Paper ID #38028Board 145: Possible Relations between Self-Efficacy, SociodemographicCharacteristics, Dropout and Performance of Freshman Students inEngineering CoursesDr. Cristiane Maria Barra Da Matta, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Master’s degree in Food Engineering at the Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia and PhD in Psychology at the Universidade Metodista de S˜ao Paulo (2019). Assistant professor and coordinator of the Student Support Program (since 2007) at Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia. It investigates themes of School and Educational Psychology: academic experiences, self-efficacy, school performance and dropout in
(URCAD) enablestudents to explore and comprehend the essence of research.Undergraduate students participating in research experiences show to enhance many of theirtechnical and professional skills [2], [3]. Communication and critical thinking, careerclarification and even further aspirations to continue to graduate school have been documentedbecause of a research experience for a student [2], [4], [5]. Another key and important element,especially at UMBC, is the impact on diversity. These experiences demonstrate increasing self-efficacy in students who are working to complete a STEM degree, especially women andmarginalized populations [5], [6], [7], [8].However, not all students have the chance or find themselves in a position to pursue such
2021 were given to women [3], but they constitute 16% of work-ing professionals in the field [4]. Additionally, Hispanic and Black populations are under-represented in the engineering/STEM workforce relative to the general workforce: 11% ofthe total workforce is Black, but only 5% of the engineering workforce, and 17% of the totalworkforce is Hispanic, but only 8% of the STEM workforce [3]. Addressing the issues thatcreate these disparities is multifaceted, but beginning with educational interventions for stu-dents that enhance their self efficacy for further pursuing engineering post graduate is a start.Prior research has indicated the need to increase self efficacy in engineering students, es-pecially from these diverse backgrounds, to help
factors by Heilbronner [3]:ability, self-efficacy, educational experiences and interest. Engineering majors are more likely tograduate when they have good math preparation [4]. Less than optimal high school preparationhas contributed to early switching out of STEM majors, and this phenomenon is experienced at ahigher rate by students of color. These students have reported that they were underprepared andoverconfident in their college STEM courses. The disconnect was described by these students asbeing top of their class in high school to being the bottom of their college physics or math classes[5]. Self-efficacy [6] is the belief by an individual that they have the ability to produce theoutcome expectancy. This can be described as an individual’s
scope of aproblem—a skill highly desired for its potential in innovation and entrepreneurship—fills a uniquecurricular gap. The survey of learning experiences showed statistically significant differencesbetween pre- and post-course scores in self-efficacies, which suggests that students sawimprovement in the ratings of their learning in five target areas: (A) background research skills,(B) critical thinking and ideation, (C) project management and teamwork, (D) technicalcommunication skills, and (E) interest in medical engineering.1. Introduction Current engineering education has well-established curricula that covers domain knowledge,mathematic skills, and engineering tools. Although education content and format have evolved,the general
].The second possibility for expanding access offers depth over breadth. Stacking multiple high-impact practices has been demonstrated to hold potential as a multiplier effect [13,4,14-15].Where experiencing a single high-impact practice is good, experiencing more than one can beeven better. In this study we ask, To what extent does stacking additional high-impact practiceson top of course-based PBL provide additional benefits for students? We examine this potentialvalue in terms of the range of benefits previously associated with PBL: developing professionalskills and mindsets, as well as building content mastery; improving self-efficacy and ownershipover learning; and career preparedness. We then extend these well-established impacts of PBLby
for(b). The 2021 and the 2022 cohort maintained the student motivation to figure out how to learnthe most difficult course materials. On the contrary, the 2022 cohort even exhibited an increasein the mean for (b) at T2, which is the end of the first term. The course was able to foster agreater sense of self-efficacy for students post-pandemic.Moreover, across the years, students in subsequent years (during and post-pandemic) exhibitedhigher motivation levels in comparison to the 2019 pre-pandemic cohort at T1, T2, and T3respectively. Table 3 lists comparisons across the years including means, standard deviations,sample sizes and p-values. Using 2019 pre-pandemic cohort as a baseline for comparison, at theend of the first term T2, the 2020
, UPRM is onlybeginning to incorporate JEDI into Strategic Planning. This project will accelerate those efforts.We intend to work with administrators to develop a climate survey and to improve the counting ofnon-binary students.3. MindsetsBefore discussing the program design, we deliberate a set of mindsets essential to develop instudents. This is a precursor to developing a competency-based profile that is under development.Student Self-efficacyAside from the theme of Sustainability, students in the new programs must be prepared to be self-motivated and willing to take a high level of responsibility for their learning. We plan to use thePittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitudes Survey (PFEAS) to assess student self-efficacy uponentry and use
