feedback that provides the students with further contextabout how the presentation was received by each of the evaluators.Grading for Growth MindsetMuch of the messaging around professionalism grading focuses on an idea of growth andcontinuous improvement. By framing a ‘3’ as “student engineer”, a ‘4’ as “engineering intern”,and a ‘5’ as “professional engineer”, students recognize that they are able (and expected) to growand improve throughout their educational and professional career. In some cases, expectationsare clear and measurable (e.g. turning things in on time, communicating absences ahead of time).In other cases, professionalism is subjective to the evaluator and context. The IRE 5-Point scalecreates pathways for both of these types of
thecourse include the deployment of the same robotic platforms both in simulation and physicalinstances.This course is targeted towards students who want to gain a basic understanding of technologiesused within robotic systems, namely autonomous mobile robots and robotic arms. Uponcompletion of this course, students should be sufficiently versed in robotics to support career rolesin a broad range of industries related to robotics. The course provides an introductory foundationthat should support further in-depth study of fundamental robotics technologies.Assessment methods Given the aforementioned circumstances that combined into thedevelopment of this graduate-level course, several assessment methods were considered topromote student engagement
project-based methodology, creates a model that can be replicated at other institutions beyond UW and SIT. This can expand opportunities for students globally, enabling them to engage with cutting-edge robotics education and gain skills necessary for future careers in robotics. 6. Boosting Innovation in Robotics: Exposure to cutting-edge robotics research, including the use of ROS 2, Turtlebot3 robots, and multimodal sensors, places students at the forefront of technological innovation. The course encouraged creativity and innovation as students work together to develop solutions that are user-centered and applicable to real-world challenges. 7. Contributing to Global Robotics Leadership: By equipping students
by AI has made AI literacy a crucial competency forindividual development, turning its cultivation into a “human issue [3].” This need isparticularly urgent for higher education students [4], as industries worldwide require top talentswith AI literacy to drive the intelligent transformation of business processes and products,while making trustworthy and ethical decisions [5]. In response, students are calling for AIliteracy to be integrated into their higher education curricula to better prepare for the challengesof the intelligent era and future careers. For instance, a survey on the use of generative AIamong undergraduates [6], found that students most commonly recommended offering relevantcourses and lectures, with a particular focus on
field of systemsengineering and young students interested in pursuing a career in engineering.The need for human resources in the industry with STEM education and practical experience hasexponentially increased over the past few decades. Multiple studies have explored the scope andbenefits of incorporating interactions with robotic platforms as a part of the K-12 curriculum [24,25, 26, 27]. Jdeed M. et al. [28] conducted a study where a swarm robotic platform Spiderinowas utilized in classroom training format for K-12 education. It displayed enhanced interest andappreciation expressed by the students towards application-based learning in STEM. Wilson S. etal. [29] developed a modular multi-robot platform with detachable gripper modules that
Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota and the director of the Minnesota Robotics Institute. His research interests include robotics, computer vision, sensors for transportation applications, and control. He is an IEEE Fellow and author or co-author of more than 400 publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Abstract:The Minnesota Robotic Institute at the University of Minnesota's Master's program in Robotics,located in the United States, prepares students for professional careers focused on research andinnovation within both academic and industrial sectors. The curriculum prioritizes applied learningmethodologies through
why we consider ourselvesdesigners. We also explore the impacts of poor design and consider how to affect change andimplement better solutions. What role does design play in the places we inhabit and the world webuild? What does that mean for one’s life, education, and career? We parlay this topic into afocus during the second week on interconnected systems, asking the students: “How Connected 10Are You?” As a class, we explore system theories and our own interconnectedness as humans,communities, and ecosystems. Students explore the people, communities, and ecosystemsconnected to their lives through an in-class activity in which they create a life map
right.The instructors explained that the“Accomplishments” slide is not abragging opportunity, but intendedto simply communicate what thesub team has done, for the othersub teams’ benefit; “Setbacks” areexpected, and “Recoveries” arewhat you are doing to remedy thesetbacks.In summary, the students designedand installed the exhibit over aperiod of three semesters using aset of processes that not onlyprovided structure andorganization, but also exposedthem to skills that are directly Figure 6. An example of the Subsystem Block Diagramtransferable to successful careers in slide.industry.KT 4: Effective electronic communications and record keepingPrior to the beginning of the project, the VIP instructors queried several members of the Schoolof