, and rehabilitation with a focus on sustainable green building design and construction.Miss Paula Alvarez Pino Paula Alvarez Pino is the Associate Director of the Sustainable Smart Cities Research Center at University of Alabama Birmingham (UAB). Paula is in charge of monitoring the progress of research, outreach and training activities in the center, as well as to set short and long-term goals to ensure the continuous progress of the SSCRC. Paula collaborates with the City of Birmingham as liaison in several projects related to the built environment and to improving the overall quality of life of the communities. Paula plans international research experience programs for undergraduate and graduate students in
. Page 26.826.4The class will act as a consulting group representing various interests: the community, the city ofGoodyear and the state of Phoenix. The City of Goodyear has strategic action plan found in thislink: http://www.goodyearaz.gov/government/city-manager-s-office/strategic-plan-goals whichcan be used a starting point.The class will be divided into three groups to advocate for three sectors: community citizens, cityadministrators and state officials. The groups will represent the transportation needs, plans andbudgets of their representative sector. Using a brainstorming visualization map (suggestion:Power Point Smart Art Graphics) brainstorm the elements of your group’s vision statement forthe City of Goodyear, Arizona. This vision
to formulate researchquestions as well as how to develop and modify research plans with the guidance of their researchmentors. Students will learn to work independently and to collaborate with other group membersas they conduct research in specific topics in energy research. This will enable them to understandtheir own levels of aptitude and interest in a career in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) and give them the tools to prepare for the next stage in their education andcareer development. Students will report and present their research results in multiple settings. Inaddition to the hands-on collaborative research experience, technical and social activities will beincorporated into the program to provide students
), and onebrave sophomore (1).BackgroundAs described by Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick in a work in progress at ASEE in 2017 [16], thecourse that these students participated in was organized around objectives that included studentlearning about working in teams and collaborating while building drones.The output of each team was a jointly-constructed drone and a team-designed plan for a “pro-social drone”—that is, a design that would somehow have a positive impact on society. Studentswere challenged to wrestle with what it means for something to be pro-social. In the syllabusstudents were alerted to the ways that this class was likely to be different than others that theyhad taken before.As Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick describe it, the course was
State University. QMRA III is a one-and-a-half-week training program designed for advanced graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and earlycareer professionals to assimilate scientific data and implement computer programs towardsbuilding a risk assessment for assuring safety and health goals. Each cohort of QMRA IIIconsists of engineering, biological and social scientists with the goal of cross training. As part ofthe evaluation plan of the program, students were asked to construct a box-and-arrow diagramconveying a risk management plan involving the full range of biologic, economic, social,political, and cultural factors that impact risk during a pathogen exposure. Additionally, experts,professors and career professionals who were also the
and submit a paper to student-reviewed campus research journal. The program aims to impact a large number of studentsinterested in working on research and development projects in all disciplines within engineering.The program is centralized at the college level and supports student/faculty teams that competeby submitting formal proposals focused on basic research projects or the development of atechnology or product. Proposals are solicited every semester, including summer, and reviewedfor quality and impact with special attention to the mentoring plan. Since its inception (Spring2013), 178 projects have been supported, with participation of engineering students in theirsecond through fourth years. Student participants in this Armour R&D
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and BS/MS in wood science and forestry from the University of Maine. A member of the WSU faculty since 1996, he previously served as an associate professor at West Virginia University’s Division of Forestry.Tamara Laninga, University of Idaho Dr. Tamara Laninga is an assistant professor in the Department of Conservation Social Sciences and the Director of the Bioregional Planning and Community Design program (BIOP) at the University of Idaho (U-Idaho). She is the University of Idaho PI for the Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance (NARA). She is an IDX instructor and also works closely with the outreach and environmental preferred products (EPP) teams. Dr. Laninga
