curious in different fields and want to diversify andculture their minds.” Another 63% of students mentioned positive personality traits associatedwith GE+ students, such as “fun,” “inviting,” “passionate,” “outgoing,” “friendly,” or even “alittle less ‘gloomy’ than the other engineering majors. We aren’t as focused on the engineeringsalary and are more focused on the people around us.”Just over 20% of the students mentioned the flexible GE+ curriculum in their descriptions, andover 97% of the comments were positive towards the GE+ major and people, indicatingsubstantial GE+ pride, which was also demonstrated in the following focus groups.Student responses for the third text-response question regarding student recommendations for theGE+ program
Paper ID #13871A Comprehensive College-Centered Engineering Undergraduate ResearchProgramDr. Natacha Depaola, Illinois Institute of TechnologyDr. Eric M Brey, Illinois Institute of TechnologyProf. Fouad Teymour, Illinois Institute of TechnologyProf. Paul R. Anderson, Illinois Institute of Technology Paul Anderson is a registered professional engineer with over 30 years of combined industrial and aca- demic experience related to water resources. At the Illinois Institute of Technology for more than 20 years, he teaches courses in water chemistry, ground water contamination, chemical transport in the envi- ronment, and industrial
sustainabilitystrategies and participating in a network of like-minded sustainability peers. A sustainable futuredemands a leader not just immersed in the sustainability issues but also be able to articulate a Page 26.826.3new paradigm that addresses sustainability not in silos but as systems based and have interrelatedfocus.Putting it all together using Learning LabsOne learning structure to help integrate sustainability, leadership and engineering in onecohesive student experience is the use of Learning Labs. Learning Labs are a two part hands oncollaborative learning experience designed for students to apply theories, models and processesinto practice and
listen toothers with an open mind) and Q21 (work on collaborative projects as a team).In addition to the survey questions, participants were asked to respond to five prompts(Q31) about various outcomes of the project. In response to the prompts, one studentsaid: “collaborating with different people from different technical backgrounds is thebiggest advantage of the program in giving students the ability to learn from peoplewith different perspectives and gain a wider view of engineering”. Another studentwrote: “gaining valuable teamwork and management skills in a setting where themain objective was shared by many”.Effective Communication: To evaluate development with respect to effectivecommunication, participants were asked to rate their growth
did not know what to expect in terms of thisparticular project relating to education—however, I was open minded and prepared to engagemyself in whatever the project encompassed. The major reasons why I applied for this researchproject were because of my strong interest in interdisciplinary work, my desire to learn aboutnew things, and because I wanted to gain experience in more ‘hands-on’ research, in contrast tothe more theoretical and abstract type of work that I had done in the past.”Q2. Confidence in Success.A2. “When I first began this project, I was a bit nervous about mylack of knowledge in engineering preventing me from bringing anything valuable to the table.Not only was I ignorant in many engineering principles (such as Dynamics
Exercise. (2010). at 11. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. (National Academy Press, 1999). at 12. Michael, D. R. & Chen, S. L. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. (Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade, 2005). at 13. White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cogn. Instr. 16, 3–118 (1998).14. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. Instructional design. (Wiley New York, NY, 1999)15. Wankat, P. C. Improving engineering and technology education by applying what is known about how people learn. J. SMET Educ. Innov. Res. 3, 3–8 (2002).16. Kubiszyn, T. &
Paper ID #13767FOCUS in Climate: Flights of Courses Unified for StudentsDr. Deanna H Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Deanna H. Matthews is Associate Department Head for Undergraduate Affairs and Assistant Teaching Professor in Engineering and Public Policy, and Education Director and researcher in the Green Design In- stitute at Carnegie Mellon University. In her role in Engineering and Public Policy, Dr. Matthews oversees the undergraduate programs in EPP, including coordination of the undergraduate double major and minor curricula, undergraduate student advising, and teaching introductory courses in
project itself and the research team were multidisciplinary in nature. Theteam was composed of an undergraduate student, midway through a general engineering programwith a concentration in mechanical engineering, and a professor in electrical engineering. Theproject was a second-stage of development for an idea originally developed for a Senior Capstoneproject. The research group for the capstone project consisted of four students of variousengineering concentrations, who ultimately presented their work at a regional conference6.With the above context in mind, the instructor set out to design a research experience that wouldbe challenging and rewarding for the student. In the continuum of process vs product-orientedundergraduate research, the
Media at Polytechnic University (now NYU Polytechnic School of En- gineering), and her Ph.D. in Educational Communication and Technology at New York University. Her mixed methodology research, focusing on interdisciplinary studies, has been presented at numerous na- tional and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed book chapters and journal articles on varied topics such as technical writing, the future of science education, game design, virtual reality, and problem solving. Her book is entitled Cases on Interdisciplinary Research Trends in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Studies on Urban Classrooms (Information Science Reference, 2013).Dr. Candido Cabo, New York City College of
, [and] collaborative learning.”1 Faculty at FloridaGulf Coast University (FGCU) set out to improve their gateway course to the engineeringcurriculum, a one-credit hour course common across three of the four programs within the U. A.Whitaker College of Engineering, being mindful not only of including identified high impacteducational practices, but also incorporating the University’s upcoming 5-year QualityEnhancement Plan (QEP), which focuses on “improving student learning in relation to Writing,Critical Thinking, and Information Literacy.”b The result of these efforts is a course with anemphasis on the development of information literacy, teamwork, and communication skills,focusing on engineering innovations related to the Grand Challenges
the recently launched interdis- ciplinary medical product development course. She also serves as Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively involved in engineering outreach for global health. Miiri received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Prof. Stephanie Tharp, University of Michigan Stephanie Tharp received a master of industrial design degree from the Rhode Island School of Design, and a bachelor of mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan. From 2002 until 2014, she was Associate Professor, and Program Chair
Paper ID #12329The Summer Undergraduate Research Bridge Experience for CommunityCollege Students: Providing Connections from Community College to theFour-Year InstitutionMs. Jeanne R. Garland, New Mexico State University Jeanne Garland has worked at New Mexico Alliance for Minority Participation (New Mexico AMP) since August 2002. She received the B.A. from Baylor University and the M.A. from NMSU in English, with an emphasis in Rhetoric and Professional Communication. She worked for the College of Engineering’s Engineering Research Center (ERC) as Technical Writer, then was employed at Arizona State University (ASU) for