. Facilitated by a diverse team of 12 multinational lecturers from5 countries (Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines), these programs offer aninterdisciplinary educational experience consisting of technology, history, and cultures of Asiancountries to enhance participants' self-efficacy [1]. VAx was initiated as a response to satisfy thedesperate demand for mobility programs hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic, providing aDigital Transformation solution that offers borderless mobility programs regardless of locationand budget limitations. After three batches in 2021 and 2022 with a total of 239 certificateawardees, the program transitioned to a hybrid model in 2023. Of the 88 registered participantsfrom 10 different nationalities, 44
experiences vary depending on the particular program ormodel students choose. For instance, the nature of the research undertaken by undergraduates working oncapstone projects differs from that involved in study abroad opportunities. Students participating incapstone projects have reported the development of professional skills such as project management,teamwork, and communication abilities [12], [13]. Alternatively, undergraduates conducting researchabroad consistently demonstrate growth in areas like cultural awareness, emotional resilience, linguisticskills, and research self-efficacy [4], [14], [15]. Extended involvement in undergraduate research hasbeen shown to result in more pronounced skill development [16]. While both models represent
group environment. Tutors are encouraged to ask questions, clarify expectations,and make contributions to the discussion based on their tutoring experience. WATTS trainingprovides generalist tutors with the background knowledge and self-efficacy to engage STEMstudents in meaningful conversations about their reports and reinforce the students’understanding and application of rhetorical principles.Given that the tutors’ focus is on writing and students’ ability to express their ideas in anunderstandable way, only two of the nine Universal Intellectual Standards of the Paul-ElderCritical Thinking Framework [7] apply to the writing tutoring session. They are: 1) Clarity: Could you elaborate further? Could you give me an example
discussion class, and attend a couple of advancedscholarships in teaching and learning opportunities. Both sections will be attending a Teachingand Learning Symposium offered internally through the Provost office and faculty developmentcenter. Future analysis will include a deeper exploration of the impact of this certification on thestudents' development. This will include the following: ● Interviews with the students around their teaching philosophy. ● Examination of the new 396 cohort philosophy and 397 newly developed philosophies ● Impact analysis on motivation, attitudes, self-efficacy on the students and their career ● Impact on analysis on confidence and success in their respective courses as teaching fellows through
students had about the application of activelearning strategies in science courses for undergraduates. More than 250 students' writtenresponses provided a comprehensive understanding of the reasons behind their perceptions ofthese strategies' benefits or drawbacks for their learning process. According to the study, third-year students and female students saw in-class active learning strategies as crucial to enhancingtheir comprehension and interactions with peers and professors, while fourth and fifth-yearstudents were more likely to consider these strategies as a waste of lecture time. Self-efficacy,experience, and motivation are key constructs that active learning strategies are recognized toimprove among students [10]. Social and intellectual
learning," 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2016, pp. 137-142, doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856059.[19] E. F. Redish, “A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking,” Paper presented at the International School of Physics, "Enrico Fermi", Course CLVI, Varenna, Italy, July 15-25, 2003.[20] Y. Jin, J. Sun, H. Ma and X. Wang, "The impact of different types of scaffolding in project-based learning on girls' computational thinking skills and self-efficacy," 2021 Tenth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Chongqing, China, 2021, pp. 362-366, doi: 10.1109/EITT53287.2021.00077.[21] A. Saparon, B. C
learning activities, benefitingboth K-12 students and Ambassadors. K-12 students are provided with tutoring, STEMcompetition coaching, and other support while Ambassadors learn essential professionalism,communication, and leadership skills. A pilot-scale study with ten schools within the ShelbyCounty Schools district during the 2015-16 academic year showed that students working withAmbassadors achieved math performance goals at rates of 12% (middle school) and 30%(elementary) higher than that of their peers [27]. It also revealed increased confidence incommunication and leadership abilities and STEM self-efficacy ratings from the Ambassadors.Urban STEM scholars were offered the opportunity to join the STEM Ambassador program butwere not required
, C., Menold, J., and McComb, C. (November 17, 2020). "Assessing Engineering Design: A Comparison of the Effect of Exams and Design Practica on First-Year Students’ Design Self-Efficacy." ASME. J. Mech. Des. May 2021; 143(5): 052301.
studentsthe ability to reflect upon their learnings and leads to a general increase in self-motivation and self-efficacy. UBD or understanding by design models help students inrelating what they learn in a course to the real world, and thus deepening theirunderstanding. But given the limitations of these and other models, there is always someimportant piece of experience or learning that is left out. For that very reason, designthinking is one of the most renowned educational models. The model incorporates notonly the self-motivation and reflection of project-based learning, and the real-lifeassociation of concepts as seen in UBD models, but goes a step further and grantsstudents the freedom of exploration to truly expand their horizons