ofcollaboration technologies. Although there has been great emphasis on developing collaborationcompetencies in the engineering curriculum, empirical evidence of successful strategies fordistributed team settings is scarce. As an attempt to fill this gap this study investigates theimpact of a scalable intervention in developing virtual collaboration skills. The intervention,based on instructional scaffolds embedded with collaboration technologies, is aimed atsupporting specific processes including planning, goal setting, clarifying goals and expectations,communication, coordination and progress monitoring. A quasi-experimental design was used toevaluate the impact of the intervention on student teamwork skills. Data from 278 graduate andundergraduate
like to workon. Based on their interest, the students were subdivided into two teams: one toaddress the remediation of an acid mine drainage site and one to evaluate possiblehandling methods of flow-back water from fracking sites. The activities includedin the projects were an in depth literature review, prototype design, laboratoryassessment, economic analysis, environmental regulation evaluation, communityaction plan development and submission of a final design report. The objectivewas to assess if these activities could enable the students' to develop into aneffective interdisciplinary team and to address the potential lack of interest in coreSTEM classes. In addition to describing the students' key activities, we willdescribe issues faced
a science methods class (n = 15). The paired classes collaborated inmultidisciplinary teams of 5-8 undergraduate students to plan and teach engineering lessons tolocal elementary school students. Teams completed a series of previously tested, scaffoldedactivities to guide their collaboration. Designing and delivering lessons engaged universitystudents in collaborative processes that promoted social learning, including researching andplanning, peer mentoring, teaching and receiving feedback, and reflecting and revising theirengineering lesson. The research questions examined in this pilot, mixed-methods research study include: (1)How did PSTs’ Ed+gineering experiences influence their engineering and science knowledge?;(2) How did PSTs
administrative offices working in the areas of diversity,inclusion, social justice, equal opportunity, and access so that each office can better focus on itsmission and goals. As part of this effort, OSU has established three new positions—SpecialAssistant to the President for Community Diversity Relations, Vice President and ChiefDiversity Officer, and Executive Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access, as wellas formed a new Leadership Council for Equity, Inclusion and Social Justice. All of these entitiesare working collaboratively to bring focused energy to university-wide planning andimplementation of equity and diversity efforts.Professional Development Opportunities. While there are many professional developmentopportunities at OSU
efforts have aimed to provide a holistic engineering education [1], producing T-shaped engineers [2] who possess broad knowledge across disciplines with deep expertise intheir domain. We have seen many pedagogical advances, such as team-based learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning, and creative learning using virtual reality, to name a few.The core driver for this change stems from the need for engineering education to prepareengineers to stay relevant and to contribute to society in the face of rapid global change andadvancement in information and technology.These trends have been the main motivator for integrating liberal studies and engineering.Bucciarelli and Drew laid out a “design plan” for liberal studies in engineering
“Critical Engineering Challenges”, I thinkit is problems in today’s society. I thought I would be working in a team of 3-4, working onsome sort of project that saves gas. I thought I would be doing lots of planning & engr. des.work.”Q2. Confidence and Success.A2. “Having an idea that I will be working on a motorcycle mademe a little scared due to my lack of motorcycle knowledge. I felt that I wouldn’t be THAT greatat building/machining b/c I’ve done only a little work with mechanical engineering. I did havesome confidence because I helped build a tricycle in engr. des. when I originally had no tricycleknowledge. I had about 50% confidence.”Q3. Faculty Mentoring. A3. “Initially, I thought I would be spending all my time with theresearch advisor
), called for a Decade of Education for sustainabledevelopment from 2005 to 2015 [1]. This worldwide reflection is creating a new engineeringeducation culture. Engineering educators are observing significant shifts in societal expectationsof the engineering profession to help address immediate and longer-term sustainable developmentchallenges. According to the World Federation of Engineering Organizations (WFEO),engineering plays a significant role in planning and building projects that preserve naturalresources, are cost-efficient, and support human and natural environments [2]. The NationalAcademy of Engineering formulated in 2004 its vision of the engineer of 2020 [3]. This reportoutlines a number of aspirational goals where it sees the
