Multidisciplinary Vertically Integrated Teams: Social Network Analysis of Peer Evaluations for Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program TeamsAbstractTwenty-two colleges and universities have implemented the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP)model, which consists of multidisciplinary teams, long-term large-scale projects led by faculty,the enrollment of students from different academic ranks, and the ability for students toparticipate for multiple years. At Georgia Institute of Technology, analysis of university exitsurveys found VIP participation correlated with a meaningful effect size on three questions: thedegree to which students’ education contributed to their ability to work in a multidisciplinaryteam; their
. Higher Education, 57(4), 405-415.Rogers, P., & Freuler R.J. (2015). The “T-Shaped” Engineer, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, 2015. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.VALUE. (2009). Integrative and Applied Learning VALUE Rubric. Assessing Outcomes and Improving Achievement. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2003a). Assessing interdisciplinary writing. Peer Review, 6(1), 12– 15.Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2003b). Interdisciplinary writing assessment profiles. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 126–69.
Content Analysis Guidebook. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE, 2002.[20] M. W. Ohland, H. R. Pomeranz, and H. W. Feinstein, "The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: A New Peer Evaluation Instrument," in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL., 2006.[21] N. Kidd, T. Parry-Giles, S. Beebe, and W. Mello, "Measuring College Learning in Communication," in Improving Quality in American Higher Education: Learning Outcomes and Assessments for the 21st Century, ed: Jossey-Bass, 2016, p. 189.[22] C. Griffin, "Programs for Writing Across the Curriculum: A Report," College Composition and Communication, vol. 36, pp. 398-403
different majors, the course has been very popular and has proven to enhance studentengagement in engineering-related topics for students from diverse academic backgrounds.To broaden the opportunities for students, an on-line version of the course has been developedwhich transforms the current course through: enhanced use of electronic portfolios and on-linecollaboration tools for group work; design of peer evaluation activities which leverage the on-line nature of the course to provide additional collaborative content and encourage thedevelopment of communication skills; a modular approach to provide key readings and videocontent while linking the analysis of real-world examples to key engineering and managementprinciples; design of a multimodal
final project presentation, foreach of the projects were determined. The Google Spreadsheet was revisited several timesthroughout the semester to remind students of their commitments, and to encourage students toconsider if they will be able to make deliverables and ask for extensions early if needed materialfrom others had been delayed.Scope of work, deliverables, and presentations were instructor-graded. The instructor wasprimarily looking for clarity of communication – if the submission was shared with members ofthe public or of the Conservation Commission, would it be understood? Was there enoughbackground on the project and on any results or conclusions?Peer review on presentations, using the rubric found in Table 1, was a part of the
aswell as to allow faculty to provide feedback on their growth. In addition to reflective writing,students sketched in their journals. Sketches could be ideas for their project or as responses to theweekly questions. In addition to encouraging reflective growth, these activities were designed tohelp students become comfortable with the basic skills, like sketching, required to implementdesign thinking. Notably, some student disciplines were relatively unfamiliar with narrativereflection while others rarely sketch as part of their work.The first iteration of the course was offered as a special topics course in each discipline and crosslisted through Interprofessional Education at James Madison University. Biology and healthscience students did
, revise, and update the materials to track their success.Similarly, instructors would be likely to use such a repository of modules if it were easilysearchable, peer-reviewed, and had clear learning objectives for assessment. This learningmodule approach also relates to a case library of workplace engineering problems which appliedcase-based reasoning (CBR) to provide a knowledge base and pedagogical support system(Jonassen et al. 2006). Furthermore, there exists a growing body of relevant research in the fields of cognitivepsychology and behavioral science which has seen little application to engineering andconstruction. Over the past half-century, researchers have identified many cognitive barriers*,including biases and heuristics, that
Waterloo. Ada’s research and teaching interests include decision making under uncertainty, subjective probability, gender issues in STEM disciplines, design teaching, experiential and online learning, team processes, and peer review.Mehrnaz Mostafapour, University of WaterlooDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She
common freshman year focusing on the profession,preparatory skills and retention. A new innovation is the Chemistry for Engineers course, ascience course concerned with topics for professional development. GenEd is the University corerequirement which satisfies the social sciences and humanities requirement. First Semester Second Semester Calculus I Calculus II Chemistry for Engineers, Chemistry Lab Elementary Classical Physics I Introduction to Engineering Engineering Graphics GenEd Analytical Reading and Writing Computer Programming and Analysis
variety of sustainability assessments, ranging from indirect todirect measures of student learning, are available but a comprehensive review of the field isneeded to make the assessments more accessible and implementable by educators from acrossengineering disciplines.A systematic review of ASEE conference proceedings was conducted to identify and discuss thequality of available methods for assessing student knowledge of and interest in sustainability.First, a search of the ASEE PEER database for the terms “sustainability + assessment” yielded1001 results. Records with relevance indexes above 1.0 were screened based on their abstractsand appraised by their full texts according to four inclusion criteria: (1) The study was publishedduring 2011 to
robots were provided to thestudents by our department. Nonetheless, this does not mean that the project is simply puttingvarious parts together. In particular, students first had to design the electrical circuits andmechanical layout of the robot; they then needed to write embedded software that uses the inputfrom various sensors and transducers to control actuators (motors). Our next two learningobjectives are:Objective #2: To learn how to interface with and program Raspberry Pi in an embeddedenvironment.Objective #3: To learn the basics of computer networking and Wi-Fi received signal strength(RSS)In what follows, we present how we use project-based learning to inspire the students to achievethe above learning objectives along the way.3
, and has participated in research and curriculum development projects with $6.4 million funding from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 85 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research. He has published over 85 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Benefits for undergraduates from engagement in an interdisciplinary environmental monitoring research and