduates’ knowledge base and qualifications that industrial employers look fortoday as well as what is missed in graduates’ knowledge base, which points out to the gaps in theFaculty curriculum. In addition, alumni provided a fresh perspective on how to approachengineering curriculum enhancement in light of expectations of contemporary employers. Thesefindings are important to consider when developing and/or re-designing engineering designcurriculum to account for industrial demands as of today.Introduction This paper is one in a series from an empirical research study and regards engineeringeducation and design theory, methodology and practical applications. The new transdisciplinarynature of industrial product design requires new
literature have addressed the development of assistivetechnologies as a focus for engineering project applications. Over the past eight years, theCollaboratory for Strategic Partnerships and Applied Research at Messiah College has fosteredseveral interdisciplinary undergraduate student and faculty projects, such as the assistivecommunication technology Wireless-Enabled Remote Co-presence (WERCware) described here.WERCware is designed for those who depend on job- or life-coaching, to ameliorate cognitiveand behavioral challenges that affect performance at home or in the workplace. It facilitatesremote communication between coach and consumer, for training and/or other support asneeded, to increase independence of the consumer. WERCware development
Paper ID #14939The Bucknell Poetry Path App Experiment: A Collaboration Across CampusProf. Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University Prof. Thompson is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer engineering electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. His research interests
-making and communication. However, research demonstrates that thecurrent approach is not sufficient to develop student’s skills for industry practice [26]. “Effectivelearning can only take place in larger, multidisciplinary team scenarios” [26]. The best way forAEC education institutions to promote students’ professional identity is disseminating cross-disciplinary collaborative courses, projects, assignments and even competitions that simulatesreal-word experiences [25], [26].Three Processes Demanding Collaboration in the AEC IndustryBuilding information modeling (BIM). Building information modeling (BIM) allows thedevelopment of a holistic design represented as a virtual information model that can be shared bya multidisciplinary team. This way
Waterloo is developing a series of sixworkshops intended to be delivered to engineering students in all disciplines in their first threeyears of study. The first three workshops will provide an introduction to team-forming andbuilding, team communication, and conflict management. The last three workshops will providereinforcement and opportunities for application in the same areas and in multidisciplinary settings.This paper describes the first two workshops in this series. Their design is based on the principlethat teamwork skills are best learned by doing, i.e., by practicing in a context that approximatescommon team experiences in engineering. In the first workshop, students work in groups toconstruct a tower out of straws and connectors under
Academic Boot Camp (ABC)which was initiated by the Purdue University Minority Engineering Program. It was created toaddress a nine percentage point difference between the 2004 underrepresented minority (URM)first year retention rates and the overall cohort’s retention (67% vs 76%). The program wasoffered for the first time in summer 2005. This program was designed to address transition issuesexperienced by URM students entering a majority institution through a rigorous simulation of thefirst semester engineering experience. Embracing the best practices of learning communities,engineering students are required to live, study, and attend classes together in preparation forglobal competition. Through these methods, the Academic Boot Camp aims to
Samsung phones and iPhones. We expect to overcome much of thereluctance and frustration in transdisciplinary collaborations targeted to health care apps.Future Research: Our next course offering, in spring ’18, will recruit juniors in CS and CE, andinvolve them in transdisciplinary collaborations with nursing and arts students for buildinghealthcare apps. Since this will be an elective course, we will be able to set up a case-controlstudy, with the case group consisting of engineering juniors taking this course. We will trackthem over the next two years till they graduate on the following fronts: persistence (or retention),and focus of their capstone design project. We hypothesize that retention rate of women andURM students will improve, and
computerprogramming-related problem-solving skills in particular.This study presents best practices and lessons learned from our LC, and we present three novelstrategies to integrate writing in PS courses for majors and non-majors. First, since implementationof LCs is not always feasible, to infuse narrative elements into problem-solving we developed anarrative module to help students develop narrative and writing skills that can be incorporated inall sections of the PS course. Second, we developed a series of student-assessed case studies thatcan be integrated in all sections of the PS course for computer systems majors. Cases studiesprovide a narrative context in which students learn basic constructs of computer programming suchas sequencing, selection and
designs and makesaccessible contextual technology education for learners traditionally underrepresented in theSTEM fields. The outcomes of this program can help to establish best practice and serve as aneducational training model that can be expanded upon and utilized by other learning institutions.This paper discusses results of one particular component of the larger pathway between thepartner institutions: the renewable energy summer research internship. Since its inception in2011, university researchers and graduate students have been collaborating with communitycollege staff to provide daily support and technical mentorship for community college and highschool interns over eight weeks in the summer. Students representing multiple disciplines
isneeded.The National Academies of Sciences (NAS) report [10] emphasizes that using a piecemealapproach to data science curriculum development may result in content coverage but also ‘lackeducational and cross discipline cohesion’. While programs need to address data science skills,they should also prepare students for the actual ‘data challenges they will face in their careers’[10]. The NAS report also calls out the need to include high impact educational practices such asfirst year seminars, undergraduate research, common intellectual experiences (common andintegrative core knowledge), writing intensive courses, collaborative projects and assignments,and capstone courses. Important findings to note within the NAS report [10] include enhancingthe
sophomores, juniors and seniors interested in the program. • Descriptions of their research areasApplications are reviewed at the college level and they are supported to the extentthat funding allows. Each faculty member (or interdisciplinary faculty team) who isselected will receive support for a graduate student and prototype materialdevelopment.Design RationaleGiven the learning outcomes for the program, key program design decisions weremade during early development. The rationales for some of these design decisions arepresented in the following paragraphs.Multidisciplinary Teamwork: To develop knowledge and skills associated with thisoutcome, undergraduate students should work on a project in teams in which otherteam members are from
engineering” due to their interest in pursuing medical, law, or any otherprofessional school. This program is not ABET accredited and preferable for students who do notintend on practicing engineering in the workplace, such as pre-professional degree students. Thesecond path is designed for “students who want to practice engineering around a focusedconcentration by combining or involving several academic disciplines. Both pathways involvestudents developing their plan of study or adapting a well-established plan of study and integratingtheir interests outside of engineering with various combinations of engineering disciplines.PositionalityTo illustrate the importance of providing context when situating research, I will share mypositionality as a
they could have asked or observed. 2. Multidisciplinary Experiential Learning ECE students and CJ students rarely get to work on joint course projects. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, we are not aware of these two disciplines working together in the context of educational settings. Here, ECE and CJ students worked together in two ways. First, once the CJ students designed the interview questions, they practiced these questions on ECE graduate students to become more familiar with how the grid worked, whether their questions made sense, and used any feedback to revise their question set. Second, during the joint exercise, CJ and ECE students had conversations about strategies for securing the grid and maintaining operations. CJ students