reference.The records and deliverables associated with the progress of the project collected through ashared Google drive as well as personal observation during the competition period were used ascomplementary sources for the current analysis and discussion. Figure 3. Sample of the survey used to assess the learning experience of students in the SD competitionResults and DiscussionThe results of the surveys are presented according to the three phases considered in the analysis:beginning (the design and planning phase of the project), middle (development phase of theproject), and end (final phase of the project and contest week). The survey response rates were 5students, 27 students, and 22 students for the
Commission “Software Development is totally different now than what it used to be. The best job candidate needs to bring a background in computer science and data analysis, with an understanding of business requirements.” – Charles Morgan, CEO/Chairman, First Orion, and former Chairman / CEO /Co-Founder of Acxiom Corp. This bold plan utilizes the development of the science of data analytics to cut across the areas of opportunity for economic improvement in Arkansas.” [13] – Arkansas Science Advisory CommitteeIn addition, in numerous interviews with senior executives for major companies, mid-sizedcompanies, and start-ups by the College of Engineering, the Walton College of Business, and theFulbright College of Arts & Sciences
their context, by adapting strategies we have employed.At this stage, formalizing our engineering project curriculum as authentic experiential learningrepresents a work in progress involving a pilot group of five engineering students who mustsatisfy the new ELI requirements by spring 2017 to graduate on schedule. Results of this pilotgroup help test our plan, providing feedback to inform us what adjustments we may need tomake, as we ramp up to the “full-on” implementation of 50+ students per year over the next twoyears. As available, this paper presents details of the ongoing pilot group results.Having introduced the case for experiential learning with its move from popularity towardmaturity in engineering education, and having described the
technology platform ardupilot, and 2) design and build aunique payload for the drone. The course assignments involve designing and building the device(a clear engineering challenge) with the more conceptual work of planning for its integration intopro-social organizational processes (a clear peace and justice challenge). To facilitate thisexploration, we have designed the course to minimize lectures and instead use class time forconversations and collaboration. This will be done through a combination of group discussions,team exercises, and collaborative workshops.This paper, submitted as a work-in-progress, presents the current state of our coursedevelopment. We discuss our learning outcomes, describe our pedagogical approaches, andidentify areas
,engineering management, and chemistry departments as well as the university’s Nanofabricationand Imaging Center. Over three years, twenty-six students have been selected for theNanotechnology Fellows Program, and their majors span seven disciplines. Table 1 provides asummary of the program participation by gender and undergraduate major.This paper reports on the program’s evolution over the course of three years as well as thepositive impacts on students’ academic and professional careers. Formative and summativeevaluation tools were developed by program evaluators in the Office of Academic Planning andAssessment and psychology department; the tools include student feedback analysis, focusgroups, and surveys. The evaluation results from the first
develop and establish mentoring plans without any formal training in how to beeffective mentors. Since the start of this initiative, over 300 faculty, postdoctoral associates and graduatestudents have been trained on promising practices, strategies, and tools to enhance their research mentoringexperiences. In addition to formal mentor training, opportunities to foster a community of practice withcurrent mentors and past mentor training participants (sage mentors) were provided. During theseinteractions, promising mentoring practices were shared to benefit the mentors and the different mentoringpopulations that the EFRI-REMs serve. The community of practice connected a diverse group of institutionsand faculty to help the EFRI-REM community in its
confident that they had chosen the correct major, will do well in their major during the currentacademic year, were comfortable approaching a faculty member, and will graduate with a degreein their major. The responses for “I am well prepared for post-graduation plans” were more evenlydistributed. One 3rd-4th year student and one 4th-graduation student chose “slightly disagree”indicating that perhaps participating in such a program during earlier academic years would haveproven helpful in determining a career path.Figure 2In the survey, students were given three prompts to reflect on their experience. A simple wordfrequency query in NVIVO 12 pro on each prompt produced the respective word clouds. The top10 most frequent words (with stemmed words
