Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gilbert C. Brunnhoeffer III, Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teacher and an engaged, participative student. Alongthe way the student should learn how to explore gaining knowledge without the teacher in orderto instill life-long learning. The teacher usually also tries to instill a good work ethic as thestudent learns. For the mathematics and sciences courses this often involves assigning problemsets for the student to apply and practice the tools, techniques, and concepts presented in classand in the reading assignments. At regular intervals the student is tested on her or his ability toidentify and categorize problems, select the appropriate tools to solve the problem, and apply theappropriate problem solving steps to actually solve the problem. This testing exercise isdesigned for assessment and feedback

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #19408Helping Students to Provide Effective Peer FeedbackDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Helping Students to Provide Effective

Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine; Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #18735Which ”Me” am I Today? The Many Disciplines and Skill Sets of Engineer-ing EducatorsDr. Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor and

Conference Session

The Care and Keeping of Graduate Students - GSD Tech Session 6

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators

challenges students may experience during the transition to graduate school and getting started in coursework and research activities  Communication strategies for working with colleagues from different backgrounds, experiences and disciplines  Balancing academic, research and personal responsibilities  Research ethics and responsible research practices for the mentor’s discipline4. ConclusionThrough the proposed activities which are grounded in best practices as well as multiple theories,participants will come out of this interactive panel discussion with draft versions of researchgroup charters, plans to enact mentorship contracts, and knowledge gained from other earlycareer faculty through case studies and group

Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clint Armani PhD, Unites States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

 Clear Communication  Application of Engineering Methods  Warrior Ethos as Airmen and Citizens  Ethics and Respect for Human Dignity  The Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies  Scientific Reasoning and the Principles of Science  Leadership, Teamwork, and Organizational Management  National Security of the American Republic in a Complex Global EnvironmentWhile two of these outcomes are specific to the military culture, the others are universal, andmany university and colleges have similar outcomes. Making sure new faculty understand theinstitutional outcomes is a critical element of any orientation program. This Faculty LearningOutcome on effective teaching practices included a session on outcome based lesson

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #19411Self-Assessment to Improve Learning and EvaluationDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Self-Assessment to Improve Learning and

Conference Session

Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian M. Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University; Neal A Lewis, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

integrating with an LMS. Each instructor needs to consider the way assignments arestructured, what sort of academic misconduct could occur, and which tools are best to combat it.Bibliography 1. McCabe, Donald L., (1997), “Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 3: pp. 433-445. 2. Haines, Valerie J., George M. Diekhoff, Emily E. LaBeff, and Robert E. Clarke, (1986), “College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude.” Research in Higher Education, 25, pp. 342-354. 3. Diekhoff, George M., Emily E. LaBeff, and Robert E. Clarke, Larry E. Williams, Billy Francis, and Valerie J. Haines, (1996), “College Cheating: Ten Year Later.” Research

Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee; Courtney S. Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Erin McCave, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

; alphabetical order6. Least contributors; alphabetical order ● *Bare minimum work to be an author is revising; everyone has option to opt-in; those who opt-out will be listed under acknowledgements ● Everyone gets opportunity to read everything before published and “Ok” anonymity ● If individuals (i.e., non-authors) could be identified, share article (or text segments) with them and work collaboratively to address any areas of concern prior to publication or presentation of the work. (ensures ethical validation as per Q3 framework)By initialing below, I acknowledge that I participated in formulating these operating procedures and rulesof conduct. If circumstances change and I feel that they need to be modified, I

Conference Session

Technology for Faculty Development and Classroom Management

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rustin Deane Webster, Purdue University, New Albany

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

work well on technology) teams. Problems and solutions will be examined from societal, cultural, and ethical perspectives. Quality control practices used in manufacturing industries; MET45100 management, statistical control charts, reliability, sampling (Manufacturing 11 plans, economics, computer methods, and test equipment quality control) are presented and applied. Methods to

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

during the spring semester of 2016 and consisted of 15 sectionscontaining, collectively, 1699 students. Each section had its own set of five undergraduateteaching assistants and one graduate teaching assistant for up to 120 students. The undergraduateteaching assistants graded all homework assignments using standards-based rubrics designed forspecific learning outcome instances and the graduate teaching assistants supervised the process(while one may question the ethics of undergraduate grading, the improvement in timeliness offeedback to students makes this practice justifiable15). Each rubric item had levels of “fullyachieved,” “partially achieved,” “underachieve,” and “no evidence of achievement” (although, insome cases, one or more level was