has a single Electrical Engineering Instructor whoadvises all groups and oversees all projects. Lectures are once per week and serve the purpose ofreinforcing the design process by introducing techniques for project management, research,design process management, prototype planning, and effective presentations and writing skills.The Computer Engineering capstone course consisted of 8 projects. Three were sponsored byindustry and a fourth was a collaborative effort between the CE capstone class and the UCSBDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. Other projects were student defined.One of the industry sponsored projects was the CE contribution to the SpaceX Hyperloop Podcompetition described above. The technical focus of this team
been a Visiting Associate Professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University. From 2014 to 2016, he has been a Visiting Professor with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Missouri. Currently, he is As- sociate Professor with the Engineering Department, Colorado State University-Pueblo. He is the author of two book chapters, more than 73 articles. His research interests include artificial intelligence systems and applications, smart material applications, robotics motion, and planning. Also, He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and ASME-ABET PEV.Dr. Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. (M.S
(either within or outside of class). Comm5 I am involved with the GE+ program. Comm6 I interact with GE+ faculty. Page 26.816.7 Comm7 I plan to complete a degree in engineering. Comm8 I plan to complete a degree in GE+. Comm9 I am a welcome member of the GE+ community. Comm10 Experiences in GE+ have given me a positive impression of engineering. Comm11 Differences exist between GE+ students and other engineering majors.Table 3. Codes and GE+ Survey Identity Statements Used for Analysis12 Code GE+ Identity Statement ID1 I can
10 1 5 10 1 1 1 7 63.6% 4.1Teamwork & Collaboration 10 1 5 10 1 1 1 7 63.6% 4.1Aircraft Design & Requirements 10 5 10 10 1 1 1 10 8 72.7% 6.0Project Planning & Management 5 1 5 1 10 5 45.5% 4.4Systems Engineering & Critical Thinking 10 5 5 10 1 5 5 10 8 72.7% 6.4Configuration Selection & Vehicle Performance 5 1 10
, understanding technical reinvent, how it is done in knowledge, inhibited by industry, sketching skills. 2 Planning, development, Values structure, Demands accountability, user, face-to-face, formal, interactive team solution motivated, informal, active, member, versatile stronger link between participate, listening, ideas, leader, lead by education and industry development. example
Bathe, Associate Professor, BiologicalEngineering, Geoffrey Beach, Professor, Materials Science and Engineering, Markus Buehler, JerryMcAfee Professor in Engineering and Head, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Dennis Freeman, Henry Ellis Warren Professor of Electrical Engineering, Kristala Prather, Arthur D.Little Professor of Chemical Engineering, Michael Short, Class of ’42 Career Development AssistantProfessor of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Bruce Tidor, Professor of Biological Engineering andComputer Science, and, Maria Yang, Professor of Mechanical Engineering. The Extended NEETFaculty Committee comprises faculty from the other four schools --- School of Humanities and SocialSciences, School of Architecture and Planning
students. The new Engineering Plus degree has a core setof required foundational courses in engineering, a multi-year design sequence, and allows forself-defined pathways. The new curriculum also offers three defined degree pathways that havebeen chosen based on an examination of student “fate” data: secondary education, pre-medical,and environmental studies, with additional pathways planned for the near future. The fateanalysis examined the paths of students who were enrolled in an engineering or STEM major inone year and samples their major choice in the following year. This analysis maps the flow ofstudents into and out of the major with demographic slicers to more closely understand these in-migration and out-migration choices.This paper will
design project to formulate the thread ofdesign in the curriculum. Table 2 provides a listing of the different courses hosting the designproject as part of the CASCADE project. As shown by table 1, implementation of the CASCADE project started in the academicyear of 2012 – 2013 and continued through the following years [21]. Currently the project is stillongoing with minor changes of logistics and participating faculty depending on availability offaculty and the changes in their assignments. Nevertheless, the general plan and objectives arestill the same with activities and participation expanding every year. Two departments participatedin the project at its inception in 2013. In the following years, two additional departments joinedand
establish peer/mentor relationships.Students receive a paid 2-week research skills workshop, followed by 8-10 weeks of researchtraining as a full-time UMB employee during the summer.24Promoting early engagement for community college students in STEM research, the Internshipsin Nanosystems Science, Engineering, and Technology (INSET) program, is held at theUniversity of California at Santa Barbara, a tier-one research university. Similar to the SCCOREprogram goals, INSET provides research opportunities to increase retention and degreecompletion. Unlike bridge programs that were researched, the INSET program involvescommunity college faculty in all aspects of program planning and implementation of theprogram. The faculty from the four community